`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________________
`
` NETNUT LTD.,
`
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`Case IPR2021-01492
`
`Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE AS TO PETITIONER DUE TO
`SETTLEMENT UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.741
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`
`1 This Joint Motion was authorized by the Board in an e-mail dated May 24, 2022.
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`
`
`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1
`
`II. CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 1
`
`III. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................. 2
`
`IV. THE PARTIES HAVE SETTLED THEIR DISPUTES. .................................... 3
`
`V. THE BOARD HAS NOT MADE A DECISION ON THE MERITS. ............... 3
`
`VI. GRANTING TERMINATION AS TO PETITIONER IS MANDATORY. ...... 4
`
`VII. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`i
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner NetNut Ltd.
`
`and Patent Owner Bright Data Ltd. (together, the “Parties”) jointly move to terminate
`
`IPR2021-01492 (this proceeding) and IPR2021-01493 (related proceeding) as to
`
`Petitioner due to settlement. As discussed below, the Parties respectfully request
`
`termination as to Petitioner for at least three reasons:
`
`1. the Parties have settled their disputes;
`
`2. the Board has not made a decision on the merits;
`
`3. granting termination as to Petitioner is mandatory.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this chapter
`
`shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the
`
`petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” (emphasis added).
`
`II. CERTIFICATION
`
`In compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), the Parties
`
`have filed Exhibit 2019, a true copy of the written settlement agreement between the
`
`Parties, and the Parties concurrently filed a Joint Request to File Settlement
`
`Agreement as Business Confidential Information and Be Kept Separate from the
`
`Patent Files. Exhibit 2019 has been filed for access by the “Parties and Board Only.”
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`The Parties jointly certify that Exhibit 2019 reflects final settlement and resolution
`
`of all disputes between the Parties, including those relating to Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`(the “’319 Patent”), and there are no other collateral agreements or understandings
`
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination sought.
`
`III. BACKGROUND
`
`Trial was recently instituted on March 21, 2021. Paper 12. The Board issued
`
`a Scheduling Order setting the due date for the Patent Owner Response and/or
`
`Motion to Amend on June 15, 2022. Paper 13 at 11. The Board issued an Order sua
`
`sponte staying the concurrent ex parte reexamination of the ‘319 Patent in Control
`
`No. 90/014,875 on April 7, 2022. Paper 14.
`
`On May 13, 2022, the Parties sent a joint email to inform the Board that they
`
`had reached settlement in principle and to request a conference call to discuss
`
`authorization to file papers related to termination.
`
`On May 18, 2022, Patent Owner filed a Notice of Settlement and Related
`
`Court Order. Paper 16.
`
`On May 20, 2022, the Parties held a conference call with the Board to discuss
`
`authorization to file papers related to termination.
`
`On May 24, 2022, the Board authorized the filing of papers related to
`
`termination.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`IV. THE PARTIES HAVE SETTLED THEIR DISPUTES.
`
`With authorization from the Board, the Parties jointly move to terminate this
`
`proceeding as to Petitioner due to settlement. No other petitioner remains in the
`
`proceeding.2
`
`The Parties have resolved all disputes between them and with regard to the
`
`‘319 Patent. The Parties contemplate no new administrative or district court
`
`proceeding between them in the foreseeable future.
`
`V. THE BOARD HAS NOT MADE A DECISION ON THE MERITS.
`
`This IPR is at a relatively early stage. The Parties have not yet fully briefed
`
`their arguments following the Board’s institution decision. There have been no
`
`expert depositions and there has been no briefing regarding exclusion of evidence.
`
`There has been no prehearing conference and the oral argument (set for December
`
`
`2 In IPR2022-00861, Petitioners Code200, UAB et al. moved for joinder to this
`
`IPR. Patent Owner opposes joinder for the reasons set forth in its opposition filed
`
`on May 18, 2022. See id., Paper 11. In IPR2022-00915, Petitioner Major Data
`
`UAB moved for joinder to this IPR. Patent Owner opposes joinder and for the
`
`reasons set forth in its opposition filed on May 23, 2022. See id., Paper 7.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`16, 2022) has not yet occurred. No final written decision has been issued in this
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`proceeding.
`
`VI. GRANTING TERMINATION AS TO PETITIONER IS
`MANDATORY.
`
`The Parties respectfully submit this Joint Motion with authorization from the
`
`Board. With this Joint Motion, termination as to Petitioner NetNut Ltd. is mandatory
`
`because, as discussed, the Board has not decided the merits of the proceeding. 35
`
`U.S.C. § 317(a).
`
`VII. CONCLUSION
`
`Based on the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Board grant
`
`termination of this proceeding as to Petitioner NetNut Ltd.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Respectfully submitted on May 24, 2022,
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`RuyakCherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`
`By: /s/ Ronald Abramson (with
`permission)
`Ronald Abramson
`Reg. No. 34,762
`
`Liston Abramson LLP
`405 Lexington Avenue, 46 FL
`New York, N.Y. 10174
`(212) 822-0163
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PETITIONER,
`NETNUT LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that this Paper is within the 15 page-limit,
`
`in compliance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.24(a)(1)(v).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 24, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`RuyakCherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies JOINT
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE AS TO PETITIONER DUE TO SETTLEMENT
`
`UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 317 AND 37 C.F.R. § 42.74 was served on the undersigned
`
`date via email, as authorized by Petitioner, at the following email addresses:
`
`ron.abramson@listonabramson.com
`
`ari.jaffess@listonabramson.com
`
`michael.lewis@listonabramson.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 24, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`RuyakCherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`