`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`OCEAN SEMICONDUCTOR LLC,
`Patent Owner
`
`IPR2021-01342
`U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S OBJECTIONS TO PETITIONER’S
`HEARING DEMONSTRATIVES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Mail Stop PATENT BOARD
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`Submitted Electronically via PTAB E2E
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Board’s October 19, 2022 Hearing Order (Paper 48), Patent
`
`Owner Ocean Semiconductor LLC hereby submits its objections to Petitioner
`
`Applied Materials, Inc. Hearing Demonstratives (Ex. 1050). The parties met and
`
`conferred in relation to the below objections on November 9, 2022.
`
`
`
`Demonstrative Slide
`Slide 3
`
`Slide 6
`
`Slide 7
`
`Slide 12
`
`Slide 13
`
`Slide 14
`
`Slide 24
`
`Slide 31
`
`Patent Owner’s Objection
`Fed. R. Evid. 403, 704 – Mischaracterizes and
`inaccurately summarizes expert testimony; improperly
`cites expert testimony for a legal conclusion
`37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b); CTPG at 84 – Improper; not only
`has there not been any stipulation or agreement on any
`of these points, Petitioner has never even argued that
`Patent Owner has not disputed these claim elements
`Fed. R. Evid. 403; 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b); CTPG at 84 –
`Mischaracterizes Patent Owner’s position when it states
`that these claims are “undisputed”; in addition, Patent
`Owner has not conceded that there are no objective
`indicia and Petitioner has not argued that it has
`Fed. R. Evid. 704 – Improperly cites expert testimony
`for a legal conclusion
`Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403 – There is no “Schulze Gupta” –
`that reference does not exist
`Fed. R. Evid. 403 – Misleadingly quotes expert witness
`out of context and does not include the question to
`which he was responding
`Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403 – Slide insufficiently indicates
`that the text and diagram come from Shanfield
`Declaration rather than from Gupta itself and is
`therefore misleading; there is no “Schulze Gupta” – that
`reference does not exist
`Fed. R. Evid. 401, 403 – There is no “Schulze Gupta” –
`that reference does not exist
`1
`
`
`
`Slides 27-31
`
`Fed. R. Evid. 403; 37 C.F.R. § 42.23(b); CTPG at 84 –
`These arguments come from Petitioner’s procedural
`motions, appear nowhere in its principal briefs, and are
`therefore improper for oral argument on the
`merits. While Patent Owner does not object to
`Petitioner arguing these points, they are not appropriate
`demonstratives.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 14, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/ Timothy Devlin /
`Timothy Devlin
`Registration No. 41,706
`Alex Chan
`Registration No. 52,713
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`Telephone: (302) 449-9010
`Facsimile: (302) 353-4251
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served
`
`electronically via electronic mail on November 14, 2022 on the following counsel
`
`of record for Petitioners:
`
`LEAD COUNSEL
`
`
`Eric A. Krause
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`560 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Phone: 415-490-1491
`Fax: 415-490-2001
`ekrause@axinn.com
`
`
`Counsel for Applied Materials, Inc.
`BACKUP COUNSEL
`
`Pan C. Lee
`(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`plee@axinn.com
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`560 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Phone: 415-490-1488
`Fax: 415-490-2001
`
`Jeannine Yoo Sano
`(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jsano@axinn.com
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`560 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Phone: 415-490-1490
`Fax: 415-490-2001
`
`Don Zhe Nan Wang
`(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`dwang@axinn.com
`Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`560 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Phone: 415-490-1499
`Fax: 415-490-2001
`
`applied-ocean@axinn.com
`
`
`/s/ Timothy Devlin
` Timothy Devlin
`3
`
`
`
`