throbber
10/27/21, 11:54 AM
`
`Gilstrap Holds Top Spot For Pandemic-Era Jury Patent Trials - Law360
`
`Gilstrap Holds Top Spot For Pandemic-Era Jury Patent Trials
`
`Portfolio Media. Inc. | 111 West 19th Street, 5th floor | New York, NY 10011 | www.law360.com
`Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | customerservice@law360.com
`
`By Tiffany Hu
`Law360 (October 26, 2021, 6:28 PM EDT) -- Texas has seen the most patent jury trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, with Eastern District of Texas Judge
`Rodney Gilstrap holding the most trials since August of last year, according to a new report by Baker Botts LLP.
`
`Of the 18 patent jury trials that took place in the Eastern District of Texas from August 2020 to September 2021, Judge Gilstrap handled 16 of those trials,
`including one that resulted in a $506 million verdict against Apple over Optis Wireless' standard-essential 4G wireless patents, according to the Oct. 22
`report. Judge Gilstrap later overturned the jury's calculation of damages and granted Apple a new damages trial, and a new jury returned a $300 million
`verdict against Apple in August.
`
`But the largest award that has come out of patent jury trials so far is from Western District of Texas Judge Alan Albright's courtroom. In March, jurors issued
`a $2.18 billion verdict against Intel for infringing two computer chip patents owned by VLSI Technology LLC. The report also notes that Judge Albright
`handled the second-most patent jury trials during this period, overseeing all six of the patent jury trials in the Western District of Texas since August 2020.
`
`Many of the larger verdicts seemed to have been awarded when courts were beginning to engage in patent jury trials again, Baker Botts intellectual property
`litigation co-chair Doug Kubehl, who co-authored the report with senior associate Lindsay Volpenhein Cutié and associate Fred Carbone, told Law360 on
`Tuesday.
`
`Click to view interactive version
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1434133/print?section=delaware
`
`1/2
`
`SAMSUNG V. SOLAS
`IPR2021-01254
`Exhibit 2007
`Page 1
`
`

`

`Gilstrap Holds Top Spot For Pandemic-Era Jury Patent Trials - Law360
`10/27/21, 11:54 AM
`The largest jury award to come out of patent trials from August 2020 to September was the
`Source: Baker Botts
`$2.18 billion verdict against Intel in Western District of Texas Judge Alan Albright's courtroom.
`
`August 2020
`
`October 2020
`
`March 2021
`
`May 2021
`
`July 2021
`
`August 2021
`Gilstrap
`
`Schroder
`
`Albright
`
`Gilstrap
`
`Gilstrap
`Go to Tableau Public
`Mazzant
`Undo
`Gil t
`"I definitely think we've seen a trend in the last 12 to 18 months of larger patent jury verdicts than we've seen generally in the past," Kubehl said, noting that
`there was still a "small" sample size. "By my count, it was maybe 27% awarded that were more than $100 million, which seems to be an uptick in the
`number of just very large awards that we've seen."
`
`According to the report, the "locations of the patent jury trials also reflect the timing in which COVID-19 restrictions were lifted by states," as Texas gradually
`lifted its safety restrictions through March of this year, while California took a few months longer to fully reopen.
`
`"Unlike the district courts in Texas, the Central District of California, which comes in fourth ... for patent lawsuit filings, has not held a patent trial, either a
`jury or bench, since pandemic shutdowns began," the report states. Following the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas, the District of Delaware placed
`third, according to the report.
`
`The report also details the various health and safety protocols that courts have taken during the pandemic. Judge Albright appeared to be more consistent in
`his Western District of Texas courtroom — including requiring masks, social distancing and COVID-19 tests — compared to judges in the Eastern District of
`Texas, who were more varied in the measures that they implemented.
`
`Kubehl said that courts are starting to lift some restrictions that were put in place — including the Northern District of Georgia, which in September held an
`in-person trial with no mask mandate or use of plexiglass — which may continue as more and more people get vaccinated.
`
`--Editing by Bruce Goldman.
`
`All Content © 2003-2021, Portfolio Media, Inc.
`
`https://www.law360.com/articles/1434133/print?section=delaware
`
`2/2
`
`SAMSUNG V. SOLAS
`IPR2021-01254
`Exhibit 2007
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket