throbber
Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 1 of 10
`
`DIAMOND McCARTHY LLP
`Matthew K. Blackburn (CSB No. 261959)
`mblackburn@diamondmccarthy.com
`Evan E. Boetticher (CSB No. 274377)
`evan.boetticher@diamondmccarthy.com
`150 California Street, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: 415.692.5200 | Fax: 415.263.9200
`Allan B. Diamond (pro hac vice)
`adiamond@diamondmccarthy.com
`John B. Sample, IV (pro hac vice)
`john.sample@diamondmccarthy.com
`909 Fannin Street, 37th Floor
`Houston, Texas 77010
`Tel: 713.333.5100 | Fax: 713.333.5199
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs NANTWORKS, LLC
`and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`COOLEY LLP
`Heidi L. Keefe (CSB No. 178960)
`Dena Chen (CSB No. 286452)
`Alexandra D. Leeper (CSB No. 307310)
`Lauren J. Krickl (CSB No. 305379)
`Patrick W. Lauppe (CSB No. 322218)
`3175 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`Telephone: (650) 843-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 849-7400
`hkeefe@cooley.com
`dchen@cooley.com
`aleeper@cooley.com
`lkrickl@cooley.com
`plauppe@cooley.com
`COOLEY LLP
`Michael G. Rhodes (CSB No. 116127)
`101 California Street, 5th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
`Telephone: (415) 693-2000
`Facsimile: (415) 693-2222
`rhodesmg@cooley.com
`Attorney for Defendant NIANTIC, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, AND
`NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC.,
`
`v.
`
`NIANTIC, INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING
`STATEMENT
`
`Hearing:
`Place:
`Judge:
`
`August 19, 2021 (11:00 A.M.)
`Courtroom B, 15th Floor
`Honorable Laurel Beeler
`
`Error! Reference source not found.
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 001
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 2 of 10
`
`Pursuant to Patent Local Rule (“PLR”) 4-3, Plaintiffs NantWorks, LLC, and Nant
`Holdings IP, LLC., (together, “NantWorks”) and Defendant Niantic, Inc. (“Niantic”) (collectively,
`the “Parties”) having met and conferred, jointly submit this Joint Claim Construction and
`Prehearing Statement for the August 19, 2021 claim construction hearing on NantWorks’ U.S.
`Patent No. 10,403,051 (“the ’051 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 10,664,518 (“the ’518 Patent”).
`I.
`CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE TERMS ON WHICH THE PARTIES AGREE
`(PLR 4-3(a))
`To narrow their disputes, the counsel for the parties have meet and conferred on May 3rd
`and May 10th, and the parties have reached agreement on the constructions for the following claim
`terms:
`
`II.
`
`Term
`“tessellated tiles”
`
`Construction
`Claim
`“tiles fitted together to cover an area without
`’518 Patent,
`gaps”
`claim 1
`CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE TERMS ON WHICH THE PARTIES DISAGREE,
`AND IDENTIFICATIONS OF EACH PARTY’S INTRINSIC AND EXTRINSIC
`EVIDENCE (PLR 4-3(b))
`There are ten claim terms in dispute. The parties proposals as to the disputed claim terms
`are as follows:
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`1
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 002
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 3 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“determine at least one
`context related to the AR
`capable device and pertinent
`to the environment based at
`least on the device location”
`(’051 Patent, claim 1)
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: It is
`presently unclear why
`NantWorks wishes to construe
`the entire claim element, or
`why plain and ordinary
`meaning does not suffice.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: 6:39-41; 7:19-35;
`8:23-24
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction:
`Determine at least one
`augmented reality experience
`on the AR capable device
`based on real world element
`attributes related to the local
`environment of the AR
`capable device.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: 2:3-15; 3:43-52; 3:49-
`52; 4:10-16; 4:42-44; 5:10-17;
`7:67-8:3; 8:23-25; 8:41-44;
`8:49-53; 9:13-26; 9:44-47;
`11:4-8; 11:65-12:5; 12:13-21;
`12:27-28; 12:31-37; 12:44-48;
`13:1-7; 14:65-15:28; 15:34-
`43; 15:64-16:3; 16:20-23;
`18:64-19:1; Figs 2, 3, 5.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Mar.
`25, 2019 Amdt, pp. 11-14;
`and Apr. 10, 2019 Ntc of
`Allow., pp. 2-4; ‘244 Appl.,
`March 3, 2014 Resp. Off. Act.
`p. 9.
`Bathiche (U.S. App
`09/167,787): ¶¶ 0021, 0048,
`0052; Fig. 5.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`2
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 003
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 4 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“AR object” (’051 Patent,
`claim 1)
`
`“AR object repository” / “AR
`repository” (’051 Patent,
`claim 1)
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: The
`virtual item that is to be
`presented to the user.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: Abstract; Fig. 1, 4, 5,
`6; 1:32-33; 5:57-59; 6:13-23;
`6:36-38; 8:4-13; 9:9-60; 12:9-
`13; 15:62; 17:18; 21:17-18.
`
`Proposed Construction: The
`database(s) that contain(s) the
`AR objects.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: 5:7-17; 5:64-66; 8:45–
`9:11; 19:1-4.
`File History: 2019-3-25
`Amdt/Req. Reconsideration
`After Non- Final Rejection,
`pp. 13-14.
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: Data
`structure of at least the virtual
`object image for integration
`into an AR experience.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: Abstract; 1:33-34; 2:1-
`3; 3:58-62; 4:12-16; 4:40-41;
`5:10-17; 5:57-59; 5:66-6:7;
`6:13-17; 7:19-25; 7:29-35;
`9:15-28; 9:48-60; 14:20-26;
`16:45-51; 16:61-17:6; 19:54-
`60; 20:23-26; Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4,
`5, 6.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Mar.
`25, 2019 Amdt, pp. 13-14;
`Apr. 10, 2019 Ntc of Allow.,
`pp. 2-4; and Oct. 29, 2019
`Amdt., pp. 1-4.
`Extrinsic Evidence: Object,
`render, The American
`Heritage Dictionary, (5th ed.
`2011)
`NW_NIANTIC_001760 -
`1767; Object, render,
`Microsoft Encarta College
`Dictionary, (1st ed. 2001)
`NW_NIANTIC_001768 -
`1774.
`
`Proposed Construction: Plain
`and ordinary meaning. If the
`Court finds construction
`necessary: Memory storing
`AR objects.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: 5:64-66; 7:59-60;
`8:45-49; 8:57-60; 8:63-9:8;
`10:46-51; 12:26-31; 19:1-4;
`Figs. 1, 2, 5.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Mar.
`25, 2019 Amdt, pp. 13-14;
`Apr. 10, 2019 Ntc of Allow.,
`pp. 2-4; and Oct. 29, 2019
`Amdt., pp. 1-4.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`3
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 004
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 5 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“identify relevant AR objects
`from the AR repository
`representing available AR
`objects corresponding to the at
`least one context”
`(’051 Patent, claim 1)
`
`“alter presence” / “altered
`presence” (’051 Patent, claim
`1)
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: See
`above for the terms “AR
`object” and “AR repository.”
`It is presently unclear why
`NantWorks wishes to construe
`the entire claim element, or
`why plain and ordinary
`meaning does not suffice for
`the remainder.
`Intrinsic Evidence: See above
`for the terms “AR object” and
`“AR repository.”
`
`Proposed Construction:
`Change anything about the
`object’s presentation.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: Abstract; 18:18-45.
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction:
`Identify a set of AR objects
`from the AR repository based
`on context and identify
`relevant AR objects that are
`within that set.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: 5:64-66; 7:59-60;
`8:45-49; 8:57-60; 8:63-9:8;
`10:46-51; 12:16-21; 12:26-31;
`and 19:1-4; Figs. 1, 2, 3, 5.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Mar.
`25, 2019 Amdt, pp. 13-14;
`Apr. 10, 2019 Ntc of Allow.,
`pp. 2-4; and Oct. 29, 2019
`Amdt., pp. 1-4.
`
`Proposed Construction: The
`degree of at least a relevant
`AR object’s visual
`presentation based on a
`spectrum.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: Abstract; 4:40-41;
`5:38-43; 15:58-16:3; 16:20-
`29; 16:36-39; 16:47-60;
`16:67-17:6; 17:51-59; 17:63-
`18:9; 18:2-6; 18:10-13; 18:18-
`25; 18:36-45; Fig. 4.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Apr.
`10, 2019 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-
`4; ‘244 Appl., July 18, 2013
`Resp. Off. Act. p. 5-7; ‘244
`Appl., Sept. 26, 2013 Resp.
`Off. Act. p. 5; Oct. 18, 2013
`Resp. Off. Act. p. 6; and Mar.
`3, 2013 Resp. Off. Act. p. 9,
`11.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`4
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 005
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 6 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“determine whether to alter
`presence of a relevant AR
`object based on at least the
`device location and the virtual
`element attribute”
`(’051 Patent, claim 1)
`
`“obtain[ing] an area of interest
`via an area database based on
`at least the device location
`within the sensor data”
`(’518 Patent, claim 1)
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: See
`above for the terms “AR
`object” and “alter presence.”
`It is presently unclear why
`NantWorks wishes to construe
`the entire claim element, or
`why plain and ordinary
`meaning does not suffice for
`the remainder.
`See above for the terms “AR
`object” and “alter presence.”
`
`Proposed Construction: It is
`presently unclear why
`NantWorks wishes to construe
`the entire claim element, or
`why plain and ordinary
`meaning does not suffice.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: 26:54-55
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction:
`Determine the degree of at
`least a relevant AR object’s
`visual presentation based on a
`spectrum based on at least the
`device location, AR object
`attributes, and the virtual
`element attribute.
`Intrinsic Evidence: ’051
`Patent: Abstract; 5:38-42;
`15:58-62; 16:21-27; 16:49-51;
`18:2-6; 18:18-32; and 18:36-
`45; Figs 1, 2, 3, 4.
`File History: ’405 Appl., Apr.
`10, 2019 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-
`4.
`
`Proposed Construction:
`Obtain data from a database
`related to the layout of a real-
`world space, area, or setting
`based on at least the device
`location within the sensor
`data.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: 2:23-25; 2:30-37;
`2:45-55; 2:58-66; 4:5-6; 4:63-
`67; 5:9-15; 5:21-24; 5:30-35;
`5:36-63; 5:58-64; 6:35-38;
`6:44-52; 8:8-25; 8:36-39;
`8:46-57; 9:38-41; 10:25-29;
`10:35-41; 10:42-46; 11:1-11;
`11:25-39; 11:55-62.
`File History: ‘419 Appl: Nov.
`4, 2019 Office Action, pp. 17-
`18, 22-23, 27; and Jan. 21,
`2020 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-4.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`5
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 006
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 7 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“AR content objects”
`(’518 Patent, claim 1)
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: The
`virtual items that are to be
`presented to the user.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: Abstract; 2:19-
`22; 2:39-41; 3:54-61; 5:8-19;
`7:9-35; 14:64–15:2; 25:12-14.
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: Data
`structure including at least the
`content that is to be visually
`presented to generate an
`augmented reality experience.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: Abstract; 2:26-
`29; 2:38-44; 3:10-15; 3:39-42;
`3:54-61; 5:8-19; 7:9-23; 7:24-
`31; 7:36-41; 8:19-25; 15:2-13;
`16:42-52; 18:8-11; 19:33-36;
`19:45-54; 19:55-20:12; 25:5-
`14; Figs. 1, 2, 5, 6.
`File History: ‘419 Appl: Nov.
`4, 2019 Office Action, pp. 17-
`18, 22-23, 27; and Jan. 21,
`2020 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-4.
`Extrinsic Evidence: Object,
`render, The American
`Heritage Dictionary, (5th ed.
`2011)
`NW_NIANTIC_001760 -
`1767; Object, render,
`Microsoft Encarta College
`Dictionary, (1st ed. 2001)
`NW_NIANTIC_001768 -
`1774 .
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`6
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 007
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 8 of 10
`
`Claim Term
`
`“an area tile map of the area
`of interest, the area tile map
`represented by a set of tile
`subareas that includes one or
`more tessellated tiles from a
`tessellated tile map”
`(’518 Patent, claim 1)
`
`“associated with”
`(’518 Patent, claim 1)
`
`NantWorks’ Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: Map
`of an area of interest divided
`into tiles including subsets set
`of tiles having at least one
`tessellated tile from a
`tessellated tile map.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: 3:35-42; 3:45-52;
`4:11-12; 4:48-52; 14:39-48;
`16:13-24; 17:57-62; 18:36-45;
`20:26-31; Figs. 5, 6.
`File History: (‘419 Appl.):
`Nov. 4, 2019 Office Action,
`pp. 17-18, 27; and Jan. 21,
`2020 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-4.
`Extrinsic Evidence:
`Tessellate, The American
`Heritage Dictionary, (5th ed.
`2011)
`NW_NIANTIC_001760 -
`1767; Tessellate, Microsoft
`Encarta College Dictionary,
`(1st ed. 2001)
`NW_NIANTIC_001768 -
`1774 .
`
`Proposed Construction: Plain
`and ordinary meaning.
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: 3:39-42; 11:55-
`62; 12:7-19; 16:42-52; 18:36-
`45; 20:2-5; and 20:16-19.
`File History: ‘419 Appl: Nov.
`4, 2019 Office Action, pp. 17-
`18, 22-24, 27-28; and Jan. 21,
`2020 Ntc of Allow., pp. 2-4.
`Extrinsic Evidence: Associate,
`The American Heritage
`Dictionary, (5th ed. 2011)
`NW_NIANTIC_001760 -
`1767 ; Associate, Microsoft
`Encarta College Dictionary,
`(1st ed. 2001)
`NW_NIANTIC_001768 -
`1774 .
`
`Niantic’s Proposed
`Construction and Support
`Proposed Construction: See
`above for the term “tessellated
`tiles.” It is presently unclear
`why NantWorks wishes to
`construe the entire claim
`element, or why plain and
`ordinary meaning does not
`suffice for the remainder.
`See above for the term
`“tessellated tiles.”
`
`Proposed Construction:
`Bound to
`Intrinsic Evidence:
`’518 Patent: 3:34-42; 12:40-
`46; 15:14-31; 15:36-65;
`16:42-52; 16:57-17:21; 18:4-
`12; 18:42-58
`Extrinsic Evidence: Associate,
`The American Heritage
`Dictionary, (5th ed. 2011)
`NW_NIANTIC_001760 -
`1767 ; Associate, Microsoft
`Encarta College Dictionary,
`(1st ed. 2001)
`NW_NIANTIC_001768 -
`1774.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`7
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 008
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 9 of 10
`
`III.
`
`IDENTIFICATIONS OF SIGNIFICANT TERMS AND WHETHER THOSE
`TERMS WILL BE CASE OR CLAIM DISPOSITIVE (PLR 4-3(c))
`In Section II above, NantWorks and Niantic have consolidated their proposed terms for
`construction to a total of ten (10) terms, which include the case or claim dispositive terms for the
`Court’s consideration. NantWorks additionally identifies the following terms as the most
`significant terms: “alter presence” / “altered presence” (’051 Patent, claim 1), “determine whether
`to alter presence of a relevant AR object based on at least the device location and the virtual
`element attribute” (’051 Patent, claim 1), “obtain[ing] an area of interest via an area database
`based on at least the device location within the sensor data” (’518 Patent, claim 1), and “an area
`tile map of the area of interest, the area tile map represented by a set of tile subareas that includes
`one or more tessellated tiles from a tessellated tile map” (’518 Patent, claim 1).
`Niantic identifies the following terms as the most significant terms: “alter presence” /
`“altered presence” (’051 Patent, claim 1), “AR object repository” / “AR repository” (’051 Patent,
`claim 1), “associated with” (’518 Patent, claim 1).
`IV.
`ANTICIPATED LENGTH OF TIME NECESSARY FOR THE CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION HEARING (PLR 4-3(d))
`NantWorks and Niantic believe that two to three hours would be sufficient for the claim
`construction hearing.
`V.
`IDENTITY OF ANTICIPATED WITNESSES (PLR 4-3(e))
`At this time, neither NantWorks nor Niantic intends to call any witnesses at the claim
`construction hearing.
`VI.
`FACTUAL FINDINGS REQUESTED FROM THE COURT RELATED TO CLAIM
`CONSTRUCTION (PLR 4-3(f))
`The Parties do not request any factual findings, as they believe that all claim-construction
`issues presented here are pure questions of law.
`
`Attestation Under Civil Local Rule 5-1
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), by his signature below, counsel for NantWorks
`8
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 009
`
`

`

`Case 3:20-cv-06262-LB Document 61 Filed 05/18/21 Page 10 of 10
`
`attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Niantic concurs in the filing of this document and
`consents to the affixing of her electronic signature on this document.
`DATED: May 18, 2021
`DIAMOND MCCARTHY LLP
`By:
`/s/ Matthew K. Blackburn
`Matthew K. Blackburn
`Evan E. Boetticher
`Allan B. Diamond
`John B. Sample, IV
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs NANTWORKS, LLC
`and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`COOLEY LLP
`By:
`/s/ Heidi Keefe
`Michael G. Rhodes
`Heidi L. Keefe
`Dena Chen
`Alexandra D. Leeper
`Lauren J. Krickl
`Patrick W. Lauppe
`
`Attorneys for Defendant NIANTIC, INC.
`
`PATENT L.R. 4-3 JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`AND PREHEARING STATEMENT
`
`9
`
`(cid:38)(cid:36)(cid:54)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:49)(cid:50)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:22)(cid:29)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:70)(cid:89)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:19)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:25)(cid:21)(cid:3032)-(cid:3032)(cid:47)(cid:37)
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Niantic's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 010
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket