throbber
Sign up today to receive FREE daily patent litigation alerts!
`
`Zones
`
`Analytics
`
`Data
`
`News
`
`About
`
`Join
`
`FAQ
`
`FAQ
`
`Success
`
`Events
`
`Offices
`
`Members
`
`Team
`
`Jobs
`
`What is Unified?
`Unified is a 200+ international membership organization that seeks to improve patent quality and deter
`unsubstantiated or invalid patent assertions in defined technology sectors (Zones) through its activities. Its actions are
`focused broadly in Zones with substantial assertions by Standards Essential Patents (SEP) holders and/or Non-
`Practicing Entities (NPEs) . These actions may include analytics , prior art, invalidity contests , patentability analysis,
`administrative patent review (PTAB) , amicus briefs, economic surveys, and essentiality studies. Unified works
`independently of its members to achieve its deterrence goals. Small members join for free while larger ones pay
`modest annual fees .
`
`Is Unified a law firm representing its members?
`No. Unified is a deterrence entity that seeks to deter the assertion of poor quality patents in certain technology zones.
`Unified acts independent of its members or any other company. Unified is not a law firm, and does not have an
`attorney-client relationship with members. Unified’s activities are not based on the interests of any particular member
`or members.
`
`Does Unified ever settle with NPEs?
`
`Yes. Should Unified determine that its goals can be better served by settling a post-grant challenge (or agreeing to
`never file any challenges), Unified will consider settling in exchange for a license, though never for money. As with all
`aspects of its challenges, Unified acts independently when settling, and never provides members with advance notice
`of negotiations, draft settlement agreements, or actual settlement. For this reason, Unified will not negotiate unless a
`nondisclosure agreement is in place. Unified's practice of settling disputes springs from its long-term Zone deterrence
`goals, as it saves legal fees, which can be reallocated for other future deterrence activities. In order to have
`discussions we require executing an NDA which can be obtained here: LINK
`
`What are the primary differences between AST, RPX, and
`Unified Patents, LLC?
`
`Unified is the only solution designed to deter NPE activity and, therefore, Unified never pays any money to NPEs,
`whether to purchase licenses or otherwise. This ensures that Unified never incentivizes further NPE activity.
`Additionally, by focusing on deterrence, Unified is never put into the conflicted position of negotiating a licensing deal
`between NPEs and defendants in litigation.
`
`How can members of particular zones be sure they aren't
`subsidizing other zones?
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2019
`Unified Patents v. MemoryWeb – IPR2021-01413
`1 of 2
`
`

`

`Subscription fees paid by a member with respect to one zone are not used by Unified for activities for other zones
`(excluding administrative overhead). If a patent or portfolio involves more than one zone, any activities and/or costs
`related to that patent or portfolio are allocated amongst the affected zones.
`
`Is Unified interested in receiving demand letters and hearing
`about patents that are for sale in a particular zone?
`Yes. For members and non-members alike, Unified invites and welcomes any and all non-confidential information
`regarding demand letters, threats of assertion, or patent licensing and sales.
`
`Do members receive advance notice of Unified's actions?
`No. Unified (including its employees, agents and representatives) does not discuss details with its members concerning
`the preparation and prosecution of any patentability or validity challenge before the USPTO, including whether Unified
`will (or will not) file. To be specific, members receive no prior notice that Unified is preparing or filing any post-grant
`patent challenge.
`
`Do members have any control over Unified's use of post-
`grant proceedings at the USPTO?
`No. Unified retains sole and absolute discretion regarding all aspects of any challenge.
`
`This includes, but is not limited to:
`
`Identifying any relevant prior art,
`Conducting an invalidity/patentability analysis,
`Deciding whether to file or what procedure to file,
`Preparing a petition or request,
`Prosecuting a post-grant challenge once filed, and
`Terminating that challenge (including settlement).
`
`How does Unified successfully deter?
`
`Unified uses the subscription fees collected for each Zone to provide a wide range of services. Unified conducts patent
`analytics and provides those analytics to subscribed members. Unified also monitors ownership data, secondary-
`market patent sales, demand letters, post-grant procedures, and litigation to track activity and risks in each Zone.
`Unified also files post-grant procedures against patents it believes are unpatentable or invalid.
`
`Contact Us
`
`Home
`
`Solution
`
`News
`
`About
`
`Join
`
`(650) 999-0889 info@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Copyright © 2021 Unified Patents, LLC. All rights reserved.
`Legal | Privacy Policy | DMCA
`
`MemoryWeb Ex. 2019
`Unified Patents v. MemoryWeb – IPR2021-01413
`2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket