throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`STRATOSAUDIO INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Case No. 6:20-CV-01125-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`PLAINTIFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL PRELIMINARY INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`Plaintiff StratosAudio Inc. (“Plaintiff’) provides the following Supplemental Preliminary
`
`Infringement Contentions to defendant Hyundai Motor America (hereinafter refeferred to as
`
`“Hyundai” or “Defendant”). This disclosure is based on the information available to Plaintiff as
`
`of the date of this disclosure, and Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this disclosure to the full
`
`extent consistent with the Court’s Rules and Orders.
`
`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT
`
`Plaintiff asserts that Defendant infringes one or more of the following claims
`
`(collectively, “Asserted Claims”) of the following patents (collectively, “Asserted Patents”):
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,166,081 (“’081 patent”), claims 9-11, and 23
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,688,028 (“’028 patent”), claims 11, 14, 16, and 18
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,903,307 (“’307 patent”), claims 11, 16, and 18
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,584,843 (“’843 patent”), claims 10, 11, and 13
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,294,806 (“’806 patent”), claims 5-8, and 10
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2009
`Hyundai v. StratosAudio
`IPR2021-01267
`Page 1 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`U.S. Patent No. 9,355,405 (“’405 patent”), claims 12, and 14-16
`
`Plaintiff asserts that the Asserted Claims are infringed by the various methods and
`
`apparatuses used, made, sold, offered for sale, or imported into the U.S. by Defendant, as
`
`identified in the claim charts attached to Plaintiff’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions served
`
`on May 14, 2021 and the claim charts served herewith. Plaintiff’s Preliminary Infringement
`
`Contentions served on May 14, 2021 and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by reference.
`
`Plaintiff’s analysis is based on certain limited information that is publicly available or
`
`produced by Defendant to date, and Plaintiff’s own investigation prior to any discovery in this
`
`action. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend or supplement these disclosures to the full extent
`
`consistent with the Court’s Rules and Orders.
`
`II.
`
`PRIORITY DATE (I.E., EARLIEST DATE OF INVENTION)
`
`The Asserted Claims of the ’081 patent are entitled to a priority date of February 5, 2008.
`
`At this time, and based on currently available evidence, Plaintiff contends the earliest
`
`corroborated date of invention for the ’081 patent is October 5, 2007. The Asserted Claims of
`
`the ’028 patent are entitled to a priority date of September 13, 2000. At this time, and based on
`
`currently available evidence, Plaintiff contends the earliest corroborated date of invention for the
`
`’028 patent is January 6, 2000. The Asserted Claims of the ’307 patent are entitled to a priority
`
`date of September 13, 2000. At this time, and based on currently available evidence, Plaintiff
`
`contends the earliest corroborated date of invention for the ’307 patent is January 6, 2000. The
`
`Asserted Claims of the ’843 patent are entitled to a priority date of February 5, 2008. At this
`
`time, and based on currently available evidence, Plaintiff contends the earliest corroborated date
`
`of invention for the ’843 patent is September 13, 2007. The Asserted Claims of the ’806 patent
`
`are entitled to a priority date of February 5, 2008. At this time, and based on currently available
`
`
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2009
`Hyundai v. StratosAudio
`IPR2021-01267
`Page 2 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`evidence, Plaintiff contends the earliest corroborated date of invention for the ’806 patent is
`
`September 13, 2007. The Asserted Claims of the ’405 patent are entitled to a priority date of
`
`February 5, 2008. At this time, and based on currently available evidence, Plaintiff contends the
`
`earliest date of invention for the ’405 patent is October 5, 2007.
`
`III. DOCUMENT PRODUCTION
`
`Documents Bates numbered STRATOS_00000001 - STRATOS_00247658 were
`
`previously produced. Documents Bates numbered STRATOS_00247659 -
`
`STRATOS_00247678 are being produced concurrently herewith. These documents include
`
`documents related to the invention date for the Asserted Patents.
`
`
`
`Date: September 27, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Jonathan Lamberson
`
`
`Jonathan Lamberson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Henry Huang (admitted pro hac vice)
`2 Palo Alto Square, 3000 El Camino Real, #900
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`Tel: 650-213-0300
`lamberson@whitecase.com
`
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`Michael Songer (admitted pro hac vice)
`701 Thirteenth Street, NW
`Washington DC, 20005
`Tel: 202-626-3600
`michael.songer@whitecase.com
`
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`Charles Larsen (admitted pro hac vice)
`Daniel S. Sternberg (admitted pro hac vice)
`75 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`Tel: 617-979-9300
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2009
`Hyundai v. StratosAudio
`IPR2021-01267
`Page 3 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`charles.larsen@whitecase.com
` dan.sternberg@whitecase.com
`
`
`FRIEDMAN, SUDER & COOKE
`Corby R. Vowell
`604 East 4th Street, Suite 200
`Fort Worth, TX 76102
`Tel: 817-334-0400
`Fax: 817-334-0401
`vowell@fsclaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Stratosaudio, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2009
`Hyundai v. StratosAudio
`IPR2021-01267
`Page 4 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on the 27th day of September 2021, I served via e-mail the attorneys
`of record for Defendants.
`
`
` /s/ Jonathan Lamberson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`StratosAudio Exhibit 2009
`Hyundai v. StratosAudio
`IPR2021-01267
`Page 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket