Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 1 of 7
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (a Korean
`Company) and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00411-ADA
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to the Agreed Scheduling Order (Dkt. 35) and the Court’s Standing Order
`
`Governing Proceedings – Patent Cases dated April 14, 2022, Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`(“MemoryWeb”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby submit this Joint Claim Construction Statement
`
`identifying the disputed and agreed constructions for U.S. Patent Nos. 10,423,658 (“the ‘658
`
`patent”), 10,621,228 (“the ‘228 patent”), and 11,163,823 (“the ‘823 patent”).
`
`I.
`
`Disputed Claim Constructions
`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`Claim Term(s) /
`Phrase(s)
`[first/second] “geotag”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`MemoryWeb’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`data associated with a file
`describing geographic
`information
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction
`digital data assigned to a
`file describing the latitude
`and longitude of the
`location where the
`photograph or video was
`taken
`
`1
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`MemoryWeb, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
` vs.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (a Korean
`Company) and Samsung Electronics America,
`Inc.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`§
`
`Civil Action No. 6:21-cv-00411-ADA
`
`Jury Trial Demanded
`
`JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT
`
`Pursuant to the Agreed Scheduling Order (Dkt. 35) and the Court’s Standing Order
`
`Governing Proceedings – Patent Cases dated April 14, 2022, Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`(“MemoryWeb”) and Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics
`
`America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby submit this Joint Claim Construction Statement
`
`identifying the disputed and agreed constructions for U.S. Patent Nos. 10,423,658 (“the ‘658
`
`patent”), 10,621,228 (“the ‘228 patent”), and 11,163,823 (“the ‘823 patent”).
`
`I.
`
`Disputed Claim Constructions
`
`Term
`No.
`1
`
`Claim Term(s) /
`Phrase(s)
`[first/second] “geotag”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`MemoryWeb’s Proposed
`Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`data associated with a file
`describing geographic
`information
`
`Samsung’s Proposed
`Construction
`digital data assigned to a
`file describing the latitude
`and longitude of the
`location where the
`photograph or video was
`taken
`
`1
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 1 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 2 of 7
`
`2
`
`“thumbnail image”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`reduced-sized duplicate of
`an image
`
`reduced-sized representation
`of at least a portion of an
`image
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Indefinite
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1;
`‘228 patent, claim 1;
`‘823 patent, claim 5
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`3
`
`“the [first / second]
`location being
`associated with the
`geographic coordinates
`of a [first / second]
`geotag”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`2
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 2 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 3 of 7
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`“including” in these phrases
`means “consisting of,” i.e.,
`is closed-ended
`
`4
`
`“[first / second] set of
`digital photographs and
`videos including all of
`the digital photographs
`and videos associated
`with the [first / second]
`geotag”
`
`“[third / fourth set of
`digital photographs and
`videos including digital
`photographs and videos
`associated with [first /
`second] person”
`
`“the [first / second] set
`of digital files
`including digital files
`including associated
`with the [first / second]
`location”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1;
`‘228 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`terms for construction
`
`5
`
`“partially overlapping
`the [first / second]
`location selectable
`thumbnail image”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`which overlaps a first
`portion of the [first /
`second] location selectable
`thumbnail image and does
`not overlap a second portion
`of the [first / second]
`location selectable
`thumbnail image
`
`a portion of which does not
`overlap the [first / second]
`location selectable
`thumbnail image
`
`3
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 3 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 4 of 7
`
`6
`
`“scaled replica”
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`an identical copy that is
`scaled up or down equally
`in all dimensions
`
`a scaled copy or scaled
`reproduction
`
`7
`
`[first /second] “person-
`location selectable
`element”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning,
`or in the alternative:
`
`‘658 patent, claims 8,
`11
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`a selectable element
`associated with the
`[first/second] person and
`locations
`
`8
`
`“digital file”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`a selectable element,
`responsive to the selection
`of which a representation of
`all locations having a digital
`photograph or video
`associated with the [first /
`second] person is displayed;
`otherwise, indefinite
`
`an electronic file that can be
`in various file formats (e.g.,
`PNG, JPEG, PDF, TIFF,
`MP3, MP4, WAV, and GIF)
`that are of items such as
`photos, videos, audio files,
`and documents
`
`9
`
`‘228 patent, claim 1;
`‘823 patent, claims 1
`and 29
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`“the first digital file
`having a first size in
`the first person view
`and a second size in the
`first detail view,
`wherein the second
`size is greater than the
`first size”
`
`‘823 patent, claims 1
`and 29
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`Indefinite
`
`4
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 4 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 5 of 7
`
`10
`
`“profile image”
`
`‘823 patent, claims 5
`and 31
`
`Samsung proposed
`term for construction
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning;
`or, in the alternative:
`
`an image representing the
`[first/second] person
`
`picture of a person
`displayed on the same page
`as profile information about
`the person; otherwise,
`indefinite
`
`II.
`
`Agreed Constructions
`
`Claim Term(s) / Phrase(s)
`[first/second] “count value image”
`
`Agreed Construction
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`‘658 patent, claim 1
`
`“relationship information associated with the
`first person and another person”
`
`Plain and ordinary meaning
`
`‘823 patent, claim 12
`
`“tag information”
`
`‘823 patent, claim 21
`
`any type of digital data that can be assigned to
`a file to describe some aspect of that file
`through a tagging process
`
`Dated: May 20, 2022
`
`/s/ Allan A. Kassenoff_____________
`
`Melissa Richards Smith
`Gillam and Smith, LLP
`303 South Washington Avenue
`Marshall, Texas 75670
`Telephone: 903.934.8450
`Facsimile: 903.934.9257
`melissa@gillamsmithlaw.com
`
`Richard A. Edlin
`Allan A. Kassenoff
`Justin A. MacLean
`Jeffrey R. Colin
`Vimal M. Kapadia
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Daniel J. Schwartz
`
`Arthur Gollwitzer III
` Texas Bar No. 24073336
`Jackson Walker LLP
`100 Congress Avenue, Suite 1100
`Austin, TX 78701
`Telephone: 512.236.2268
`Facsimile: 512.236.2002
`agollwitzer@jw.com
`
`Daniel J. Schwartz (pro hac vice)
`Matthew A. Werber (pro hac vice)
`Angelo J. Christopher (pro hac vice)
`Paulina M. Starostka (pro hac vice)
`NIXON PEABODY LLP
`
`5
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 5 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 6 of 7
`
`70 West Madison, Suite 5200
`Chicago, IL 60602-4224
`Telephone: 312.977.4400
`Facsimile:312.977.4405
`djschwartz@nixonpeabody.com
`mwerber@nixonpeabody.com
`achristopher@nixonpeabody.com
`pstarostka@nixonpeabody.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`Elana B. Araj
`GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
`Metlife Building, 200 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10002
`Telephone: (212) 801-9200
`Facsimile: (212) 801-6400
`edlinr@gtlaw.com
`kassenoffa@gtlaw.com
`macleanj@gtlaw.com
`colinj@gtlaw.com
`kapadiav@gtlaw.com
`eraj@gtlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Samsung
`Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung
`Electronics America, Inc.
`
`6
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 6 of 7
`
`
`
`Case 3:22-cv-03776-WHO Document 66 Filed 05/20/22 Page 7 of 7
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document
`
`has been served on May 20, 2022 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to
`
`electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`/s/ Daniel J. Schwartz
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff MemoryWeb, LLC
`
`7
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS EXHIBIT 1032
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC v. MEMORYWEB, LLC
`IPR2021-01413
`Page 7 of 7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
