throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`Witricity Corporation,
`Patent Owner.
`
`
`
`
`Patent No. 8,304,935
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SYLVIA D. HALL-ELLIS, PH.D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 001
`
`

`

`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1. My name is Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis. I have been retained as an expert by
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation (referred to herein as “Petitioner”).
`
`2.
`
`I have written this declaration at the request of Petitioner to provide my
`
`expert opinion regarding the authenticity and public availability of a publication.
`
`My report sets forth my opinions in detail and provides the bases for my opinions
`
`regarding the public availability of this publication.
`
`3.
`
`I reserve the right to supplement or amend my opinions, and bases for
`
`them, in response any additional evidence, testimony, discovery, argument, and/or
`
`other additional information that may be provided to or obtained by me after the date
`
`of this declaration.
`
`4.
`
`I am being compensated for my time spent working on this matter at
`
`my normal consulting rate of $325 per hour, plus reimbursement for any additional
`
`reasonable expenses. My compensation is not in any way tied to the content of this
`
`Declaration, the substance of my opinions, or the outcome of this dispute. I have no
`
`other interests in this proceeding or with any of the parties.
`
`5.
`
`All of the materials that I considered are discussed explicitly in this
`
`Declaration.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 002
`
`

`

`
`
`II. QUALIFICATIONS
`6.
`I am currently an Adjunct Professor in the School of Information at San
`
`José State University. I obtained a Master of Library Science from the University
`
`of North Texas in 1972 and a Ph.D. in Library Science from the University of
`
`Pittsburgh in 1985. Over the last forty-five years, I have held various positions in
`
`the field of library and information resources. I was first employed as a librarian in
`
`1966 and have been involved in the field of library sciences since, holding numerous
`
`positions.
`
`7.
`
`I am a member of the American Library Association (“ALA”) and its
`
`Association for Library Collections & Technical Services (“ALCTS”) Division, and
`
`I served on the Committee on Cataloging: Resource and Description (which wrote
`
`the new cataloging rules) and as the founding chair of the Committee for Education
`
`and Training of Catalogers and the Competencies and Education for a Career in
`
`Cataloging Interest Group. I also served as the Founding Chair of the ALCTS
`
`Division’s Task Force on Competencies and Education for a Career in Cataloging.
`
`Additionally, I have served as the Chair for the ALA Office of Diversity’s
`
`Committee on Diversity, as a member of the REFORMA National Board of
`
`Directors, and as a member of the Editorial Board for the ALCTS premier cataloging
`
`journal, Library Resources and Technical Services. Currently I serve as a Co-Chair
`
`for the Library Research Round Table of the American Library Association.
`2
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 003
`
`

`

`
`
`8.
`
`I have also given over one-hundred presentations in the field, including
`
`several on library cataloging systems and Machine-Readable Cataloging (“MARC”)
`
`standards. My current research interests include library cataloging systems,
`
`metadata, and organization of electronic resources.
`
`9.
`
`I have been deposed eighteen times.
`
`10. My full curriculum vitae is included in Exhibit 1006.
`
`III. PRELIMINARIES
`A.
`Scope of This Declaration And Legal Understanding
`11.
`I am not an attorney and will not offer opinions on the law. I am,
`
`however, rendering my expert opinion on the authenticity of the documents
`
`referenced herein and on when and how each of these documents was disseminated
`
`or otherwise made available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily
`
`skilled in the subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence, could have
`
`located the documents.
`
`12.
`
`I am informed by counsel that an item is considered authentic if there
`
`is sufficient evidence to support a finding that the item is what it is claimed to be. I
`
`am also informed that authenticity can be established based on the contents of the
`
`documents themselves, such as the appearance, contents, substance, internal
`
`patterns, or other distinctive characteristics of the item, taken together with all of the
`
`circumstances.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 004
`
`

`

`
`
`13.
`
`I am informed by counsel that a printed publication qualifies as publicly
`
`accessible as of the date it was disseminated or otherwise made available such that
`
`a person interested in and ordinarily skilled in the relevant subject matter could
`
`locate it through the exercise of ordinary diligence.
`
`14. While I understand that the determination of public accessibility under
`
`the foregoing standard rests on a case-by-case analysis of the facts particular to an
`
`individual publication, I also understand that a printed publication is rendered
`
`“publicly accessible” if it is cataloged and indexed by a library such that a person
`
`interested in the relevant subject matter could locate it. That is, I understand that
`
`cataloging and indexing by a library is sufficient, although there are other ways that
`
`a printed publication may qualify as publicly-accessible. One manner of sufficient
`
`indexing is indexing according to subject matter category. I understand that the
`
`cataloging and indexing by a single library of a single instance of a particular printed
`
`publication is sufficient, even if the single library is in a foreign country. I
`
`understand that, even if access to a library is restricted, a printed publication that has
`
`been cataloged and indexed therein is publicly-accessible so long as a presumption
`
`is raised that the portion of the public concerned with the relevant subject matter
`
`would know of the printed publication. I also understand that the cataloging and
`
`indexing of information that would guide a person interested in the relevant subject
`
`matter to the printed publication, such as the cataloging and indexing of an abstract
`4
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 005
`
`

`

`
`
`for the printed publication, is sufficient to render the printed publication publicly-
`
`accessible.
`
`15.
`
`I understand that routine business practices, such as general library
`
`cataloging and indexing practices, can be used to establish an approximate date on
`
`which a printed publication became publicly accessible.
`
`B.
`16.
`
`Persons of Ordinary Skill in the Art
`I am told by counsel that the subject matter of this proceeding relates
`
`generally to wireless power transfer through inductive coupling.
`
`17.
`
`I have been informed by counsel that a “person of ordinary skill in the
`
`art at the time of the inventions” is a hypothetical person who is presumed to be
`
`familiar with the relevant field and its literature at the time of the inventions. This
`
`hypothetical person is also a person of ordinary creativity, capable of understanding
`
`the scientific principles applicable to the pertinent field.
`
`18.
`
`I am told by counsel that persons of ordinary skill in this subject matter
`
`or art would have had at least a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering (or
`
`equivalent) and at least two years’ industry experience, or equivalent research.
`
`Alternatively, a person of ordinary skill could substitute directly relevant additional
`
`education for experience, e.g., an advanced degree in electrical engineering (or
`
`equivalent), with at least one year of industry experience.
`
`5
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 006
`
`

`

`
`
`19.
`
`It is my opinion that such a person would have been engaged in
`
`research, learning through study, and practice in the field and possibly through
`
`formal instruction the bibliographic resources relevant to his or her research. By not
`
`later than the mid-2000s such a person would have had access to a vast array of long-
`
`established print resources in the field, as well as to a rich set of online resources
`
`providing indexing information, abstracts, and full text services for publications
`
`relevant to the field of this dispute.
`
`C. Authoritative Databases
`20.
`In preparing this report, I used authoritative databases, such as the
`
`OCLC WorldCat and the Library of Congress Online Catalog to confirm citation
`
`details of the publication discussed.
`
`21. OCLC Bibliographic Database. The OCLC was created “to establish,
`
`maintain and operate a computerized library network and to promote the evolution
`
`of library use, of libraries themselves, and of librarianship, and to provide processes
`
`and products for the benefit of library users and libraries, including such objectives
`
`as increasing availability of library resources to individual library patrons and
`
`reducing the rate of rise of library per-unit costs, all for the fundamental public
`
`purpose of furthering ease of access to and use of the ever-expanding body of
`
`6
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 007
`
`

`

`
`
`worldwide scientific, literary and educational knowledge and information.1 Among
`
`other services, OCLC and its members are responsible for maintaining the WorldCat
`
`database,2 used by independent and institutional libraries throughout the world.
`
`D.
`Indexing
`22. A researcher may discover material relevant to his or her topic in a
`
`variety of ways. One common means of discovery is to search for relevant
`
`information in an index of periodical and other publications. Having found relevant
`
`material, the researcher will then normally obtain it online, look for it in libraries, or
`
`purchase it from the publisher, a bookstore, a document delivery service, or other
`
`provider. Sometimes, the date of a document’s public accessibility will involve both
`
`indexing and library date information. However, date information for indexing
`
`entries is often unavailable. This is especially true for online indices.
`
`23.
`
`Indexing services use a wide variety of controlled vocabularies to
`
`provide subject access and other means of discovering the content of documents.
`
`The formats in which these access terms are presented vary from service to service.
`
`
`
`1 Third Article, Amended Articles of Incorporation of OCLC Online Computer
`Library
`Center,
`Incorporated
`(available
`at
`https://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/membership/articles-of-incorporation.pdf).
`2 http://www.worldcat.org/
`
`7
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 008
`
`

`

`
`
`24. Before the widespread development of online databases to index
`
`articles in journals, magazines, conference papers, and technical reports, libraries
`
`purchased printed volumes of indices. Graduate library school education mandated
`
`that students learn about the bibliographic control of disciplines, the prominent
`
`indexing volumes, and searching strategies required to use them effectively and
`
`efficiently. Half of the courses that I studied in library school were focused on the
`
`bibliography and resources in academic disciplines.
`
`25. Librarians consulted with information seekers to verify citations, check
`
`availability in union catalogs, printed books catalogs, and the OCLC database, and
`
`make formal requests for materials, e.g., books, conference proceedings, journal
`
`articles. Requests were transmitted using Telex machines, rudimentary email
`
`systems, and the United States Postal Service. During my career, I have performed
`
`and supervised staff who handled these resource sharing tasks.
`
`26. Online indexing services commonly provide bibliographic information,
`
`abstracts, and full-text copies of the indexed publications, along with a list of the
`
`documents cited in the indexed publication. These services also often provide lists
`
`of publications that cite a given document. A citation of a document is evidence that
`
`the document was publicly available and in use no later than the publication date of
`
`the citing document.
`
`8
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 009
`
`

`

`
`
`IV. LIBRARY CATALOGING PRACTICES
`A. Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) Standard
`27.
`I am fully familiar with the library cataloging standard known as the
`
`Machine-Readable Cataloging (MARC) standard, which is an industry-wide
`
`standard method of storing and organizing library catalog information.3 MARC was
`
`first developed in the 1960s by the Library of Congress. A MARC-compatible
`
`library is one that has a catalog consisting of individual MARC records for each of
`
`its items. Today, MARC is the primary communications protocol for the transfer
`
`and storage of bibliographic metadata in libraries.4
`
`
`
`3 The full text of the standard is available from the Library of Congress at
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/
`4 Almost every major library in the world is MARC-compatible. See, e.g., MARC
`(FAQ),
`Library
`of
`Congress,
`Frequently
`Asked
`Questions
`https://www.loc.gov/marc/faq.html (last visited April 26, 2021) (“MARC is the
`acronym for MAchine-Readable Cataloging. It defines a data format that emerged
`from a Library of Congress-led initiative that began nearly forty years ago. It
`provides the mechanism by which computers exchange, use, and interpret
`bibliographic information, and its data elements make up the foundation of most
`library catalogs used today.”). MARC is the ANSI/NISO Z39.2-1994 (reaffirmed
`2016) standard for Information Interchange Format.
`9
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 010
`
`

