`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`MEMORYWEB, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2021-01413
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) requests that the Board expunge
`
`information in the confidential record relating to whether Apple and Samsung are
`
`real parties in interest (“RPIs”). Both parties agree that the Board should defer ruling
`
`on Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) so the record remains intact pending
`
`resolution of any rehearing requests and appeals for the present proceeding.
`
`However, the Board should deny Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) because
`
`it contemplates expunging relevant materials prior to resolution of rehearing requests
`
`and appeals for related proceedings initiated by Apple (IPR2022-00031) and
`
`Samsung (IPR2022-00222), (collectively the “Related Proceedings”). In other
`
`words, the confidential record should be preserved pending resolution of any
`
`rehearing requests and appeals for not only the present proceeding, but also the
`
`Related Proceedings.
`
`II. Discussion
`Information in the confidential record of this proceeding may be highly
`
`relevant to the Related Proceedings, as the parties are presently litigating the RPI
`
`and estoppel issues in those proceedings. See, Paper 56, p. 5 (Director decision
`
`vacating the Board’s RPI decision and holding the Board “can and should make a
`
`determination of the real parties in interest or privity” in the Related Proceedings).
`
`However, at this time there is considerable uncertainty as to whether any portions of
`
`1
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`the confidential record can be inspected and/or discovered in the Related
`
`Proceedings. See, IPR2022-00031, Ex. 3004 at p. 3 (Unified objecting to Apple and
`
`Samsung’s inspection of the confidential record in the present proceeding).
`
`Thus, the possibility exists that this proceeding’s confidential record may be
`
`the only source of certain information highly relevant to issues arising in relation to
`
`rehearing requests and appeals in the Related Proceedings. Petitioner’s motion
`
`makes no attempt to address these concerns. Thus, the Board should deny
`
`Petitioner’s motion to ensure the confidential record is preserved during the
`
`pendency of these related proceedings (including appeals). See e.g., Unified Patents
`
`Inc. v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC et al, IPR2018-00091, Paper 37,
`
`p. 9 (noting “it is it is prudent to retain [RPI related] details in the record as they may
`
`be relevant to future related proceedings, albeit in the confidential record”).
`
`III. Conclusion
`For these reasons, the Board should deny Petitioner’s motion to expunge
`
`(Paper 73) so the record remains intact pending resolution of any rehearing requests
`
`and appeals for not only the present proceeding, but also the Related Proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: May 30, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Jennifer Hayes/
`Jennifer Hayes
`Reg. No. 50,845
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`300 South Grand Avenue,
`Suite 4100,
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3151
`Tel. 213-629-6179
`Fax 866-781-9391
`
`3
`
`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Opposition to Motion to Expunge was served on May 30, 2023, upon the following
`
`parties via electronic service:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ellyar@unifiedpatents.com
`
`michelle@unifiedpatents.com
`
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner, Unified Patents, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jennifer Hayes
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`1
`
`