throbber
Ex. 3003
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Trials
`Thursday, March 17, 2022 12:05 PM
`Keese, Daniel T. (POR); Trials
`'allison.lucier@hklaw.com'; 'benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com'; 'bradford.cangro@pvuslaw.com';
`'brian.bozzo@klgates.com'; 'erik.halverson@klgates.com'; 'gbgulliver65@gmail.com'; 'Greg Gulliver';
`'jacob.baron@hklaw.com'; 'jeremy.peterson@pvuslaw.com'; 'meredith@addyhart.com';
`robert@addyhart.com; *Keese-ptab; *Tessar-ptab; 'td-ptab@devlinlawfirm.com';
`'TCLSisvelIPRService@pvuslaw.com'; *Perkins Service Sisvel IPR; 'Cradlepoint-IPRService@hklaw.com';
`'litigation-dkt@addyhart.com'; 'SISVELII.IPR.SERVICE@klgates.com'
`RE: IPR2021-01141: Motion Filed - Cradlepoint, Inc. v. 3G Licensing S.A.
`
`Counsel:  No further briefing is necessary at this time.  Decisions on motions in cases related to IPR2021‐00584, ‐580 
`(e.g., IPR2021‐01141) will be held in abeyance until a decision is reached in the ‐580 and ‐584 proceedings.  Should 
`additional briefing be necessary, in any proceeding, regarding Patent Owner’s Request for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mr. 
`Neil Benchell, the Board will issue an order. 
`
`Thank you, 
`
`Maria King 
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials 
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board 
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office 
`703‐756‐1288 
`
`From: Keese, Daniel T. (POR) <DKeese@perkinscoie.com>  
`Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2022 7:07 PM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: 'allison.lucier@hklaw.com' <allison.lucier@hklaw.com>; 'benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com' 
`<benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com>; 'bradford.cangro@pvuslaw.com' <bradford.cangro@pvuslaw.com>; 
`'brian.bozzo@klgates.com' <brian.bozzo@klgates.com>; 'erik.halverson@klgates.com' <erik.halverson@klgates.com>; 
`'gbgulliver65@gmail.com' <gbgulliver65@gmail.com>; 'Greg Gulliver' <gbgulliver@addyhart.com>; 
`'jacob.baron@hklaw.com' <jacob.baron@hklaw.com>; 'jeremy.peterson@pvuslaw.com' 
`<jeremy.peterson@pvuslaw.com>; 'meredith@addyhart.com' <meredith@addyhart.com>; robert@addyhart.com; 
`*Keese‐ptab <Keese‐ptab@perkinscoie.com>; *Tessar‐ptab <Tessar‐ptab@perkinscoie.com>; 'td‐
`ptab@devlinlawfirm.com' <td‐ptab@devlinlawfirm.com>; 'TCLSisvelIPRService@pvuslaw.com'
`<TCLSisvelIPRService@pvuslaw.com>; *Perkins Service Sisvel IPR <PerkinsServiceSisvelIPR@perkinscoie.com>;
`'Cradlepoint‐IPRService@hklaw.com' <Cradlepoint‐IPRService@hklaw.com>; 'litigation‐dkt@addyhart.com' <litigation‐
`dkt@addyhart.com>; 'SISVELII.IPR.SERVICE@klgates.com' <SISVELII.IPR.SERVICE@klgates.com>
`Subject: RE: IPR2021‐01141: Motion Filed ‐ Cradlepoint, Inc. v. 3G Licensing S.A.
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on 
`links, or opening attachments. 
`
`Dear Board, 
`
`1
`
`

`

`I understand that the Board provided guidance today in two other IPRs (IPR2021‐00906 and IPR2021‐00908) where 
`petitioner raised issues regarding Mr. Benchell’s application.  For clarity, as in IPR2021‐00906 and IPR2021‐00908 
`proceedings, Petitioner agrees to be bound by the outcome in the IPR2021‐00580 and IPR2021‐00584 proceedings in 
`this proceeding should the Board agree to hold in abeyance this motion for admission.   
`  
`Based on the guidance in the other IPR2021‐00906 and IPR2021‐00908, Petitioner understands that no further briefing 
`needs to be filed today.  If the Board prefers additional briefing be filed in parallel in this proceeding (as opposed to 
`waiting for a determination as to those issues raised in IPR2021‐00580, ‐00584), Petitioner respectfully requests a 
`similar briefing schedule be entered in this proceeding outlining page limits and due dates for the opposition. 
`  
`Thank you, 

`Daniel Keese | Perkins Coie LLP
`SENIOR COUNSEL
`1120 N.W. Couch Street Tenth Floor
`Portland, OR 97209-4128
`D. +1.503.727.2132
`F. +1.503.346.2132
`E. DKeese@perkinscoie.com

`From: Keese, Daniel T. (POR)  
`Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 1:08 PM 
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV> 
`Cc: allison.lucier@hklaw.com; benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com; bradford.cangro@pvuslaw.com; 
`brian.bozzo@klgates.com; erik.halverson@klgates.com; gbgulliver65@gmail.com; Greg Gulliver 
`<gbgulliver@addyhart.com>; jacob.baron@hklaw.com; jeremy.peterson@pvuslaw.com; meredith@addyhart.com; 
`robert@addyhart.com; *Keese‐ptab <Keese‐ptab@perkinscoie.com>; *Tessar‐ptab <Tessar‐ptab@perkinscoie.com>; td‐
`ptab@devlinlawfirm.com; TCLSisvelIPRService@pvuslaw.com; *Perkins Service Sisvel IPR 
`<PerkinsServiceSisvelIPR@perkinscoie.com>; Cradlepoint‐IPRService@hklaw.com; litigation‐dkt@addyhart.com; 
`SISVELII.IPR.SERVICE@klgates.com 
`Subject: RE: IPR2021‐01141: Motion Filed ‐ Cradlepoint, Inc. v. 3G Licensing S.A. 

`Dear Board, 
`  
`I am counsel for Petitioner in the above captioned matter.  Patent Owner recently filed a motion for admission pro hac 
`vice for Mr. Neil Benchell in this matter (below) and Petitioner has indicated its opposition.  Petitioner is currently also 
`opposing the admission of Mr. Benchell in IPR2021‐00580, IPR2021‐00584, and IPR2021‐00640, and the Parties are in 
`the middle of the as‐ordered briefing schedule in two proceedings IPR2021‐00580 and IPR2021‐00584, while the briefing 
`in IPR2021‐00640 has been paused pending the outcome of ‐00580 and ‐00584.   
`
`  
`Petitioner notes that the issues raised here are substantially similar to those previously briefed, with the additional twist 
`of additional misstatements in Mr. Benchell’s declaration here that were not at issue for his previous motions.  See, e.g., 
`Ex. 2009, Benchell Dec. at ¶¶8‐9 (attesting that Mr. Benchell has been admitted in IPR2021‐00580 and IPR2021‐00584 
`and that Petitioner sought to have his admission revoked; but he has not been admitted; see generally IPR2021‐00580 
`and IPR2021‐00584); ¶¶7, 10 (attesting that there is no evidence that Mr. Benchell was on the 2014 NJ list; but 
`Petitioner submitted exactly such evidence in IPR2021‐00580 at Paper 36 at 3 (citing Exhibit 1017) and Exhibit 1017 
`(noting the New Jersey Supreme court sent notice to each pro hac vice attorney, and stating that “every reasonable 
`effort has been made…to notify all pro hac vice attorneys of their obligations”)).  
`  
`If the Board prefers briefing be filed in parallel in this proceeding (as opposed to waiting for a determination as to those 
`issues raised in IPR2021‐00580, ‐00584), Petitioner respectfully requests a similar briefing schedule be entered in this 
`proceeding outlining page limits and due dates for the opposition. 
`
`  
`Thank you, 
`
`2
`
`

`

`Daniel Keese | Perkins Coie LLP
`SENIOR COUNSEL
`1120 N.W. Couch Street Tenth Floor
`Portland, OR 97209-4128
`D. +1.503.727.2132
`F. +1.503.346.2132
`E. DKeese@perkinscoie.com

`From: PTABE2E_System@uspto.gov <PTABE2E_System@uspto.gov>  
`Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2022 5:54 PM 
`To: *Keese‐ptab <Keese‐ptab@perkinscoie.com>; td‐ptab@devlinlawfirm.com; *Tessar‐ptab <Tessar‐
`ptab@perkinscoie.com> 
`Cc: allison.lucier@hklaw.com; amu@bannerwitcoff.com; benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com; 
`bradford.cangro@pvuslaw.com; brian.bozzo@klgates.com; ckronenthal@bannerwitcoff.com; 
`erik.halverson@klgates.com; gbgulliver65@gmail.com; jacob.baron@hklaw.com; jeremy.peterson@pvuslaw.com; 
`jhutchins@bannerwitcoff.com; meredith@addyhart.com; robert@addyhart.com; wjones@bannerwitcoff.com 
`Subject: IPR2021‐01141: Motion Filed ‐ Cradlepoint, Inc. v. 3G Licensing S.A. 

`

`  
`

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`Motion Filed Notice 
`
`AIA Review No.:  
`IPR2021‐01141  
`Petitioner:  
`Cradlepoint, Inc. et al.  
`Patent Owner:  
`3G Licensing S.A.  
`Patent No.:  
`7215653  
`Motion Filing Party:  Patent Owner  
`Motion Type:  
`Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice  
`Motion Filing Date:   03/09/2022  
`Submitted By:  
`Timothy Devlin, td‐ptab@devlinlawfirm.com 
`
`The motion and related document(s), if any, have been filed. 
`
`The following document(s) has/have been filed. 
`
`Document(s) List 
`
`3
`
`

`

`No. Document 
`No. 
`
`Document 
`Type 
`
`Document Name 
`
`1 
`
`2 
`
`3 
`
`4 
`
`5 
`
`6 
`
`27 
`
`2005 
`
`2006 
`
`2007 
`
`2008 
`
`2009 
`
`Motion 
`
`Patent Owner's Motion for Pro Hac Vice 
`Admission of Mr. Neil Benchell 
`
`Exhibit 
`
`Exhibit 2005 
`
`Exhibit 
`
`Exhibit 2006 
`
`Exhibit 
`
`Exhibit 2007 
`
`Exhibit 
`
`Exhibit 2008 
`
`Exhibit 
`
`Exhibit 2009 ‐ Affidavit of Neil Benchell 
`
`Filing 
`Party 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`Patent 
`Owner 
`
`Availability 
`
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`Available for 
`everyone. 
`
`Questions regarding this receipt should be directed to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board at 571‐272‐7822 or e‐mail to 
`Trials@uspto.gov. 
`
`This e‐mail is computer‐generated. Do not reply to this e‐mail because the e‐mail box is not monitored. 
`


`
`
`NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply email and
`immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you. 
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket