throbber
11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`
`Account
`News, cases, companies, firm
`
`Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
`
`Logged in as: pmazur@devlinlawfirm.com
`My Account
`Emails & Alerts
`Newsletter Signup
`Log Out
`
`News, cases, companies, firm
`Search Toggle Dropdown
`
`Search Law360
`Search News Only
`Search Cases Only
`Search PTAB Only
`Search TTAB Only
`
`Advanced Search
`
`Account
`My Account
`My Feeds and Alerts
`My Briefcase
`Newsletter Signup
`Help
`Log Out
`
`Law360
`Law360 UK
`Law360 Pulse
`Law360 Employment Authority
`Law360 Tax Authority
`Law360 Insurance Authority
`
`Products
`Lexis®
`Law360 In-Depth
`Law360 Updates
`Law360 Podcasts
`
`Rankings
`Regional Powerhouses
`Law360's MVPs
`Glass Ceiling Report
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`Close
`
`1/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`
`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Law360 400
`Diversity Snapshot
`Practice Groups of the Year
`Rising Stars
`Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
`
`Sections
`Adv. Search & Platform Tools
`Browse all sections
`Banking
`Bankruptcy
`Class Action
`Competition
`Employment
`Energy
`Expert Analysis
`Insurance
`Intellectual Property
`Product Liability
`Securities
`
`Beta Tools
`Track docs
`Track attorneys
`Track judges
`
`Site Menu
`Join the Law360 team
`Search legal jobs
`Learn more about Law360
`Read testimonials
`Contact Law360
`Sign up for our newsletters
`Site Map
`Help
`
`Delaware Legal Industry Access To Justice Law360 UK Pulse || See all sections
`
`
`
`
`Is your firm a Social Impact Leader?
`Click here to find out.
`
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict
`In WDTX
`
`By Lauren Berg ·
`
`Share us on: By Lauren Berg
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`2/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Law360 (November 16, 2021, 9:45 PM EST) -- Google LLC and YouTube LLC owe VideoShare LLC nearly
`$26 million for infringing the company's video sharing patent, a Texas federal jury found Tuesday, rejecting
`Google's case for invalidating the patent.
`
`A day after closing arguments were heard in U.S. District Judge Alan D. Albright's Waco courtroom, the jury
`found that Google and its YouTube subsidiary directly infringed all six asserted claims of VideoShare's U.S.
`Patent No. 10,362,341, according to the verdict form.
`
`The jury also rejected Google's argument that portions of the patent's claims are conventional, making it
`unpatentable.
`
`The jury said Google and YouTube must pay $25.9 million to compensate VideoShare for their infringement of
`the '341 patent, which was the amount that VideoShare's damages expert had recommended.
`
`"VideoShare had the facts and the law on its side," said VideoShare attorney Michael Shore of Shore Chan LLP
`in a statement Tuesday. "In that scenario the only thing required for a just outcome is a fair trial."
`
`"In the Western District of Texas all parties are treated equally before the law and fair trials are the norm," he
`added.
`
`Counsel for Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday evening.
`
`The patent battle between Google and VideoShare dates to 2013, when VideoShare asserted in Delaware federal
`court two streaming video patents that were issued that year.
`
`In the Delaware suit, VideoShare claimed Google and YouTube infringed patents relating to a way to share video
`with advertisements, but the case was tossed in August 2016 after a judge agreed with Google that both
`patents were invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision because they covered the abstract idea of
`sharing streaming video online.
`
`In November 2019, after obtaining the current patent as a continuation of the invalidated patents, VideoShare
`sued Google and YouTube in the Western District of Texas.
`
`Judge Albright rejected two bids by Google to dismiss the lawsuit, the first in May 2020 and then in
`September of this year.
`
`In his first denial, the judge rejected Google's argument that VideoShare was barred from asserting a patent that
`is related to one already invalidated in an earlier dispute. In his second denial, he found the current patent was
`still enforceable despite its link to the prior invalidated patents.
`
`During the weeklong trial, VideoShare sought to convince jurors that Google's defense to the infringement
`claims fails under claim construction.
`
`In his closing arguments, VideoShare's attorney Shore said it was the weakest invalidity case he had seen in his
`30 years in law.
`
`"This is garbage, and they know it," he said. "They're not satisfied with trying to escape infringement. They want
`to destroy the patent. They want everybody out there to know if you come after Google and you're not willing to
`take a tiny little settlement, we're going to destroy you."
`
`Google's attorney, Luann L. Simmons of O'Melveny & Myers LLP, refuted Shore's characterization of Google's
`trial strategy, telling jurors the company wasn't seeking to destroy anyone but was just defending itself.
`
`She said Google and YouTube deny infringing VideoShare's '341 patent, which relates to a way of automatically
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`3/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`converting video into different formats. Key differences, including the fact that YouTube never distributes the
`original video format to users, show the website doesn't use VideoShare's patent, Simmons said.
`
`The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent No. 10,362,341.
`
`VideoShare is represented by Charles L. Ainsworth and Robert C. Bunt of Parker Bunt & Ainsworth PC and
`Michael W. Shore, Alfonso G. Chan, William D. Ellerman, Aris Rafilson and Halima Shukri Ndai of Shore
`Chan LLP.
`
`Google is represented by J. Mark Mann and G. Blake Thompson of Mann Tindel Thompson and Luann L.
`Simmons, David S. Almeling, Marc J. Pensabene, Brad N. Garcia, Cameron W. Westin, Bill Trac, Amy K.
`Liang, Sorin G. Zaharia, Stacy P. Yae and Daniel Silverman of O'Melveny & Myers LLP.
`
`The case is VideoShare LLC v. Google LLC et al., case number 6:19-cv-00663, in the U.S. District Court for the
`Western District of Texas.
`
`--Additional reporting by Katie Buehler, Ryan Davis and Tiffany Hu. Editing by Andrew Cohen.
`
`For a reprint of this article, please contact reprints@law360.com.
`
`0 Comments
`
`Peter Mazur
`Your name will appear next to your comment. If you do not disclose your full name, your comment will be
`deleted. Your email address will not be visible to the public.
`
`Terms of Service
`
`Tell us what you think (1,500 characters max)
`
` Comment
`
`Related Articles
`
`Google Accused Of Destroying Competition In Trial Closings
`
`IP Forecast: Google Patent Fight Heads To Texas Jury
`
`VideoShare Says 10 Hours Is Too Short For Google IP Trial
`
`Albright Won't Let Google, YouTube Escape From Patent Suit
`
`Google, YouTube Must Face Video Streaming Patent Suit
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`4/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Here's What You Missed
`
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`
`3 Ex-US Officials Reject 'Willy-Nilly' Virus Vaccine IP Waivers
`
`Fed. Circ. Tosses Apple's Bid To Kill Professor's IP Rights Suit
`
`PTAB Reverses Denial Of SharkNinja IPR Request
`
`'Borat' Star Says Pot Co. Prez Admitted To Billboard Ad Stunt
`
`Duane Morris Welcomes 2 IP Partners To Boston Office
`
`IP Forecast: Delaware '101 Day' To Start Off With Natera Battle
`
`Cannabis Co. Must Face Skittles IP Suit
`
`Dr. Martens Maker Wins Injunction In Calif. Trade Dress Case
`
`Bayer, Amgen Unit Drop IP Suit Over Cancer Drug Generic
`
`Loofah Patent Trial Delayed Over Doc Disclosure 'Oversight'
`
`Jury Awards Singaporean Plastics Co. $14.5M In TM Row
`
`Brit Cops To Pirating DVDs For Global Hacking Syndicate
`
`Pot Equipment Maker Beats Ex-Partner's $1M 'Hashatron' Suit
`
`Delta-8 Vape Maker Gets Default Win In Copyright Dispute
`
`Amazon Is Hawking Fake Cashmere, Industry Group Claims
`
`Texas Justices Order Redo Of Trade Secrets Case Appeal
`
`Facebook Given Another Chance To Fight Telecom Patent
`
`3 USPTO Updates You Need To Know
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`5/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`IP Hires: Nixon Peabody, Vedder Price, Duane Morris
`
`Health Hires: Baker Donelson, Proskauer
`
`Attached Documents
`
`Verdict
`
`Useful Tools & Links
`
`Add to Briefcase
`Save to PDF & Print
`Rights/Reprints
`Editorial Contacts
`
`Related Sections
`
`California
`Intellectual Property
`Media & Entertainment
`Technology
`Texas
`Trials
`
`Case Information
`
`Case Title
`
`VideoShare, LLC v. Google LLC et al
`
`Case Number
`
`6:19-cv-00663
`
`Court
`
`Texas Western
`
`Nature of Suit
`
`Patent
`
`Judge
`
`Alan D Albright
`
`Date Filed
`
`November 15, 2019
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`6/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`
`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Law Firms
`
`O'Melveny & Myers
`Parker Bunt
`Shore Chan
`
`Companies
`
`Google LLC
`YouTube Inc.
`
`Government Agencies
`
`U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
`U.S. Supreme Court
`
`Judge Analytics
`
`powered by Lex Machina®
`
` Alan D Albright
`
`The 2021 Regional Powerhouses
`
`The law firms on Law360's list of 2021 Regional Powerhouses are handling some of the biggest deals and most
`high-profile courtroom battles across eight states, offering clients regional expertise and making a lasting impact
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`7/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`on the law at the state and local level.
`
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`
`Top 10 trending in Intellectual Property
`
`1'Laws Of Chemistry' Trump PTAB, Illumina Rival Tells Jury
`23 Ex-US Officials Reject 'Willy-Nilly' Virus Vaccine IP Waivers
`3USPTO Finalizes Rules For Canceling Unused Trademarks
`4It May Be Time To Abolish Patent Claim Construction Hearings
`5Fed. Circ. Tosses Apple's Bid To Kill Professor's IP Rights Suit
`6Heed These Rules, Or Risk Your Argument On Appeal
`7IP Forecast: Delaware '101 Day' To Start Off With Natera Battle
`8PTAB Reverses Denial Of SharkNinja IPR Request
`9Fired King & Spalding Atty Had Belligerent Side, Jury Told
`10Justices Told Patent Findings Fall Within Fed. Circ.'s Powers
`
`Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.
`
`How can I help you today?
`
`For example, you can type:
`
`I forgot my password
`I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
`How do I sign up for a newsletter?
`
`Ask a question!
`Ask a question!
`
`
`
`© 2021, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Legal Jobs | Careers at Law360 | Advertise with Law360 |
`Terms | Privacy Policy | Cookie Settings | Help | Site Map
`

`
`Add this article to my briefcase
`
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX
`
`New Folder Name - Required
`
`OR SELECT FROM
`
`Add Now Cancel

`
`Sign up for our Intellectual Property newsletter
`
`You must correct or enter the following before you can sign up:
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`8/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

`

`11/19/21, 6:54 PM
`Google Hit With $26M Video Patent Verdict In WDTX - Law360
`Please provide a professional email: pmazur@devlinlawfirm.com
`Select more newsletters to receive for free
`
`Law360 takes your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.
`No Thanks Sign up now
`
`Thank You!
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1441219
`
`9/9
`
`IPR2021-01342
`Ocean Semiconductor Exhibit 2037
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket