Appl'n. No. 12/936,395; Amd't. dated March 6, 2013
`Reply to Office Action of October 11, 2012
`
`depend. Applicants respectfully submit that the claims, as amended and for the reasons
`
`presented subsequently, are patentable.
`
`The present invention and McCain are discussed above. Delpuch teaches a
`
`system to enable authoring of content within an interactive television environment.
`
`Claims 4 and 8-9 depend on amended Claim 1. Claims 15 and 19-20 depend on
`
`amended Claim 12.
`
`The deficiencies of McCain to teach each limitation of amended Claims 1 and 12
`
`are discussed above. Delpuch also fails to teach the claims, as amended (specifically the
`
`use of a Player and Application), and thus the combination of McCain and Delpuch fail
`
`to teach each limitation of either Claim 1 or 12, as amended.
`
`The combination of McCain and Delpuch thus cannot be used to establish a
`
`primafacie case of obviousness for any of Claims 4, 8-9, 15, and 19-20, and it is
`
`respectfully requested that the rejection of Claims 4, 8-9, 15, and 19-20 under §103(a) be
`
`withdrawn.
`
`In Paragraph 25 of the Office Action, Claims 10, 21, and 23-28 were rejected
`
`under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over McCain in view of Paddon.
`
`Applicants respectfully submit that the claims, as amended and for the reasons presented
`
`subsequently, are patentable.
`
`The present invention and McCain are discussed above.
`
`Paddon teaches device-dependent codes (UI engines 100, 101, or 102) that
`
`execute on a device (corresponding devices 111, 112, or 113) and a server system 130
`
`which interprets device-dependent codes (a "rule set"). As discussed in paragraph [0014],
`
`the UI Engine may display a UI component as requested by the application on the device
`
`by providing a request to a server system for combining a rule set for a given mobile
`
`communication device, application and screen with content obtained from a third party
`
`content provider via an adapter. The adapter allows conversion of the native format of
`
`the content on the content provider's system to a format suitable for combination with a
`
`rule set in order to form a UI component for transmittal to a mobile communication
`
`device. The rule set determines what events and data are sent back and when the events
`
`and data are sent to the rule interface component when a particular interface element for
`
`Page 13 of 16
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01022
`
`

`

`Appl'n. No. 12/936,395; Amd't. dated March 6, 2013
`Reply to Office Action of October 11, 2012
`
`example a button is asserted by a user.
`
`In short, as shown in FIG. 1, reproduced below, rule set 150 is interpreted by the
`
`server system 130, gathers information from content providers 160, etc., and then delivers
`
`content to devices 110, etc. There is no teaching or suggestion of providing device(cid:173)
`
`dependent codes (Paddon 's "rule set") to devices.
`
`Figure 1
`
`Claims 10, 21, 23 and 28 have been amended. Claim 10 depends on amended
`
`Claim 1, Claim 21 depends on amended Claim 12, and Claims 24-28 depend on amended
`
`Claim 23.
`
`Claims 10 and 21
`
`Amended Claims 10 and 21 depend on Claims 1 and 12, respectively, and recite:
`
`"such that, when the Application and Player are provided to the device, and when the
`
`Player is executed on the device, said Player interprets said Application to provide the
`
`web component corresponding to the selected UI object and dynamically received values
`
`of the web component on the display of the device." Claims 10 and 21 are patentable for
`
`at least the following reasons.
`
`Page 14 of 16
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01023
`
`

`

`Appl'n. No. 12/936,395; Amd't. dated March 6, 2013
`Reply to Office Action of October 11, 2012
`
`First, Claims 1 and 12 are amended and, for the reasons presented above,
`
`Applicants submit that McCain does not anticipate amended Claim 1. The deficiencies in
`
`McCain are not remedies by Paddon, which does not teach or suggest an authoring tool
`
`that provides both device-dependent and device-independent code. For at least this
`
`reason, the combination of McCain and Paddon cannot be used to make a prima facie
`
`case of obviousness of either Claim 1 or 12 or of dependent claims 10 or 21.
`
`Further, McCain teaches the benefits of providing a single code to the device.
`
`There is therefore no motivation within McCain to modify the teachings of McCain to
`
`incorporate incorporating device-independent codes.
`
`In addition, neither McCain nor Paddon teach an authoring tool providing both
`
`device-dependent and device-independent code to the device. McCain does not teach an
`
`authoring tool providing device-independent code to a device, and Paddon teaches
`
`providing device-independent code to a separate server.
`
`Lastly, Claim 10 and 21 recite that "when the Application and Player are provided
`
`to the device, and when the Player is executed on the device, said Player interprets said
`
`Application to provide the web component corresponding to the selected UI object and
`
`dynamically received values of the web component on the display of the device."
`
`McCain teaches a web browser which interprets web component data, and
`
`Paddon teaches that the device-independent code (the rule set) resides on a server
`
`different from the device.
`
`For any of these reasons, a primafacie case of obviousness cannot be made
`
`regarding either of Claims 10 or 21, and Applications respectfully request that the
`
`rejection of Claims 10 and 21 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) be withdrawn.
`
`Claims 23-28
`
`Claims 24-28 depend on Claim 23. Claim 23 has been amended to recite, in part,
`
`a method ... comprising:
`
`accepting a first code over the network, where said first code is device(cid:173)
`
`dependent;
`
`providing a second code over the network, where said second code is
`
`device-independent and includes symbolic names corresponding to a web
`
`component; and
`
`Page 15 of 16
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01024
`
`

`

`Appl'n. No. 12/936,395; Amd't. dated March 6, 2013
`Reply to Office Action of October 11, 2012
`
`executing said first code and said second code on the device to provide
`
`web components corresponding to the symbolic names over the network and in
`
`response to the second code.
`
`Claim 24-28 depend on Claim 23, which has been amended. Paragraph 28 of the
`
`Office Action states that McCain discloses the invention of the original Claim 23 with
`
`the exception of that "said second code is device-independent," and that this is taught by
`
`Paddon.
`
`As discussed above regarding the rejection of Claim 10, where the first code of
`
`Claim 23 is the Player, the second code of Claim 23 is the Application, and the third code
`
`of Claim 23 is device-independent code provided by the web component, the claims, the
`
`cited references do not teach each limitation of Claim 23, as amended.
`
`The combination of references thus fails to teach executing the claimed device(cid:173)
`
`independent and device-dependent codes to the device, as claimed.
`
`For any of these reasons, a primafacie case of obviousness cannot be made
`
`regarding of amended Claim 23 or of Claims 24-28, which depend on amended Claim 23,
`
`and Applications respectfully request that the rejection of Claims 23-28 under 35 U.S.C.
`
`103(a) be withdrawn.
`
`Applicants respectfully submit that the application is in condition for allowance
`
`and action to that end is respectfully solicited. If the Examiner should feel that a
`
`telephone interview would be productive in resolving any issues in the case, please
`
`telephone the undersigned at the number listed below.
`
`March 6, 2013
`
`1563 Solano Ave., #206
`Berkeley, CA 94705
`Tel: (510) 841-4711; Fax: (510) 280-2984
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/Steven R. Vosen/
`Steven R. Vosen
`Registration No. 45,186
`
`Page 16 of 16
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01025
`
`

`

`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`12936395
`
`03-Nov-201 0
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING INFORMATION ON MOBILE
`DEVICES
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Steven H. Rempell
`
`Filer:
`
`Steven R Vosen/Christine Chan
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`XPR.002US0
`
`Filed as Small Entity
`
`U.S. National Stage under 35 USC 371 Filing Fees
`
`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USO($)
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Pages:
`
`Claims:
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Petition:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-Interference:
`
`Post-Allowance-and-Post-Issuance:
`
`Extension-of-Time:
`
`Extension - 2 months with $0 paid
`
`2252
`
`1
`
`285
`
`285
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01026
`
`

`

`Description
`
`Fee Code
`
`Quantity
`
`Amount
`
`Sub-Total in
`USO($)
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Total in USD ($)
`
`285
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01027
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`EFSID:
`
`Application Number:
`
`15137804
`
`12936395
`
`International Application Number:
`
`Confirmation Number:
`
`2369
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING INFORMATION ON MOBILE
`DEVICES
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Steven H. Rempell
`
`Customer Number:
`
`40280
`
`Filer:
`
`Steven R Vosen/Christine Chan
`
`Filer Authorized By:
`
`Steven R Vosen
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`XPR.002US0
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`Filing Date:
`
`Time Stamp:
`
`06-MAR-2013
`
`03-NOV-2010
`
`19:52:38
`
`Application Type:
`
`U.S. National Stage under 35 USC 371
`
`Payment information:
`
`Submitted with Payment
`
`Payment Type
`
`Payment was successfully received in RAM
`
`RAM confirmation Number
`
`yes
`
`Credit Card
`
`$285
`
`9732
`
`Deposit Account
`
`Authorized User
`
`File Listing:
`Document I
`Number
`
`Document Description
`
`File Name
`
`I
`
`File Size(Bytes)/ I Multi I Pages
`(if appl.)
`Message Digest
`Part /.zip
`
`I
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01028
`
`

`

`1
`
`Transmittal Letter
`
`XPR002US0_ Transmittal_Form
`_v2.pdf
`
`149389
`
`eb7ab7f466cd32cdd32791 c3a 18e3f822f9b
`e091
`
`no
`
`1
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`2
`
`Extension of Time
`
`XPR002US0_Extension_of_ Tim
`e_v2.pdf
`
`55770
`
`38eaff1 9735ab03fbc02a59ce912045355ef
`d63b
`
`no
`
`1
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`3
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`XPR002_Resp_OA_v4.pdf
`
`yes
`
`16
`
`171276
`
`e3f3 944 34 28fc 7 d 9fad4405 cd4a22df24 7 ec
`847d
`
`Multipart Description/PDF files in .zip description
`
`Document Description
`
`Start
`
`End
`
`Amendment/Req. Reconsideration-After Non-Final Reject
`
`Claims
`
`Applicant Arguments/Remarks Made in an Amendment
`
`1
`
`6
`
`16
`
`1
`
`2
`
`7
`
`30588
`
`4
`
`Fee Worksheet (5B06)
`
`fee-info.pdf
`
`no
`
`2
`
`d311 dc2988576957bb58b483858ec9acdd
`075453
`
`Warnings:
`
`Information:
`
`Total Files Size (in bytes)
`
`407023
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01029
`
`

`

`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`If a new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)-(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`If a timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EO/903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 181 O), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/1 OS) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01030
`
`

`

`Doc Code: TRAN.LET
`Document Description: Transmittal Letter
`
`PTO/SB/21 (07-09)
`Approved for use through 07/31/2012. 0MB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`.
`.
`.
`.
`
`TRANSMITTAL
`FORM
`
`(to be used for all correspondence after initial filing)
`
`Total Number of Pages in This Submission
`
`Filing Date
`
`First Named Inventor
`
`Art Unit
`
`Examiner Name
`
`Attorney Docket Number
`
`November 3. 2010
`
`Steven H. Rempell
`
`2178
`
`XuYang Xia
`
`XPR.002US0
`
`ENCLOSURES
`
`(Check all that apply)
`
`[Z]
`
`[Z]
`
`Fee Transmittal Form
`
`Drawing(s)
`
`[Z]
`
`Fee Attached
`
`Amendment/Reply
`
`After Final
`
`Provisional Application
`
`Affidavits/declaration(s)
`
`Change of Correspondence Address
`
`Extension of Time Request
`
`□
`□ Licensing-related Papers
`□ Petition
`□ Petition to Convert to a
`□
`□ Power of Attorney, Revocation
`□
`[Z]
`□ Terminal Disclaimer
`□ Express Abandonment Request □ Request for Refund
`□ Information Disclosure Statement □ CD, Number of CD(s)
`□ Landscape Table on CD
`□ Certified Copy of Priority
`□ Reply to Missing Parts/
`□ Reply to Missing Parts
`
`of Appeals and Interferences
`
`(Appeal Notice, Brief, Reply Brief)
`
`Proprietary Information
`
`□ After Allowance Communication to TC
`□ Appeal Communication to Board
`□ Appeal Communication to TC
`□
`□ Status Letter
`□ Other Enclosure(s) (please Identify
`
`below):
`
`I
`I Remarks
`This Response is in reply to the Office Action that w;is m;iiled on October 11, ~!01 ~!
`
`Document(s)
`
`Incomplete Application
`
`under 37 CFR 1.52 or 1.53
`
`SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT, ATTORNEY, OR AGENT
`
`Firm Name
`
`Signature
`
`Printed name
`
`Date
`
`r
`
`/Steven R. Voseni
`
`Steven R. Vosen
`
`March 6, 2013
`
`I Reg. No. 145,186
`
`CERTIFICATE OF TRANSMISSION/MAILING
`
`""
`
`I hereby certify that this correspondence is being facsimile transmitted to the USPTO or deposited with the United States Postal Service with
`sufficient postage as first class mail in an envelope addressed to: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 on
`the date shown below:
`Signature
`
`\!::yped or printed name
`
`I Date I
`
`This collection of information is required by 37 CFR 1.5. The information is required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which is to file (and by the USPTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.11 and1 .14. This collection is estimated to 2 hours to complete, including
`gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the
`amount of time you require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and
`Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`
`If you need assistance in completing the form, ca/11-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01031
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/22 (10-12)
`Approved for use through 1/31/2013. 0MB 0651-0031
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are reauired to resoond to a coiiection of information un:ess it disp:avs a valid 0MB controi number.
`Docket Number (Optional)
`PETITION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME UNDER 37 CFR 1.136(a) XPR.002US0
`
`I Filed November 3, 2010
`I Examiner Xu Yang Xia
`
`Application Number 121936 395
`'
`SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PRESENTING INFORMATION ON MOBILE DEVICES
`1-\rt Uni1
`
`For
`
`2178
`
`This is a request under the provisions of 37 CFR 1 136(a) to extend the period for fiiing a reply in the above-identified application.
`
`The requested extension and fee are as foilows (check time period desired and enter the appropriate fee below):
`
`Ft~e
`
`Smail Enlily Fee
`
`$150
`
`$570
`
`$1,290
`
`$2,010
`
`$2,730
`
`D One month (37 CFR 1.17(a)(1))
`[I Two months (37 CFR 1 17(a)(2))
`D Three months (37 CFR 1 17(a)(3))
`D Four months (37 CFR 1.17(a)(4))
`D Five months (37 CFR 'I .17(aJ(5))
`Ill Applicant claims small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27.
`D A check in the amount of the fee is enclosed.
`D Payment by credit card. Form PTO-2038 is attached.
`D The Director has already been authorized to charge fees in this application to a Deposit Account.
`D The Director is hereby authorized to charge any fees which may be required, or credit any overpayment, to
`
`$75
`
`$285
`
`$645
`
`$1,005
`
`$1,365
`
`$ _______ _
`$285
`
`$ _______ _
`
`$ _______ _
`
`$ _______ _
`
`Deposit 1-\ccount Number ____________ _
`[iii Payment made via EFS-\Neb.
`
`WARNING: Information on this form may become public. Credit card information should not be included on this form. Provide
`credit card information and authorization on PT0-2038.
`
`I am the
`
`D applicant/inventor.
`D assignee of record of the entire interest. See 37 CFR 3. 71. 37 CFR 3.73(b) statement is enclosed (Form PTO/SBl9f3).
`[ii attorney or agent of record. Registration number _4_5_, 1_8_6 _________ _
`D attorney or agent acting under 37 CFR 1.34. Registration number _____________ _
`
`/Steven R. Vosen/
`Signature
`
`Steven R Vosen
`Typed or printed name
`
`March 6, 2013
`
`Date
`(510) 841-4711
`Telephone Number
`
`NOTE: This form must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 1.33. See 37 CFR 1.4 for signature requirements and certifications. Submit
`muiliole forms if more than one sianalure is required, see below•.
`
`D * Total of ________ forms are submitted.
`
`This co!lection of information is required by 37 CFR 1 :I 36{a). The information is required to obtain or retain a benetit by the public, which is to file (and by the
`US PTO to process) an app!k:at:on Confaientiality is governed ~;y 35 U.S.C. i 22 and 37 CFR 1.1 i anLi 1.14. This coliection is esUrnated to take 6 n1inutes to
`complete, including gathering, preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. T,me wil: vary depending upon the incl,viciuai case. Any
`comments on the arnount of t!rne you requ!r-e to complete th!s form and/or suggest!ons for reducin[~ th!s burden shou!d l1e sent to the Chief inforrnation Otticer,
`US. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Aiexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS
`TO THIS ADDRESS. SEND TO: Maii Stop PCT, Comm,ssioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01032
`
`

`

`PTO/SB/06 (07-06)
`Approved for use through 1/31/2007. 0MB 0651-0032
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid 0MB control number.
`PATENT APPLICATION FEE DETERMINATION RECORD
`Application or Docket Number
`Filing Date
`11/03/2010 □ To be Mailed
`12/936,395
`Substitute for Form PTO-875
`
`APPLICATION AS FILED- PART I
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`FOR
`
`NUMBER FILED
`
`NUMBER EXTRA
`
`SMALL ENTITY [8J
`RATE($)
`FEE($)
`
`OR
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`RATE($)
`
`FEE($)
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(a), (b), or (c))
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(k), (i), or (ml)
`
`□ BASIC FEE
`□ SEARCH FEE
`□ EXAMINATION FEE
`
`(37 CFR 1.16(0), (p), or (q))
`TOTAL CLAIMS
`(37 CFR 1.16(i))
`INDEPENDENT CLAIMS
`(37 CFR 1.16(h))
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`minus 20 =
`
`minus 3 =
`
`*
`
`*
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`X $
`
`X $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`N/A
`
`OR
`
`X $
`
`X $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`□APPLICATION SIZE FEE
`(37 CFR 1.16(s))
`
`If the specification and drawings exceed 100
`sheets of paper, the application size fee due
`is $250 ($125 for small entity) for each
`additional 50 sheets or fraction thereof. See
`35 U.S.C. 41 (a)(1 )(G) and 37 CFR 1.16(s).
`□ MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM PRESENT (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`* If the difference in column 1 is less than zero, enter "O" in column 2.
`
`TOTAL
`
`TOTAL
`
`APPLICATION AS AMENDED - PART II
`
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`(Column 3)
`
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`OR
`
`OTHER THAN
`SMALL ENTITY
`
`03/06/2013
`
`RATE($)
`
`RATE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`f--
`AFTER
`z
`AMENDMENT
`w
`Total (37 CFR
`· 28
`~ 1.16(i))
`0
`z
`Independent
`* 3
`w
`(37 CFR 1 .16fh\\
`~ D Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`□ FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`** 28
`***3
`
`PRESENT
`EXTRA
`
`= 0
`= 0
`
`Minus
`
`Minus
`
`<(
`
`(Column 1)
`
`(Column 2)
`
`(Column 3)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`X $31 =
`
`X $125 =
`
`TOTAL
`ADD'L
`FEE
`
`0
`0
`
`0
`
`OR
`
`X $
`
`OR
`
`X $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`OR
`
`OR
`
`TOTAL
`ADD'L
`FEE
`
`CLAIMS
`REMAINING
`AFTER
`AMENDMENT
`
`HIGHEST
`NUMBER
`PREVIOUSLY
`PAID FOR
`
`*
`
`*
`
`Minus
`
`**
`
`Minus
`
`***
`
`=
`
`=
`
`f--
`z
`Total (37 CFR
`w
`1.16(i\\
`~ Independent
`0
`(37 CFR 1.16(hll
`z D Application Size Fee (37 CFR 1.16(s))
`w
`~
`□ FIRST PRESENTATION OF MULTIPLE DEPENDENT CLAIM (37 CFR 1.16(j))
`<(
`
`PRESENT
`EXTRA
`
`RATE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`RATE($)
`
`ADDITIONAL
`FEE($)
`
`X $
`
`X $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`OR
`
`X $
`
`OR
`
`X $
`
`=
`
`=
`
`OR
`
`* If the entry in column 1 is less than the entry in column 2, write "0" in column 3.
`** If the "Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 20, enter "20".
`*** If the "Highest Number Previously Paid For" IN THIS SPACE is less than 3, enter "3".
`The "Highest Number Previously Paid For" (Total or Independent) is the highest number found in the appropriate box in column 1.
`
`TOTAL
`TOTAL
`ADD'L
`ADD'L
`FEE
`FEE
`Legal Instrument Examiner:
`/STELLA LITTLE/
`
`OR
`
`This collection of 1nformat1on 1s required by 37 CFR 1.16. The 1nformat1on 1s required to obtain or retain a benefit by the public which 1s to file (and by the US PTO to
`process) an application. Confidentiality is governed by 35 U.S.C. 122 and 37 CFR 1.14. This collection is estimated to take 12 minutes to complete, including gathering,
`preparing, and submitting the completed application form to the USPTO. Time will vary depending upon the individual case. Any comments on the amount of time you
`require to complete this form and/or suggestions for reducing this burden, should be sent to the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S.
`Department of Commerce, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450. DO NOT SEND FEES OR COMPLETED FORMS TO THIS
`ADDRESS. SEND TO: Commissioner for Patents, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450.
`If you need assistance in completing the form, call 1-800-PTO-9199 and select option 2.
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01033
`
`

`

`UNITED STA IBS p A IBNT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STA TES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria., Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`12/936,395
`
`11/03/2010
`
`Steven H. Rempell
`
`XPR.002US0
`
`2369
`
`40280
`7590
`SIBVEN VOSEN
`1563 SOLANO A VENUE #206
`BERKELEY, CA 94707
`
`04/01/2013
`
`EXAMINER
`
`XIA,XUYANG
`
`ART UNIT
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`2178
`
`MAIL DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`04/01/2013
`
`PAPER
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01034
`
`

`

`Office Action Summary
`
`Application No.
`
`Applicant(s)
`
`12/936,395
`
`Examiner
`
`REMPELL ET AL.
`
`Art Unit
`
`2178
`XUYANG XIA
`-- The MAILING DA TE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address -(cid:173)
`Period for Reply
`
`A SHORTENED STATUTORY PERIOD FOR REPLY IS SET TO EXPIRE ;J. MONTH(S) OR THIRTY (30) DAYS,
`WHICHEVER IS LONGER, FROM THE MAILING DATE OF THIS COMMUNICATION.
`Extensions of time may be available under the provisions of 37 CFR 1.136(a). In no event, however, may a reply be timely filed
`after SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`If NO period for reply is specified above, the maximum statutory period will apply and will expire SIX (6) MONTHS from the mailing date of this communication.
`Failure to reply within the set or extended period for reply will, by statute, cause the application to become ABANDONED (35 U.S.C. § 133).
`Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of this communication, even if timely filed, may reduce any
`earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
`
`Status
`
`1 )IZI Responsive to communication(s) filed on 06 March 2013.
`2a)IZI This action is FINAL.
`2b)O This action is non-final.
`3)0 An election was made by the applicant in response to a restriction requirement set forth during the interview on
`__ ; the restriction requirement and election have been incorporated into this action.
`4)0 Since this application is in condition for allowance except for formal matters, prosecution as to the merits is
`closed in accordance with the practice under Ex parte Quayle, 1935 G.D. 11, 453 O.G. 213.
`
`Disposition of Claims
`
`5)1Zl Claim(s) 1-28 is/are pending in the application.
`5a) Of the above claim(s) __ is/are withdrawn from consideration.
`6)0 Claim(s) __ is/are allowed.
`7)1Zl Claim(s) 1-28 is/are rejected.
`8)0 Claim(s) __ is/are objected to.
`9)0 Claim(s) __ are subject to restriction and/or election requirement.
`
`* If any claims have been determined allowable, you may be eligible to benefit from the Patent Prosecution Highway
`program at a participating intellectual property office for the corresponding application. For more information, please see
`htto:/iwww.uspto.aov/oatents/init events/pph/index.is_p or send an inquiry to PPHfeedback@uspto.qov.
`
`Application Papers
`
`10)0 The specification is objected to by the Examiner.
`11 )IZI The drawing(s) filed on 04 October 2010 is/are: a)IZI accepted or b)O objected to by the Examiner.
`Applicant may not request that any objection to the drawing(s) be held in abeyance. See 37 CFR 1.85(a).
`
`Replacement drawing sheet(s) including the correction is required if the drawing(s) is objected to. See 37 CFR 1.121 (d).
`
`Priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119
`
`12)0 Acknowledgment is made of a claim for foreign priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(a)-(d) or (f).
`a)O All b)O Some * c)O None of:
`1.0 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received.
`2.0 Certified copies of the priority documents have been received in Application No. __ .
`3.0 Copies of the certified copies of the priority documents have been received in this National Stage
`application from the International Bureau (PCT Rule 17.2(a)).
`*Seethe attached detailed Office action for a list of the certified copies not received.
`
`Attachment{s)
`1) [8J Notice of References Cited (PTO-892)
`2) 0 Information Disclosure Statement(s) (PTO/SB/08)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date __ .
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`PTOL-326 (Rev. 09-12)
`
`3) 0 Interview Summary (PTO-413)
`Paper No(s)/Mail Date. __ .
`4) 0 Other: __ .
`
`Office Action Summary
`
`Part of Paper No./Mail Date 20130312
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01035
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/936,395
`Art Unit: 2178
`
`Page 2
`
`DETAILED ACTION
`
`This final rejection is in response to the amendment filed on: 3/6/2013.
`
`Claims 1,3-7 10, 12, 14-18,21-25 and 28 are amended. Thus, claims 1-28 are pending.
`
`The following rejections are withdrawn, in view of new grounds of rejection necessitated
`
`by applicant's amendments:
`
`Claims 1-3,5-7,11-14,16-18,22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) as being
`
`anticipated by McCain US Patent Application Publication No.: 2005/0273705.
`
`Claims 4,8-9,15,19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`McCain US Patent Application Publication No.: 2005/0273705 in view of Delpuch et
`
`al. US Patent Application Publication No.: 2004/0055017.
`
`Claims 10,21,23-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over
`
`McCain US Patent Application Publication No.: 2005/0273705 in view of Paddon et
`
`al. US Patent Application Publication No: 2006/0063518
`
`Claim Objections - 35 USC§ 101
`
`1.
`
`35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows:
`
`Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of
`matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the
`conditions and requirements of this title.
`
`Claims 1-11 are objected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as not falling within one of the
`
`four statutory categories of invention. Claims 1-11 are non-statutory because claims 1:
`
`11..are directed to a system that does not have any physical structural elements. The
`
`system of claims 1-11
`
`include a database and an authoring tool. The broadest
`
`reasonable
`
`interpretation of
`
`the claims means
`
`it
`
`includes an entirely software
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01036
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/936,395
`Art Unit: 2178
`
`Page 3
`
`implementation. The body of the claims is directed to software component alone, With
`
`no other structure in the independent claim to rely on, the alleged "system" of the claims
`
`turns out to be an abstract idea for being a computer program per se, and, thus, does
`
`not fit within the definition of the categories of patentable subject matter set forth in §
`
`101. Therefore, the claims are non-statutory.
`
`Note that Applicant may resolve the deficiency through use of the suggestion in
`
`the OG notice, but that it is not the sole manner of correction. Either way, ensure the
`
`new claim terminology has antecedent basis in the specification (37 CFR 1.75(d)(1) and
`
`MPEP 608.01 (o)) and note that "rephrasing" the specification is acceptable and would
`
`normally be supported by the original disclosure so as not to constitute new matter
`
`(MPEP 2163.07).
`
`Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103
`
`2.
`
`The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all
`
`obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action:
`
`(a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set
`forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and
`the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the
`invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains.
`Patentability shall not be negatived by the manner in which the invention was made.
`
`The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148
`USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining
`obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) are summarized as follows:
`1.
`Determining the scope and contents of the prior art.
`2.
`Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue.
`3.
`Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art.
`4.
`Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating
`obviousness or nonobviousness.
`
`IPR2021-01145 Page 01037
`
`

`

`Application/Control Number: 12/936,395
`Art Unit: 2178
`
`Page 4
`
`3.
`
`Claims 1-3,5-7,10-14,16-18,21-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being
`
`unpatentable over McCain US Patent Application Publication No.: 2005/0273705 in
`
`view of Sidman US Patent Application Publication No.: 20040163020 and Paddon
`
`et al. US Patent Application Publication No: 2006/0063518.
`
`In regard to claim 1, McCain discloses the claimed invention (Currently
`
`Amended): A system (Paragraph [0002]) for generating code (paragraph [0081]) to
`
`provide content on a display of a device, (paragraph [0041], [0042]) said system
`
`comprising: a database obtainable over a network, (Fig. 1, paragraph [0070]) an
`
`authoring tool (paragraph [0023] ) configured to: define a user interface illll_object for
`
`presentation on the display, (paragraph [0072]) seleet a where said UI object
`
`corresponds to a web component of a web service included in said registry, (paragraph
`
`[0072]-[0073],[0080], [0109]-[0113], see below for registry) produce an Application.
`
`(paragraph [0109]-[0113])
`
`But McCain fails to explicitly teach "a database including a registry of one or
`
`more web components related to inputs and/or outputs of a web service , where each
`
`web component includes the symbolic names of inputs and/or outputs associated with
`
`teach web services; included in said registry, select a symbolic name from said web
`
`component corresponding to the defined UI object, associate said objeet with said the
`
`selected symbolic name with the defined UI obiect, produce an Application including the
`
`selected symbolic name of the defined UI obiect and symbolic name as