throbber
as) United States
`a2) Patent Application Publication co) Pub. No.: US 2009/0051224 Al
` Cooket al. (43) Pub. Date: Feb. 26, 2009
`
`
`
`US 20090051224A1
`
`(54)
`
`INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A
`RESONATOR
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Aug,11, 2008
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`(75)_Inventors: Nigel P. Cook, El Cajon, CA (US); (60) Provisional application No. 60/954,941, filed onAug.
`
`
`LukasSieber, Olten (CH);
`Hanspeter Widmer, Wohlenschwil
`9, 2007.
`(CH)
`
`Publication Classification
`
`Correspondence Address:
`Law Office of Scott C Harris Inc
`PO Box 1389
`Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067 (US)
`.
`(73) Assignee:
`
`.
`NIGELPOWER,LLC, San Diego,
`CA (US)
`
`(21) Appl. No.:
`
`12/189,433
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`H02J 17/00
`(52) US. C0. cececccccsssssssesssssssssvessssssssssnseessssssseees 307/104
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`A wireless powering and charging system is described. The
`antennas can be high q loop antennas. The antennas can use
`coupling betweena first part and a secondpart.
`
`P.t
`
`TRANSMITTER
`(ENERGY SOURCE)
`
`L-
`
`SOURCE
`1 (HF GENERATOR)
`
`150
`
`RECEIVER
`(ENERGYSINK)
`
`LOAD
`(RECTIFIER AND
`REGULATOR)
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 001
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 001
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26, 2009 Sheet 1 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`YIAIFOIY
`
`
`
`(¥NISADYINI)
`
`ONVYFIdIL9FY)
`
`aqvol
`
`0917
`
`YILLINSNVYL
`
`] d
`
`JouNos
`
`YOLVYINID4H)
`
`Ltk
`
`
`
`(J9YNOSADYINI)
`
`LO
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 002
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 002
`
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26,2009 Sheet 2 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Ls
`oS
`
`|—
`N |
`
`!
`
`261 oS
`
`Oo:
`
`QI
`
`84
`
`Ke)
`N
`
`S
`A
`7
`™
`
`>
`
`we
`
`o
`
`_
`c-
`~
`-
`
`=> an
`
`oo
`
`A
`e>
`
`a
`
`N
`
`.S
`
`La
`
`=
`
`oe
`-ag
`i
`an
`
`=>
`
`+
`=<
`
`om
`
`‘\
`
`ws
`>
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 003
`
`A
`
`>
`
`"- 8
`
`=
`
`aa
`
`N
`
`a
`oa N
`
`=>
`
`1
`=
`
`~
`
`=
`
`~
`
`nN
`
`aa
`(
`=
`m
`
`wa
`oc
`
`2
`NUN
`
`w~
`BQDd
`qQ
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 003
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26, 2009 Sheet 3 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Sk
`
`e
`
`Sw
`
`Sw
`
`D
`
`S
`
`N
`
`S
`
`x
`=
`
`“ome
`
`<l&
`Ul
`
`x<
`oO
`
`=
`
`S
`
`“wr

`(j) Xewup
`
`NI
`
`=
`
`>
`
`ow
`cs
`he
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 004
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 004
`
`€
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26,2009 Sheet 4 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`opudi GoKO2
`
`8
`
`10
`
`12
`
`14
`
`2
`
`4
`
`6
`
`Wire Radius(mm)
`
`FIG. 4
`
`
`
`FIG. 5
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 005
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 005
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26, 2009 Sheet 5 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`600
`
`\y_“A
`
`611
`
`FIG. 6
`
`705
`
`710
`
`FIG. 7
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 006
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Patent Application Publication
`
`Feb. 26, 2009 Sheet 6 of 6
`
`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`800x
`
`Cube to Small
`
`2.1/5
`
`ReceivedPowerWatts(For
`
`15WTransmitted)
`
`3.75
`
`
`
`Large to Very Small
`
`Cube to Very Small
`
`
`02
`
`04
`
`O06
`
`08
`
`1
`
`1.2
`
`Distance (m)
`
`FIG. 8
`
`
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 007
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 007
`
`

`

`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`INCREASING THE Q FACTOR OF A
`RESONATOR
`
`[0001] This application claims priority from provisional
`application No. 60/954,941, filed Aug. 9, 2007, the entire
`contents of which are herewith incorporated by reference.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`It is desirable to transfer electrical energy from a
`[0002]
`source to a destination without the use of wires to guide the
`electromagneticfields. A difficulty of previous attempts has
`been low efficiency together with an inadequate amount of
`delivered power.
`
`SUMMARY
`
`[0003] The present application teaches a wireless electrical
`energy transfer, and teaches specific techniques for that
`energy transfer including specific antennas, and specific
`materials for the antennas.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`[0017] Other embodiments may use similar principles of
`the embodiments and are equally applicable to primarily elec-
`trostatic and/or electrodynamicfield coupling as well. In gen-
`eral, an electric field can be used in place of the magnetic
`field, as the primary coupling mechanism.
`[0018] One aspect of the embodimentis the use of a high
`efficiency that comes from increasing the so-called Q factor
`of the coupling structures (primarily the antennas) at the
`self-resonant frequency used for the sinusoidal waveform of
`the electromagneticfield, voltage or current used. The present
`inventors have discovered that the efficiency and amount of
`poweris superior for a system which uses a single, substan-
`tially un-modulated sine wave. In particular, the performance
`is superior to a wide-band system which attempts to capture
`the powercontained in a wideband waveformorin a plurality
`of distinct sinusoidal waveforms of different frequencies.
`Other embodiments mayuse less pure waveforms, in recog-
`nition of the real-world characteristics of the materials that
`
`are used. Techniquesare described herein which enable small
`resonant antennas with relatively high Q factors.
`[0019] The Q of a resonant deviceis the ratio of the reso-
`nant frequency to the so-called “three dB” or “half power”
`bandwidth of the resonant device. While there are several
`
`“definitions,” all are substantially equivalent to each other, to
`describe Q in terms ofmeasurementsor the values ofresonant
`circuit elements.
`
`[0004] These and other aspects will now be described in
`detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
`[0005]
`FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a magnetic wave
`based wireless powertransmission system;
`[0006]
`FIG.2 illustrates circuit diagramsofthe circuits in
`[0020] A basic embodiment is shown in FIG. 1. A power
`the FIG. 1 diagram;
`transmitter assembly 100 receives power from a source, for
`[0007]
`FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary nearfield condition
`example, an AC plug 102. A frequency generator 104 is used
`plot;
`to create a signal at a frequency (Pt) and to couple that fre-
`quency to an antenna 110, here a resonant antenna. The
`FIG.4 illustrates a graph between Q factors that
`[0008]
`antenna 110 includes an coupling loop 111, which is induc-
`were experimentally found between different antennas;
`tively and non-contactively coupled to a high Q resonant
`[0009]
`FIG.5 illustrates a large one turn antenna;
`antenna part 112.
`[0010]
`FIG.6 illustrates a cube-shaped two turn antenna;
`[0011]
`FIG. 7A illustrates a very small receiver antenna;
`[0021] The resonant antenna includes a number N ofcoil
`
`[0012] loops 113 each loop havingaradius R,,. A capacitor 114, hereFIG. 8 illustrates some exemplary powertransfer
`
`operations; and
`shownas a variable capacitor, is in series with the coil 113,
`forming a resonant loop. In the embodiment, the capacitoris
`[0013]
`FIG. 9 illustrates a large transmit antenna with a
`a totally separate structure from the coil, but in certain
`capacitor holder including plural different standoffs.
`embodiments, the self capacitance of the wire forming the
`coil can form the capacitance 114.
`[0022] The frequency generator 104 can be preferably
`tuned to the antenna 110, and also selected for FCC compli-
`ance.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION
`
`[0014] The general structure and techniques, and more spe-
`cific embodiments which can be usedto effect different ways
`of carrying out the more general goals, are described herein.
`[0015] The present application describestransfer of energy
`from a powersource to a powerdestination via electromag-
`netic field coupling. Embodiments describe techniques for
`new coupling structures, e.g.,
`transmitting and receiving
`antennas.
`
`[0023] This embodimentuses a multidirectional antenna as
`the antenna part 112. 115 shows the energy as output in all
`directions. The antenna 100 is non-radiative, in the sense that
`much of the output of the antenna is not electromagnetic
`radiating energy, but is rather a magnetic field which is more
`stationary. Of course, part of the output from the antenna will
`in factradiate.
`
`[0016] An embodiment is shown in which the main cou-
`pling occurs via inductive coupling, using primarily a mag-
`[0024]
`Another embodiment may usea radiative antenna.
`netic field component. In the embodiment shown in FIG.1,
`[0025] A receiver 150 includes a receiving antenna 155
`for example, energy is formedas a stationary magnetic wave
`placed a distance d away from the transmitting antenna 110,
`in the area of the transmitting antenna 110. The energythatis
`but not coupled thereto. The receiving antennais similarly a
`produced is at least partly a non-radiative, stationary mag-
`high Q resonant coil antenna having a coil part and capacitor
`netic field. The produced field is not entirely magnetic, nor
`151, coupled to an inductive coupling loop 152. The capacitor
`entirely stationary, howeverat least a portion is stationary and
`151 may be variable for tuning. As in the transmitting
`magnetic. Unlike a traveling electromagnetic wave, which
`antenna, the coupling loop 152 is physically separate from the
`would continue propagating into space and haveits energy
`main part of the antenna. The output ofthe coupling loop 152
`wasted, at least a portion of the stationary magnetic wave
`is rectified in a rectifier 160, and applied to a load. That load
`remains in the area ofthe transmitting antenna andis rendered
`
`usable by the disclosed techniques. can be any type of load, for examplearesistive load such as a
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 008
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 008
`
`

`

`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`light bulb, or an electronic device load such as an electrical
`appliance, a computer, a rechargeable battery, a music player
`or an automobile.
`
`[0026] The energy can betransferred through either elec-
`trical field coupling or magnetic field coupling, although
`magnetic field coupling is predominantly described herein as
`an embodiment.
`
`[0027] Electrical field coupling provides an inductively
`loadedelectrical dipole that is an open capacitor ordielectric
`disk. Extraneous objects may provide a relatively strong
`influence onelectric field coupling. Magnetic field coupling
`may bepreferred, since it extraneous objects have the same
`magnetic properties as “empty” space.
`[0028] The embodiment describes a magnetic field cou-
`pling using a capacitively loaded magnetic dipole. Such a
`dipole is formed of a wire loop formingat least one loop or
`turn of a coil, in series with a capacitorthat electrically loads
`the antenna into a resonantstate.
`
`FIG. 2 shows an equivalent circuit for the energy
`[0029]
`transfer. The transmit circuit 100 is a series resonant circuit
`with RLC portions that resonate at the frequency of the high
`frequency generator 205. The transmitter includes a series
`resistance 210, and inductive coil 215, and a variable capaci-
`tance 220. This produces the magnetic field M which is shown
`as magnetic lines of force 225.
`[0030] The signal generator 205 has an internal resistance
`that is preferably matched to the transmit resonator’s resis-
`tance at resonance by the inductive loop. This allowstrans-
`ferring maximum powerfrom the transmitter to the receiver
`antenna.
`
`[0031] The receive portion 150 correspondingly includes a
`capacitor 250, transformer coil 255, rectifier 260, and regu-
`lator 261, to provide a regulated output voltage. The outputis
`connectedto a load resistance 265. FIG. 2 shows a half wave
`
`rectifier, but it should be understood that more complex rec-
`tifier circuits can be used. The impedanceofthe rectifier 260
`and regulator 261 is matchedto the resistance of the receive
`resonatorat resonance. This enables transferring a maximum
`amountofpowerto the load. The resistances take into account
`skin effect/proximity effect, radiation resistance, as well as
`both internal and external dielectric loss.
`
`[0032] A perfect resonant transmitter will ignore, or mini-
`mally react with, all other nearby resonant objects having a
`different resonant frequency. However, when a receiver that
`has the proper resonant frequency encounters the field of the
`transmitting antenna 225, the two couple in order to establish
`a strong energy link. In effect, the transmitter and receiver
`operate to becomea loosely coupled transformer.
`[0033] The inventors have discovered a numberoffactors
`that
`improve the transfer of power from transmitter to
`receiver.
`
`[0034] Q factor of the circuits, described above, can assist
`with certain efficiencies. A high Q factor allows increased
`values of current at the resonant frequency. This enables
`maintaining the transmissionovera relatively low wattage. In
`an embodiment, the transmitter Q may be 1400, while the
`receiver Q is around 300. For reasonsset forth herein, in one
`embodiment, the receiver Q may be much lower than the
`transmitter Q, for example 14 to 4 the transmitter Q. How-
`ever, other Q factors may be used.
`[0035] High Q has a corresponding disadvantage ofnarrow
`bandwidth effects. Such narrow bandwidth have typically
`been considered as undesirable for data communications.
`
`However, the narrow bandwidth can be used in powertrans-
`
`fer. When a high Q is used, the transmitter signal is suffi-
`ciently pure and free of undesired frequency or phase modu-
`lation to allow transmission of most of its power over this
`narrow bandwidth.
`
`For example, an embodiment may use a resonant
`[0036]
`frequency of 13.56 MHz and a bandwidth of around 9 kHz.
`This is highly usable for a substantially un-modulated funda-
`mental frequency. Some modulation on the fundamentalfre-
`quency maybetolerated or tolerable, however, especially if
`other factors are used to increase the efficiency. Other
`embodiments use lower Q components, and may allow cor-
`respondingly more modulation on the fundamental.
`[0037] An important feature may include use of a fre-
`quency whichis permitted by regulation, such as FCC regu-
`lations. The preferred frequency in this exemplary embodi-
`mentis 13.56 MHz but other frequencies may be used as well.
`[0038]
`In addition, the capacitors should be able to with-
`stand high voltages, for example as high as 4 kV, since the
`resistance may be smallin relation to the capacitive reactance.
`A final important feature is the packaging: the system should
`be in a small form factor.
`
`[0039] One aspect of improving the coupling between the
`transmit and receive antenna is to increase the Q of the
`antenna. The efficiency of powertransfer 1 may be expressed
`as
`
`33
`Pat Vay Qe Qr
`1ad6
`
`n(d) =
`
`[0040] Note that this increases as the cube of the radius of
`the transmitting antenna, the cubeofthe radiusofthe receiv-
`ing antenna, and decreasesto the sixth powerofthe distance.
`The radii of the transmit and receive antennas may be con-
`strained by the application in which they are used. Accord-
`ingly, increasing the Q in some applications may be a pre-
`ferred way of increasing the efficiency.
`[0041]
`FIG. 4 illustrates a graph between Q factors that
`were experimentally found between different antennas. This
`graph shows that, for a given frequency,
`the Q factors
`increases when the resonator coil of the resonator has fewer
`turns.
`
`[0042] The inventors discovered an optimum antenna that
`may exist with a single turn loop, provided that the loss
`resistance ofthe material, e.g., the wire or tubing, forming the
`loop is maintained sufficiently low.
`[0043] An embodiment illustrated in FIG. 5 uses a single
`turn antenna 500 formedofa relatively thick conductor mate-
`rial, driven by a smaller coil 505. The antenna 500 is provided
`in series with a capacitive loading, here a vacuum capacitor
`502. In an embodiment, the single turn antenna is formed of
`copper tubing. The vacuum capacitors which have a very high
`Q factor and can also handle a very high voltage. Vacuum
`capacitors on the order of 200 pf can be used, for example.
`This antenna may have a low impedance, thereby enabling
`high current and high magnetic field. It may also provide low
`RFvoltage andthus low electric stray field and lower suscep-
`tibility to loss from extraneous objects.
`[0044] An embodiment may use a 6 mm copper tube coil
`resonator and a loop radius of 9 inches. Another embodiment
`may use a 30 mm coppertube. Preferably the coppertubeis at
`least 1 inch in diameter, used with a vacuum capacitorthat has
`a very high Q. A vacuum capacitor may have a Q of 1000.
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 009
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 009
`
`

`

`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`[0045] An issue with the single turn loop antennais thatit
`must havea relatively large diameter.
`[0046] A compromise size may be formed from a two-turn
`antenna, which is shownin FIG.6. The two-turn antenna can
`have a 3 4 inch diameter coil 600. FIG.6 illustrates a plastic
`housing, using a vacuum capacitor integrated directly on the
`antenna. The transmission inducement coil 610 is also
`
`mounted on the housing, connected to a cable 611.
`[0047] The receiver antennas can also be important. FIG. 7
`illustrates an exemplary receiver antenna including a plurality
`ofturns ofmaterial 700 mounted ona substrate 705. A capaci-
`tor 710 is attached to the coil material 700.
`[0048]
`It was foundthatthe substrate that is used as a base
`may itself be important in setting the Q. Table 1 illustrates
`some exemplary electrical properties (including Quality fac-
`tor) for different substrates
`
`TABLE1
`
`Electric properties of different substrate materials
`
`Material
`FR4
`PVC
`Rubalit 710
`PTFE(Teflon)
`
`Loss factor
`(tan 8)
`0.0222
`0.0063
`0.0013
`0.0011
`
`Quality Factor
`(1/tan 8)
`45
`160
`7710
`910
`
`Dielectric
`constante,.
`3.95
`1.10
`1.00
`1.20
`
`This data is valid for frequencies in the range from 10-20 MHz only
`
`[0049] Table 1: Electrical Properties of Different Substrate
`Materials
`[0050] The FIG. 7 antennais a six turn antenna, and has a
`quality factor of around 400. According to an embodiment, a
`high quality factor material, such as PTFE, is used as the
`substrate. Another aspect is the limits which can be used on
`these antennas. Table 2 illustrates the likely limits for the
`application.
`
`Someexemplary powertransfer operationsare illus-
`[0051]
`trated in FIG. 8. The receiver antenna can be small or “very
`small”. The transmitting antenna can be the type “large”,
`shown in FIG.5, or the “cube” type shownin FIG.6. FIG. 8
`illustrates the power for a transmit power of 15 W. The hori-
`zontalline 800 in FIG.8 illustrates 14 watt being received for
`a 15 watt transmission. Anything above this amount may be
`considered acceptable.
`[0052]
`FIG.9 illustrates the large transmit antenna, using
`30 mm tubing 900, and a vacuum capacitor 905 integrated in
`between the portions of the antenna. The capacitor 905 is
`mounted within a capacitor holder structure 910 which is
`welded or soldered between ends of the loop. A capacitor
`holder includes plural different standoffs 950, within which,
`or attached to which, the capacitors can be located. The sub-
`strate 911 in FIG. 9 may be a high-q material, as described
`above.
`
`[0053] Although only a few embodiments have been dis-
`closed in detail above, other embodiments are possible and
`the inventors intend these to be encompassed within this
`specification. The specification describes specific examples
`to accomplish~more general goal that may be accomplished
`in another way. This disclosure is intended to be exemplary,
`and the claims are intended to cover any modification or
`alternative which might be predictable to a person having
`ordinary skill in the art. For example, other sizes, materials
`and connections can be used. Although the coupling part of
`the antenna is shown as a single loop of wire, it should be
`understood that this coupling part can have multiple wire
`loops.
`[0054] Also, the inventors intend that only those claims
`which use the-words “means for” are intended to be inter-
`preted under 35 USC 112, sixth paragraph. Moreover, no
`limitations from the specification are intendedto be read into
`any claims, unless those limitations are expressly included in
`the claims.
`
`FCC LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM PERMISSABLE EXPOSURE (MPE
`
`Frequency
`Range
`(MHz)
`
`Electric Field Magnetic Field
`Strength (E)
`Strength (H)
`(V/m)
`(A/m)
`
`Power Density Averaging Time
`(S)
`IES, IH? or S
`(mW/cm?)
`(minutes)
`
`(A) Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure
`
`(100)*
`1.63
`614
`0.3-3.0
`(900/fy*
`4.89/f
`1842/f
`3.0-30
`1.0
`0.163
`61.4
`30-300
`£/300
`—
`—
`300-1500
`5
`—
`—
`1500-100,000
`(B) Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure
`
`0.3-1.34
`1.34-30
`30-300
`300-1500
`1500-100,000
`
`614
`824/f
`27.5
`—
`—
`
`1.63
`2.19/f
`0.073
`—
`—
`
`(100)*
`(180/f)*
`0.2
`£/1500
`1.0
`
`6
`6
`6
`6
`6
`
`30
`30
`30
`30
`30
`
`f= frequency in MHz
`*Plane-wave equivalent power density
`NOTE1:
`See Section 1 for discussion of exposure categories.
`NOTE2:
`The averaging time for General Population/Uncontrolled exposure to fixed transmitters is
`not applicable for mobile and portable transmitters. See 47 CFR §$§2.1891 and 2.2863 on
`source-based time-averaging requirements for mobile and portable transmitters.
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 010
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 010
`
`

`

`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`[0055] Where a specific numerical value is mentioned
`herein,
`it should be considered that
`the value may be
`increased or decreased by 20%, while still staying within the
`teachings of the present application, unless some different
`range is specifically mentioned. Where a specified logical
`sense is used, the opposite logical sense is also intendedto be
`encompassed.
`Whatis claimed is:
`
`16. A system as in claim 1, further comprising an attach-
`mentpart across distal edges of material defining a loop, said
`attachmentpart holding a vacuum capacitor.
`17. A receiver system for receiving wireless electrical
`power, comprising:
`an antenna part, having no wired electrical connection
`thereto, configured for receiving a magnetic field, said
`antenna part formedof an inductive part with an induc-
`tance L and a capacitive part with a capacitance C,
`1. A transmitter system for transmitting wireless electrical
`collectively defining an LC value which are substan-
`power, comprising:
`tially resonant with a specified frequency; and
`a source which creates an outputelectrical signal having a
`a coupling loop, spaced from said antenna part, such that
`specified frequency;
`said coupling loop is not directly connected to said
`a coupling part, directly connected to said source, said
`antenna part, but
`is magnetically connected to said
`coupling part formed ofa first loop of wire which is
`antenna part, said coupling part receiving a signal hav-
`impedance matchedto said source; and
`ing said specified frequency from said antennapart, and
`an antennapart, spaced from said coupling loop suchthatit
`creating a power output based thereon.
`is not directly connected to said coupling part, but mag-
`18.A system as in claim 17, further comprising an electri-
`netically coupled to a magnetic field created by said
`cal circuit that receives said power output and creates output
`coupling part, said antennapart having no wired electri-
`powerbased thereon.
`cal connection thereto and receiving power wirelessly
`19. A system as in claim 18, wherein said antennapart has
`from said coupling loop, and said antennapart creating
`a quality factor greater than 500.
`a magnetic field based on said powerthat is wirelessly
`20. A system as in claim 18, wherein said antennapart is
`received, said antenna part formedof an wire coil having
`formed onasubstrate that supports said antenna part, and said
`an inductance L, anda capacitor having a capacitance C,
`substrate has a quality factor which is greater than 500.
`and said antenna part having an LC value which is sub-
`21. A system as in claim 19, wherein said antennapart is
`stantially resonant with said specified frequency.
`formed with an integral capacitor made from a vacuum
`2. A system as in claim 1, wherein said antenna part has a
`capacitor.
`quality factor greater than 500.
`22. A system as in claim 19, wherein said antennapart has
`3. A system as in claim 1, wherein said antennapart is
`an inductive coil loop, and a capacitor connected across a
`formed ona substrate that supports said antenna part, and said
`portion of said inductive coil loop.
`substrate has a quality factor whichis greater than 500.**
`23. A system as in claim 22, further comprising a cube
`4. A system as in claim 2, wherein said antennapart is
`shaped housing in which said capacitor is housed.
`formed with an integral capacitor made from a vacuum
`24. A system as in claim 22, wherein said antennapart has
`capacitor.
`a single turn in the coil loop.
`5. A system as in claim 2, wherein said antenna part has a
`25.A system as in claim 22, wherein said antenna has two
`an inductive coil loop, and a capacitor connected across a
`turns in the coil loop.
`portion of said inductive coil loop.
`26.A system as in claim 19, further comprising a transmit-
`6. Asystem as in claim 5, further comprising a cube shaped
`ter for the electrical power, where the transmitter includes an
`housing in which said capacitor is housed.
`antenna that is tuned to said specified frequency.
`7. A system as in claim 5, wherein said antenna part has a
`27. A system as in claim 26, wherein the transmitter has a
`single turn in the coil loop.
`quality factor value that is lower than a quality factor value of
`the transmitter.
`8. A system as in claim 5, wherein said antenna has two
`turns in the coil loop.
`9. A system as in claim 1, further comprising a receiver for
`the electrical power, where the receiver includes an antenna
`that is tuned to said specified frequency.
`10. A system as in claim 9, wherein the receiver has a
`quality factor value that is lower than a quality factor value of
`the transmitter.
`
`11. A system as in claim 9, wherein the receiver has a
`quality factor that is equal to or less than 4 of the quality
`factorof the transmitter.
`
`12.A system as in claim 9, whereinthe receiver antenna has
`a size that is smaller than a size of the transmitter antenna.
`
`13.A system as in claim 9, wherein the transmitter antenna
`and receiver antenna coupledto one anotherin order to form
`an energy link that is operative like a loosely coupled trans-
`former.
`
`14. A system as in claim 1, wherein said quality factor is a
`ratio of a resonant frequency of the antenna to a half power
`bandwidth of the antenna.
`
`15. A system as in claim 1, wherein said capacitor has a Q
`of at least 1000.
`
`28. A system as in claim 26, wherein the transmitter has a
`quality factor that is equal to or less than 4 of the quality
`factor of the transmitter.
`
`29. A system as in claim 26, wherein the transmitter
`antennahasa size that is smaller than a size of the transmitter
`antenna.
`
`30. A system as in claim 26, wherein the transmitter
`antenna and receiver antenna coupled to one another in order
`to form an energy link that is operative like a loosely coupled
`transformer.
`
`31. A system as in claim 26, wherein said quality factoris
`a ratio of a resonant frequencyof the antennato a half power
`bandwidth of the antenna.
`
`32. A system as in claim 26, wherein said capacitor has aQ
`of at least 1000.
`
`33. A system as in claim 26, wherein said capacitor is a
`vacuum capacitor.
`34. A method, comprising:
`creating a magnetic field at a specified frequency based on
`applied powerusing a first loop antenna which includes
`no seperate capacitor attached thereto; and
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 011
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 011
`
`

`

`US 2009/0051224 Al
`
`Feb. 26, 2009
`
`where said second loop antenna has a resonantvalue at
`coupling a portion of the wireless power between saidfirst
`said specified frequency; and
`loop antenna and a secondloop antennathatare associ-
`coupling a portion of the wirelessly-received magnetic
`ated with one another andare notelectrically connected
`field between said first loop antenna and a second loop
`to one another, where said second loop antenna has a
`antennathat are associated with one another and are not
`capacitor element that is separate from said loop, and
`electrically connected to one another, and where said
`where said second loop antenna has a resonantvalue at
`second loop antenna has no separate capacitor attached
`said first specified frequency.
`thereto; and
`35. A method as in claim 34, wherein said first and second
`rectifying an output from said second loop antennato cre-
`loop antennas are both transmit antennas.
`ate a DC output.
`36. A methodas in claim 34, wherein said coupling com-
`38. A method as in claim 37, wherein said first and second
`prises coupling using a loosely-coupled transformer cou-
`loop antennas are both receive antennas.
`pling.
`39. A methodas in claim 37, wherein said coupling com-
`37. A method, comprising:
`
`prises coupling using a_loosely-coupled transformer
`receiving a magnetic field at a specified frequency based on
`coupling.
`applied power using a first loop antenna that has a
`capacitor element that is separate from said loop, and
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 012
`
`Momentum Dynamics Corporation
`Exhibit 1013
`Page 012
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket