throbber
5806
`
`J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 5806-5808
`
`Isotopic Effect Study of Propofol Deuteration on the Metabolism, Activity, and
`Toxicity of the Anesthetic
`
`J. Helfenbein,*,† C. Lartigue,‡ E. Noirault,‡ E. Azim,† J. Legailliard,† M. J. Galmier,† and J. C. Madelmont‡
`ORPHACHEM, Rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005 Clermont-Ferrand, France, and UMR INSERM 484,
`Rue Montalembert, BP 184, 63005 Clermont-Ferrand, France
`
`Received February 25, 2002
`
`The use of isotopic substitution to delay the oxidative metabolism of the anesthetic propofol 1
`was studied. The aromatic hydrogens of propofol 1 were replaced by deuterium to produce the
`mono- and trideuterated derivatives 4 and 5. In vitro metabolic studies on human hepatic
`microsomes showed no isotopic effect in the para hydroxylation of propofol, and 1, 4, and 5
`display similar hypnotic activity and toxicity in mice.
`
`Introduction
`Propofol 1 (2,6-diisopropylphenol) is a short-acting
`hypnotic agent used for inducing and maintaining
`anesthesia. It is intravenously administered either by
`repeated bolus injections or by continuous injection.1
`The exact neurochemical mechanism of action of pro-
`pofol remains unclear. However, it is well-known that
`the general neurochemical mechanism of anesthetics
`undergoes interactions between the anesthetic and the
`GABA receptor.2
`The propofol is quickly and widely distributed into
`the body, intensively metabolized, and eliminated. Thus,
`88% of the initial dose is found in the urine within 5
`days and 2% in the feces.3 The major metabolic pathway
`of propofol is its glucuronidation consuming 50-60% of
`the total dose. The second metabolic pathway is the para
`hydroxylation of propofol producing compound 2 (Scheme
`1). The final metabolic pathways are the 1- and 4-glu-
`curonidation or the 4-sulfation of the metabolite 2.4 All
`these metabolic pathways reduce or even suppress the
`propofol activity.
`The oxidative metabolism of propofol at low concen-
`trations involves cytochrome CYP2C9 (at least 50%) and
`other isoforms such as CYP2A6, 2C8, 2C18, 2C19, and
`1A2. The role of the latter group of cytochromes is
`amplified with increasing concentrations of propofol and
`decreasing concentrations of CYP2C9. For this reason,
`the metabolism of propofol has low interindividual
`variability and low interactions with other drugs.5
`Drugs labeled with stable isotopes can be used as
`ideal internal standards in quantitative studies, and
`stable isotopes having no isotopic effect such as 13C or
`15N are then preferred. However, the deuterium isotope
`is often employed. Indeed, it may induce some modifica-
`tions of the chemical and physicochemical properties of
`the labeled drugs (polarity, molar volume, electron
`donation, van der Waals forces, dipolar moment, and
`lipophilicity) and therefore may contribute to the modi-
`fication of metabolism kinetics and biological properties
`such as biodistribution and affinity for the receptors.
`
`* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: (33) 4 73
`27 29 52. Fax:
`(33) 4 73 27 98 61. helfenbein@inserm484.u-
`clermont1.fr.
`† ORPHACHEM.
`‡ UMR INSERM 484.
`
`Scheme 1a
`
`(a) ICl/AcOH; (b) D2/Pd; (c) DCl/D2O; (d) HNO3/
`a Reagents:
`AcOH; (e) Sn/HCl; (f) H2SO4/NaNO2; (g) Na2S2O4/NaOH; (h) DCl/
`D2O.
`
`Various biological consequences of deuterium labeling
`can be observed. Thus, lower metabolism kinetics has
`been established for the N-deethylation of deuterated
`lidocaine6 and for the debenzylation of deuterated
`1-benzyl-4-cyano-4-phenylpiperidine7 while the para
`hydroxylation of the phenytoin8 (5,5-diphenylhydantoin)
`is not modified by deuteration of the metabolism site.
`Concerning the in vivo biological properties, the
`deuterated amphetamines (phenyl-2-aminopropane) have
`a lower locomotor activity9 than the protio compound,
`the deuterated 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitroso-
`urea (CCNU) has the same cytotoxic activity10 as the
`protio compound, whereas the inhibitory activity on the
`gastric secretion of N,N-dimethyl-N¢ -[2-(diisopropylami-
`no)ethyl]-N¢ -(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyridyl)urea is increased by
`deuterium substitution.11 Accordingly, we set out to
`investigate the influence of deuterium labeling on the
`metabolism and the pharmacological activity and toxic-
`ity of propofol.
`
`Chemistry
`Monodeuterated propofol 4 was synthesized by a
`catalyzed (Pd/C) exchange reaction under D2 atmo-
`sphere from 4-iodo-2,6-diisopropylphenol 3, which was
`obtained as previously described12 by direct iodination
`
`10.1021/jm020864q CCC: $22.00 © 2002 American Chemical Society
`Published on Web 11/20/2002
`
`Downloaded via REPRINTS DESK INC on July 23, 2019 at 15:36:10 (UTC).
`
`See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
`
`Auspex Exhibit 2017
`Apotex v. Auspex
`IPR2021-01507
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Brief Articles
`
`Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2002, Vol. 45, No. 26 5807
`
`Table 1. Km and Vm on Human Hepatic Microsomes, HD50 (Hypnotic Dose), LD50 (Lethality Dose), and TI (Therapeutic Index) on
`Mice, Effects of a 24 mg/kg (2 (cid:2) HD50) Dose on Mice, LRR (Loss of Righting Reflex), RW (Recovery to Walking), Loss of Sensibility
`(LS), and Loss of Painful Sensibility (LPS)
`LD50,
`HD50,
`Vmax,
`Km,
`LPS,
`LS,
`RW,
`LRR,
`mg kg-1
`mg kg-1
`nmol mg-1 min-1
`(cid:237)M
`min
`min
`min
`min
`TI
`3.1 ( 0.6b
`4.4 ( 0.7b
`8.8 ( 3.2b
`6.8 ( 1.6b
`12.3 ( 3.8a
`1.6 ( 0.2a
`1
`2.1
`32
`15
`2.1 ( 0.7b
`3.3 ( 1.0b
`6.4 ( 1.9b
`5.2 ( 1.4b
`1.6 ( 0.3a
`16.7 ( 4.1a
`4
`3
`39
`13
`2.3 ( 0.9b
`3.8 ( 1.3b
`7.3 ( 3.0b
`5.4 ( 1.8b
`1.7 ( 0.3a
`16.4 ( 2.8a
`5
`2.7
`35
`13
`a The results are expressed as means and standard deviations of four determinations from four separate microsomal experiments. The
`differences in the Km and Vm among 1, 4, and 5 are not statistically significant (Student’s t test). b The results are expressed as means
`and standard deviations of 10 determinations.
`
`of propofol 1 (Scheme 1). The trideuterated propofol 5
`was synthesized by an exchange reaction in DCl/D2O
`at 140 °C under pressure. The synthesis of 4-hydroxy-
`2,6-diisopropylphenol 2 was undertaken by a Sandm-
`eyer reaction from 4-amino-2,6-diisopropylphenol 7,
`which was prepared as previously described12 by nitra-
`tion of propofol 1 and reduction of 2,6-diisopropyl-4-
`nitrophenol 6. The Sandmeyer reaction leads to a
`mixture of 4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 2 and 2,6-
`diisopropyl-1,4-quinone 8, which was reduced to 4-hy-
`droxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 2. 3,5-Dideuterium-4-hy-
`droxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 9 was synthesized by an
`exchange reaction in DCl/D2O at 140 °C under pressure.
`The monodeuterated propofol 4, the trideuterated pro-
`pofol 5, and 3,5-dideuterium-4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropy-
`lphenol 9 were obtained at low isotopic dilutions (3%,
`6%, and 3%, respectively). The compounds were fully
`characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, mass spectrom-
`etry, and microanalysis data.
`In Vitro Experiments and GC-MS Analysis
`Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)
`has previously been used13-16 for propofol kinetic studies
`in plasma16 or whole blood13 and for metabolic studies
`on human hepatic microsomes.14 The propofol metabo-
`lism was followed by measuring the propofol decrease13
`or followed indirectly14 by measuring 2,6-diisopropyl-
`1,4-quinone 8, produced from 4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopro-
`pylphenol 2 in alkaline conditions. The GC-MS method
`selected in the present work includes a derivatization
`by silylation16 in order to improve the stability and peak
`shapes of compounds in the course of gas chromatog-
`raphy.
`The metabolism of propofol 1, propofol-d1 4, and
`propofol-d3 5 was followed using the appearance of the
`related hydroxylated metabolites. A quadratic regres-
`sion analysis was carried out between 10 and 10 000
`ng/mL 4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 2 or 3,5-dideu-
`terium-4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 9, and equa-
`tions of the mean plots (n ) 4) were y ) (2.71 (cid:2) 10-8)x2
`+ (1.73 (cid:2) 10-4)x + 1.47 (cid:2)10-2 (r ) 0.999) for the
`4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 2 and y ) (6.15 (cid:2)
`10-9)x2 + (2.55 (cid:2) 10-4)x + 3.44 (cid:2) 10-2 (r ) 0.999) for
`the 3,5-dideuterium-4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopropylphenol 9.
`The incubation of propofol 1 with human microsomes
`and NADPH produced only one metabolite, 4-hydroxy-
`2,6-diisopropylphenol 2. Indeed, the occurrence of the
`metabolite 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinone 8, systematically
`followed using the characteristic ion at m/z 149, has
`never been observed. The incubation of propofol-d1 4
`produced a single metabolite, 4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopro-
`pylphenol 2. The occurrence of 3-deuterium-4-hydroxy-
`2,6-diisopropylphenol 10 after propofol-d1 4 administra-
`
`Figure 1. Arene oxidative pathway in microsomal oxidation
`of aromatic substrate.
`
`tion (following the characteristic ion at m/z 339), owing
`to a NIH-shift mechanism17 (Figure 1), was not found.
`The incubation of propofol-d3 5 likewise produced only
`one metabolite, 3,5-dideuterium-4-hydroxy-2,6-diisopro-
`pylphenol 9.
`Propofol 1 and its deuterated derivatives 4 and 5
`displayed similar kinetics of metabolism. The Michae-
`lis-Menten plots gave mean values of Vm ) 1.6 ( 0.3
`nmol mg-1 min-1 and Km ) 15.1 ( 3.6 (cid:237)M (Table 1).
`
`In Vivo Experiments
`The hypnotic activity (HD50) and the toxicity (LD50)
`of propofol 1 and of the two deuterated compounds
`propofol-d1 4 and propofol-d3 5 were compared on mice.
`The speed of induction, the sleeping time, and the
`recovery time were noted and joined to a quantitative
`assessment of the analgesia for a 24 mg/kg dose (about
`2 (cid:2) HD50) (Table 1). Concerning the hypnotic activity,
`propofol-d1 4 and propofol-d3 5 presented slightly lower
`HD50 compared to those obtained for the standard
`propofol 1. Concerning the toxicity, the deuterated
`compounds and mainly propofol-d1 4 were found to be
`less toxic than propofol (LD50propofol < LD50propofol-d3 <
`LD50propofol-d1). Further experiments performed in mice
`at a 24 mg/kg dose showed that the induction times,
`the sleeping times, and the recovery times of the three
`compounds were similar and that the quality of the
`analgesia was preserved. Times of loss of sensibility and
`times of loss of painful sensibility were equivalent.
`
`Discussion
`The in vitro experiments of the three compounds give
`mean values of Vm and Km (Vm ) 1.6 ( 0.3 nmol mg-1
`min-1 and Km ) 15.1 ( 3.6 (cid:237)M), which are similar and
`in good agreement with those obtained for propofol 1
`by Guitton et al.5 The deuterium substitution of the
`aromatic hydrogens of propofol 1 does not postpone the
`metabolism of the drug. The lack of evidence of an
`
`Auspex Exhibit 2017
`Apotex v. Auspex
`IPR2021-01507
`Page 2
`
`

`

`5808 Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2002, Vol. 45, No. 26
`
`Brief Articles
`
`isotopic effect in the aromatic hydroxylation of the
`propofol indicates that the cleavage of the C-H bond is
`not the rate-limiting step.
