`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`BRIGHT DATA LTD.,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`CODE 200, UAB ET AL.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`ORDER
`
`Case No. 2:19-cv-00396-JRG
`
`Before the Court is the Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order (“Order”) of
`
`Magistrate Judge Payne dated February 8, 2021 (Dkt. No. 97). Defendants Code200, UAB,
`
`Oxysales, UAB, and Metacluster LT, UAB (collectively, “Defendants”) have filed Objections to
`
`the Order (Dkt. No. 103), to which Plaintiff Bright Data Ltd., formerly Luminati Networks Ltd.
`
`(“Plaintiff”) has filed a Response (Dkt. No. 109). Likewise, Plaintiff has filed Objections to the
`
`Order (Dkt. No. 102), to which Defendants filed a Response (Dkt. No. 110).
`
`In response to Plaintiff’s Objections(cid:15) Magistrate Judge Payne issued a Supplemental
`
`Claim Construction Order (“Supplement(cid:68)(cid:79) Order”) dated August 6, 2021 (Dkt. No. 244). In
`
`response to (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)Supplemental Order, Plaintiff filed Objections to the Supplemental Order (Dkt.
`
`No. 248), with Defendants filing a Response (Dkt. No. 250).
`
`After considering the reasoning provided in the Order, the reasoning provided in
`
`the Supplement(cid:68)(cid:79) Order, the underlying claim construction briefing, both Plaintiff and
`
`Defendants’ Objections, and the Responses (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:82), the Court agrees with the conclusions
`
`reached within the Order as modified by the Supplement(cid:68)(cid:79) Order, finds Defendants’
`
`arguments within their Objections unpersuasive, and finds(cid:3) (cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:87) the Supplement(cid:68)(cid:79) Order
`
`properly addresses the arguments in Plaintiff’s Objections that are (cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:68)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:72)(cid:17)
`
`Exhibit 1114
`Code 200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data
`IPR2021-01492
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00396-JRG Document 251 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12159
`
`Accordingly,
`
`the Court OVERRULES
`
`Plaintiff’s Objections(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71) Defendants’
`
`Objections, (cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71) ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Payne’s Order and Supplement(cid:68)(cid:79) Order.
`
`So ORDERED and SIGNED this 16th day of September, 2021.
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
`
`RODNEY GILSTRAPDNEY GILSSSTTTTTTTTTTTRAP
`ITED STATEEEEESSSS DISTRICT JUD
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Exhibit 1114
`Code 200, UAB, et al. v. Bright Data
`IPR2021-01492
`Page 2 of 2
`
`