`Subject: RE: IPR2021-01160 and IPR2021-01161 | Request for Authorization in Light of Settlement
`Date: December 16, 2021 at 12:51 PM
`To: Kristopher Davis kdavis@raklaw.com, Trials Trials@USPTO.GOV
`Cc: rak_neodron@raklaw.com, Bowen, Tyler R. (Perkins Coie) TBowen@perkinscoie.com, Campbell, Chad (Perkins Coie)
`CSCampbell@perkinscoie.com, Coughlan, James B. (Perkins Coie) JCoughlan@perkinscoie.com
`Counsel: No conference call is necessary. The parties are authorized to file a joint
`motion to terminate in each of the three subject proceedings. The parties should be
`mindful of the requirements set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`that any agreement between the parties made in connection with the termination of
`the respective proceedings must be in writing and a copy must be filed with the
`Board. To the extent the parties wish to maintain some level of confidentiality for
`such an agreement, refer to the procedures set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`With respect to having the settlement agreement treated as business confidential
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), the parties must file the confidential settlement
`electronically in the PTAB-E2E system as an exhibit in accordance with the
`instructions provided on the Board’s website (uploading as “Parties and Board
`Only”). The parties are directed to FAQ G2 on the Board’s website at
`https://www.uspto.gov/patents/ptab/ptab-e2e-frequently-asked-questions for
`instructions on how to file their settlement agreement as confidential.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`
`From: Kristopher Davis <kdavis@raklaw.com>
`Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2021 3:12 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: rak_neodron@raklaw.com; Bowen, Tyler R. (Perkins Coie)
`<TBowen@perkinscoie.com>; Campbell, Chad (Perkins Coie)
`<CSCampbell@perkinscoie.com>; Coughlan, James B. (Perkins Coie)
`<JCoughlan@perkinscoie.com>
`Subject: IPR2021-01160 and IPR2021-01161 | Request for Authorization in Light of
`Settlement
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE
`SOURCE before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`Dear Board,
`I represent Patent Owner Neodron Ltd. in IPR2021-01160 and IPR2021-01161.
`Petitioner STMicroelectronics, Inc. and Patent Owner Neodron Ltd. have reached a settlement and request
`authorization to file a joint motion to terminate IPR2021-01160 and IPR2021-01161 and to submit the settlement
`
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`authorization to file a joint motion to terminate IPR2021-01160 and IPR2021-01161 and to submit the settlement
`agreement as confidential.
`Counsel for STMicroelectronics, Inc. are copied on this email. The parties are available if there are any
`questions.
`Respectfully,
`Kris Davis
`
`Kristopher Davis
`Russ August & Kabat
`12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90025
`(310) 826-7474
`kdavis@raklaw.com
`
`Exhibit 2001
`Page 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
