IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OCEAN SEMICONDUCTOR LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR: IPR2021-01342
`U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_____________________
`
`
`APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OCEAN SEMICONDUCTOR LLC,
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`_____________________
`
`Case IPR: IPR2021-01342
`U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248
`_____________________
`
`PETITIONER’S UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`1001
`
`1002
`
`1003
`
`1004
`
`1005
`
`EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Description
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248 (“’248 patent”)
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,907,305 (“’305 patent”)
`
`Declaration of Stanley Shanfield, Ph.D.
`
`Curriculum Vitae of Stanley Shanfield, Ph.D.
`
`File Wrapper for the ’248 patent
`
`1006
`
`File Wrapper for the ’305 patent
`
`1007
`
`1008
`
`1009
`
`1010
`
`1011
`
`Schulze, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0116083
`(provisional application filed Oct. 17, 2000; application filed Oct. 16;
`2001; published Aug. 22, 2002)
`
`Gupta et al., U.S. Patent No. 4,888,692 (filed Nov. 10, 1988; issued
`Dec. 19, 1989)
`
`Schulze, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/241,343 (filed Oct. 17,
`2000)
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Electronic Assignment
`Record for U.S. Patent No. 6,968,248
`
`District Court Trial Dates Tend to Slip After PTAB Discretionary
`Denials, available at https://www.patentspostgrant.com/district-
`court-trial-dates-tend-to-slip-after-ptab-discretionary-denials/ (last
`visited July 20, 2021)
`
`1012
`
`
`B.L. MacCarthy and J. Liu, Addressing the Gap in Scheduling
`Research: A Review of Optimization and Heuristic Methods in
`Production Scheduling, Int. J. Prod. Pres., Vol. 31, No. 1, 59-79
`(1993)
`1013 W. Shen, L. Wang and Q. Hao, Agent-based Distributed
`Manufacturing Process Planning and Scheduling: A State-of-the-art
`1
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`Description
`survey, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C
`(Applications and Reviews), vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 563-577 (July 2006)
`
`W. Shen, Distributed manufacturing scheduling using intelligent
`agents, IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, 88-94 (Jan.-Feb.
`2002)
`
`M. Yamamoto and S. Y. Nof, Scheduling/rescheduling in the
`manufacturing operating system environment , International Journal
`of Production Research, 23:4, 705-722 (1985)
`
`J. Sun and D. Xue, A Dynamic Reactive Scheduling Mechanism for
`Responding to Changes of Production Orders and Manufacturing
`Resources, Computers in Industry, 189-207 (2001)
`
`J. McGehee, The MMST Computer-Integrated Manufacturing System
`Framework, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 7:
`107-16 (1994)
`
`P. Cowling and M. Johansson, Using Real Time Information for
`Effective Dynamic Scheduling, European Journal of Operational
`Research 139, 230-244 (2002)
`
`P. Diwan and D. Kothari, Role of Automation and Robotics in
`Semiconductor Industry, IETE Technical Review, 7: 368-77 (1990)
`
`N.R. Jennings and M. Wooldridge, Applications of Intelligent
`Agents, Agent Technology, 3-28 (1998)
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`
`1014
`
`
`1015
`
`
`1016
`
`
`1017
`
`
`1018
`
`1019
`
`1020
`
`1021
`
`J.Y. Pan and J.M. Tenenbaum, Toward an Intelligent Agent
`Flamework for Enterprise Integration, AAAI (1991)
`
`1022
`
`H. Fargher and R. Smith, Planning for the Semiconductor
`Manufacturer of the Future, AAAI (1992)
`1023 W. Shen and D. Norrie, A Hybrid Agent-Oriented Infrastructure for
`Modeling Manufacturing Enterprises (1998)
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`Description
`
`K. Kouiss, H. Pierreval, and N. Mebarki, Using Multi-Agent
`Architecture in FMS for Dynamic Scheduling, J. Intelligent
`Manufacturing, vol. 8, no. 1, 41–47 (Feb. 1997)
`
`S. Parthasarathy and S.H. Kim, Manufacturing Systems: Parallel
`System Models and Some Theoretical Results, International Journal
`of Computer Applications in Technology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 225-238
`(1990)
`
`R. Uzsoy, C. Lee, and L. Martin-Vega, Models in the Semiconductor
`Industry Part I: System Characteristics, Performance Evaluation and
`Production Planning, IIE Transactions, 24:4, 47-60 (1992)
`
`H. Fargher, et al., A Planner and Scheduler for Semiconductor
`Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor
`Manufacturing, Vol. 7, No. 2, 117-28 (May 1994)
`
`R. Leachman and D. Hodges, Benchmarking Semiconductor
`Manufacturing (2001)
`
`J. Macher et al., E-Business and Semiconductor Industry Value
`Chain: Implications for Vertical Specialization and Integrated
`Semiconductor Manufacturers, East-West Center Working Papers
`Economics Series No. 47 (May 2002)
`
`G. Tassey, Standardization in Technology-Based Markets (June
`1999)
`
`R. Langlois, Capabilities and Vertical Disintegration in Process
`Technology: The Case of Semiconductor Fabrication Equipment
`(January 1998)
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. Analog Devices, Inc., No. 1:20-cv-
`12310 (D. Mass.), ECF No. 37, Sept. 20, 2021
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. Infineon Tech. AG, No. 1:20-cv-12311
`(D. Mass.), ECF No. 38, Sept. 20, 2021
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1024
`
`1025
`
`1026
`
`1027
`
`1028
`
`1029
`
`1030
`
`1031
`
`1032
`
`1033
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`Description
`
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. MediaTek Inc., No. 6:20-cv-1210
`(W.D. Tex.), ECF No. 49, Nov. 29, 2021
`Tetrad Tech., LLC v. Implus Footcare, LLC, No. 6:21-cv-796 (W.D.
`Tex.), ECF No. 15, Oct. 13, 2021
`Peters v. United States, No. 6:21-cv-550 (W.D. Tex.), ECF No. 13,
`Oct. 3, 2021
`Springman v. Fun Town Enter., LLC, No. 6:21-cv-63 (W.D. Tex.),
`ECF No. 14, Apr. 16, 2021
`Satco Prod., Inc. v. Signify N. Am. Corp., No. 6:21-cv-146 (W.D.
`Tex.), ECF No. 34, July 14, 2021
`How reliable are trial dates relied on by the PTAB in the Fintiv
`analysis? available at https://www.1600ptab.com/2021/10/how-
`reliable-are-trial-dates-relied-on-by-the-ptab-in-the-fintiv-analysis/
`(last visited Dec. 7, 2021)
`WSOU Inv., LLC v. Dell Tech. Inc., No. 6:20-cv-00473 (W.D. Tex.),
`ECF No. 128, Dec. 1, 2021
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. MediaTek Inc., No. 6:20-cv-1210
`(W.D. Tex.), ECF No. 51, Dec. 9, 2021
`Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. MediaTek Inc., No. 6:20-cv-1210
`(W.D. Tex.), Docket Report, Dec. 10, 2021
`Declaration of Pan Lee in Support of Petitioner’s Motion for Pro
`Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`Declaration of Jeannine Yoo Sano in Support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`Declaration of Don Zhe Nan Wang in Support of Petitioner’s Motion
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c)
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1034
`
`1035
`
`1036
`
`1037
`
`1038
`
`1039
`
`1040
`
`1041
`
`1042
`
`1043
`
`1044
`
`1045
`
`1046
`
`Deposition Transcript of Kurt D. Humphrey, June 22, 2022
`
`1047
`
`SEMI E81-0600 Provisional Specification for CIM Framework
`Domain Architecture (June 2000)
`4
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`Exhibit
`No.
`
`1048
`
`1049
`
`Description
`Claim Construction Memorandum and Order, Ocean Semiconductor
`LLC v. Huawei Device USA, Inc., No 4:20-cv-00991 (E.D. Tex.),
`ECF No. 39, Feb. 2, 2022
`Claim Construction Order, Ocean Semiconductor LLC v. MediaTek
`Inc., No 6:20-cv-01210 (W.D. Tex.), ECF No. 51, Dec. 9, 2021
`
`1050
`
`Petitioner’s Hearing Demonstratives1
`
`
`1 Same as IPR2021-01344 (Related U.S. Patent No. 6,907,305)
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 9, 2022
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Eric A. Krause/
`Eric A. Krause (Reg. No. 62,329)
`Lead Attorney for Petitioner
`Applied Materials, Inc.
`
`Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`55 Second Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-3491
`(415) 490-1491
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List
`IPR2021-01342
`
`CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies that he caused the
`
`above-captioned Petitioner’s Updated Exhibit List and Exhibit 1050 to be served in
`
`its entirety on November 9, 2022 on counsel for Patent Owner Ocean
`
`Semiconductor LLC via email:
`
`Timothy Devlin (Lead Counsel)
`Alex Chan (Backup Counsel)
`Joel W. Glazer (Backup Counsel)
`Peter Mazur (Backup Counsel)
`Henrik Parker (Backup Counsel)
`Alan Wright (Backup Counsel)
`Joseph Zito (Backup Counsel)
`Devlin Law Firm LLC
`1526 Gilpin Avenue
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`TD-PTAB@devlinlawfirm.com
`achan@devlinlawfirm.com
`jglazer@devlinlawfirm.com
`pmazur@devlinlawfirm.com
`hparker@devlinlawfirm.com
`awright@devlinlawfirm.com
`jzito@devlinlawfirm.com
`dlflitparas@devlinlawfirm.com
`oceansemi-dlf@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`Dated: November 9, 2022k
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`/Eric A. Krause/
`Eric A. Krause (Reg. No. 62,329)
`Lead Attorney for Petitioner
`Applied Materials, Inc.
`
`Axinn Veltrop & Harkrider LLP
`55 Second Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`(415) 490-1491
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
