throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`
`IPR2022-01488
` Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`______________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`______________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`______________________________________________
`Case No. IPR2022-01488
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`______________________________________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE INTER PARTES REVIEW
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`
`IPR2022-01488
` Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`Patent Owner Future Link Systems, LLC (“FLS”) and Petitioner Apple Inc.
`
`(“Apple”) have reached a settlement. Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37
`
`C.F.R. §§ 42.72 and 42.74, the parties jointly request termination of the inter
`
`partes review of U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505 (“Patent-in-Suit”), Case IPR2022-
`
`01488. As set forth in an e-mail dated June 9, 2022, the Board authorized the
`
`filing of the requested Joint Motion to Terminate this Petition.
`
`As required under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b), a true copy
`
`of the release agreement that resolves the disputes in the above-captioned inter
`
`partes review relating to the Patent-in-Suit as between FLS and Apple is filed
`
`herewith as an exhibit. There are no other collateral agreements between the parties
`
`made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the termination sought.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), FLS and Apple are
`
`concurrently filing a Joint Request to Keep Separate, which asks the Board to treat
`
`the release agreement as business confidential information, and to keep it separate
`
`from the files of this proceeding and the files of the Patent-in-Suit.
`
`I.
`
`STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF REQUESTED
`The parties jointly request that the Board terminate the inter partes review of
`
`the Patent-in-Suit, IPR2022-01488.
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`
`IPR2022-01488
` Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`II. TERMINATION IS APPROPRIATE
`Termination of this proceeding with respect to all parties is proper. This
`
`inter partes review is still in an early stage. This Petition was filed on September
`
`28, 2021.
`
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under this
`
`chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of
`
`the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of the
`
`proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” Because all parties request
`
`termination and the Board has not yet decided the merits of the proceeding, the
`
`Board should terminate the proceeding with respect to Apple.
`
`When there are no petitioners remaining in an inter partes review, the Board
`
`may terminate the proceeding entirely. 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`Apple is the only petitioner in this inter partes review. All parties support
`
`termination of this proceeding. With no petitioners remaining in the proceeding
`
`and no final written decision on the merits, termination of this proceeding entirely
`
`is appropriate.
`
`The lawsuits involving the Patent-in-Suit between FLS and Apple have been
`
`dismissed, and FLS and Apple do not contemplate any litigation or proceeding
`
`involving the Patent-in-Suit in the foreseeable future.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`
`IPR2022-01488
` Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`FLS and Apple have settled all disputes relating to the Patent-in-Suit. The
`
`USPTO can conserve its resources through terminating now, removing the need for
`
`the Board to further consider the arguments and to issue a Final Written Decision.
`
`Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Board terminate this
`
`proceeding.
`
`
`Dated: June 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`7015 College Boulevard, Suite 700
`Overland Park, KS 66211
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`/Reza Mirzaie /__________________
`Reza Mirzaie (Reg. No. 69,138)
`Russ, August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,807,505
`
`IPR2022-01488
` Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`
`The undersigned certifies to 37 C.F.R. §42.6(e) and §42.105 that the above
`
`document was served on June 10, 2022, by filing this document through the Patent
`
`Trial and Appeal Board End to End system as well as by delivering a copy via
`
`electronic mail to the following attorneys of record for the Patent Owner:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY: /s/ Adam P. Seitz
`Adam P. Seitz, Reg. No. 52,206
`
`COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket