throbber
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Demaray LLC
`Samsung Electronic's Exhibit 1018
`Exhibit 1018, Page 1
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000 A2
`
`—_MIUIIINIIIINTATITARITIARTNTATMTTi
`
`Il, LU, MC, NL, PL, SK, TR), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CK, Aor two-letter codes and other abbreviations, refer to the "Guid-
`CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`ance Notes on Codes andAbbreviations" appearing at the begin-
`ning ofeach regular issue ofthe PCT Gazette.
`
`Published:
`
`—_without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 2
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 2
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`TITLE OF THE INVENTION
`
`METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DEPOSITING FILMS
`
`This International Application claims benefit of U.S. Application No. 60/185,068
`
`filed February 25, 2000.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The present invention relates to the deposition offilms,or layers, primarily in the
`
`fabrication of integrated circuits, but also in the manufacture of other products.
`
`Integrated circuit fabrication procedures are composed ofa variety of operations,
`
`10
`
`including operations for depositing thin films on a semiconductor substrate, or wafer.
`
`Typically, a large numberof identical integrated circuits are formed on such a wafer, which is
`
`then cut, or diced, into individual circuit chips.
`
`Given the small dimensionsof these integrated circuits, the quality of each deposited
`
`layer or film has a decisive influence on the quality ofthe resulting integrated circuit.
`
`15
`
`Basically, the quality of a film is determined byits physical uniformity, including the
`
`uniformity of its thickness and its homogeneity.
`
`In particular, several process steps require the ability to deposit high quality thin
`
`conductive films and to deposit conducting material in both high aspectratio trenches and
`
`vias (and/or contacts).
`
`20
`
`According to the current state of theart, films, or layers, are deposited on a substrate
`
`according to two types of techniques: physical vapor deposition (PVD), which encompasses
`
`various forms of sputtering; and chemical vapor deposition (CVD). According to each type
`
`ofprocedure, a layer of material composed of a plurality of atoms or molecules of elements
`
`or compounds, commonlyreferred to collectively as “adatoms”, is deposited upon a substrate
`
`25
`
`in a low pressure region.
`
`In typical PVD procedures, a target material is sputtered to eject adatomsthat then
`
`diffuse through the low pressure region and condense on the surface of the substrate on which
`
`the layer is to be deposited. This material forms a layer on the substrate surface.
`
`Continuation ofthis process leads to the growth of a thin film. The sputtering itself is a
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 3
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 3
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`2
`
`physical process which involves accelerating heavy ions from an ionized gas, such as argon,
`
`toward the target surface, where the ions act to dislodge and eject adatomsofthe target
`
`material as a result of momentum exchange which occurs upon collision of the ions with the
`
`target surface.
`
`Onthe other hand, in CVD procedures, two or more gases are introduced into a
`
`vacuum chamber where they react to form products. One of these products will be deposited
`
`as a layer on the substrate surface, while the other product or products are pumped out of the
`
`low pressure region.
`
`Both types of deposition processes are advantageously performed with the assistance
`
`10
`
`of a plasma created in the low pressure region. In the case of PVD processes,it is essential to
`
`provide a primary plasmato generate the ions that will be used to bombardthetarget.
`
`However, in these processes, a secondary plasma may be formedto assist the deposition
`
`process itself. In particular, a secondary plasma can serve to enhance the mobility of adatoms
`
`in proximity to the substrate surface.
`
`15
`
`Although CVD processes are widely used in the semiconductor fabrication industry,
`
`processes ofthis type have been foundto possess certain disadvantages. For example, in
`
`order to employ CVD fora particular deposition operation,it is necessary to be ableto create
`
`a chemical reaction that will produce, as one reaction product, the material to be deposited. In
`
`contrast, in theory, any material, including dielectric and conductive materials, can be
`
`20
`
`deposited by PVD andthis is the process of choice when deposition must be performed while
`
`maintaining the substrate temperature within predetermined limits, and particularly when
`deposition is to be performed while the substrate is at a relatively low temperature.
`
`A film composedofa dielectric material can be formed by PVD either by directly
`
`sputtering a target madeof the dielectric material, or by performingareactive sputtering
`
`25
`
`operation in which a conductive materialis sputtered from a target and the sputtered
`
`conductive material then reacts with a selected gas to producethedielectric material thatis to
`
`be deposited. One exemplary target material utilized for direct sputtering is silicon dioxide.
`
`PVDcan also be used for conductive layers.
`
`The simplest known PVD structure has the form of a planar diode which consists of
`
`30
`
`two parallel plate electrodes that define cathode constructed to serve as the target and an
`
`anode which supports the substrate. A plasma is maintained between the cathode and anode
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 4
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 4
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`3
`
`and electrons emitted from the cathode by ion bombardmententer the plasma as primary
`
`electrons and serve to maintain the plasma.
`
`While a target made of a conductive material can be biased with a DC power supply,
`
`a target madeofa dielectric material must be biased with high frequency, and particularly RF
`
`power, which can also assist the generation of ions in the plasma. The RF poweris supplied
`
`to the target by a circuit arrangement including, for example, a blocking capacitor, in orderto
`
`cause the applied RF powerto result in the development of a DC self-bias on thetarget.
`
`Since the planar diode configuration is not suitable for efficient generation of ions,
`
`DC and RF magnetron configurations have been developed for producing a magneticfield
`
`10
`
`having field lines that extend approximately parallel to the target surface. This magnetic field
`
`confines electrons emitted from the target within a region neighboring the target surface,
`
`thereby improving ionization efficiency and the creation of higher plasmadensities for a
`
`given plasmaregion pressure.
`
`Additional configurations followed including the variety of cylindrical magnetrons.
`
`15
`
`Several versions of the cylindrical magnetron variation have appeared in the patentprior art,
`
`in particular, the family of U.S. Patents Nos. 4,132,613, 4,132,613, 4,132,612, 4,116,794,
`
`4,116,793, 4,111,782, 4,041,353, 3,995,187, 3,884,793 and 3,878,085.
`
`Asdescribed in Thornton in "Influence of Apparatus Geometry and Deposition
`
`Conditions on the Structure and Topography of Thick Sputtered Coatings", J. Vac. Sci.
`
`20
`
`Technol., Vol 11, No 4, 666-670 (1974), the structure of a deposited metalfilm is dependent
`
`on both the temperature of the substrate and the gas pressure within the plasma region. The
`
`highest film quality can be achieved when the substrate is at a relatively low temperature and
`
`conditions are created to effect a certain level of bombardmentof the substrate with ions
`
`from the plasma while the film is being formed. When optimum conditions are established, a
`
`25
`
`dense, high quality thin film which is substantially free of voids and anomalies can be
`
`achieved.
`
`It is known in the art that bombardmentofthe substrate with ions having energies
`
`under 200 eV, and preferably not greater than 30 eV, and more preferably between 10 and 30
`
`eV, can result in the formation ofdielectric films having optimum characteristics. This has
`
`30
`
`been found to be true in the case of, for example, thin films of SiOz and Ti02.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 5
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 5
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`4
`
`Achievementof high deposition rates and optimum quality of the deposited layer
`requires a high energy density in the plasma adjacent both the target and the substrate. Plasma
`energy flux (with units of J/m’-sec) is the product ofthe ion flux (with units ofnumber of
`ions/m?-sec) and ion energy (with units ofJ/ion).
`
`However, whereas the highest possible ion energy is desired adjacent the target to
`
`maximize the target sputtering rate, it has been found that the ion energy adjacent the
`
`substrate,i.e., the energy of ions that bombard the substrate, should be less than the
`
`maximum achievable for reasonsrelating primarily to layer quality.
`
`For example, a reduced ion energy in the plasma adjacent the substrate reduces the
`
`10
`
`rate of implantation ofplasma gas ions into the substrate, as well damageto the substrate
`
`subsurface, and the creation of voids and mechanicalstresses in the layer being formed.
`
`Therefore, while it is desirable to have a high ion density in the plasma adjacent both
`
`the target and the substrate, different desiderata exist with respect to plasma ion energy. The
`
`plasma density in these systems are quite uniform, ie within +/-20% due to diffusion.
`
`15
`
`The plasma energyflux to the target and to the substrate are each limited by the
`
`ability to remove heat from the target or substrate/chuck, respectively. Moreover, the ion
`
`energy associated with ions striking the substrate surface is desired to be limited to a
`
`maximum value to assure layer deposition quality. Therefore, it is imperative to use a plasma
`source capable of generating a dense plasma (107 cm”) or, equivalently, a high ion current
`density at the target and substrate surfaces while enabling direct control of the ion energy via
`
`20
`
`other means.
`
`For PVD of conductive material, an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) plasma
`source is known, capable of generating plasmas with a density in the range of 10°? cm? and
`higher. However, the plasma density proximate the substrate is often significantly reduced
`
`25
`
`since the substrate is generally downstream from the plasma source.
`
`In general, known systemsare not suitable for both generating a high density plasma
`and allowing appropriate control of the ion energy deliveredto the substrate. Specifically,
`
`when, in the known systems, the plasma density is increased, the plasmapotentialis
`
`correspondingly raised and this leads to high sheath voltages and high ion energies in the
`
`30
`
`vicinity of the substrate.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 6
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 6
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`5
`
`Furthermore, a growing problem associated with many PVD chambersis a lack of
`
`directivity for the adatom specie. Subsequently, whenfilling high aspect vias and trenches,
`
`the feature may be “pinched off’ prematurely due to deposition coating growth on the feature
`
`side-walls. Therefore, the concept of “ion plating” was introduced wherein a fraction of the
`
`adatom specie is ionized and attracted to the substrate surface by meansofa substrate bias.
`
`Consequently, the directed (normal) flow of ionized adatom specie enabled a uniform coating
`
`growth without pinch-off; see U.S. Patent No. 5,792,522.
`
`In addition, an inherent problem associated with the use of inductively coupled
`
`plasma sources for conductive material PVD applicationsis the development of conductive
`
`10
`
`coatings on the chamber walls. Oncethis thin coating exceeds somethickness (~400 A), the
`
`wall coating becomessufficiently conductive that the plasma source ceasesto sustain a
`
`plasma. In both U.S. Patent No. 5,800,688 and 5,763,851, a circumferential shield
`
`comprising longitudinal and transverse structures is employed to limit the field of view of
`
`sputtered material migrating towards the chamber walls, hence, interrupting the generation of
`
`15
`
`a continuous wall coating of conducting material. Figure 1 of U.S. Patent No. 5,800,688
`
`showsa series of angular blade sections displaced circumferentially, whereas Figure 2 U.S.
`
`Patent No.5,763,851 showsa series of concentric shields comprising longitudinal slots, with
`
`slots alternately placed between adjacent layers.
`
`BRIEF SUMMARYOF THE INVENTION
`
`20
`
`A primary object of the present invention is to form high quality films on a substrate.
`
`Another object of the present invention to provide a method and apparatus for
`
`performing PVD in a plasmaregion which contains a high density plasma and in which the
`
`target is bombarded with high energy ions and the substrate is bombarded with comparatively
`
`low energy ions.
`
`25
`
`A further object of the invention is to allow independent controlofthe target and
`
`substrate bombardmention energies.
`
`A further object of the invention is to achieve high target material sputter rates in
`
`order to produce corresponding high film deposition rates.
`
`Yet another object of the invention is to provide a noveltarget electrode structure
`
`30
`
`which allows the desired high sputtering rate to be achieved.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 7
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 7
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`6
`
`Further objects ofthe invention are to reduce particle contamination due to complex
`
`geometric features in the process chamber, and to improvethe efficiency of coupling RF
`
`powerto the plasma.
`
`Another object of the invention is to eliminate certain obstacles to the plasma-assisted
`
`deposition of conductive layers on substrates.
`
`A still further object ofthe invention is to control the buildup of sputtered material on
`
`the chamberwalls.
`
`The aboveand other objects are achieved, according to the present invention, by
`
`apparatus for performing physical vapor deposition of a layer on a substrate, which apparatus
`
`10
`
`includes a deposition chamber enclosing a plasma region for containing an ionizable gas, and
`
`electromagnetic field generating means surrounding the plasmaregionfor inductively
`
`coupling an electromagneticfield into the plasma region to ionize the gas and generate and
`
`maintain a high density, low potential plasma. A source of deposition material including a
`
`solid target is installed in the chamber. Thesolid target contains a material whichis to be
`
`15
`
`deposited onto the substrate. The target is electrically biased in order to cause ions in the
`
`plasmatostrike the target and sputter material from the target. The apparatus further includes
`
`a substrate holder for holding the substrate at a location to permit material sputtered from the
`
`target to be deposited on the substrate.
`
`In preferred embodiments of the apparatus according to the invention, the
`
`20
`
`electromagnetic field generating means comprise an electrostatically shielded radio frequency
`
`electromagnetic field source that includes an electrostatic shield surrounding the plasma
`
`region and a coil surrounding the shield for converting RF power into an electromagnetic
`
`field that is coupled into the plasma through the electrostatic shield.
`
`It has been found that a source of this type is capable of generating a high density
`
`25
`
`plasma, which makespossible the achievementof high target sputter rates and high substrate
`
`deposition rates while maintaining a low plasmapotential and, hence, enabling independent
`
`control of the DC self-bias induced in each of the target and substrate.
`
`Objects according to the invention are further achieved by the provision, in such
`
`apparatus, of a target assembly constructed to have the following features:
`
`the area of the
`
`30
`
`target is small relative to the unbiased area of the chamber, thereby maximizing DCself-bias
`
`of the target; a match network is provided for permitting application of a high frequency RF
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 8
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 8
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`7
`
`voltage to create the self-bias, the target presenting a low impedanceto high frequencies; the
`
`match network is constructed to minimize harmonicsof the high frequency on the target;
`
`some RF poweris capacitively coupled to the target; the target is brazed to a stainless steel
`
`plate which maximizes heat transfer from the target to a heat removal system; the heat
`
`removal system is constructed to be capable of high heat removalrates, typically in excess of
`10 W/cm’; and a network for monitoring electrode arcing is provided.
`
`Objects according to the invention are further achieved by the provision of a substrate
`
`holder in the form of a chuck having the following features:
`
`the chuck is constructed to
`
`electrostatically clamp the substrate to the chuck; a system for delivering gas to the lower
`
`10
`
`surface of the substrate is provided; the chuck is constructed to removeheat at a high rate
`
`from the substrate; and a RF bias is applied to the chuck in order to induce a DC self-bias in
`
`the substrate. The combination. ofall four of these features will facilitate the delivery of a
`
`high ion flux to the substrate and, consequently, high deposition rates, while ions having a
`
`relatively low energy also impact on the substrate. As noted earlier herein, a certain amount
`
`15
`
`of low energy in bombardmentis needed to produce the highest quality depositing films.
`
`In further accordance with the invention, the electrostatic shield of the
`electromagnetic field generating meansis arranged to be electrically and/or thermally biased.
`The application of such bias during a sputtering process or between sputtering operations can
`
`serve to remove material that has been deposited on the inner surface of the shield, which
`
`20 |
`
`constitutes a lateral wali of the deposition chamber. This at least reduces,if not completely
`
`eliminating, wall contamination and, thus, subsequent substrate contamination. The thickness
`ofmaterial deposited on the wall can be monitored, and this will provide an indication of
`when a wall cleaning is required.
`
`Also in accordance with the invention, the apparatus may be configured to permit
`deposition of conductiye material by providing a dielectric process tube that surrounds and
`delimits the plasma region andabias shield that surrounds the process tube and is used for
`
`25
`
`monitoring the thickness of a conductive material layer deposited on the process tube and to
`
`provide a bias voltage that acts to sputter the conductive material off of the processtube.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 9
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 9
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`8
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING
`
`FIG.1 is an elevational view,partly in cross-section and partly pictorial, of a first
`
`embodiment of a PVD apparatus according to the invention.
`
`FIG.2 is a cross-sectional, detail view of one structural feature of the apparatus of
`
`FIG. 1.
`
`FIG.3 is a view similar to that ofFIG 1 of a second embodiment ofPVD apparatus
`
`according to the invention.
`
`FIG.4 is a cross-sectional, detail view of a portion of a modified version of the
`
`apparatus ofFIG. 1 or FIG. 3 for PVD of conductive materials.
`
`10
`
`FIGs. 5A and 5b are developed views, FIG. 5A being a top plan cross-sectional detail
`
`view and FIG. 5B being a side elevational detail view, of one embodiment of components of
`
`the apparatus shown in FIG.4.
`
`FIG.6 is a developed side elevational detail view of a second embodiment of one of
`
`the components shown in FIGs. 5A and 5B.
`
`15
`
`FIG. 7A is partially a developed cross-sectional plan view and partially a schematic
`diagram showing one embodimentof a coating thickness monitoring arrangement according
`
`to the invention.
`
`FIG. 7B is a diagram showing an equivalent circuit of the arrangement of FIG. 7A.
`
`FIG.8 is a diagram showing the variation of sputtering yield with ion energy for
`
`20
`
`several target compositions.
`
`DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
`
`The first embodiments to be described are particularly suitable for sputtering and
`
`depositing dielectric material.
`
`25
`
`FIG.1 illustrates a first embodiment of an apparatus according to the present
`
`invention for performing physical vapor deposition, on a substrate, of a layer of a dielectric
`
`material sputtered from a target. The apparatus is composedof a housing 2 that encloses a
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 10
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 10
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`9
`
`plasma chamber4, an annular coil enclosure 6, a target assembly 8 and a substrate holder 10.
`
`Plasma chamber4 is separated from coil enclosure 6 by a cylindrical conductive sheet 14 that
`Serves as an electrostatic shield.
`
`Coil enclosure 6 contains a multi-turn helical coil 16 connected between ground and a
`
`series arrangement of a RF powergenerator 18 and a matching network 20.
`
`Housing 2 is also connected to ground and conductive sheet 14 is connected to
`
`ground,at least during the major portion of a deposition process. Target 8 is composed
`
`basically of a metal plate 24 and a dielectric sheet, or plate, 26 constituting the source of
`material to be sputtered and deposited on a substrate. Metal plate 24 is provided with
`passages forming part of a coolant flow path 30 through which a coolant fluid flows during
`
`10
`
`deposition operation. Plate 24 is conductively connected to a RF powergenerator 32 via a
`
`series arrangement of a matching network 34 and a blocking capacitor 36.
`
`Substrate holder 10 provides a support surface for a substrate 40 on which the layeris
`
`to be deposited. Substrate holder 10 is provided with flow passages forming part of a coolant
`
`15
`
`flow path 44 for flow of a coolant that will remove heat from substrate 40. Substrate holder
`
`10 is connected to a RF powergenerator 46 via a matching network 48 provided to maximize
`
`powertransfer to holder 10.
`
`As shown in FIG.4, to be described in detail below,it is desirable that electrostatic
`
`shield 14 be well ground at the top and bottom and maintained permanently at ground
`
`20
`
`potential. A secondelectrically isolated shield, or bias shield, 80 is provided between shield
`
`14 and a process tube 82 madeofdielectric material. Shield 80 may be used for imposing an
`
`electrical wall bias to remove deposited layers thereon.
`
`Conductive sheet 14 is provided with an array of slots 60 via which electromagnetic
`
`energy generated by coil 16 is coupled into plasma chamber 4. Slots 60 will be closed by
`
`25
`
`dielectric windows,or sheet 14 may entirely encircle a cylindrical process tube, such as tube
`
`82 of FIG. 4.
`
`In the arrangement illustrated in Figure 1, coil 16 and conductive sheet 14 constitute
`
`the essential components of an electrostatically-shielded radio frequency (ESRF) plasma
`
`source that is already known in the art. For example, generators of this type are described in
`
`30
`
`USS. Patents Nos. 4,938,031 and 5,234,529, as well as in Lieberman and Lichtenberg,
`
`Principles ofplasma discharges and materials processing, Chapter 12, John Wiley and Sons,
`
`Inc. (1994). As described in the latter text, coil 16 can be configured to formahelical
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 11
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 11
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`10
`
`resonator by giving coil 16 a length equal to an integral numberof quarter wavelengths of the
`
`RF input signal. The point on coil 16 to which RF poweris supplied from generator 18 is
`
`located close to one end ofthe coil which is grounded. This portion ofthe coil effectively
`
`serves as part of the matching network, enabling selection of a tap position for achieving a
`
`match condition. Under certain conditions, proper selection of the tap point location can
`
`provide the desired impedance matchingforthe circuit. The open-circuited part of coil 16
`
`provides a termination that is resonant at the RF.
`
`In accordance with the usual practice in the art, enclosure 6 is filled with a bath ofa
`
`dielectric fluid, one example of which is sold underthe trademark Fluorinert, in order to
`
`10
`
`maintain coil 16 at a desired temperature.
`
`The purpose ofmatching network 20 is to match the power supply output impedance
`
`to the load impedanceas represented by the intrinsic impedanceof coil 16 and the impedance
`
`ofthe plasma established in chamber 4,in order to maintain efficient energy transfer to the
`
`plasma. Matching networks for achieving this result are already knownin the art.
`
`15
`
`According to preferred embodiments of the invention, metal plate 24 and othertarget
`
`components connected to generator 32 are preferably madeofstainless steel and the target
`
`material is attached to plate 24 in a mannerdictated by the nature of the materials involved.
`
`For example, the target, or dielectric plate, 26 may be made of alumina, which will be brazed
`
`to copper plate 24. One advantage of brazing is that it will maximize the heat transfer
`conductance between plates 24 and 26.
`
`20
`
`The load impedance on powersupply 18 is a functionofthe intrinsic impedance of
`
`coil 14 and the impedance presented by a plasma created in chamber 4. The impedance of
`
`the plasma will vary significantly between that which exists prior to plasma ignition andthat
`
`which exists while a plasma is being maintained. Matching network 20 is provided
`
`25
`
`essentially to maintain efficient energy transfer from generator 18 to the plasma despite such
`
`load impedance variations.
`
`Each matching network 20, 34, 48 and 58 may be an L-network composed of two
`
`variable capacitors and an inductor, the capacitors being mechanically adjustable by an
`
`automatic control network in order to maintain the desired impedance match. Typically, the
`
`30
`
`source impedance of an RF generatoris of the order of 50 © and the variable match network
`
`components will be adjusted so that the output impedance of the match networkis the
`
`complex conjugate ofthe input impedanceto the plasma source. Under matched conditions,
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 12
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 12
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`11
`
`the forward powerat the match network junction is maximized and the reflected poweris
`
`minimized. Use can be made of known matching network designs which, while differing
`
`from one another in speed, robustness and controllability, are based upon the same
`
`fundamental principles which are abundantly described in the art. The provision ofseries
`
`connected blocking capacitor 36 serves to promote the development of a high level DC self-
`
`bias voltage on plates 24 and 26.
`
`The RF bias applied to target 26 must exceed the sputtering threshold ofthe target,
`
`whichis typically between 60 and 100 volts. The sputtering yield will then increase linearly
`
`as a function of voltage until reaching a level between 500 and 1000 volts. The optimum
`
`10
`
`operating point for a target is that at which the sputtering yield per unit power absorbedis a
`
`maximum. Thesputtering yield itself is basically dependant on the powerdissipated at the
`
`target. This poweris limited by the thermal conductivity of the target material and the rate of
`
`heat conduction to the coolant flow path. A typical, efficient target design can dissipate on
`the order of 10W/cm?.
`
`15
`
`Furthermore, the area of target 26 should be small relative to the area of the grounded
`or unbiased surfaces delimiting the plasma chamberin order to assure a high DC self-bias at
`target 26. This derives from the known fact that when a potential exists between two
`
`electrodes, and one electrode has an area substantially different from the other, the resulting
`
`DC self-biased will be relatively large.
`
`20
`
`In further accordance with the present invention, the RF power produced by generator
`
`32 should be at a very high frequency, preferably higher than 50MHz. Whendielectric target
`
`26 has a thickness of several millimeters, it is necessary that capacitive coupling to thefront,
`
`or exposed, surface of target 26 provide the mechanism for transmitting power through target
`
`26. The following Table 1 provides one preferred exemplary set of specifications for
`
`25
`
`performance of a deposition process according to the invention in apparatus of the type
`
`shown in Figure 1.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 13
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 13
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`12
`
`Table 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In further accordance with the invention, the structure for supplying RF power from
`
`generator 32 to target electrode 24 may be constructed to reduce the amplitude. ofharmonic
`
`components ofthe RF power. The presence ofharmonic components having significant
`
`amplitudes can lead to a non-uniform spatial distribution of the electric field that is coupled
`
`from electrode 24 into the plasma in chamber 4. Even though only the fundamental RF
`
`power frequency is coupled to target electrode 24 and ultimately couples powerat this
`
`frequency into the plasma, harmonicsof that fundamental frequency can be generated within
`
`10
`
`the plasma due to the inherent nonlinearity of the plasma, and in particular the plasma
`
`sheaths, which are thin boundary layers of the plasma adjacent to electrode surfaces. Within
`
`the plasma sheath adjacentto dielectric plate 26, powerat the fundamental RF frequency can
`
`be redistributed to harmonic frequencies by a nonlinear waveform rectification mechanism.
`
`Electric field components at these harmonic frequencies can then appear in target 24, 26
`
`15
`
`becauseit directly interfaces with the plasma. In many cases, harmonic energy can then be
`
`reflected at impedance mismatches, such as may exist at the base of the match network, and
`
`this reflected energy is returned to the plasma.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 14
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 14
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`13
`
`In order to obtain an improved target sputtering uniformity, it is therefore desirable to
`
`incorporate harmonic reduction techniques. One such approach would be the construction of
`
`a conical, coaxial RF transmission line for feeding the RF powerto target 24, 26 in order to
`
`make the line transparent to harmonic frequencies. Wave propagation along the line may be
`
`attenuated using a dielectric material having a significant dielectric or magnetic loss tangent,
`
`6 within a coaxial conductoror by using RF filtering techniques. Construction of such
`
`arrangements can be based on knowledge already existing in theart, as disclosed, for
`
`example, in a Provisional application filed by Windhorn on February 14, 2000, Attorney
`Docket No. 258426. When, for example, a high density plasma, of the order of 10'ions/cm?
`, is generated in chamber4, with ion current densities ofthe order of 30mA/cm’flowing to
`
`10
`
`the surface ofdielectric plate, or sputter target plate 26, together with the creation of high ion
`
`energies, a high energy flux can be created at the target surface. By maximizing the energy
`
`flux to the target surface and optimizing its breakdown between ion flux and ion energy, a
`
`maximum sputter yield can be created.
`
`15
`
`Substrate holder 10 includes a chuck, which may be an electrostatic chuck, for
`
`holding substrate 40 in place. Substrate holder 10 is mounted to be capable of undergoing
`
`vertical movementin order to bring substrate 40 to a desired level with respect to chamber4.
`
`Vertically moveable substrate holders are already well known in the art. In accordance with
`
`the present invention, this capability may be employedto position the upper surface of
`
`20
`
`substrate 40 just slightly below the lower extremities of slots 60. The density ofthe
`
`inductively coupled plasma produced in chamber 4 decays rapidly below the lower
`
`extremities, and above the upper extremities, of slots 60. The rate of decayis strongly
`
`dependent upon the pressure within chamber 4. The density becomesnearly zero within a
`
`few centimeters above and below theslot extremities. This allows the upper surface of
`
`25
`
`substrate 40 to be located in proximity to a region ofhigh plasma density, while itself being
`
`in a region of low plasmadensity, thereby allowing a low level of ion energy to be achieved
`
`at the substrate surface. This level can be controlled by suitable selection of the substrate
`
`self-bias voltage.
`
`Substrate holder 10 is further constructed to maintain the substrate at a specified
`
`30
`
`temperature by incorporating therein a cooling system, including a coolant flow path 44,
`capable ofremovingheat from substrate 40 at a rate of the order of 5-10W/cm’. Thermal
`
`conduction between substrate 40 and substrate holder 10 is improved by supplying a layer of
`
`gas therebetween and bycreating electrostatic forces to hold substrate 40 against holder 10.
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 15
`
`Ex. 1018, Page 15
`
`

`

`WO 01/63000
`
`PCT/US01/04563
`
`14
`
`The combination of a layer of gas and electrostatic clamping, each of which is conventional
`
`in the art, serves to increase the thermal conductivity in the interface region between substrate
`
`40 and substrate holder 10. One such devicein the priorart is described in U.S. Patent #
`
`5,625,526 (Watanabeet al.) entitled “Electrostatic Chuck”.
`
`At the bottom of chamber4, holder 10 is surrounded by an annular region whichis in
`
`communication with a ducting system (not shown) leading to a vacuum pump, such as a
`
`turbomolecular pump, that maintains a desired vacuum pressure within chamber 4. RF power
`
`is supplied by generator 46 to substrate holder 10 for the purpose of establishing a DC self-
`bias on substrate 40.
`
`10
`
`The RF bias supplied to holder 10, a

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket