throbber
Vol. 16 Nos. 9-10, October 2006
`
`N•mromuscular disorders : NMD.(IM)
`v. '16. no. 9-10 {Oct. 20%)
`· GP.n ;:! r:il Collf:c!ion
`1.r..t 1 NE.'!:37C8
`2006-10-1 i -~
`
`16 (9-10) 541-736
`ISSN 0960-8966
`
`Editor-in-Chief
`V Dubowitz UK
`Associate Editors
`AG Engel USA
`L Merlini Italy
`F M S Tome France
`T Voit Germany
`
`This issue includes abstracts for the
`11th INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF
`THE WORLD MUSCLE SOCIETY
`Bruges, Belgium,
`4-7 October 2006
`
`0
`
`PROPERlY OF THE
`NATIONALl>~/
`LIBRARY OF / ~ I
`MEDICINE
`.J
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`PERGAMON
`
`Official Journal of the World Muscle Society
`
`

`

`© 2006 Elsevier 13.V. All rights reserved.
`This journal and the individual contributions contained in it arc protected under copyright by Elsevier IJ.V., and the following terms and
`conditions apply to their use:
`Photocopying
`Single photocopies of single articles may be made for personal use as allowed by national copyright laws. Permission of the Publisher and
`payment of a fee is required for all other photocopying, including multiple or systematic copying, copying for advertising or promotional
`purposes, resale, and all forms of document delivery. Special rates are available for educational institutions that wish to make photocopies
`for non-profit educational classroom use.
`Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier's Rights Department: phone (+I) 215 239 3804; fax (+I) 215 239 3805, c-111::·1:
`healthpcrmissions@elscvier.com. Requests may also be completed on-line via the Elsevier homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/loc,.tc/
`permissions).
`In the USA, users may clear permissions and make payment through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers,
`MA 01923, USA; phone: (+I) (978) 7508400, fax: (+I) (978) 7504744, and in the UK through the Copyright Licensing Agency Rapid
`Clearance Service (CLARCS), 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WIP OLP, UK; phone: (+44) 20 7631 5555; fax: (+44) 20 7631 5500.
`Other countries may have a local reprographic rights agency for payments.
`Derivative Works
`Subscribers may reproduce tables of contents or prepare lists of articles including abstracts for internal circulation within their institutions.
`Permission of the Publisher is required for resale or distribution outside the institution.
`Permission of the Publisher is required for all other derivative works, including compilations and translations.
`Electronic Storage or Usage
`Permission of the Publisher is required to store or use electronically any material contained in this journal, including any article or part of an
`article.
`Except as outlined above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any
`means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Publisher.
`Address permissions requests to: Elsevier Rights Department, at the fax and e-mail addresses noted above.
`Notice
`No responsibility is assumed by the Publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability,
`negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein.
`Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made.
`Although all advertising material is expected to conform to ethical (medical) standards, inclusion in this publication docs not constitute a
`guarantee or endorsement of the quality or value of such product or of the claims made of it by its manufacturer.
`@) The paper used in this publication meets the requirements of ANSI/NI SO Z39.48-l992 (Permanence of Paper).
`
`Author enquiries
`For enquiries relating lo the submission of artick:s (including ckctronic submission where available) please visit the Author Gateway frc:11
`Elsevier at http://authors.clsevier.com. The Author (iatcway also provides the facility to track accepted articles and set up e-mail alerts to
`inform you of when an article's status has changcd. as well as detailed artwork guidelines, copyright information, frequently asked questions
`and more.
`
`Contact details for questions arising after ,IL·ceplance of an article. especially those relating to proofs, arc provided after registration of an
`article for publication.
`
`

`

`This material may be protected by Copyright law (Title 17 U.S. Code)
`
`PERGAMON
`
`Neuromuscular Disorders 16 (2006) 583-590
`
`www.elsevicr.com/locatc/nmd
`
`Induced dystrophin exon skipping in human muscle explants
`
`G. McClorey a A.M. Fall '\ H.M. Moulton b' P.L. Iversen b' J.E. Rasko c
`M. Ryan <\ S. Fletcher '\ S.D. Wilton a,*
`" Erpcri111rntal Molcrnlar Afrdicinc Group. Cmtre /i1r Nc11ro11111sc11/ar and Neurological Disorders, U11irNsity (!/' Wes/em Australia,
`Nedla11,ls, IVA (,()(llJ, Australia
`b A VI 1Jiol'lwm1a Inc. 4575 SW Research Way, Suite 200, Corrnllis, OR 97333, U-S'A
`" Grne and S1e111 Cell Therapy Progra111, Ce11/1'11arr Institute of' Cm1cer Medicine and Cell !Jiology, Unil"crsity of' Syd11ey (//1// Sydney Cm1cer Centre.
`Ne1v1m,·n. NSIV 2042. Australia
`d The /11.l'litutcfi,r Neuro11111srnlar Research. The Childre11'.1· 1/ospital of' 1Ve.1·1111c1ul, Westn1c1ul. NSIV 2145, Australia
`
`Received 20 March 2006; received in revised form 15 May 2006; accepted 26 May 2006
`
`Abstract
`
`Antiscnsc oligonuclcotidc (AO) manipulation of prc-mRNA splicing of the dystrophin gene is showing promise in overcoming
`Duchcnnc muscular dystrophy (DM DJ-causing mutations. To date, this approach has been limited to studies using animal models
`or cultured human muscle cells, and evidence that AOs can induce cxon skipping in human muscle has yet to be shown . In this
`study, we used difTcrcnt AO analogues to induce cxon skipping in muscle explants derived from normal and DMD human tissue.
`We propose that inducing cxon skipping in human muscle explants is closer to in vim conditions than cells in monolaycr cultures,
`and may minimize the numbers of participants in Phase I clinical studies to demonstrate proof of principle of cxon skipping in
`human muscle.
`© 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
`
`Key1rnrds: Duchcnnc muscular dystrophy; Antiscnsc oligonucleotidcs; Exon skipping; Explant
`
`I. Introduction
`
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe
`muscle wasting disease that is typically caused by non(cid:173)
`sense or frame-shifting mutations in the dystrophin gene
`that result in the loss of functional protein [I]. Antisense
`oligonucleotides (AOs) have been used to modulate dys(cid:173)
`trophin pre-mRNA splicing to reduce the consequences
`or nonsense or frame-shifting mutations that would
`translation.
`terminated
`otherwise have prematurely
`/\Os can redirect splicing patterns by masking motifs
`
`,lhhrt'1•iatio11.I': DMD, Duchcnnc muscular dystrophy; AO, anti(cid:173)
`sense oligonuclcotides; 2OMc, 2'-O-mcthyl phosphorothioatc; PMO,
`phosphorodiamidatc morpholino oligonuclcotidc.
`• Corresponding author.
`h"-111ail addrt'.1·s: swilton (Zi)cyllcnc.uwa.cdu.au (S.D. Wilton).
`
`0%0-89(,(,/$ - sec front matter © 2006 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
`doi: I 0.1 OJ o/j.nmd .2006.05.017
`
`in the dystrophin pre-mRNA to block spliceosomc
`assembly, such that the target exon is not recognized
`by the splicing machinery [2,3]. In this manner, one or
`more targeted exons can be removed, with the flanking
`intronic regions, from the mature RNA. Selected remov(cid:173)
`al of a nonsense mutation or restoration of the reading(cid:173)
`frame around a genomic deletion or duplication should
`result in an mRNA transcript that can be translated into
`an internally shortened, yet still partially functional dys(cid:173)
`trophin. In many cases, it should be possible to predict
`the level of functionality of the induced dystrophin pro(cid:173)
`tein by comparing it with analogous rearrangements
`found in Becker muscular dystrophy, a less severe
`condition generally arising from in-frame dystrophin
`deletions [4].
`The use of AO-induced dystrophin exon skipping has
`rapidly progressed from i11 vitro mouse [3] and human [5]
`studies using cultured cells, to i11 vivo application in
`
`

`

`584
`
`G. McC/orey et al. I Ne11ro11111.1·m/ar Disorders /6 (2006) 583-590
`
`to preparation for
`·md finally
`dcls [6 7]
`I

`.
`'
`amma mo
`,
`human clinical trials [8]. Parallel human tnals a~c c:tr-
`rently envisaged where two di~er~nt AO chcm1stncs,
`2'-O-methyl modified ribose m01et1es on a ph~spl~oro(cid:173)
`thioate backbone (2OMe AO) and phos_phoro~uumdate
`morpholino oligonucleotides (PMO), _will be dirccted at
`amenable domains in the dystrophm pre-mRNA to
`induce exon skipping.
`. .
`Phase J trials will involve intramuscular _adm1111stra-
`tion of limited amounts of the compounds mto dystro-
`It is generally acknowledged that
`1 · muscle [8].
`p11c
`.
`. bl
`1·
`.
`· tramuscular delivery regimens are not a via e c 1111-
`d
`111
`•
`•
`•
`cal option for AO induced exon sk1pp1~g, smce ystr_o-
`phin exon skipping will _only. be loc~1h_zcd and pe~s1st
`for the duration of the b1olog1cal actlVlty of the ohgo(cid:173)
`nucleotides. A comprehensive series of intramuscular
`injections across the body to _address all d~stroph_ic
`muscles, including the heart, will not be applicable m
`a clinical setting, particularly since periodic readminis(cid:173)
`tration would be needed. As 2OMe AOs have not pre(cid:173)
`viously been injected into humans, initial safety and
`toxicology studies will be mandatory. It is proposed
`that the initial 2OMc AO studies in DMD patients will
`commence with administration by intramuscular injec(cid:173)
`tion [8]. Although relatively small amounts of 2OMe
`AO will be injected into dystrophic muscle, compared
`to that necessary for systemic treatment, localized AO
`concentrations will be far higher than those which
`could be achieved after systemic delivery. Whilst suc(cid:173)
`cessful induction of localized dystrophin expression
`would demonstrate proof of concept in human muscle,
`only
`limited
`information could be obtained from
`around the injection site with respect to safety, AO dis(cid:173)
`tribution
`and
`duration of
`induced
`dystrophin
`expression.
`In contrast to the 2OMe AO chemistry, PMOs have
`already undergone several human clinical trials where
`PMOs with different targeted sequences have been sys(cid:173)
`temically administered to humans in treating restenosis,
`cancer [9] and viral infections, with no drug-related
`adverse effects observed to date (http://www.antivirals.
`com/devNcugcne.html). However, for PMOs conjugat(cid:173)
`ed to peptides for enhanced cellular delivery (PMO(cid:173)
`Peps), initial safety trials will be necessary as they have
`yet to be used in humans, although testing is ongoing
`in rodent and primate models. We have recently shown
`in vivo that PMOs induce more sustained cxon skipping
`in the mdx mouse model of muscular dystrophy than the
`equivalent 2OMc AO [IO]. Proof that any AO, of either
`the 2OMc AO or PMO chemistries, can induce dystro(cid:173)
`phin cxon skipping in vivo in humans has not yet been
`demonstrated.
`In an attempt to minimize the number of intramuscu(cid:173)
`lar studies needed to provide proof of concept, we
`describe an ex vivo system to evaluate induced exon
`skipping in muscle. Hasson ct al. 2005, described the
`
`potential of micro-organs; microscopic fragments that
`preserve the tissue structure of their organ of origin, as
`a method for monitoring viral transfection and gene
`replacement [II]. We show here that muscle fragments,
`obtained after informed consent during unrelated, elec(cid:173)
`tive surgical procedures, can be transfcctcd with AOs
`to induce specific cxon skipping for up to two weeks.
`To our knowledge, this is the first time that AO induced
`exon skipping in human muscle has been reported.
`
`2. Materials and methods
`
`2.1. Sources <d' tissue
`
`Mouse muscle was taken from the tibia/is anterior of
`6 week old mdx mice. Human muscle biopsies were
`obtained from normal individuals undergoing elective
`surgery at Royal Perth Hospital after informed consent.
`Dystrophic human muscle was obtained from a DMD
`patient undergoing spinal corrective surgery, following
`informed consent, at Childrens Hospital Westmcad,
`Sydney. The dystrophin mutation in this patient had
`been identified as an cxon 3-17 deletion, which was sub(cid:173)
`in
`the exon skipping studies.
`sequently confirmed
`Human muscle was stored in DMEM (lnvitrogen, Mel(cid:173)
`bourne) with 20'1/c, FBS (lnvitrogcn) and 50 U/ml peni(cid:173)
`cillin (lnvitrogcn), 50 ftg/ml streptomycin (lnvitrogen)
`and 1.25 ftg/ml amphotcricin 8 (Sigma, Castle Hill, Aus(cid:173)
`tralia) for approximately 2 h at 4"C prior to use, whilst
`the DMD muscle was shipped on ice overnight in the
`same media.
`
`2.2. A11tise11se oligo1111cleotides
`
`The 2OMc AO, M23D(+07-18), was obtained from
`Avccia (Grangcmouth, Scotland). AOs targeting human
`dystrophin gene transcripts were synthesized in-house
`on an Expedite 8909 nucleic acid synthesizer (Applied
`Biosystems, Melbourne) using the I ftmol thioate syn(cid:173)
`thesis protocol. PM Os were synthesized at A VI Bio(cid:173)
`l'harma, USA as described elsewhere [ 12]. The cell
`penetrating peptide conjugated
`to PMO has
`the
`sequence or (RXR) 4XB where X and B represent 6-
`aminohexanic acid and beta-alanine, respectively. The
`peptide was synthesized using standard FMOC chemis(cid:173)
`try and purified to >90'1/., purity by/\ VI BioPharma.
`
`2.3. Exposure of' tissue exp/ants to a11ti,1·c'11.1·e
`oligo1111cleoti<les
`
`Muscle was dissected into small fragments, approxi(cid:173)
`mately 2-3 mm 3 and infused in an OptiMEM (lnvitro(cid:173)
`gcn, Australia) -AO solution with 50 U/ml penicillin,
`50 ftg/ml streptomycin and 1.25 pg/ml amphotericin B.
`containing either uncomplcxed 2OMc AOs, PMOs or
`PMO-Pcp. AOs were directed to either dystrophin exon
`
`

`

`G. AfrC/orey el al. I Ne11ro11111sm/ar Disorders 16 (2006) 583--590
`
`585
`
`Table I
`Sequences or antisense oligonucleotides used in this study
`
`Description
`
`Mouse exon 23 2OMe AO
`11 uman exon 6 AO
`lluman exon 8 AO
`Human exon 18 AO
`lluman exon 19 AO
`1 luman exon 20A AO
`lluman cxon 20B AO
`
`Nomenclature
`
`M23D(+07-18)
`I I06A{ +69+9 I)
`H0SA(-06+18)
`1118/\(+24+53)
`1119A(+35+65)
`ll20A{+44+71)
`1120A(l47+168)
`
`Sequence 5' -3'
`
`caaaccucggcuuacCUGAAA U
`UACGAGUUGAUUGUCGGACCCAG
`GA UAGGUGG UA UCAACA Ucuguaa
`CAGCUUCUGAGCGAGUAAUCCAGCUGUGAA
`GCCUGAGCUGAUCUGCUGGCAUCUUGCAGUU
`CUGGCAGAAUUCGAUCCACCGGCUGUUC
`CAGCAGUAGUUGUCAUCUGCUC
`
`Upper and lower case characters indicate cxonic and intronic nucleotides, respectively. PMO chemistries have uracil bases substituted with thymine.
`
`3. Results
`
`Muscle from 111dx mouse tibia/is anterior was used to
`optimize the technique for AO induced exon skipping in
`muscle explants which were either injected, infused, or
`injected and infused with 5 ttM of M23D(+07-18)
`2OMe AO, PMO or PMO-Pep in OptiMEM (data not
`shown). RNA was then extracted I or 7 days later for
`nested PCR analysis. Removal of exon 23 (~213 bp)
`or 22 and 23 (~359 bp) from the dystrophin transcript
`could be detected after 24 h (data not shown), however
`exon skipping was more sustained and pronounced fol(cid:173)
`lowing 7 days exposure to the AO (Fig. I). Infusion in
`
`23 for mouse studies, cxons 6 or 8 for normal human
`muscle studies or exon I 8, I 9 and 20 for DMD muscle
`studies (Table
`I). The nomenclature for A Os
`is
`described by Mann ct al. [I 3]. Muscle fragments were
`incubated in the OptiMEM-AO solution at 37 °C, 5'%
`CO2, and after 3 days were supplemented with an equal
`volume of DMEM containing 10'½, horse serum, to
`obtain a final concentration of 5% horse scrum.
`
`2.4. PCR analysis of exon skipping
`
`RNA was extracted from free-floating muscle ex plant
`fragments al specified times using Trizol {lnvitrogcn),
`according to the manufacturer's instructions. RT-PCR
`was performed on I 00 ng of total RNA for 35 cycles
`of amplification, using I U of Superscript III (lnvitro(cid:173)
`gcn) in a 12.5 ~ti reaction. Primers were used at 94 °C
`for 30 s, 55 °C annealing for I min, 68 °C extension for
`2 min and arc listed in Table 2. A I ttl sample from this
`reaction was then used as the template for 30 cycles of
`secondary PCR amplification using 0.5 U of AmpliTaq
`Gold (Applied Biosystems) under cycling conditions
`described above. Products were then electrophoresed
`on a 2'½, TAE agarose gel, with products of interest puri(cid:173)
`fied using MoBio UltraClean spin columns (Geneworks,
`Adelaide) and then sequenced on an Applied Biosystems
`377 automated sequencer using BigDye V3.1 terminator
`chemistry (Applied Biosystems).
`
`Table 2
`Primer sequences for nested PCR analysis
`
`"O
`.'!!
`"'
`~
`c
`:::>
`
`C.
`.0
`0
`0
`
`...
`
`:;;
`:,.
`0 ...
`.,
`:;;
`0
`N
`
`:;;
`...
`:,.
`0
`
`0
`:;;
`0..
`
`t.23 1073 bp - •
`
`1286 bp- :_·_~ -
`• - -
`t.22+23 927 bp --
`-
`
`C.
`
`:;;
`...
`:,.
`0
`.,
`0..
`0
`:;;
`0..
`
`.,
`?
`a::
`u
`a.
`
`C.
`.0
`0
`0
`
`...
`
`-
`
`Fig. I. RT-PCR analysis or nulx mouse muscle explants following 7
`days incubation with 10 11M of either 2OMc, PMO or PMO-Pep
`M23O(+7-18) AOs. The shorter PCR products of 1073 hp or 927 bp,
`indicates removal of cxon 23 or cxon 22 and 23 respectively, from the
`dystrophin transcript. (6 = cxon removal).
`
`Description
`
`Mouse exon 13- 27 outer
`
`Mouse exon 18-26 inner
`
`lluman cxon 1-10 outer
`
`lluman exon 1- 10 inner
`
`I luman exon I -27 outer
`
`I luman exon 1- 26 inner
`
`PCR primer
`
`MExonl3F
`MExon27R
`MExonl8F
`MExon26R
`IIExon0IF(a)
`IIExonl0R(a)
`IIExon0I F{b)
`IIExonlOR(b)
`IIExon0IF(a)
`I 1Exon27R
`IIExonOIF{b)
`11Exon2(,R
`
`Sequence 5'-3'
`
`get tea agaaga tctagaacaggagc
`ctat I taeagtctcagtaagg
`ga tataactgaacttcacag
`t tet tea get tgtgtca tee
`ctttccccctacaggactcag
`etctccateaa Lgaaetgcc
`ctgggaggcaa ttacel tcgg
`gaettgtet Lcaggagcttc
`ctttcccectacaggaeteag
`get a tgacaeta 11 taeagacte
`etgggaggeaattaccl Legg
`at tcglgca tetctga Laga tc
`
`" DMD exon J-17 deletion taken into account when calculating expected size.
`
`Expected size (hp)
`
`1286
`
`1147
`
`1611"
`
`

`

`586
`
`G. McC/orey el al. I Ne11ro11111srnlar Disorders /6 ( 2006) 583--590
`
`<
`
`the AO-OptiMEM solution was prcferabl_c, as_ tl~is ~cch(cid:173)
`niquc was more easily control~cd, unlike 111JCcll_ons,
`where leakage of the AO solution could occur from
`some small muscle explant~. ~s ~o ad~ant_age :"as con(cid:173)
`d by combining AO mJect1on with mfus1on, AO
`r
`d" ·
`•
`1erre
`· n •tlonc w·1s selected as the optimum con 1t1on
`· f
`111 USIO
`c
`·nduce exon skipping in muscle explants.
`d .
`t
`01
`111 nor-
`AO induced exon skipping was demonstrate
`mal human muscle explants, comparing the etlkacy of
`the three AO chemistries. A biopsy fragment from the
`vastus 111edialis muscle was dissected into 2-3 mm 3 seg(cid:173)
`ments and infused with 10 ~tM of either H6A(+69+91)
`or H8A(-06+ 18) 2OMe AO, PMO or PMO-Pep for 7
`to RNA extraction. H6A(+69+91) or
`days prior
`H8A(-06+ 18) A Os had been optimized in our laborato-
`
`ry and were the only human dystrophin AOs available
`that had been synthesized using all three chemistries.
`Removal of exon 6 (ti 173 bp) from the dystrophin tran(cid:173)
`script was detected for each AO chemistry with an
`observed ellicacy: PMO-Pep > PMO > 2OMe
`the
`in
`ability to induce exon removal (Fig. 2) . Removal of
`cxons 6 and 9 (L'i305 bp) from the dystrophin transcript
`was sporadically observed ( Fig. 2). In contrast, exon 8
`skipping (L'il85 bp) was always accompanied by exon 9
`removal and could be detected in PMO and PMO-Pcp
`treated tissue, but not after treatment of the ex plant with
`the 2OMc AO (Fig. 2).
`Dystrophic muscle was obtained from a DMD
`patient with the deletion of dystrophin exons 3-17,
`that
`transcript
`which produces an out-of-frame
`
`..
`"C
`!!l
`a. ~
`.0
`0
`C
`0
`~ ::,
`Cd w WH-~
`
`::;;
`:,.
`:;;
`0
`:;; ~
`:,.
`a.
`:,.
`0
`Q)
`~ 0
`~ 0..
`Q)
`0 6
`:;;
`::;;
`:;;
`0
`0..
`0..
`N
`
`- .. ·--
`
`1147 bp -
`A6974bp- -
`A6+9 842 bp - • -
`
`Q)
`
`'l'
`a::
`u
`0..
`
`Q)
`
`a.
`.0
`0
`0
`
`::;;
`:,.
`0
`:;;
`:;;
`..
`:,.
`a.
`"C
`:,.
`0
`!!l
`Q)
`~ 0
`'l'
`0..
`0 6
`~ Q)
`a::
`:;;
`::;;
`:;; u
`0
`C
`::,
`0..
`0..
`0..
`N
`,.._ c• kl:.~ -,~ ...
`- -1015 bp M
`, ...
`
`- 1147 bp
`
`- 830 bp A8+9
`
`rig. 2. Control human muscle cxplants were incubated with 10 r1M of either 116A(+69+91) or IISA(-06+ 18) 2OMe, l'MO or PMO-Pcp AOs for 7
`days. Shorter PCR products indicate removal of cxon 6 alone (974 hp) , cxon (,and') (842 hp), cxon 8 and 9 (830 bp) or cxon 9 alone ( 1015 bp) from
`the dystrophin transcript.
`
`H6A(+69+91)
`
`HBA(-06+18)
`
`h
`
`a.
`.c
`0
`0 ....
`
`"O
`2
`ra
`~ :!:
`:::i.
`-
`C:
`0
`....
`::>
`
`C.
`.c
`0
`0 ....
`
`a.
`.c
`0
`0
`
`-1611bp-
`-M81487 bp-
`
`Day 3
`
`Day 7
`
`"O
`a,
`io
`~ :!:
`:::i.
`-
`C:
`0
`....
`::>
`
`a,
`:!: ~
`=:(cid:173)
`.....
`(.J
`C..
`
`:::i.
`O
`'<!"
`
`a.
`.c
`0
`0 ....
`
`:!:
`:::i.
`0
`N
`
`II
`
`E,on 2 I Exoo 19
`
`, T T T T C T ;, ;, G G C C ., T ;, G ;, G C
`
`- 1611 bp
`-MS 1487 bp
`
`Day 14
`
`a
`
`- C
`
`
`
`C.
`.c
`0
`0 ....
`
`/
`
`Fig. 3. ln<lucti'.m ofexon 18 skipping in dystrophin transcripts from DMD musdc ex plants missing cxon 3-17, to restme the mRNi\ reading fra111c.
`Explants were mcubated with II 18A(+24+ 53) 2OMc AO for (a) 3 days, (h) ?days and (c) 14 days at IO, 20 and 40 pM. A shorter !'CR product of
`1487_ hp correspond~ to removal of cxon 18 from the dystrophin transcript. A sporadic PCR product of ~ 1350 hp rnuld not he identified and is
`poss1hly a PCR artifact. !'CR products larger than 1611 bp arc products of the outer primer set from the nested arnplilication. (d) Conlirlllation ot'
`the precise splicing of exon 2- 19 was confirmed hy sequencing.
`
`

`

`Ci. McC/orcy <'I al. I Ne11ro11111.1·c11/ar Disorders /6 ( 2006) 583-590
`
`587
`
`precludes the synthesis of a full length dystrophin pro(cid:173)
`tein, Removal or exon 18 restores the dystrophin
`mRNA reading frame and would potentially allow the
`synthesis of an internally deleted dystrophin protein.
`Hl8A(+24+53) and Hl8A(+31+61) had been designed
`to induce exon 18 removal based on in vitro exon skip(cid:173)
`ping studies using normal human myoblast cultures
`(data not shown). These AOs were only available as
`2OMe compounds, so PMO and PMO-Pep chemistries
`could not be evaluated. DMD muscle explants were
`infused with Hl8A(+24+ 53) or Hl8A(+31+61) 2OMe
`AO at 10 ~tM, 20 ~tM and 40 ~tM and RNA extracted
`for nested PCR analysis, after incubation for up to 14
`days. Both AOs induced a similar pattern of exon 18
`removal, but only the results for the H18A(+24+53)
`AO arc shown (Figs. 3a-c). Strong and consistent levels
`or exon 18 skipping was observed by day 3 (Fig. 3a),
`induced at all concentrations, and was still evident at
`day 14 (Pig. 3c). Sequencing of the shorter PCR product
`confirmed precise splicing ofexon 2 to exon 19 (Fig. 3d).
`To ascertain if multiple exon skipping could be
`induced, a cocktail of three additional AOs designed
`to also remove exons 19 and 20, were tested. A IO ~tM
`cocktail of Hl9A(+35+65), H20A(+ 44+71) and
`H20A(+ 147+ 168) 2OMc AOs was combined with
`10 ~tM or Hl8A(+24+53) and DMD tissue fragments
`incubated with the AO mix for I, 3, 7 and 14 days.
`
`or 3 days
`No exon skipping was observed following
`or infusion, however by days 7 and 14, removal or exon
`20 alone (<'1242 bp), 18 and 19 (<'1212 bp) and 18,19 and
`20 (<'1454 bp) was observed (Fig. 4a). The appearance of
`the shorter transcript correlated with a reduction in the
`amount of full length transcript, with the in-frame tran(cid:173)
`script arising from splicing of exons 2-21 being the dom(cid:173)
`inant transcript at day 14 (Fig. 4a), as confirmed by
`sequence analysis (Fig. 4b) .
`
`4. Discussion
`
`Recent studies in the nulx mouse and in human mus(cid:173)
`cle cultures have clearly established the potential of an
`AO induced exon skipping approach to restore dystro(cid:173)
`phin synthesis, despite mutations in the dystrophin gene.
`To date however, these studies have been limited to ani(cid:173)
`mal models and in vitro human experiments, which
`although promising, are unable to provide conclusive
`evidence that exon skipping would be induced by AOs
`delivered to human muscle.
`A humanized mouse model has been constructed to
`facilitate direct testing of AOs to induce exon skipping
`within the human dystrophin gene transcript in muscle
`[14]. However, we urge some caution in interpreting data
`obtained during the processing of a human gene tran(cid:173)
`script using rodent splicing machinery. Whilst we have
`
`"O
`(1)
`<G
`~
`'E
`:::,
`~:..·:~:: .;·:~~- .
`:::.: - . . . . . . . ; .. . ,i
`~
`- - -
`
`-
`
`....
`
`>,
`<G
`0
`
`M
`>,
`<G
`0
`
`.....
`>,
`<G
`0
`
`'<t
`.....
`>,
`<G
`0
`
`(1) ::-
`0::
`(.)
`0..
`
`a.
`..c
`0
`0
`.....
`-
`-- . M8+19 1399bp
`-
`
`- ~20 1369bp
`
`a.
`..c
`0
`....
`0
`
`- h
`
`
`
`a
`
`1611 bp-
`
`M8+19+20 1157bp -
`
`H18A(+24+53)
`H19A(+35+65)
`H20A(+44+71)
`H20A(+147+168)
`
`Exon 2 I Exon 21
`
`,\ T T T T CT h /, G G A T G ,\ /. G T C ;\
`
`hg. 4. (a ) Multiple cxon skipping in DMD L'i3- 17 muscle cxplants incubated with 10 pM oflll8A(+24+53). 1119A( + 35+ 65), II20A(+44+7 1) and
`l 120A( ·I 147+ 168) 2OMc A Os. RT-PCR analysis was performed following I, 3, 7 and 14 days incubation . Removal or exon 18 and 19 ( 1399 bp),
`cxon 20 ( IJ(,9 bp) and cxon 18 and 19 and 20 ( 1157 bp) could be observed by day 7 and 14. (b) Sequencing confirmation or precise removal of exons
`:l --20 from the dystrophin transcript.
`
`

`

`588
`
`G. A-fcC/orcy ct al. / Nrnro11111.1T11lar Disorders 16 (2006) 51/3- 59/J
`
`shown that the same AOs can induce exon 19 skipping
`in human and murine cells in vitro [15], we have found
`that targeting the coordinates which resulted in strong
`and sustained exon 23 skipping in the mdx mouse, had
`no efTect on human exon 23 retention in vitro (unpub(cid:173)
`lished observations). Similarly, when the same coordi(cid:173)
`nates that excluded human dystrophin exons 52 and
`53, were targeted in the mdx mouse, there was no effect
`on murine dystrophin mRNA processing (unpublished
`observations).
`A splice mutation in the sodium channel Navl .6 gene
`(Scn8a) particularly highlights the importance of splic(cid:173)
`ing machinery. Two strains of mice with difTerent splic(cid:173)
`transcript
`the mutant
`ing backgrounds process
`differently and show dramatic variation in disease phe(cid:173)
`notype [ 16, 17]. Additionally, phenotypic variation can
`arise within families with the same dystrophin mutation.
`Disease severity in a family with a nonsense mutation in
`exon 29, appeared to correlate with the levels of exon 29
`skipping [ 18]. In the presence of such reports, we would
`suggest that it is generally preferable to monitor human
`dystrophin splicing on a human background.
`Currently proposed clinical trials will initially under(cid:173)
`take localized intramuscular injections to provide proof
`of concept in human muscle [8]. Obviously, systemic AO
`delivery would be preferable, but in the absence of
`proof-of-principle of this approach in human tissue,
`approval for systemic clinical trials is unlikely to be
`forthcoming, particularly for those AO chemistries that
`have not yet been used in humans. To address this issue,
`we sought to develop an ex villo system that would allow
`for the testing of /\0 analogues to induce exon skipping
`in human muscle.
`Due to the precious nature and limited availability or
`human tissue, optimization of this approach was initial(cid:173)
`ly performed using 111dx mouse muscle. Accurate injec(cid:173)
`tion or AOs into the muscle fragments was hampered
`by AO leakage from the explanl, relkcted in variable
`induction or exon skipping (data not shown). In con(cid:173)
`trast, tissue infusion in media containing the /\0 al a
`specified concentration allowed for more consistent
`AO delivery in multiple ex plants with typical results pre(cid:173)
`sented. Additionally, AO incubation allowed the use of
`smaller muscle fragments, which maximized the surface
`area of muscle fibres in contact with the AO.
`Previous in vitro [3] and in Pivo [6,7] studies demon(cid:173)
`strated that targeting the donor site of cxon 23 could
`cfTicicntly induce removal of that exon and by-pass the
`11ulx nonsense mutation. Incubation of 111dx tissue in
`~he 2OMe, PMO and PMO-Pep AOs preparations
`mduced the removal of exon 23 and cxons 22 and 23
`from the dystrophin transcript. The removal of exon
`22 and 23 has been reported previously [3] and is
`thought to reflect closely coordinated processing of these
`exons. The level of exon skipping was higher and more
`consistent following 7 days of infusion, indicating that
`
`cxplant viability was suflkient to allow the splicing pro(cid:173)
`cess and subsequent synthesis of dystrophin mRNA to
`continue ( data not shown). All AO chemistries induced
`strong cxon skipping where at least 50'% or the tran(cid:173)
`scripts were missing cxon 23, and under these conditions
`it is not possible to identify the preferred compound .
`in exon skipping cllicacy become more
`Differences
`apparent at lower AO concentrations and over extended
`time points. We have recently shown that PMOs were
`able to exert more persistent and sustained cxon 23 skip(cid:173)
`ping in the mdx mouse in vivo when compared to the
`equivalent 2OMcAO (19].
`Having induced consistent exon removal in 111d.t
`tissue, the approach was extended to normal human
`muscle. Surplus muscle from biopsies from individuals
`undergoing contracture testing for malignant hyperther(cid:173)
`mia was obtained for cxplant studies. Similarly, we only
`obtain dystrophic material when a patient undergoes
`elective surgery. These restrictions limit the availability
`of muscle for experimentation, however no patient
`would be required to undergo surgery only for these
`studies. We do not consider this ex vivo protocol to be
`practical for pre-screening patients for suitability for
`an cxon skipping strategy.
`We have developed a panel of AOs to address muta(cid:173)
`tions across the human dystrophin gene transcript [20].
`To dale, no universal splice motif has been identified
`as a reliable target for AOs to redirect dystrophin prc(cid:173)
`mR NA processing. AO design has been optimized using
`overlapping annealing sites, once an amenable target
`had been identified. Moving an annealing site by only
`two or three bases can dramatically influence exon skip(cid:173)
`ping cfTicacy of the AO (unpublished observations).
`However, a hierarchy of cxon skipping potential has
`been observed with overlapping /\Os targeting the 111dx
`mouse dystrophin exon 23 donor splice site, in vitro
`and in 1'ivo. /\ 25mcr was more clTcctivc at cxon 23
`removal than a 20mcr, which in turn was more c!licicnt
`than longer /\Os, regardless of whether the 2OMc or
`morpholino /\Os were used (I larding cl al, manuscript
`in preparation). From these studies, it appears that tar(cid:173)
`get site and /\0 length determined using 2OMc /\Os is
`directly applicable to the l'MO chemistry.
`Because or our interest in the minor deletion hotspot
`of the human dystrophin gene [21 ]. and also in address(cid:173)
`ing the golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GR.MD)
`mutation [22]. we had /\Os optimized for cxons 6 and
`8 that had been synthesized as all three /\0 prepara(cid:173)
`tions, 2OMe, PMO and PMO-pcp. All three /\0 com(cid:173)
`pounds induced cxon (1 removal, whereas only PMO
`and PMO-pcp induced cxon 8 (and 9) removal consis(cid:173)
`tently at 10 ~1M. The 2OMc AO was unable to excise
`exon 8 (and 9) in multiple cxplanls treated at 5, IO or
`20 pM, despite its cllicicncy in Pilro [20]. The inability
`of this compound to induce cxon skipping in cxplants
`may indicate the need for a higher dosage in order lo
`
`

`

`(i. i\fcC/orey et al. I Nc11rn11111.1·rnlar Di.wmlcr.,· /6 ( 2006) 583 -5()(1
`
`589
`
`induce a comparable response to that shown with the
`PMO and PMO-Pep. Alternately, the environment of
`the explant tissue may more closely resemble the i11 vivo
`model and as such may behave differently to typical
`i11 vitro results. Fletcher ct al. [ 19], demonstrated in the
`11ulx mouse that a 2OMe AO directed at the exon 23
`donor splice site was very inefficient at inducing exon
`skipping in vivo, when compared to the PMO under
`the same delivery conditions.
`Significantly, the removal of either exon 6 or exon 8
`from the normal dystrophin transcript produces an
`out-of-frame transcript, which would be expected to be
`subjected to nonsense mediated decay [23]. It is testa(cid:173)
`ment to the ellicacy of this approach that substantial lev(cid:173)
`els of these transcripts could be observed relative to the
`normal full length human dystrophin transcript. The
`removal

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket