throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-01092-ADA
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`PLAINTIFF HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC’S
`PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND RELATED DISCLOSURES
`
`Plaintiff HD Silicon Solutions LLC (“HDSS”) hereby provides its preliminary
`
`
`
`infringement contentions and related disclosures. HDSS’s disclosures are based on publicly
`
`available materials regarding the accused infringing products of defendant Microchip
`
`Technology Inc. (“MTI”) that describe or discuss aspects of the operation of such products.
`
`HDSS has not had access to any discovery of defendant’s materials at this point, and certain
`
`information is not yet available to HDSS that may be relevant to its infringement claims. HDSS
`
`reserves the right to supplement or alter its disclosures herein based on additional information
`
`obtained concerning defendant’s products.
`
`I.
`
`Preliminary Infringement Contentions
`
`A.
`
`Infringed Claims
`
`
`
`The following table identifies the patents-in-suit and summarizes each claim of those
`
`patents that is alleged to be infringed by MTI.
`
`
`
`1
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 1 of 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`Patent
`
`Infringed Claims
`
`7,260,731 1, 4, 6, 8
`
`7,870,404 1, 3, 5, 6, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21
`
`7,810,002 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
`
`6,748,577 1–38
`
`7,154,299 1–16, 18, 19, 23, 24, 25
`
`7,302,619 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 21 22, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31
`
`6,774,033 1, 2, 5, 8, 10, 13, 17
`
`HDSS reserves the right to augment and supplement its identification of asserted claims
`
`based upon additional information obtained through discovery.
`
`B.
`
`Infringing Instrumentalities
`
`
`
`Based upon information presently available to it, HDSS asserts infringement by the
`
`instrumentalities set forth in the table below.
`
`Patent
`
`7,260,731
`7,870,404
`
`Infringing Instrumentalities
`
`MTI microcontroller unit families/products:
`
`• PIC32MM0064GPL036
`
`• PIC32MM0256GPM064
`
`• PIC32MX1XX/2XX
`
`• PIC24FJ128GC010
`
`• PIC24FJ64GB202
`
`• PIC24FJ128GB202
`
`• PIC24FJ64GB204
`
`• PIC24FJ128GB204
`
`• PIC24FJ512GU410
`
`• PIC24FJ512GU410
`
`
`
`2
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 2 of 8
`
`

`

`Patent
`
`Infringing Instrumentalities
`
`• PIC24FJ128GL306
`
`• PIC24FJ64GP205/GU205
`
`• PIC24FJ256GA412/GB412
`
`• PIC24FJ128GA204
`
`• PIC24FJ128GA310
`
`• PIC24FJ256GA412/GB412
`
`• PIC24FJ1024GA610/GB610
`
`• PIC24FJ256GA705
`
`• PIC24FV16KM204
`
`• PIC24FV32KA304
`
`• PIC24F16KA102
`
`• PIC18F06/16Q41
`
`• PIC18F27/47/57Q43
`
`• PIC18F26/45/46Q10
`
`• PIC16LF1554/1559
`
`• PIC16LF1566/1567
`
`• PIC16LF1902/3
`
`• PIC16LF1904/6/7
`
`• PIC16(L)F18855/75
`
`• PIC18(L)F67K40
`
`• PIC16(L)F1717/8/9
`
`• Any other microcontrollers described as including XLP Technology
`
`7,810,002 MTI microcontroller unit families/products:
`
`• SAM L11, including but not limited to ATSAML11D14A,
`ATSAML11D15A, ATSAML11D15A, and ATSAML11E15A
`
`6,748,577 MTI field-programmable gate array families/products:
`
`• AT40K05
`
`• AT40K10
`
`• AT40K20
`
`
`
`3
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 3 of 8
`
`

`

`Patent
`
`Infringing Instrumentalities
`
`• AT40K40
`
`• AT40K10AL
`
`• AT40K20AL
`
`• AT40K40AL
`
`7,154,299 MTI field-programmable gate array families/products:
`
`• PolarFire FPGAs, including but not limited to Mid-Range FPGAs, PolarFire
`SOC FPGAs, and RT PolarFire Radiation-Tolerant FPGAs
`
`• SmartFusion2 SoC FPGA
`
`•
`
`IGLOO2 FPGA
`
`7,302,619 MTI microcontroller unit families/products:
`
`• PIC32MZ EF family
`
`• PIC32MZ DAK/DAL/DAR/DAS family
`
`• PIC32MK (GPG/MCJ) family
`
`• PIC32MK (GPK/MCM) family
`
`6,774,033 MTI products containing static RAM produced by foundries, including but not
`limited to TSMC, UMC, and SMIC, using foundry processes from 90 nm to 10 nm,
`including but not limited to:
`
`• 90 nm
`
`• 65 nm
`
`• 40 nm
`
`• 28 nm
`
`• 16 nm
`
`• 12 nm
`
`• 10 nm
`
`Examples of such products include, but are not limited to, the ’299 Accused Chips.
`
`
`
`
`More complete information about MTI’s products and methods is in the possession of
`
`MTI and is expected to be obtained through discovery. HDSS reserves the right to augment and
`
`
`
`4
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 4 of 8
`
`

`

`supplement its preliminary identification of infringing products based upon additional
`
`information obtained through discovery.
`
`C.
`
`Claim Charts for Literal Infringement
`
`
`
`HDSS’s preliminary infringement charts are provided as attached Exhibits A1–A7. The
`
`“Accused Chips” referenced in each chart are the Infringing Instrumentalities identified above
`
`for that patent. In each claim chart, the discussion for dependent claims should be read as
`
`incorporating by reference the discussion corresponding to the claims on which they depend. In
`
`addition, the discussion for each row in the chart should be read within the context of the
`
`discussion for the entire claim to which that row pertains. Where the charts incorporate excerpts
`
`of a document, the excerpt is exemplary and should be read within the context of the entire
`
`document.
`
`
`
`HDSS reserves the right to augment and supplement its preliminary claim charts based
`
`upon additional information obtained through discovery.
`
`D.
`
`Doctrine of Equivalents
`
`
`
`Unless otherwise noted in the claim charts, HDSS alleges that defendants infringe
`
`literally all claims identified above. To the extent any differences are alleged to exist between the
`
`above-identified claims and MTI’s infringing conduct, such differences are insubstantial and
`
`MTI’s products and processes perform substantially the same function, in substantially the same
`
`way, to yield substantially the same result, and therefore MTI infringes under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents.
`
`
`
`MTI reserves the right to augment and supplement its disclosure concerning the doctrine
`
`of equivalents based upon additional information obtained through discovery or based upon the
`
`Court’s claim construction.
`
`
`
`5
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 5 of 8
`
`

`

`II.
`
`Priority Dates
`
`
`
`The table below shows the asserted priority date for each asserted claim.
`
`Patent
`
`Claims
`
`Priority Date
`
`7,260,731 all asserted claims October 23, 2000
`
`7,870,404 all asserted claims October 23, 2000
`
`7,810,002 all asserted claims
`
`June 28, 2005
`
`6,748,577 all asserted claims December 30, 2000
`
`7,154,299 all asserted claims
`
`July 20, 2001
`
`7,302,619 all asserted claims
`
`July 6, 2004
`
`6,774,033 all asserted claims November 4, 2002
`
`
`
`
`HDSS reserves the right to augment and supplement its disclosure concerning priority
`
`dates based upon information obtained through discovery (including from the inventors), the
`
`Court’s claim construction, or other information.
`
`III. Document Production
`
`A.
`
`Conception and Reduction to Practice
`
`
`
`HDSS identifies the following documents as potentially evidencing conception and
`
`reduction to practice for each claimed invention: HDSS00000015–39 (relating to ’299 Patent)
`
`and HDSS00000040–59 (relating to ’577 Patent).
`
`
`
`HDSS’s identification of such documents is not an admission that any such document
`
`evidences a disclosure of any claimed invention or that such document evidences or is prior art
`
`under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
`
`B.
`
`File History
`
`
`
`HDSS identifies the following documents as the file history for each patent-in-suit:
`
`HDSS-FH-00000001–1881.
`
`
`
`6
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 6 of 8
`
`

`

`
`DATED: May 4, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Max L. Tribble Jr.
`
`
`
`
`
`Max L. Tribble Jr.
`
`Texas State Bar No. 20213950
` mtribble@susmangodfrey.com
`Joseph S. Grinstein
`
`Texas State Bar No. 24002188
`
`jgrinstein@susmangodfrey.com
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, TX 77002
`Telephone: (713) 651-9366
`Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
`
`Kalpana Srinivasan
`(admitted pro hac vice)
`
` California State Bar No. 237460
`
`ksrinivasan@susmangodfrey.com
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
`Los Angeles, CA 90067
`Telephone: (310) 789-3100
`Facsimile: (310) 789-3150
`
`Daniel J. Shih
`(admitted pro hac vice)
`
` Washington State Bar No. 37999
`
`dshih@susmangodfrey.com
`P. Ryan Burningham
`(admitted pro hac vice)
`
` Washington State Bar No. 54358
`
`rburningham@susmangodfrey.com
`SUSMAN GODFREY LLP
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
`Seattle, Washington 98101
`Telephone: (206) 516-3880
`Facsimile: (206) 516-3883
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC
`
`7
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 7 of 8
`
`

`

`
`
`
`I hereby certify that on May 4, 2021, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`upon all counsel of record by email.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` /s/ Daniel J. Shih
`Daniel J. Shih
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC. EXHIBIT 1054
`Page 8 of 8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket