`
`NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2021-01492, EX. 2002
`Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`Bright Data proposesthat, similar to the parties’ agreementin their prior case, the parties
`
`adopt this Court’s claim constructions for the asserted °510 and °319 Patents from the Claim
`
`Construction Opinion and Order in Luminati Networks, Ltd. V. Teso LT, UAB et al., Case No. 2:19-
`
`cv-00395, Dkt. No. 191, dated December 7, 2020 (attached as Exhibit 1).
`
`In adopting the claim
`
`constructions from the 7eso litigation the parties would preserve and not waive their rights to
`
`appeal, including to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, any claim construction that
`
`departs from their proposed constructions and positions. Should Defendants not agree to adopting
`
`these prior constructions, Bright Data also reserves the right to identify additional claim terms for
`
`construction for the *510 and *319 Patents.
`
`Bright Data provides below proposed claims terms for construction for the asserted ’713,
`
`°852, and °346 Patents.
`
`Claim Term
`
`Relevant Claims
`
`
`
`All asserted claims of the ’713, 852, and °346 Patents
`
`All asserted claims of the ’713 and °852 Patents
`
`All asserted claims of the ’713 and ’852 Patents
`
`All asserted claims of the ’346 Patent
`
`Dated: December8, 2021
`
`By: /s/ J. Michael Woods
`
`Elizabeth L. DeRieux
`State Bar No. 05770585
`Capshaw DeRieux, LLP
`114 E. Commerce Ave.
`Gladewater, TX 75647
`Telephone: 903-845-5770
`ederieux@capshawlaw.com
`
`J. Mark Mann
`G. Blake Thompson
`
`NetNutLtd. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2021-01492, EX. 2002
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Bright Data Ltd.
`
` /s/ J. Michael Woods
`
`NetNut Ltd. v. Bright Data Ltd.
`IPR2021-01492, EX. 2002
`Page 3 of 3
`
`