`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB;
`OXYSALES, UAB; AND CORETECH LT, UAB,
`
`Petitioners1
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2021-01492
`
`Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`1 NetNut Ltd. was terminated as Petitioner in this case. See Paper 20. Petitioners in
`IPR2022-00861 are now identified as Petitioners in this case. See Paper 25 at 40.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.8, Patent Owner Bright Data Ltd. hereby
`
`provides the following updated mandatory notices in connection with IPR2021-
`
`01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319 entitled “System providing faster and more
`
`efficient data communication.” Specifically, this paper updates the case caption
`
`pursuant to the Board’s Decision (Paper 25 at 40)(“Petitioner [in IPR2022-00861]
`
`shall be the named petitioner in the case caption in IPR2021-01492 for all further
`
`submissions in that case”) and related matters.
`
`I. Real Parties-In-Interest
`
`The real party-in-interest remains the same.
`
`II. Related Matters
`
`This administrative proceeding is related to IPR2021-01493 of Patent No.
`
`10,484,510 which originally involved the same original petitioner (now terminated)
`
`and now involves the same joinder petitioners. Patent No. 10,484,510 is based upon
`
`a continuation of the application that issued as Patent No. 10,257,319.
`
`Other administrative proceedings involving Patent Nos. 10,257,319 and
`
`10,484,510 are:
`
`• IPR2020-01266 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2020-01358 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2022-00135 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (pending);
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`• IPR2022-00138 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (pending);
`
`• IPR2022-00861 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (termination ordered);
`
`• IPR2022-00862 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (termination ordered);
`
`• IPR2022-00915 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (pending);
`
`• IPR2022-00916 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (pending);
`
`• IPR2022-01109 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (pending);
`
`• IPR2022-01110 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (pending);
`
`• IPR2023-00038 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (pending); and
`
`• IPR2023-00039 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (pending).
`
`Other reexamination proceedings involving Patent Nos. 10,257,319 and
`
`10,484,510 are:
`
`• Control No. 90/014,875 of Patent No. 10,257,319 (pending; currently
`
`stayed in view of IPR2021-01492); and
`
`• Control No. 90/014,876 of Patent No. 10,484,510 (pending; currently
`
`stayed in view of IPR2021-01493).
`
`Court cases involving Patent Nos. 10,257,319 and 10,484,510 are styled as
`
`follows:
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`• Bright Data Ltd. f/k/a Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Tefincom S.A., No.
`
`2:19-cv-414 (E.D. Tex.)(pending);
`
`• Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd., No 2:21-cv-225
`
`(E.D.
`
`Tex.)(dismissed);
`
`• Bright Data Ltd. v. Ninja-Tech, SIA, No. 2:21-cv-00434 (E.D.
`
`Tex.)(dismissed);
`
`• Bright Data Ltd. f/k/a Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB, et al.,
`
`No. 2:19-cv-395 (E.D. Tex.)(jury verdict entered; asserted patents
`
`found valid and infringed); and
`
`• Luminati Networks Ltd. v. BI Science (2009) Ltd., No. 2:19-cv-397
`
`(E.D. Tex.)(closed).
`
`One or more of the petitioners have filed for inter partes review, challenging
`
`other patents assigned to Patent Owner. They are:
`
`• IPR2020-01506 of Patent No. 10,469,614 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2021-00122 of Patent No. 10,484,511 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2021-00249 of Patent No. 10,637,968 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2021-01502 of Patent No. 9,241,044 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2021-01503 of Patent No. 9,742,866 (institution denied);
`
`• IPR2022-00103 of Patent No. 11,044,342 (pending);
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`• IPR2022-00353 of Patent No. 11,044,344 (pending);
`
`• IPR2022-00687 of Patent No. 11,190,622 (pending); and
`
`• IPR2022-00936 of Patent No. 11,206,317 (pending).
`
`Patent Owner filed for inter partes review, challenging Patent No. 10,601,948
`
`assigned to Petitioner Metacluster LT, UAB, in IPR2021-00983 (institution denied).
`
`One or more of the petitioners have filed for post grant review, challenging
`
`other patents assigned to Patent Owner. They are:
`
`• PGR2022-00052 of Patent No. 11,272,034 (pending); and
`
`• PGR2022-00061 of Patent No. 11,349,953 (pending).
`
`One or more of the petitioners have filed Ex Parte Requests for
`
`Reexamination with the USPTO on other patents assigned to Patent Owner. They
`
`are:
`
`• Control No. 90/014,816 of Patent No. 10,637,968 (pending);
`
`• Control No. 90/014,827 of Patent No. 10,484,511 (pending); and
`
`• Control No. 90/019,025 of Patent No. 10,469,614 (denied).
`
`There are other district court cases between Patent Owner and one or more of
`
`the petitioners that involve other patents assigned to Patent Owner. They are styled
`
`as follows:
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`• Luminati Networks Ltd. v. UAB Tesonet, No. 2:18-cv-299 (E.D.
`
`Tex.)(closed); and
`
`• Bright Data Ltd. f/k/a Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al.,
`
`No. 2:19-cv-396 (E.D. Tex.)(pending).
`
`There is another district court case between Patent Owner and Petitioner
`
`Metacluster LT, UAB involving other patents assigned to Metacluster LT, UAB,
`
`styled as follows: Metacluster LT, UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., No. 2:22-cv-00011
`
`(E.D. Tex.)(pending).
`
`There was another district court case between Patent Owner and Petitioner
`
`Teso LT, UAB related to business torts, styled as follows: Teso LT, UAB v. Luminati
`
`Networks Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00073 (E.D. Tex.)(closed).
`
`III. Lead and First Back-Up Counsel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The lead and first back-up counsel remain the same.
`
`IV. Service Information
`
`
`The service information remains the same.
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 20, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`Cherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies the
`
`UPDATED MANDATORY NOTICES PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.8 was
`
`served on the undersigned date via email, as authorized by Petitioners, at the
`
`following email addresses:
`
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`ctolliver@ccrglaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: October 20, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`Cherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`