`Concerning the metabolism of the propofol-d1 4, for
`any deuterated metabolite detected, the mechanism of
`hydroxylation of the propofol avoids using the NIH shift
`pathway (Figure 1), which has previously been described
`for the aromatic hydroxylation of different molecules
`such as phenytoin,18 warfarin,19 and oxprenolol.20
`Slight differences between the three analogues of
`propofol are observed in the in vivo experiments. The
`deuterated compounds (more particularly propofol-d1 4)
`seem to have lower HD50, higher LD50, and as a result
`higher therapeutic index. However, these differences are
`not statistically significant and it may be partly related
`to the low sensibility of the pharmacological tests.
`Concerning the propofol anesthetic activity (HD50),
`our results are in agreement with those obtained by
`Anderson et al.21 We also point out that lower toxicity
`has already been observed with deuterated compounds
`compared to their protio analogues (i.e, amphetamines9
`and 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol22), which is inter-
`esting for a such a category of short-acting anesthetics
`requiring repeated injections.
`
`Conclusion
`This work demonstrates that the deuteration proce-
`dure, commonly used in quantitative studies with
`internal standards or for the identification of metabolic
`pathways, does not delay the metabolism kinetics of
`propofol. The cleavage of the C-H bond is not the rate-
`limiting step in the mechanism of para hydroxylation
`of propofol, and this mechanism avoids using the NIH
`shift pathway. Additionally, in vivo experiments show
`that the deuteration does not abolish anesthetic proper-
`ties of propofol.
`
`Supporting Information Available: General experimen-
`tal procedure for preparation, physical and spectral charac-
`terization (1H and 13C NMR, mass spectrometry, IR spectros-
`copy, and elemental analysis) of the synthesized compounds,
`and general experimental procedures for in vitro biological
`studies on human hepatic microsomes and in vivo biological
`studies in mice. This material is available free of charge via
`the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
`
`References
`(1) Gepts, A.; Trenchant A. Propofol. Anaesth. Pharmacol. Rev. 1995,
`3, 46-56.
`(2) Franks, N. P.; Lieb, W. R. Molecular and cellular mechanisms
`of general anesthesia. Nature 1994, 367, 607-614.
`(3) Simons, P. J.; Cockshott, E. J.; Douglas, E. J.; Gordon, E. A.;
`Hopkins, K.; Rowland, M. Disposition in male volunteers of a
`subanaesthetic intravenous dose of an oil in water emulsion of
`14C-propofol. Xenobiotica 1988, 18, 429-440.
`(4) Trapani, G.; Altomare, C.; Sanna, E.; Biggio, J.; Liso, G. Propofol
`in anesthesia. Mechanism of action, structure-activity relation-
`ships and drug delivery. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7, 249-271.
`(5) Guitton, J.; Buronfosse, T.; Desage, M.; Flinois, J. P.; Perdrix,
`J. P.; Brazier, J. L.; Beaune, P. Possible involvement of multiple
`human cytochrome P450 in the liver metabolism of propofol. Br.
`J. Anaesth. 1998, 80, 788-795.
`
`(6) Nelson, S. D.; Pohl, L. R.; Trager, W. F. Primary and (cid:226)-secondary
`deuterium isotope effects in N-deethylation reactions. J. Med.
`Chem. 1975, 18, 1062-1065.
`(7) McMahon, R. E.; Culp, H. W. Mechanism of the dealkylation of
`tertiary amines by hepatic oxygenases. Stable isotope studies
`with 1-benzyl-4-cyano-4-phenylpiperidine. J. Med. Chem. 1979,
`22, 1100-1103.
`(8) Mamada, K.; Kasuya, Y.; Baba, S. Pharmacokinetic equivalence
`of deuterium-labeled and unlabeled-phenytoin. Drug Metab.
`Dispos. 1986, 14, 509-511.
`(9) Najjar, S. E.; Blake, M. I.; Benoit, P. A.; Lu, M. C. Effects of
`deuteration on locomotor activity of amphetamine. J. Med.
`Chem. 1978, 21, 555-558.
`(10) Farmer, P. B.; Foster, A. B.; Jarman, M.; Oddy, M. R.; Reed, D.
`J. Synthesis, metabolism, and antitumor activity of deuterated
`analogues of 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea. J. Med.
`Chem. 1978, 21, 514-520.
`(11) Hoffman, J. M.; Habecker, C. N.; Pietruszkiewicz, A. M.;
`Bolhofer, W. A.; Cragoe, E. J.; Torchiana, M. L.; Hirschmann,
`R. A Deuterium isotope effect on the inhibition of gastric
`secretion by N,N-dimethyl-N¢ -[2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl]-N¢ -
`(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyridyl)urea. Synthesis of metabolites. J. Med.
`Chem. 1983, 26, 1650-1653.
`(12) Trapani, G.; Latrofa, A.; Massimo, F.; Altomare, C.; Sanna, E.;
`Usala, M.; Biggio, G.; Liso, G. Propofol analogues. Synthesis,
`relationships between structure and affinity at GABAA receptor
`in rat brain, and differential electrophysiological profile at
`recombinant human GABAA receptors. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41,
`1846-1854.
`(13) Guitton, J.; Desage, M.; Lepape, A.; Degoute, C. S.; Manchon,
`M.; Brazier, J. L. Quantitation of propofol in whole blood by gas
`chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B 1995,
`669, 358-365.
`(14) Guitton, J.; Burronfosse, T.; Sanchez, M.; Desage, M. Quanti-
`tation of propofol metabolite, 2,6-diisopropyl-1,4-quinol, by gas
`chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Lett. 1997, 30,
`1369-1378.
`(15) Elbast, W.; Guitton, M.; Desage, M.; Deruaz, D.; Manchon, M.;
`Brazier, J. L. Comparison between gas chromatography-atomic
`emission detection and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
`for assay of propofol. J. Chromatogr. B 1996, 686, 97-102.
`(16) Stetson, P. L.; Domino, E. F.; Sneyd, J. R. Determination of
`plasma propofol levels using gas chromatography-mass spec-
`trometry with selected-ion monitoring. J. Chromatogr. B 1993,
`620, 260-267.
`(17) Langenhove, A. V. Isotope effects: definitions and consequences
`for pharmacological studies. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1986, 26, 383-
`389.
`(18) Claesen, M.; Moustafa, M. A. A.; Adline, J.; Vandervorst, D.;
`Poupaert, J. H. Evidence for an arene oxide-NIH shift pathway
`in the metabolic conversion of phenytoin to 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-
`5-phenylhydantoin in the rat and in man. Drug Metab. Dispos.
`1982, 6, 667-671.
`(19) Darbyshire, J. F.; Iyer, K. R.; Grogan, J.; Korzekwa, K. R.;
`Trager, W. F. Selectively deuterated Warfarin. Substate probe
`for the mechanism of aromatic hydroxylation catalyzed by
`cytochrome P450. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1996, 24, 1038-1045.
`(20) Nelson, W. L.; Bru¨ ck, R. T. Metabolism of (cid:226)-adrenergic antago-
`nists. Evidence for arene oxide-NIH shift pathway in the
`aromatic hydroxylation of oxprenolol. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 22,
`1088-1092.
`(21) Anderson, A.; Belelli, D.; Bennett, D. J.; Buchanan, K. I.; Casula,
`A.; Cooke, A.; Feilden, H.; Gemmell, D. K.; Hamilton, N. M.;
`Hutchinson, E. J.; Lambert, J. J.; Maidment, M. S.; McGuire,
`R.; McPhail, P.; Miller, S.; Muntoni, A.; Peters, J. A.; Sansbury,
`F. H.; Stevenson, D.; Sundaram, H. R-Amino acid phenolic ester
`derivatives: novel water-soluble general anesthetic agents which
`allosterically modulate gaba(a) receptors. J. Med. Chem. 2001,
`44, 3582-3591.
`(22) Mizutani, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Tajima, K. Isotope effects on the
`metabolism and pulmonary toxicity of butylated hydroxytoluene
`in mice by deuteration of the 4-methyl group. Toxicol. Appl.
`Pharmacol. 1983, 69, 283-290.
`JM020864Q
`
`Auspex Exhibit 2017
`Apotex v. Auspex
`IPR2021-01507
`Page 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket