`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA”),
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.: 6:20-cv-1211
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PATENT CASE
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff Ocean Semiconductor LLC (“Ocean Semiconductor” or “Plaintiff”) files this
`
`Complaint against NVIDIA Corporation (“NVIDIA” or “Defendant”), seeking damages and other
`
`relief for patent infringement, and alleges with knowledge to its own acts, and on information and
`
`belief as to other matters, as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the Patent Laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff Ocean Semiconductor is a limited liability company organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, and its registered agent for service of process in
`
`Delaware is Rita Carnevale, 717 N. Union Street, Wilmington, DE 19805.
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 2 of 83
`
`3.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 2701 San Tomas
`
`Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050. NVIDIA is registered with the State of Texas and may be
`
`served with process through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company d/b/a CSC-
`
`Lawyers Incorporating Service Company, 211 E. 7th St., Suite 620, Austin, TX 78701. On
`
`information and belief, NVIDIA has a regional office in this District, including at least at 11001
`
`Lakeline Blvd., Building 2, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78717.
`
`4.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA sells, offers to sell, and/or uses
`
`products and services throughout the United States, including in this judicial District, and
`
`introduces infringing products and services into the stream of commerce knowing that they
`
`would be sold and/or used in this judicial District and elsewhere in the United States.
`
`5.
`
`Plaintiff Ocean Semiconductor is the assignee and owner of the patents at issue in
`
`this action: U.S. Patents Nos. 6,660,651, 6,725,402, 6,907,305, 6,968,248, 8,120,170, 8,847,383,
`
`7,080,330, 6,836,691, and 8,676,538 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). Ocean
`
`Semiconductor holds all substantial rights, title, and interest in the Asserted Patents, including
`
`the exclusive right to sue NVIDIA for infringement and recover damages, including damages for
`
`past infringement.
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiff Ocean Semiconductor seeks monetary damages and prejudgment interest
`
`for Defendant’s past and ongoing direct and indirect infringement of the Asserted Patents.
`
`7.
`
`Defendant NVIDIA is a semiconductor company that designs, develops, sells,
`
`offers to sell, and imports into the United States semiconductor products in the communications,
`
`internet of things, automotive, computer, and consumer electronics industry (“Accused
`
`Products”).
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 3 of 83
`
`8.
`
`Defendant NVIDIA, which has its own design centers in the United States
`
`(including a facility in Austin, Texas), contracts with third-party semiconductor fabricators or
`
`foundries (“NVIDIA Foundry Partners”) that own, operate, or control semiconductor fabrication
`
`plants (“fabs”) within and/or outside of the United States (“International Facilities”) to produce
`
`the Accused Products. One such NVIDIA Foundry Partner is United Microelectronics Corp.
`
`(“UMC”). See, e.g., “NVIDIA Increases Foundry Outsourcing to TSMC and UMC,” available
`
`at https://www.techpowerup.com/60649/nvidia-increases-foundry-outsourcing-to-tsmc-and-umc
`
`(last accessed October 12, 2020). Another NVIDIA Foundry Partner is Taiwan Semiconductor
`
`Manufacturing Company Ltd. (“TSMC”). See “Nvidia plans for Ampere, Hopper with TSMC
`
`orders,” available at https://techreport.com/news/3470476/nvidia-tsmc-5nm-7nm-ampere-
`
`hopper/ (last accessed October 12, 2020). Both UMC and TSMC have a contractual partnership
`
`with NVIDIA to design, develop, or manufacture semiconductor products including integrated
`
`circuits for NVIDIA.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through one or more
`
`of its Foundry Partners such as UMC and TSMC) has a contractual relationship with Applied
`
`Materials, Inc. (“Applied Materials”) (see, e.g., UMC’s YY Chen video, available at
`
`https://www.appliedmaterials.com/automation-software (last accessed October 12, 2020); see
`
`also Applied Materials’ job posting for “TSMC F15 E3 project,” available at
`
`http://www.mse.ntu.edu.tw/attachments/article/154/AMT_Summer%20Student%20Program_Job
`
`%20Post_2013.pdf (last accessed October 12, 2020); see also “NVIDIA to transfer 28nm chip
`
`orders to UMC,” available at https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20170724PD214.html (last
`
`visited Oct. 12, 2020); see also “BRIEF-UMC orders machinery equipment from Applied
`
`Materials' unit,” available at https://www.reuters.com/article/brief-umc-orders-machinery-
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 4 of 83
`
`equipment-fro/brief-umc-orders-machinery-equipment-from-applied-materials-unit-
`
`idUKH9N1M601Z (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); see also “BRIEF-TSMC Orders Machinery
`
`Equipment Worth T$1.06 Billion From Applied Materials,” available at
`
`https://www.reuters.com/article/brief-tsmc-orders-machinery-equipment-wo/brief-tsmc-orders-
`
`machinery-equipment-worth-t1-06-billion-from-applied-materials-idUSS7N1QP04B (last visited
`
`Oct. 12, 2020)), and PDF Solutions Inc. (“PDF Solutions”) (e.g., “Taiwan Semiconductor
`
`Manufacturing Company adopts PDF Solutions yield improvement technology,” available at
`
`https://www.edn.com/taiwan-semiconductor-manufacturing-company-adopts-pdf-solutions-
`
`yield-improvement-technology/ (last accessed Oct. 12, 2020); see also “Exensio: Big Data in the
`
`Fab,” available at https://semiwiki.com/eda/4351-exensio-big-data-in-the-fab/ (last accessed
`
`Oct. 12, 2020), and one or more of the NVIDIA Foundry Partners (e.g., UMC and/or TSMC)
`
`employ Applied Materials’ semiconductor fabrication or manufacturing equipment, platforms,
`
`and/or framework, including Applied Materials’ E3 system, including the E3 factory
`
`advanced/automation process control (“APC”) platform hardware and/or software (collectively,
`
`“E3 system”), PDF Solutions’ Exensio hardware and/or software (collectively, “Exensio
`
`system”), and/or other advanced/automation process control system and platform hardware
`
`and/or software to design, develop, and/or manufacture Defendant NVIDIA’s semiconductor
`
`devices, including integrated circuits.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, UMC and/or TSMC employ Applied Materials’
`
`and/or PDF Solutions’ semiconductor fabrication or manufacturing equipment, platforms, and/or
`
`framework (e.g., Applied Materials’ E3 system and/or PDF Solutions’ Exensio system) at their
`
`manufacturing facilities. Applied Materials has received supplier awards and recognition from
`
`UMC. See, e.g., https://www.appliedmaterials.com/files/nanochip-
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 5 of 83
`
`journals/nanochip_v7_iss2_112912.pdf (last accessed October 12, 2020); see also
`
`https://www.appliedmaterials.com/nanochip/nanochip-technology-journal/july-2014 (last visited
`
`October 12, 2020); see also https://www.appliedmaterials.com/files/nanochip-journals/nanochip-
`
`fab-solutions-12-2014-revised.pdf (last accessed October 12, 2020). Applied Materials also has
`
`received supplier awards and recognition from TSMC. See, e.g., “TSMC Recognizes
`
`Outstanding Suppliers at Supply Chain Management Forum,” available at
`
`https://pr.tsmc.com/english/news/1873 (last accessed October 12, 2020). On information and
`
`belief, TSMC also employs PDF Solutions’ Exensio system at TSMC’s manufacturing facilities.
`
`11.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TSMC) employs Applied Materials’ E3 system and/or
`
`PDF Solutions’ Exensio system to design, develop or manufacture one or more systems,
`
`products, devices, and integrated circuits for importation into the United States for use, sale,
`
`and/or offer for sale in this District and throughout the United States, including, but not limited
`
`to, graphics cards (e.g. GEFORCE RTX models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE RTX
`
`2060, 2060 SUPER, 2070, 2070 SUPER, 2080, 2080 SUPER, 3070, 3080, and 3090),
`
`GEFORCE GTX models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE GTX 1650, 1650 SUPER,
`
`1660, and 1660 Super), GEFORCE GTX TI models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE
`
`GTX 1650 TI and 1660 TI), TITAN RTX models (including, but not limited to, TITAN RTX ,
`
`TITAN XP models, ZOTAC models, GIGABYTE models, ASUS models, MSI models, and
`
`EVGA models), SHIELD devices, SHIELD TV media streamers, Jetson developer kits (e.g.,
`
`NANO, NANO 2GB, and NANO MODULE), QUADRO professional graphics cards (e.g.,
`
`QUADRO RTX 8000, QUADRO RTX 8000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO RTX 6000,
`
`QUADRO RTX 6000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO GV100, QUADRO GV100 Bridge, and
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 6 of 83
`
`QUADRO Sync II), DGX AI Workstations, products manufactured at, for example, 5nm, 7nm,
`
`28nm, and/or 90nm technology node, and similar products, devices, systems, components of
`
`systems, and/or integrated circuit (“NVIDIA APC Products”).
