`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB; OXYSALES,
`UAB; AND CORETECH LT, UAB,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR 2021-01492
`Patent 10,257,319
`____________
`
`NOTICE OF FILING PETITIONERS’ DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`
`
`
`LISTING OF EXHIBITS
`
`Ex. No.
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`1006
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`1012
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`1016
`
`United States Patent No. 10,257,319 to Shribman et al.
`
`File History for United States Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Petitioners’ Chart of Challenged Claims
`
`Luminati’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss,
`Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al., 2:19-cv-00395-
`JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`Declaration of Keith J. Teruya with curriculum vitae
`
`Michael Reiter & Aviel Rubin, Crowds: Anonymity for Web
`Transactions, ACM Transactions on Information and System
`Security, Vol. 1, No. 1, Nov. 1998, at 66-92
`
`Declaration of Scott Delman (regarding Crowds)
`
`Marc Rennhard, MorphMix – A Peer-to-Peer-based System for
`Anonymous Internet Access (2004) (Doctoral Thesis)
`
`Declaration of Marc Rennhard (regarding MorphMix)
`
`Declaration of Bernhard Plattner (regarding MorphMix)
`
`Declaration of Andreas Berz (regarding MorphMix)
`
`United States Patent No. 6,795,848 to Border et al.
`
`Fielding, R. et al., “Hypertext Transfer Protocol – HTTP/1.1”,
`RFC 2616, June 1999
`
`Socolofsky, T. and C. Kale, “TCP/IP Tutorial”, RFC 1180,
`January 1991
`
`Postel, J., “Internet Protocol”, STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981
`
`Braden, R., Ed., “Requirements for Internet Hosts -
`Communication Layers”, STD 3, RFC 1122, October 1989
`
`1017
`
`Claim Construction Opinion and Order, Luminati Networks Ltd.
`
`v. Teso LT, UAB et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`1
`
`
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`W3C, Glossary of Terms for Device Independence (Jan. 2005)
`available at https://www.w3.org/TR/di-gloss/#ref-wca-terms
`
`U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2009/0037977
`
`Supplemental Claim Construction Opinion and Order, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (E.D.
`Tex.)
`
`Transcript or Pretrial Conference, Luminati Networks Ltd. v.
`Teso LT, UAB et al., 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (E.D. Tex.)
`
`1022-1100
`1101
`
`[RESERVED]
`EDTX-2-19-cv-00395 Docket Sheet
`
`1102
`
`1103
`
`1104
`
`1105
`
`1106
`
`1107
`
`1108
`
`1109
`
`1110
`
`1111
`
`1112
`
`1113
`
`EDTX-2-21-cv-00225 Docket Sheet
`
`EDTX-2-21-cv-00225 DI 86
`
`2021-12-17 NetNut's Invalidity Contentions
`
`IPR2021-00458 Inst. Decision
`
`IPR2021-00465 Inst. Decision
`
`Photograph of IBM Computer (Williams Deposition Exhibit)
`
`MacBook Pro (16-inch, 2023) Technical Specifications
`(Williams Deposition Exhibit)
`
`iPhone 14 Pro Max Technical Specifications (Williams
`Deposition Exhibit)
`
`Mac mini Server (Late 2012) Technical Specifications (Williams
`Deposition Exhibit)
`
`Deposition Transcript of Dr. Tim A. Williams, dated February
`23, 2023
`
`Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB, et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-
`JRG, D.I. 97 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2021)
`
`Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-
`00395-
`JRG, D.I. 493 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 21, 2021)
`
`2
`
`
`
`1114
`
`1115
`
`1116
`
`1117
`
`1118
`
`1119
`
`1120
`
`1121
`
`1122
`
`1123
`
`1124
`
`ORDER - Overruling Plaintiff’s Objections and Defendant’s
`Objections, and Adopting Magistrate Judge Payne’s Order and
`Supplemental Order, Luminati Networks Ltd. v. Code200, UAB,
`et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG, D.I. 251 (E.D. Tex. Sept.
`16, 2021)
`
`Claim Construction Order, Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.,
`EDTX 2:21-cv-225, Claim Construction Order
`
`Order on Pretrial Motions and Motions in limine, Bright Data
`Ltd. v. Teso LT et al., Case No. 2:19-cv-00395-JRG, D.I. 476
`(E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2021)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, The
`Data Company Technologies Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-
`00138, Paper 12 (PTAB May 11, 2022)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut
`Ltd. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01493, Paper 11 (PTAB Mar.
`11, 2022)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, NetNut
`Ltd. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2021-01492, Paper 12 (PTAB Mar.
`21, 2022)
`
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution
`of Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00862, Paper 19 (PTAB Oct. 19, 2022)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, The
`Data Company Techs. Inc. v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00135,
`Paper 12 (PTAB June 1, 2022)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major
`Data UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00916, Paper 18 (PTAB
`Sept. 15, 2022)
`
`DECISION Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review, Major
`Data UAB v. Bright Data Ltd., IPR2022-00915, Paper 18 (PTAB
`Sept. 15, 2022)
`
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution
`of Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00103, Paper 7 (PTAB June 1, 2022)
`
`3
`
`
`
`1125
`
`1126
`
`1127
`
`1128
`
`1129
`
`DECISION Rehearing on Director Remand Granting Institution
`of Inter Partes Review, Code200, UAB et al v. Bright Data Ltd.,
`IPR2022-00353, Paper 8 (PTAB July 1, 2022)
`
`Luminati’s Opening Claim Construction Brief, Luminati
`Networks Ltd. v. Teso LT, et al, 2:19-cv-00395-JRG (September
`29, 2020)
`
`Non-Final Office Action mailed March 23, 2022, Reexamination
`No. 90/014,876
`
`Final Office Action mailed June 21, 2022, Reexamination Nos.
`90/014,827 & 90/014,624
`
`U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2003/0009518
`(“Harrow”)
`
`1130
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s Hearing Order (Paper 45), Petitioners submit
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits, while have been filed as Exhibit 1130.
`
`Dated: June 6, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON
`& GARZA, PLLC
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Craig Tolliver
`Craig Tolliver (Reg. No. 45,975)
`(Lead Attorney for Petitioners)
`George “Jorde” Scott (Reg. No. 62,859)
`John C. Heuton (Reg. No. 62,467)
`
`3333 Lee Parkway
`Suite 460
`Dallas, TX 75219
`(214) 521-6400
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies that the
`
`above Notice of Filing Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits, and Exhibit 1130, were
`
`served on counsel for Patent Owner via e-mail, as authorized by Patent Owner, at
`
`the following e-mail addresses:
`
`Thomas Dunham tomd@cherianllp.com
`Elizabeth O’Brien elizabetho@cherianllp.com
`Robert Harkins
`bobh@cherianllp.com
`
`
`
`CHARHON CALLAHAN ROBSON &
`GARZA, PLLC
`
`
`
`/s/ Craig Tolliver
`Craig Tolliver (Reg. No. 45,975)
`(Lead Attorney for Petitioners)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: June 6, 2023
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
