throbber
Case 6:21-cv-00063-ADA-JCM Document 14 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
` WACO DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SPRINGMAN, ON
`MICHAEL
`BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL
`OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED,
`
`PLAINTIFF
`
`
`v.
`
`FUN TOWN ENTERPRISES, LLC
`AND WACO FUNTOWN, LP,
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`













`
`
`
` CA NO. 6:21-cv-63-ADA-JCM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Rule 16, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court ORDERS that the
`
`following schedule will govern deadlines up to and including the trial of this matter:
`
`
`Date
`April 1, 2021
`
`August 1, 2021
`
`March 31, 2022
`
`August 1, 2021
`
`Event
`Discovery commences on all issues.
`
`
`All motions to amend pleadings or to add
`parties shall be filed on or before this date.
`
`
`Fact Discovery Deadline. Any fact discovery
`requests must be propounded so that the
`responses are due by this date.
`
`
`The parties asserting claims for relief shall
`submit a written offer of settlement to
`opposing parties on or before this date. All
`offers of settlement are to be private, not
`filed, and the Court is not to be advised of the
`same. The parties are further ORDERED to
`retain the written offers of settlement and
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Ex. 1037
`Applied v. Ocean, IPR2021-01342
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00063-ADA-JCM Document 14 Filed 04/16/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`April 16, 2021
`
`January 1, 2022
`
`September 1, 2021
`
`February 1, 2022
`
`responses as the Court will use these in
`assessing attorney’s fees and court costs at the
`conclusion of trial.
`
`
`Each party shall complete and file the
`attached “Notice Concerning Reference to
`United States Magistrate Judge”
`
`
`Parties with burden of proof to designate
`Expert Witnesses and provide their expert
`witness reports, to include all information
`required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B).
`
`
`Each opposing party shall respond, in writing,
`to the written offer of settlement made by the
`parties asserting claims for relief by this date.
`All offers of settlement are to be private, not
`filed, and the Court is not to be advised of the
`same. The parties are further ORDERED to
`retain the written offers of settlement and
`responses as the Court will use these in
`assessing attorney’s fees and court costs at the
`conclusion of trial.
`
`
`Parties shall designate Rebuttal Expert
`Witnesses on issues for which the parties do
`not bear the burden of proof, and provide their
`expert witness reports, to include all
`information required by Rule 26(a)(2)(B).
`
`March 31, 2022
`
`
`Expert Discovery Deadline.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Any objection to the reliability of an expert’s
`proposed testimony under Federal Rule of
`Evidence 702 shall be made by motion,
`specifically stating the basis for the objection
`and identifying the objectionable testimony,
`not later than 14 days of receipt of the written
`report of the expert’s proposed testimony or
`not later than 14 days of the expert’s
`
`2
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Ex. 1037
`Applied v. Ocean, IPR2021-01342
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00063-ADA-JCM Document 14 Filed 04/16/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`deposition, if a deposition is taken, whichever
`is later. The failure to strictly comply with
`this paragraph will be deemed a waiver of
`any objection that could have been made
`pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702
`
`
`All dispositive motions shall be filed and
`served on all other parties on or before this
`date and shall be limited to 25 pages.
`Responses shall be filed and served on all
`other parties not later than 14 days after the
`service of the motion and shall be limited to
`20 pages. Any replies shall be filed and
`served on all other parties not later than 7
`days after the service of the response and
`shall be limited to 10 pages, but the Court
`need not wait for the reply before ruling on
`the motion.
`
`
`By this date the parties shall meet and confer
`to determine pre-trial deadlines, including,
`inter alia, exchange of exhibit lists,
`designations of and objections to deposition
`testimony, and exchange of demonstratives.
`
`
`By this date the parties shall exchange a
`proposed jury charge and questions for the
`jury. By this date the parties will also
`exchange draft Motions in Limine to
`determine which may be agreed.
`
`
`By this date the parties shall exchange any
`objections to the proposed jury charge, with
`supporting explanation and citation of
`controlling law.
`
`
`By this date the parties shall also submit to
`the Court their Motions in Limine.
`
`
`
`3
`
`July 1, 2022
`
`October 3, 2022
`
`October 14, 2022
`
`October 31, 2022
`
`October 31, 2022
`
`
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Ex. 1037
`Applied v. Ocean, IPR2021-01342
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00063-ADA-JCM Document 14 Filed 04/16/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`By this date the parties will submit to the
`Court their Joint Pre-Trial Order, including
`the identification of issues to be tried,
`identification of witnesses, trial schedule
`provisions, and all other pertinent
`information. By this date the parties will also
`submit to the Court their oppositions to
`Motions in Limine.
`
`
`Final Pre-Trial Conference.
`
`
`Jury Trial Commences
`
`
`
`November 15, 2022
`
`November 22, 2022 at 9:30 am
`
`December 5, 2022 at 9:00 am
`
`
`
`
`
`SIGNED this 16th day of April, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JEFFREY C. MANSKE
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Ex. 1037
`Applied v. Ocean, IPR2021-01342
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cv-00063-ADA-JCM Document 14 Filed 04/16/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`MICHAEL SPRINGMAN,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`FUNTOWN ENTERPRISES, LLC, et.
`al.,
`
` Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`










`
`NOTICE AND STATEMENT REGARDING CONSENT
`TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO. 6:21-CV-00063-ADA-JCM
`
`
`
`Notice of a magistrate judge’s availability. A United States Magistrate Judge is
`available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action (including a jury or nonjury trial) and to
`order the entry of a final judgment. The judgment may then be appealed directly to the United
`States court of appeals like any other judgment of this court. A magistrate judge may exercise
`this authority only if all parties voluntarily consent. You may consent to have your case referred
`to a magistrate judge or you may withhold your consent without adverse substantive
`consequences.
`
`Statement regarding consent. The following parties DO / DO NOT1 consent to the
`
`jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge to conduct all proceedings in this case
`
`including trial proceedings, entry of judgment, and post-trial proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Circle one.
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Party:
`
`Representative’s Signature
`
`Date:
`
`__________________
`__________________
`__________________
`__________________
`
`_______________________
`_______________________
`_______________________
`_______________________
`
`__________
`__________
`__________
`__________
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Ex. 1037
`Applied v. Ocean, IPR2021-01342
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket