`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`Civil Action No. 1:21 Civ. 05205 (LGS)
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`SOLAS OLED LTD. and NEODRON
`LTD.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ PENDING
`MOTIONS TO SEAL AND GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE TO SEAL
`CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION IN DOCUMENTS FILED IN THIS CASE
`
`Plaintiffs Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,
`
`(collectively “Samsung Electronics”) having moved to redact limited portions of its Amended
`
`Complaint and one associated exhibit (Dkt. 33) and a blackline of its Amended Complaint to its
`
`initial Complaint (Dkt. 38), and the Court having reviewed the motion and supporting materials
`
`and having found sufficient cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and also having
`
`ordered the Parties to propose an order governing the sealing of confidential information going
`
`forward (Dkt. 43), and the Parties having conferred and proposed the following order, it is
`
`hereby
`
`ORDERED that Samsung Electronics’ motions to partially redact its documents (Dkts.
`
`33, 38) are granted and the unredacted version of the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 36) and the
`
`unredacted blackline of its Amended Complaint to its initial Complaint (Dkt. 40) may be
`
`maintained under seal.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties may file documents in this proceeding
`
`under seal without further motions to do so, provided that within seven days the party filing a
`
`SAMSUNG V. SOLAS
`IPR2021-01254
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:21-cv-05205-LGS Document 45 Filed 09/03/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`document under seal shall, for each document so filed, publicly file a (i) slip sheet indicating that
`
`the document shall be maintained entirely under seal; or (ii) version of the document with only
`
`confidential information redacted.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that unless the document the party is proposing to maintain
`
`under seal or the redacted portions of the document include only information previously sealed
`
`or redacted in this case, the parties must file with the slip sheet or redacted document a public
`
`motion or letter-motion articulating the basis for its new sealings or redactions and, in the case of
`
`redactions, providing a copy of the document with all redactions highlighted, which highlighted
`
`document may itself be filed under seal.
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any party objecting to any sealing or redaction shall
`
`within seven days file a response stating its objection, to which the party propounding the sealing
`
`or redactions shall have seven days to respond.
`
`
`
`Dated: September __, 2021
`
`New York, NY
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED:
`
`
`
`LORNA G. SCHOFIELD
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`SAMSUNG V. SOLAS
`IPR2021-01254
`Exhibit 2006
`Page 2
`
`