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TSMC) uses Applied Materials’ E3 system and/or PDF
`
`Solutions’ Exensio system to design, develop, or manufacture the NVIDIA APC Products for
`
`importation into the United States for use, sale, and/or offer for sale in this district and
`
`throughout the United States.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA, directly and/or through one or
`
`more of the NVIDIA Foundry Partners (e.g., UMC and/or TSMC), also employs Applied
`
`Materials’ SmartFactory system or platform, including Advanced Productivity Family solutions
`
`and Smart Scheduling (collectively, “SmartFactory”), camLine’s semiconductor fabrication or
`
`manufacturing solutions, including camLine’s LineWorks production automation solution (e.g.,
`
`LineWorks eCap and LineWorks PULSE modules) (collectively, “LineWorks system”), and/or
`
`other similar proprietary or third-party scheduling and dispatching platform hardware and/or
`
`software (e.g., with similar technical and functional features) to design, develop, and/or
`
`manufacture Defendant NVIDIA’s semiconductor devices, including integrated circuits. See,
`
`e.g., “UMC Shares Success With The Applied SmartFactory®,” available at
`
`https://www.appliedmaterials.com/files/umc-china_0.mp4 (last accessed Oct. 12, 2020); see also
`
`“LineWorks Product,” available at https://www.all-electronics.de/wp-
`
`content/uploads/migrated/document/97654/infodirectccamlineproductcatalog.pdf (last accessed
`
`Oct. 12, 2020) (“Customers … > TSMC”).
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 7 of 83
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TSMC) employs Applied Materials’ SmartFactory,
`
`camLine’s LineWorks system, and/or other similar proprietary or third-party scheduling and
`
`dispatching platform hardware and/or software (e.g., with similar technical and functional
`
`features) to design, develop or manufacture one or more systems, products, devices, and
`
`integrated circuits for importation into the United States for use, sale, and/or offer for sale in this
`
`District and throughout the United States, including, but not limited to, graphics cards (e.g.
`
`GEFORCE RTX models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE RTX 2060, 2060 SUPER,
`
`2070, 2070 SUPER, 2080, 2080 SUPER, 3070, 3080, and 3090), GEFORCE GTX models
`
`(including, but not limited to, GEFORCE GTX 1650, 1650 SUPER, 1660, and 1660 Super),
`
`GEFORCE GTX TI models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE GTX 1650 TI and 1660
`
`TI), TITAN RTX models (including, but not limited to, TITAN RTX , TITAN XP models,
`
`ZOTAC models, GIGABYTE models, ASUS models, MSI models, and EVGA models),
`
`SHIELD devices, SHIELD TV media streamers, Jetson developer kits (e.g., NANO, NANO
`
`2GB, and NANO MODULE), QUADRO professional graphics cards (e.g., QUADRO RTX
`
`8000, QUADRO RTX 8000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO RTX 6000, QUADRO RTX 6000
`
`NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO GV100, QUADRO GV100 Bridge, and QUADRO Sync II),
`
`DGX AI Workstations, products manufactured at, for example, 5nm, 7nm, 28nm, and/or 90nm
`
`technology node, and similar products, devices, systems, components of systems, and/or
`
`integrated circuit (“NVIDIA Scheduling Products”).
`
`15.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TSMC) uses Applied Materials’ SmartFactory and/or
`
`other similar proprietary or third-party scheduling and dispatching platform hardware and/or
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 8 of 83
`
`software (e.g., with similar technical and functional features) to design, develop, or manufacture
`
`the NVIDIA Scheduling Products for importation into the United States for use, sale, and/or
`
`offer for sale in this district and throughout the United States.
`
`16.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly and/or through its
`
`NVIDIA Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TMC) has a contractual relationship with ASML
`
`Holding N.V. and/or its subsidiaries (“ASML”) (see, e.g., LinkedIn Profile for Spencer Lin,
`
`Operation Manager at ASML, available at https://www.linkedin.com/in/spencer-lin-a48a0082/
`
`(last visited Oct. 12, 2020); LinkedIn Profile for Leo Li, Product Engineer at ASML, available at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/leo-li-74222754/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); LinkedIn Profile for
`
`Tsung Ming C., Applicant Engineer at ASML, available at https://www.linkedin.com/in/tsung-
`
`ming-c-49b4b77/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); LinkedIn Profile for Vince Liu, Product Manager
`
`at ASML, available at https://www.linkedin.com/in/vince-liu-4820b149/ (last visited Oct. 12,
`
`2020); and LinkedIn Profile for Henry Yeh, Applicant Engineer at ASML, available at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/heavyyeh/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020)), and that one or more of the
`
`NVIDIA Foundry Partners (e.g., UMC and/or) employ ASML’s semiconductor fabrication or
`
`manufacturing equipment and/or platforms (e.g., ASML’s TWINSCAN system hardware and
`
`software or “TWINSCAN”) to design, develop, and/or manufacture Defendant NVIDIA’s
`
`semiconductor products and devices, such as graphics cards (e.g. GEFORCE RTX models
`
`(including, but not limited to, GEFORCE RTX 2060, 2060 SUPER, 2070, 2070 SUPER, 2080,
`
`2080 SUPER, 3070, 3080, and 3090), GEFORCE GTX models (including, but not limited to,
`
`GEFORCE GTX 1650, 1650 SUPER, 1660, and 1660 Super), GEFORCE GTX TI models
`
`(including, but not limited to, GEFORCE GTX 1650 TI and 1660 TI), TITAN RTX models
`
`(including, but not limited to, TITAN RTX , TITAN XP models, ZOTAC models, GIGABYTE
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 9 of 83
`
`models, ASUS models, MSI models, and EVGA models), SHIELD devices, SHIELD TV media
`
`streamers, Jetson developer kits (e.g., NANO, NANO 2GB, and NANO MODULE), QUADRO
`
`professional graphics cards (e.g., QUADRO RTX 8000, QUADRO RTX 8000 NVLink HB
`
`Bridge, QUADRO RTX 6000, QUADRO RTX 6000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO GV100,
`
`QUADRO GV100 Bridge, and QUADRO Sync II), DGX AI Workstations, products
`
`manufactured at, for example, 5nm, 7nm, 28nm, and/or 90nm technology node, and similar
`
`products, devices, systems, components of systems, and/or integrated circuit (“NVIDIA
`
`TWINSCAN Products”). See, e.g., “BRIEF-Taiwan’s UMC orders equipment from ASML for
`
`T$657 mln,” available at https://www.reuters.com/article/umc-corp-asml-holding-brief/brief-
`
`taiwans-umc-orders-equipment-from-asml-for-t657-mln-idUSS7N0P700I20140728 (last
`
`accessed October 12, 2020); see also “UMC buys equipment from ASML,” available at
`
`https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20160621PM200.html (last accessed October 12, 2020); see
`
`also “ASML apparently beats Nikon for UMC’s huge 300-mm scanner order,” available at
`
`https://www.eetimes.com/asml-apparently-beats-nikon-for-umcs-huge-300-mm-scanner-order/
`
`(last accessed October 12, 2020); see also “ASML shares gain after reports of large TSMC
`
`order,” available at https://seekingalpha.com/news/3636158-asml-shares-gain-after-reports-of-
`
`large-tsmc-order (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); see also “ASML’s NXE Platform Performance,”
`
`available at http://euvlsymposium.lbl.gov/pdf/2013/pres/RudyPeeters.pdf (last visited Oct. 12,
`
`2020).
`
`17.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners such as UMC and/or TSMC) uses ASML’s TWINSCAN platform and/or its
`
`software to design, develop, or manufacture the NVIDIA TWINSCAN Products for importation
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 10 of 83
`
`into the United States for use, sale, and/or offer for sale in this district and throughout the United
`
`States.
`
`18.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly and/or through its
`
`NVIDIA Foundry Partners) has a contractual relationship with ASML and/or its subsidiaries
`
`(see, e.g., LinkedIn Profile for Spencer Lin, Operation Manager at ASML, available at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/spencer-lin-a48a0082/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); LinkedIn Profile
`
`for Leo Li, Product Engineer at ASML, available at https://www.linkedin.com/in/leo-li-
`
`74222754/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); LinkedIn Profile for Tsung Ming C., Applicant Engineer
`
`at ASML, available at https://www.linkedin.com/in/tsung-ming-c-49b4b77/ (last visited Oct. 12,
`
`2020); LinkedIn Profile for Vince Liu, Product Manager at ASML, available at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/vince-liu-4820b149/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); and LinkedIn
`
`Profile for Henry Yeh, Applicant Engineer at ASML, available at
`
`https://www.linkedin.com/in/heavyyeh/ (last visited Oct. 12, 2020)), and that one or more of the
`
`NVIDIA Foundry Partners employ ASML’s semiconductor fabrication or manufacturing
`
`equipment and/or platforms (e.g., ASML’s YieldStar metrology and inspection system hardware
`
`and software) to design, develop, and/or manufacture Defendant NVIDIA’s semiconductor
`
`products and devices, such as graphics cards (e.g. GEFORCE RTX models (including, but not
`
`limited to, GEFORCE RTX 2060, 2060 SUPER, 2070, 2070 SUPER, 2080, 2080 SUPER, 3070,
`
`3080, and 3090), GEFORCE GTX models (including, but not limited to, GEFORCE GTX 1650,
`
`1650 SUPER, 1660, and 1660 Super), GEFORCE GTX TI models (including, but not limited to,
`
`GEFORCE GTX 1650 TI and 1660 TI), TITAN RTX models (including, but not limited to,
`
`TITAN RTX , TITAN XP models, ZOTAC models, GIGABYTE models, ASUS models, MSI
`
`models, and EVGA models), SHIELD devices, SHIELD TV media streamers, Jetson developer
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 11 of 83
`
`kits (e.g., NANO, NANO 2GB, and NANO MODULE), QUADRO professional graphics cards
`
`(e.g., QUADRO RTX 8000, QUADRO RTX 8000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO RTX 6000,
`
`QUADRO RTX 6000 NVLink HB Bridge, QUADRO GV100, QUADRO GV100 Bridge, and
`
`QUADRO Sync II), DGX AI Workstations, products manufactured at, for example, 5nm, 7nm,
`
`28nm, and/or 90nm technology node, and similar products, devices, systems, components of
`
`systems, and/or integrated circuit, and similar systems, products, devices, and integrated circuits
`
`(“NVIDIA YieldStar Products”). See, e.g., “BRIEF-Taiwan’s UMC orders equipment from
`
`ASML for T$657 mln,” available at https://www.reuters.com/article/umc-corp-asml-holding-
`
`brief/brief-taiwans-umc-orders-equipment-from-asml-for-t657-mln-idUSS7N0P700I20140728
`
`(last accessed October 12, 2020); see also “UMC buys equipment from ASML,” available at
`
`https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20160621PM200.html (last accessed October 12, 2020); see
`
`also “ASML apparently beats Nikon for UMC’s huge 300-mm scanner order,” available at
`
`https://www.eetimes.com/asml-apparently-beats-nikon-for-umcs-huge-300-mm-scanner-order/
`
`(last accessed October 12, 2020); see also “ASML shares gain after reports of large TSMC
`
`order,” available at https://seekingalpha.com/news/3636158-asml-shares-gain-after-reports-of-
`
`large-tsmc-order (last visited Oct. 12, 2020); see also “ASML’s NXE Platform Performance,”
`
`available at http://euvlsymposium.lbl.gov/pdf/2013/pres/RudyPeeters.pdf (last visited Oct. 12,
`
`2020).
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners) uses ASML’s YieldStar platform and/or its software to design, develop, or
`
`manufacture the NVIDIA YieldStar Products for importation into the United States for use, sale,
`
`and/or offer for sale in this district and throughout the United States.
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 12 of 83
`
`20.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (e.g., through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners) designs, develops, and/or manufactures Defendant NVIDIA’s semiconductor
`
`products and devices that employ an integrated circuit package comprising a stiffener with a
`
`bottom surface coupled to a substrate and having a space at least partly surrounding a passive
`
`electronic component, including GPUs and graphics cards and processors, such as GeForce GTX
`
`980M GPU, GeForce GTX 980 GPU, GeForce GTX 970M GPU, GeForce GTX 980MX,
`
`GeForce GTX 980 Mobile, GeForce GTX 965M, GRID M6-8Q, Quadro M3000M, Quadro
`
`M4000, Quadro M4000M, Quadro M5000, Quadro M5000M, and Tesla M6, and similar
`
`systems, products, devices, and integrated circuits containing same (e.g., Microsoft Surface
`
`Studio computer or similar systems containing N16E-GS-KAB-A1 chipset or similar ICs
`
`(“NVIDIA Stiffener Products”).
`
`21.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners) uses this infringing method to fabricate or manufacture the NVIDIA Stiffener
`
`Products for importation into the United States for use, sale, and/or offer for sale in this district
`
`and throughout the United States.
`
`22.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (e.g., through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners) designs, develops, and/or manufactures Defendant NVIDIA’s semiconductor
`
`products and devices that employ an integrated circuit package strip with at least one integrated
`
`circuit package in the strip having four lateral sections that surround a stiffener and where at least
`
`two of the four lateral sections are shared with different integrated circuit packages along the
`
`strip, the stiffener comprising a bottom surface coupled to a substrate and having a space at least
`
`partly surrounding at least one passive electronic component, including graphics cards and GPUs
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 13 of 83
`
`(e.g., GeForce GTX 1080Ti), and similar systems, products, devices, and integrated circuits
`
`(“NVIDIA Strip Package Products”).
`
`23.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant NVIDIA (directly or through its NVIDIA
`
`Foundry Partners) uses this infringing method to fabricate or manufacture the NVIDIA Strip
`
`Package Products for importation into the United States for use, sale, and/or offer for sale in this
`
`district and throughout the United States.
`
`24.
`
`Defendant NVIDIA works with third parties to design and/or develop third party
`
`products, such as mobile devices, tablet products, internet of things devices, automotive devices,
`
`networking and broadband devices, and home devices that include one or more NVIDIA APC
`
`Products, NVIDIA Scheduling Products, NVIDIA Stiffener Products, NVIDIA Strip Package
`
`Products, NVIDIA TWINSCAN Products, and/or NVIDIA YieldStar Products (“Third Party
`
`Products”). NVIDIA assists third parties, directly or through others, to import the Third Party
`
`Products into the United States and offer to sell, and sell, such Third Party Products in the United
`
`States.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`25.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of the
`
`United States, 35 U.S.C. § 1, et seq.
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
`
`NVIDIA is subject to this Court’s general personal jurisdiction at least because
`
`NVIDIA is a resident of Texas as defined by Texas law.
`
`28.
`
`NVIDIA is additionally subject to this Court’s general and specific personal
`
`jurisdiction because NVIDIA has sufficient minimum contacts within the State of Texas and this
`
`District, pursuant to due process and/or the Texas Long Arm Statute, Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 14 of 83
`
`Code § 17.042. On information and belief, NVIDIA contracted with one or more Texas
`
`residents in this District and one or both parties performed the contract at least in part in the State
`
`of Texas and this District; NVIDIA committed the tort of patent infringement in State of Texas
`
`and this District; NVIDIA purposefully availed itself of the privileges of conducting business in
`
`the State of Texas and in this District; NVIDIA regularly conducts and solicits business within
`
`the State of Texas and within this District; NVIDIA recruits residents of the State of Texas and
`
`this District for employment inside or outside the State of Texas; Plaintiff’s causes of action arise
`
`directly from NVIDIA’s business contacts and other activities in the State of Texas and this
`
`District; and NVIDIA designs, develops, manufactures, distributes, makes available, imports,
`
`sells and offers to sell products and services throughout the United States, including in this
`
`judicial District, and introduces infringing products and services that into the stream of
`
`commerce knowing that they would be used and sold in this judicial district and elsewhere in the
`
`United States.
`
`29.
`
`Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`Defendant NVIDIA is subject to personal jurisdiction in this District and a substantial part of the
`
`events giving rise to Vantage Micro’s claims against NVIDIA occurred and continue to occur in
`
`this District. NVIDIA has a regular and established place of business in this district—including
`
`at least its regional office at 11001 Lakeline Blvd., Building 2, Suite 100, Austin, TX 78717—
`
`and its acts of infringement have taken place and are continuing to take place in this District.
`
`30.
`
`On information and belief, NVIDIA employs engineers in this District to design
`
`and develop products, devices, systems, and/or components of systems that are accused of
`
`infringing or more claims of the Asserted Patents. On information and belief, NVIDIA conducts
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 15 of 83
`
`software and hardware development, marketing, and promotion activities with respect to
`
`NVIDIA products that infringe one or more claims of the Asserted Patents.
`
`31.
`
`Further, NVIDIA has regularly made new product announcements in the state of
`
`Texas and this District. For example, on May 6, 2016, NVIDIA selected a forum in this judicial
`
`district to announce and offer for sale certain NVIDIA graphics cards, which upon information
`
`and belief infringe at least one claim of at least one of the Asserted Patents. Specifically,
`
`NVIDIA’s co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang promoted NVIDIA products, including the
`
`NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 graphics card, at the Austin Convention Center located at 500 East
`
`Cesar Chavez Street, Austin, TX, 78701, in this judicial district. Mr. Huang demonstrated and
`
`touted the capabilities of the GeForce GTX 1080 product. NVIDIA also demonstrated for the
`
`first time another infringing product (GeForce GTX 1070).
`
`32.
`
`Additionally, NVIDIA—directly or through intermediaries (including distributors,
`
`retailers, and others), subsidiaries, alter egos, and/or agents—ships, distributes, offers for sale,
`
`and/or sells its products in the United States and this District. NVIDIA has purposefully and
`
`voluntarily placed one or more of its infringing products into the stream of commerce with the
`
`awareness and/or intent that they will be purchased by consumers in this District. On information
`
`and belief, NVIDIA knowingly and purposefully ships infringing products into, and within, this
`
`District through an established distribution channel. These infringing products have been, and
`
`continue to be, purchased by consumers and businesses in this District.
`
`THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`33.
`
`On November 8, 2001, U.S. Patent Application No. 10/010,463 was filed at the
`
`USPTO (“the ’463 Application”). The ’463 Application was duly examined and issued as U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,660,651 (“the ’651 patent”), entitled “Adjustable Wafer Stage, and a Method and
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 16 of 83
`
`System for Performing Process Operations Using Same” on December 9, 2003. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ʼ651 patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`34.
`
`Ocean Semiconductor is the owner of the ʼ651 patent and has the full and
`
`exclusive right to bring actions and recover past, present, and future damages for Defendant
`
`NVIDIA’s infringement of the ʼ651 patent.
`
`35.
`
`The inventions of the ’651 patent resolve technical problems related to cross-
`
`wafer variations or non-uniformity characteristics in semiconductor wafers that are caused by
`
`different deposition and etch processes performed during semiconductor manufacturing. For
`
`example, the ’651 patent provides a process tool that includes an adjustable wafer stage that
`
`allows positioning or re-positioning of the wafer stage, such as raising, lowering, and varying a
`
`tilt of the surface of the wafer stage, in order to effectuate the deposition rates of semiconductor
`
`materials formed on a wafer.
`
`36.
`
`The claims of the ’651 patent do not merely recite the performance of some
`
`business practice known from the pre-Internet world along with the requirement to perform it on
`
`the Internet. Instead, the claims of the ’651 patent recite one or more inventive concepts that are
`
`rooted in computerized semiconductor manufacturing or fabrication technologies, and overcome
`
`problems specifically arising in the realm of computerized semiconductor manufacturing or
`
`fabrication technologies.
`
`37.
`
`The ’651 patent is directed to an invention that is not merely the routine or
`
`conventional use of the Internet or a generic computer. Instead, it is directed to a process tool
`
`with an adjustable wafer stage that offers customizable positioning features to facilitate raising,
`
`lowering, or tilting of the wafer stage. This design allows surface adjustment of a wafer surface
`
`on which semiconductor materials are deposited to ensure a surface profile that is uniform across
`
`IPR2021-01348
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2014
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-01211-ADA Document 1 Filed 12/31/20 Page 17 of 83
`
`the surface of each wafer. The ’651 patent claims thus specify how a semiconductor
`
`manufacturing system is manipulated to yield a desired result.
`
`38.
`
`Accordingly, each claim of the ’651 patent recites a combination of elements
`
`sufficient to ensure that the claim in practice amounts to significantly more than a patent on an
`
`ineligible concept.
`
`39.
`
`On April 30, 2002, U.S. Patent Application No. 10/135,145 was filed at the
`
`USPTO (the “’145 Application”). The ’145 Application was duly examined and issued as U.S.
`
`Pa