throbber
U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`
`Paper No.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC
`Petitioner
`v.
`
`MEMORYWEB, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`Patent No. 10,621,228
`
`Inter Partes Review No. IPR2021-01413
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO EXPUNGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) requests that the Board expunge
`
`information in the confidential record relating to whether Apple and Samsung are
`
`real parties in interest (“RPIs”). Both parties agree that the Board should defer ruling
`
`on Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) so the record remains intact pending
`
`resolution of any rehearing requests and appeals for the present proceeding.
`
`However, the Board should deny Petitioner’s motion to expunge (Paper 73) because
`
`it contemplates expunging relevant materials prior to resolution of rehearing requests
`
`and appeals for related proceedings initiated by Apple (IPR2022-00031) and
`
`Samsung (IPR2022-00222), (collectively the “Related Proceedings”). In other
`
`words, the confidential record should be preserved pending resolution of any
`
`rehearing requests and appeals for not only the present proceeding, but also the
`
`Related Proceedings.
`
`II. Discussion
`Information in the confidential record of this proceeding may be highly
`
`relevant to the Related Proceedings, as the parties are presently litigating the RPI
`
`and estoppel issues in those proceedings. See, Paper 56, p. 5 (Director decision
`
`vacating the Board’s RPI decision and holding the Board “can and should make a
`
`determination of the real parties in interest or privity” in the Related Proceedings).
`
`However, at this time there is considerable uncertainty as to whether any portions of
`
`1
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`the confidential record can be inspected and/or discovered in the Related
`
`Proceedings. See, IPR2022-00031, Ex. 3004 at p. 3 (Unified objecting to Apple and
`
`Samsung’s inspection of the confidential record in the present proceeding).
`
`Thus, the possibility exists that this proceeding’s confidential record may be
`
`the only source of certain information highly relevant to issues arising in relation to
`
`rehearing requests and appeals in the Related Proceedings. Petitioner’s motion
`
`makes no attempt to address these concerns. Thus, the Board should deny
`
`Petitioner’s motion to ensure the confidential record is preserved during the
`
`pendency of these related proceedings (including appeals). See e.g., Unified Patents
`
`Inc. v. Cellular Communications Equipment LLC et al, IPR2018-00091, Paper 37,
`
`p. 9 (noting “it is it is prudent to retain [RPI related] details in the record as they may
`
`be relevant to future related proceedings, albeit in the confidential record”).
`
`III. Conclusion
`For these reasons, the Board should deny Petitioner’s motion to expunge
`
`(Paper 73) so the record remains intact pending resolution of any rehearing requests
`
`and appeals for not only the present proceeding, but also the Related Proceedings.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Dated: May 30, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /Jennifer Hayes/
`Jennifer Hayes
`Reg. No. 50,845
`Nixon Peabody LLP
`300 South Grand Avenue,
`Suite 4100,
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3151
`Tel. 213-629-6179
`Fax 866-781-9391
`
`3
`
`

`

`U.S. Patent No. 10,621,228
`Patent Owner’s Opposition to Motion to Expunge
`IPR2021-01413
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing Patent Owner’s
`
`Opposition to Motion to Expunge was served on May 30, 2023, upon the following
`
`parties via electronic service:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ellyar@unifiedpatents.com
`
`michelle@unifiedpatents.com
`
`jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`Counsel for Petitioner, Unified Patents, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Jennifer Hayes
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`
`1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket