`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB; OXYSALES,
`UAB; AND CORETECH LT, UAB,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2021-01492
`Patent 10,257,319
`____________
`
`NOTICE OF JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY SCHEDULE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to a joint stipulation of Petitioners and Patent Owner (“Parties”), and
`
`in accordance with the guidance provided in the Revised Scheduling Order (Paper
`
`27), the Parties hereby stipulate to modify DUE DATES 1, 2 and 3 as follows:
`
`
`
`• DUE DATE 1 is changed from December 8, 2022 to January 6, 2023.
`
`• DUE DATE 2 (as to Petitioner’s Reply to Patent Owner’s Response to
`Petition) is changed from March 2, 2023 to March 20, 2023.
`
`• DUE DATE 3 (as to Patent Owner’s Sur-reply to Reply) is changed
`from April 13, 2023 to May 1, 2023.
`
`
`The above stipulated changes to the schedule are also made to IPR2021-
`
`01493, which involves the same Parties. The Parties therefore are filing a
`
`substantially identical Notice of Joint Stipulation in IPR2021-01493. The Parties
`
`also have coordinated the schedule changes with the Major Data UAB Petitioners in
`
`IPR2022-00915 and IPR2022-00916 (involving the same patents as IPR2021-01492
`
`and 2021-01493), such that the pre-oral argument schedule in all four IPRs would
`
`be identical.
`
`A revised DUE DATE APPENDIX is attached hereto showing the changes
`
`made relative to the latest schedule in redline. This stipulation does not affect or
`
`otherwise modify the remaining DUE DATES in the Scheduling Order. As further
`
`agreed by the Parties, Petitioners file this Notice on behalf of all Parties. The Parties
`
`do not believe that any other action is required to put the stipulated schedule into
`
`effect.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`/John C. Heuton/
`George “Jorde” Scott (Reg. No. 62,859)
`Craig Tolliver (Reg. No. 45,975)
`John C. Heuton (Reg. No. 62,467)
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON &
`GARZA, PLLC
`3333 Lee Parkway, Suite 460
`Dallas, TX 75219
`
`(214) 521-6400
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`/Thomas M. Dunham/
`Thomas M. Dunham (Reg. No. 39,965)
`CHERIAN LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`DUE DATE APPENDIX
`
`DUE DATE 1 ........................................................................................December 8,
`2022 January 6, 2023
`
`the petition
`to
`response
`Patent Owner’s
`Patent Owner’s motion to amend the patent
`
`DUE DATE 2 ........................................................................................ March 2, 2023
`
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`Petitioner’s opposition to motion to amend
` ........................................................................................ March 20, 2023
`
`Petitioner’s reply to Patent Owner’s response to petition
`
`DUE DATE 3 ......................................................................................... April 13, 2023
`
`Patent Owner’s sur reply to reply
`Patent Owner’s reply to opposition to motion to amend
`(or Patent Owner’s revised motion to amend)
`
` ............................................................................................ May 1, 2023
`
`Patent Owner’s sur-reply to reply
`
`DUE DATE 4 ............................................................................................. May 4, 2023
`
`Request for oral argument (may not be extended by stipulation)
`
`DUE DATE 5 ........................................................................................... May 25, 2023
`
`Petitioner’s sur-reply to reply to opposition to motion to amend
`Motion to exclude evidence
`
`DUE DATE 6 ............................................................................................. June 1, 2023
`
`Opposition to motion to exclude
`Request for prehearing conference
`
`DUE DATE 7 ............................................................................................ June 8, 2023
`
`Reply to opposition to motion to exclude
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`DUE DATE 8 .......................................................................................... June 29, 2023
`
`Oral argument (if requested)
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies that the
`
`above Notice of Joint Stipulation was served on counsel for Petitioners via e-mail,
`
`as authorized by Petitioners, at the following e-mail addresses:
`
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`ctolliver@ccrglaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: December 6, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`/Thomas M. Dunham/
`Thomas M. Dunham (Reg. No. 39,965)
`CHERIAN LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