`

`
`
`28. Since at least the early 1970s and continuing to the present day, MARC
`
`has been the primary communications protocol for the transfer and storage of
`
`bibliographic metadata in libraries.5 As explained by the Library of Congress:
`
`You could devise your own method of organizing the bibliographic
`information, but you would be isolating your library, limiting its
`options, and creating much more work for yourself. Using the MARC
`standard prevents duplication of work and allows libraries to better
`share bibliographic resources. Choosing to use MARC enables libraries
`to acquire cataloging data that is predictable and reliable. If a library
`were to develop a “home-grown” system that did not use MARC
`records, it would not be taking advantage of an industry-wide standard
`whose primary purpose is to foster communication of information.
`Using the MARC standard also enables libraries to make use of
`commercially available library automation systems to manage library
`operations. Many systems are available for libraries of all sizes and are
`designed to work with the MARC format. Systems are maintained and
`improved by the vendor so that libraries can benefit from the latest
`advances in computer technology. The MARC standard also allows
`
`
`
`5 A complete history of the development of MARC can be found in MARC: Its
`History and Implications by Henrietta D. Avram (Washington, DC: Library of
`Congress,
`1975)
`and
`available
`online
`from
`the Hathi
`Trust
`(https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015034388556;view=1up;seq=1; last
`visited April 26, 2021).
`
`10
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 011
`
`

`

`
`
`libraries to replace one system with another with the assurance that their
`data will still be compatible.
`
`a MARC Record Necessary? LIBRARY
`
`Is
`
`OF CONGRESS,
`
`Why
`
`http://www.loc.gov/marc/umb/um01to06.html#part2 (last visited April 26, 2021).
`
`29. Thus, almost every major library in the world is MARC-compatible.
`
`See, e.g., MARC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), LIBRARY OF CONGRESS,
`
`https://www.loc.gov/marc/faq.html (last visited April 26, 2021) (“MARC is the
`
`acronym for MAchine-Readable Cataloging. It defines a data format that emerged
`
`from a Library of Congress-led initiative that began nearly fifty years ago. It
`
`provides the mechanism by which computers exchange, use, and interpret
`
`bibliographic information, and its data elements make up the foundation of most
`
`library catalogs used today.”). MARC is the ANSI/NISO Z39.2-1994 standard
`
`(reaffirmed in 2016) for Information Interchange Format. The full text of the
`
`standard is available from the Library of Congress.6
`
`30. A MARC record comprises several fields, each of which contains
`
`specific data about the work. Each field is identified by a standardized, unique,
`
`three-digit code corresponding to the type of data that follow. For example, a work’s
`
`
`
`6 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/
`11
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 012
`
`

`

`
`
`title is recorded in field 245, the primary author or creator of the work is recorded in
`
`field 100, an item’s International Standard Book Number (“ISBN”) is recorded in
`
`field 020, an item’s International Standard Serial Number (“ISSN”) is recorded in
`
`field 022, an item’s Library of Congress call number is recorded in field 050, and
`
`the publication date is recorded in field 260 under the subfield “c.” Id.7 If a work is
`
`a periodical, then its publication frequency is recorded in field 310, alternate
`
`publication frequency is recorded in field 321, and the publication dates (e.g., the
`
`first and last publication) are recorded in field 362, which is also referred to as the
`
`enumeration/chronology field.8
`
`31. MARC records also include several fields that include subject matter
`
`classification information. An overview of MARC record fields is available through
`
`the Library of Congress website.9 For example, 6XX fields are termed “Subject
`
`
`
`7 In some MARC records, field 264 is used rather than field 260 to record publication
`information. See http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd264.html (last visited
`April 26, 2021) (“Information in field 264 is similar to information in field 260
`(Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint)). Field 264 is useful for cases where the
`content standard or institutional policies make a distinction between functions”).
`8 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd3xx.html
`9 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/
`12
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 013
`
`

`

`
`
`Access Fields.”10 Among these, for example, is the 650 field; this is the “Subject
`
`Added Entry – Topical Term” field.11 The 650 field is a “[s]ubject added entry in
`
`which the entry element is a topical term.”12 These authenticated subject entries “are
`
`assigned to a bibliographic record to provide access according to generally accepted
`
`thesaurus-building rules (e.g., Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH),
`
`Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)).”13
`
`32. Further, MARC records include call numbers, which themselves
`
`indicate a subject and physical location within the library collections. For example,
`
`the 050 field is the “Library of Congress Call Number.”14 A defined portion of the
`
`Library of Congress Call Number is the classification number, and “source of the
`
`classification number
`
`is Library of Congress Classification and
`
`the LC
`
`Classification-Additions and Changes.”15 Thus, included in the 050 field is a subject
`
`matter classification. Each item in a library has a single classification number. A
`
`library selects a classification scheme (e.g., the Library of Congress classification
`
`
`
`10 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd6xx.html
`11 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd650.html
`12 Id.
`13 Id.
`14 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd050.html
`15 Id.
`
`13
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 014
`
`

`

`
`
`scheme just described or a similar scheme such as the Dewey Decimal classification
`
`scheme or the National Library of Medicine classification scheme) and uses it
`
`consistently. When the Library of Congress assigns the classification number, it
`
`appears as part of the 050 field. If a local library assigns the classification number,
`
`it appears in a 090 field. In either scenario, the MARC record includes a
`
`classification number that represents a subject matter classification.
`
`33. Each item in a library has a single classification number. A library
`
`selects a classification scheme (e.g., the Library of Congress classification scheme
`
`just described or a similar scheme such as the Dewey Decimal classification scheme)
`
`and uses it consistently. When the Library of Congress assigns the classification
`
`number, it appears as part of the 050 field, as discussed above. For MARC records
`
`created by libraries other than the Library of Congress (e.g., a university library or a
`
`local public library), the classification number may appear in a 09X (e.g., 090)
`
`field.16
`
`34. OCLC provides its members online access to MARC records through
`
`its OCLC bibliographic database. When an OCLC member institution acquires a
`
`work, it creates a MARC record for this work in its computer catalog system in the
`
`
`
`16 http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd09x.html
`14
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 015
`
`

`

`
`
`ordinary course of its business. MARC records created at the Library of Congress
`
`were initially tape-loaded into the OCLC database through a subscription to MARC
`
`Distribution Services daily or weekly. Once the MARC record is created by a
`
`cataloger at an OCLC member institution or is tape-loaded from the Library of
`
`Congress, the MARC record is then made available to any other OCLC members
`
`online, and therefore made available to the public. Accordingly, once the MARC
`
`record is created by a cataloger at an OCLC member institution or is tape-loaded
`
`from the Library of Congress or another library anywhere in the world, any
`
`publication corresponding to the MARC record has been cataloged and indexed
`
`according to its subject matter such that a person interested in that subject matter
`
`could, with reasonable diligence, locate and access the publication through any
`
`library with access to the OCLC bibliographic database or through the Library of
`
`Congress.
`
`35. When an OCLC member institution creates a new MARC record,
`
`OCLC automatically supplies the date of creation for that record. The date of
`
`creation for the MARC record appears in the fixed field (008), characters 00 through
`
`05. The MARC record creation date reflects the date on which, or shortly after
`
`which, the item was first acquired or cataloged. Initially, field 005 of the MARC
`
`record is automatically populated with the date the MARC record was created in
`
`year, month, day format (YYYYMMDD) (some of the newer library catalog systems
`15
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 016
`
`

`

`
`
`also include hour, minute, second (HHMMSS)). Thereafter, the library’s computer
`
`system may automatically update the date in field 005 every time the library updates
`
`the MARC record (e.g., to reflect that an item has been moved to a different shelving
`
`location within the library). Field 005 is visible when viewing a MARC record via
`
`an appropriate computerized interface, but when a MARC record is printed to
`
`hardcopy, no “005” label appears. The initial field 005 date (i.e., the date the MARC
`
`record was created) does appear, however, next to the label “Entered.”17 The date
`
`upon which the most recent update to field 005 occurred also appears, next to the
`
`label “Replaced.” Thus, when an item’s MARC record has been printed to
`
`hardcopy—as is the case with the exhibits to this report—the date reflected next to
`
`the label “Entered” is necessarily on or after the date the library first cataloged and
`
`indexed the underlying item.
`
`36. Once one library has cataloged and indexed a publication by creating a
`
`MARC record for that publication, other libraries that receive the publication do not
`
`
`
`In this report, I sometimes refer to the “Entered” entry as field 008, characters
`17
`00-05. Field 005 is visible when viewing a MARC record via an appropriate
`computerized interface. But when a MARC record is printed directly to hardcopy
`from the OCLC database, the “005” label is not shown. The date in the 005 field
`instead appears next to the label “Replaced.”
`16
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 017
`
`

`

`
`
`create additional MARC records—the other libraries instead rely on the original
`
`MARC record. They may update or revise the MARC record to ensure accuracy,
`
`but they do not replace or duplicate it. This practice does more than save libraries
`
`from duplicating labor, it also enhances the accuracy of MARC records. It also
`
`allows librarians around the world to know that a particular MARC record is
`
`authoritative. In contrast, a hypothetical system wherein duplicative records were
`
`created would result in confusion as to which record is authoritative.
`
`37. The date of creation of the MARC record by a cataloger at an OCLC
`
`member institution reflects when the underlying item is accessible to the public.
`
`Upwards of two-thirds to three-quarters of book sales to libraries come from a jobber
`
`or wholesaler for online and print resources. These resellers make it their business
`
`to provide books to their customers as fast as possible, often providing turnaround
`
`times of only a single day after publication. Libraries purchase a significant portion
`
`of the balance of their books directly from publishers themselves, which provide
`
`delivery on a similarly expedited schedule. In general, libraries make these
`
`purchases throughout the year as the books are published and shelve the books as
`
`soon thereafter as possible in order to make the books available to their patrons.
`
`Thus, books are generally available at libraries across the country within just a few
`
`days of publication.
`
`17
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 018
`
`

`

`
`
`V.
`
`PUBLICATION
`A. Exhibit 1007 – Inductively Coupled Radio Frequency Power
`Transmission System for Wireless Systems and Devices by Kathleen
`O’Brien, 2006
`38. Exhibit 1007 is a doctoral dissertation, Inductively Coupled Radio
`
`Frequency Power Transmission System for Wireless Systems and Devices by
`
`Kathleen O’Brien (hereafter “O’Brien”) and published in 2007. Exhibit 1007 is a
`
`true and correct copy of the title page, table of contents, and text from the
`
`Technischen Universität Dresden 18 (Dresden, Germany). While the majority of
`
`O’Brien is in English, the Title page and page 3 of the PDF includes certain portions
`
`written in German. A certified translation of O’Brien with a German to English
`
`translation is attached as part of Exhibit 1007, as is the declaration of Irina Hinrichs
`
`certifying the translation of those German portions. The title page of O’Brien shows
`
`a submission date of May 12, 200519 and a defense date of March 11, 2006.”20 I
`
`obtained this dissertation from counsel. Specifically, the text is complete; no pages
`
`
`
`18 Technischen Universität Dresden = Dresden University of Technology
`19 Original German: “Tag der Einreichung 05.12.2005”; English translation:
`“Submitted on: 12/05/2005”
`20 Original German: “Tag der Verteidigung 03.11.2006”; English translation:
`“Defended on: 11/03/2006”
`
`18
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 019
`
`

`

`
`
`are missing,21 and the text on each page appears to flow seamlessly from one page
`
`to the next; further, there are no visible alterations to the document. Exhibit 1007
`
`can be found within the custody of the degree-granting higher education institution.
`
`The dissertation was commercially published by the German publisher Shaker
`
`Verlag GmbH in 2007. Exhibit 1007 is a true and correct copy of O’Brien in a
`
`condition that creates no suspicion about its authenticity.
`
`39. Attached hereto as Attachment 1a is a true and correct copy of the
`
`online catalog record for this dissertation from the Technischen Universität Dresden
`
`Library, as well as its certified English translation. The catalog record indicates that
`
`the library system has three copies of the dissertation located main collection and
`
`the Electrical Engineering and Information Technology Department. I personally
`
`identified and retrieved the library catalog record that is Attachment 1a.
`
`40. Attached hereto as Attachment 1b is a true and correct copy of the
`
`MARC record for the doctoral dissertation, Inductively Coupled Radio Frequency
`
`Power Transmission System for Wireless Systems and Devices by Kathleen O’Brien
`
`obtained from the OCLC bibliographic database, as well as its certified English
`
`
`
`21 The final page of O’Brien (Ex. 1007) is page 196. This is consistent with the
`online catalog record attached hereto as Attachment 1A and the MARC record
`attached hereto as Attachment 1B, each of which state that O’Brien has 196 pages.
`19
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 020
`
`

`

`
`
`translation. I personally identified and retrieved the MARC record that is
`
`Attachment 1b. As previously noted, the library that created the record is recorded
`
`in field 040 with a unique library code. For Attachment 1b, that library code is
`
`“GBVCP,” which means that the MARC record for this book was created at the
`
`Verbundzentrale Des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (Gottingen, Germany).
`
`As can be seen in the “Entered” field in the MARC record for this exhibit, a cataloger
`
`at the Verbundzentrale Des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes created OCLC
`
`record number 255667655 on March 2, 2007, as shown in the “Entered” field
`
`(“20070302”).
`
`41. Thus, as of its cataloging, the publication corresponding to the MARC
`
`record attached hereto as Attachment 1b was indexed according to the creator (in
`
`this case Kathleen O’Brien) in field 100 and title (in this case Inductively Coupled
`
`Radio Frequency Power Transmission System for Wireless Systems and Devices) in
`
`field 245. Attachment 1b includes various German language field descriptor terms
`
`in the 650 fields that describe keywords for the particular subject matter of O’Brien.
`
`I understand that the English translation of those keywords are: “Electric power
`
`transmission,” “electromagnetic field,” “radio technology,” “inductive coupling,”
`
`“power electronics,” and “transceiver.” Thus, as of its cataloging, O’Brien was
`
`indexed according to its subject matter by the creator, title, and field 650 keyword
`
`entries, and a reasonably diligent POSA could have searched for and identified
`20
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 021
`
`

`

`
`
`O’Brien based on the author, title, or keywords. Further, as of March 2, 2007, the
`
`MARC record attached hereto as Attachment 1b was accessible through any library
`
`with access to the OCLC bibliographic database or through an individual library.
`
`42. Attachment 1b indicates that the O’Brien doctoral dissertation as
`
`cataloged at the Verbundzentrale Des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes is
`
`currently available from 10 libraries. In view of the above, this doctoral dissertation
`
`was publicly available no later than March 2, 2007, because by that date it had been
`
`received, cataloged, and indexed at the Verbundzentrale Des Gemeinsamen
`
`Bibliotheksverbundes, placed in its custody, and made part of the OCLC
`
`bibliographic database. For these reasons, it is my opinion that Exhibit 1007 was
`
`published and accessible to the public no later than March 2, 2007.
`
`VI. SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`43.
`In view of the foregoing, it is my opinion that the publication described
`
`above is authentic and was publicly available no later than the corresponding date
`
`listed in the table below:
`
`Exhibit
`
`1007
`
`Publication
`
`O'Brien, Kathleen. Inductively Coupled Radio
`Frequency Power Transmission System for
`Wireless Systems and Devices. Dissertation.
`Dresden, Germany: Technischen Universität
`Dresden, 2007.
`
`Publicly Available
`No Later Than
`March 2, 2007
`
`21
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1005
`Page 022
`
`

`

`44.
`
`In signing this Declaration, I recognize that the Declaration will be filed
`
`as evidence in a case before the Patent Tria

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket