`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Ellyar Barazesh
`Director_PTABDecision_Review
`Jonathan.Strang@lw.com; jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com; michelle@unifiedpatents.com;
`gdandalides@nixonpeabody.com; roshan@unifiedpatents.com; acheung@unifiedpatents.com
`Re: IPR2021-01413 (Unified v. MemoryWeb) - Petitioner Request for Director Review
`Wednesday, May 17, 2023 2:33:24 PM
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before
`responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Director Vidal and the Honorable Board,
`
`The parties respectfully submit that no redactions to the Decision Granting Director Review
`(Paper 74) are necessary.
`
`Thank you,
`Ellyar Y. Barazesh
`Counsel for Petitioner Unified Patents, LLC
`
`Ellyar Y. Barazesh
`Senior Patent Counsel | Unified Patents®
`+1.925.434.8754
`ellyar@unifiedpatents.com
`
`This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
`privileged, confidential, proprietary, personal, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Note that
`Unified does not have an attorney-client relationship with its members. If you believe you have received this message in
`error, please advise the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you.
`
`On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:09 AM Director_PTABDecision_Review
`<Director_PTABDecision_Review@uspto.gov> wrote:
`
`Counsel,
`
`The Director has issued a Decision in this proceeding. The Decision is designated for Board
`and Parties only because the Decision quotes language from papers marked confidential.
`The parties are instructed to review the Decision and provide joint proposed redactions, as
`needed, for a public version. The proposed redactions are due by May 23, 2023.
`
`Thank you.
`
`From: Jonathan.Strang@lw.com <Jonathan.Strang@lw.com>
`Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2023 10:54 PM
`
`IPR2021-01413
`Ex. 3101
`
`
`
`To: Director_PTABDecision_Review <Director_PTABDecision_Review@uspto.gov>
`Cc: jenhayes@nixonpeabody.com; michelle@unifiedpatents.com;
`ellyar@unifiedpatents.com; gdandalides@nixonpeabody.com; roshan@unifiedpatents.com;
`acheung@unifiedpatents.com
`Subject: IPR2021-01413 (Unified v. MemoryWeb) - Petitioner Request for Director
`Review
`
`
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE
`before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`
`Director Vidal,
`
`
`
`Petitioner Unified Patents, LLC hereby notifies the parties and the USPTO of its filing of the
`attached Request for Director Review/Rehearing pursuant to the Interim process for Director
`review.
`
`
`
`The Request contains Petitioner’s confidential business information. It is marked
`accordingly and was accompanied by a motion to seal.
`
`
`
`Very Respectfully,
`
`
`
`Jonathan Strang
`
`Counsel for Petitioner Unified Patents, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Jonathan M. Strang
`
`
`
`LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
`
`555 Eleventh Street, NW
`
`Suite 1000
`
`
`
`Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
`
`Direct Dial: +1.202.637.2362
`
`Email: jonathan.strang@lw.com
`
`https://www.lw.com
`
`
`
`_________________________________
`
`
`
`This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product
`for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, reliance or distribution by
`others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies including any attachments.
`
`
`
`Latham & Watkins LLP or any of its affiliates may monitor electronic communications sent
`or received by our networks in order to protect our business and verify compliance with our
`policies and relevant legal requirements. Any personal information contained or referred to
`within this electronic communication will be processed in accordance with the firm's privacy
`notices and Global Privacy Standards available at www.lw.com.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
