throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_________________________
`
` CODE200, UAB; TESO LT, UAB; METACLUSTER LT, UAB; OXYSALES,
`UAB; AND CORETECH LT, UAB,
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-01492
`
`Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`_________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the Board’s Revised Joint Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 27), Patent Owner respectfully requests oral argument in this proceeding,
`
`IPR2021-01492.
`
`Given the similarity of issues among IPR2021-01492, IPR2021-01493,
`
`IPR2022-00915, and IPR2022-00916, Patent Owner respectfully requests a
`
`consolidated oral argument covering all four IPRs in a single hearing. The parties in
`
`the four IPRs have agreed that a consolidated oral argument would be appropriate.
`
`See generally EX. 3005 at 1-2. The parties in the four IPRs recently proposed that
`
`the single hearing be held on June 9, 2023. Id. at 2.
`
`As noted in the email dated April 20, 2023, the parties recognize that there is
`
`a difference between the panels in the above four IPRs, with two of the three Judges
`
`overlapping between the panels. EX. 3005 at 2. As further noted in that same email,
`
`the parties, of course, defer to the Board’s decision about how logistically to
`
`coordinate the panels if the Board agrees that a single, coordinated hearing is
`
`appropriate. Id.
`
`In the responsive email dated April 21, 2023, the Board indicated that it agrees
`
`a single hearing on June 9, 2023 would serve the interests of efficiency. See EX.
`
`3005 at 1.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that each side be provided with sixty (60)
`
`minutes of argument time. That is, sixty minutes for Patent Owner’s side and sixty
`
`minutes for the petitioners’ side (including Petitioners Code200, UAB, et al. and
`
`Petitioner Major Data UAB). The parties have agreed that the petitioners in the four
`
`IPRs will split the allotted time for the petitioners’ side such that they would not take
`
`more total time for the petitioners’ side than if there were only a single petitioner.
`
`EX. 3005 at 2.
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that Patent Owner be provided the
`
`opportunity to present a brief sur-rebuttal within the allotted argument time for
`
`Patent Owner’s side.
`
`Without intending to waive any issues not specifically identified, Patent
`
`Owner wishes to present arguments on the following issues:
`
`1. The petitioners have not met their burden of proof that the challenged
`
`claims are unpatentable;
`
`2. Any of the preliminary findings in the Board’s Institution Decisions;
`
`3. Any of the arguments properly raised in the parties’ papers;
`
`4. Any issues specified in the petitioners’ Request for Oral Argument;
`
`5. Rebuttal of any issues properly raised by the petitioners;
`
`6. Any procedural or evidentiary issues; and
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`7. Any other issues on which the Board seeks information or clarification.
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the oral argument be held remotely.
`
`Patent Owner respectfully requests that the Board provide a video conferencing
`
`platform and a public telephone line for the oral argument. Patent Owner respectfully
`
`requests the opportunity to display demonstratives and exhibits during oral
`
`argument.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 4, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`Cherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2021-01492 of Patent No. 10,257,319
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned hereby certifies this paper
`
`was served on the undersigned date via email, as authorized by Petitioners, at the
`
`following email addresses:
`
`jscott@ccrglaw.com
`
`jheuton@ccrglaw.com
`
`ctolliver@ccrglaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: May 4, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Thomas M. Dunham
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Reg. No. 39,965
`
`Cherian LLP
`1901 L Street NW, Suite 700
`Washington, D.C. 20036
`(202) 838-1567
`
`ATTORNEY FOR PATENT OWNER,
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket