`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Demaray LLC
`Samsung Electronic's Exhibit 1011
`Exhibit 1011, Page 1
`
`
`
`
`5,942,089
`Page 2
`
`
`
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W. D. Sproul, P. J. Rudnik and M. E. Graham, The Effect of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`N2Partial Pressure, Deposition Rate and Substrate Bias
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Potential on the Hardness and Texture of Reactively Sput-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tered TiN Coatings, Surface and Coatings Technology,
`
`
`
`39/40 (1989) 355—363.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`X. Chu, M.S. Wong, W. D. Sproul, S. L. Rohde and S. A.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Barnett, Deposition and Properties of Polycrystalline TiN/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NbN Superlattice Coatings, J. Vac Sci. Technol. A 10(4),
`
`
`Jul/Aug. 1992.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`William D. Sproul, Control ofA Reactive Sputtering Process
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`For Large Systems, Presented at
`the Society of Vacuum
`Coaters 36th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, Texas,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apr. 30, 1993.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`J. Affinito and R. R. Parsons, Mechanisms of Voltage
`
`
`
`
`
`Controlled, Reactive, Planar Magnetron Sputtering of Al in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ar/N2 and AR/O2 Atmospheres, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2(3),
`
`
`Jul.—Sep. 1984.
`
`S. Schiller, K. Goedicke, J. Reschke, V. Kirchhoff, S.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Schneider and F. Milde, Pulsed Magnetron Sputter Technol-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ogy, Surface and Coatings Technology, 61 (1993) 331—337.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`P. Frach, U. Heisig, Chr. Gottfried and H. Walde, Aspects
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and Results of Long—Term Stable Deposition of Ale3 With
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`High Rate Pulsed Reactive Magnetron Sputtering, Surface
`
`
`
`
`
`and Coatings Technology, 59 (1993) 177—182.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`W. D. Sproul, M. E. Graham, M. S. Wong, S. Lopez, and D.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Li, Reactive Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering of Alu-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`minum Oxide Coatings. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13(3),
`
`
`May/Jun. 1995.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`William D. Sproul, Michael E. Graham, Ming—Show and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paul J. Rudnik, Reactive DC Magnetron Sputtering of the
`Oxides of Ti, Zr, and Hf, Presented at
`the International
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conference on Metallurgical Coatings and Thin Films,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Town and Country Hotel, San Diego, California, Apr. 24—28,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1994 and Submitted for publication in Surface and Coatings
`
`Technology.
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 2
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 2
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 24, 1999
`
`Sheet 1 0f 5
`
`5,942,089
`
`8:05:009:96E8UmEH2
`
`NW
`
`Fm.
`
`$W
`
`SEES
`
`wztga
`
`moo
`
`I.
`
`
`
`Emgmxm9%:quEoszmSm
`
`_.6_u_
`
`
`
`562pm,
`
`go:NWIE
`
`......43»Q26xmm\oNww_:
` ...'I..'..........ll.ll'
`
`fili‘.‘.‘.Udv~IM—MH@M‘IW’i..“
`
`
`-““-“““-“
`
`“>’ v
`
`
`§__|
`.562
`
`fi-“-“‘I.w
`
`Fomcwm
`
`85358%
`
`56:10:831S_1:m_892I“sh“$50“EEO825526;
`
`
`
`
`
`mm.530a825.3N\oiu
`
`85828989:5
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 3
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 24, 1999
`
`Sheet 2 0f5
`
`5,942,089
`
`0 o(
`
`\l
`
`«2
`
`o Q
`'9'.
`Q)
`(I)
`1
`-\
`
`Qé
`i:
`
`_O
`00
`
`-0
`V.
`
`o
`
`_
`
`1..
`Q)
`
`E
`
`(1
`
`AU
`0
`U
`(9
`2
`j
`
`LL
`:—
`Q
`o
`.9
`CD
`
`0
`.1.
`N :—
`ci
`3
`E E
`g
`
`(D
`
`o o o o o o o O o
`o O o o
`o o o o
`
`A‘aBQHOA apoqu)
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 4
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 4
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 24, 1999
`
`Sheet 3 0f 5
`
`5,942,089
`
`
`
`5261Us895363mmoEwEE>m<
`
`l.|lllllIIllllllllllllllI.lllllO(a
`
`02
`
`A
`
`0.2m
`
`08.MlOOTU6
`
`cow-
`
`3W00¢-.Um0%.a
`
`om0p00cmow0m0m9o
`
`owmldEC
`
`
`
`.qu895525QCSEE>m<zWBSEw.7830m
`
`
`
`2113880121180268:3
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 5
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 5
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 24, 1999
`
`Sheet 4 0f 5
`
`5,942,089
`
`@Emmwbwaér
`
`9685251
`
`no80.0mov.0nomo6
`
`
`
`:8EgsmwwaBEE535
`
`
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 6
`
`O L
`
`n
`or)
`
`d
`
`4
`
`00?
`
`/\ ’96:;qu labigi
`
`
`
`
`
`83meBEE$95.9,mafia;EPQkOE
`
`And.“—
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 6
`
`
`
`US. Patent
`
`Aug. 24, 1999
`
`Sheet 5 0f5
`
`5,942,089
`
`.
`
`4
`
`L0
`N
`
`0
`(\l
`
`E
`
`9U)
`Ex
`Q
`
`L1.
`C
`
`02‘
`’53
`
`L0
`
`I
`!
`
`O
`o
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 7
`
`0')
`01E
`.gw
`<08
`9:5
`8w
`—-Q
`[pin
`
`'
`
`-
`
`‘
`
`'\
`a
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`,
`._
`
`‘
`
`a
`
`5
`9
`Ll_
`‘9'
`e:
`
`:3
`(I)
`8
`
`;_
`0'
`
`‘0
`E
`(C5
`D.
`S:
`to
`Q)
`'
`C)“
`L9
`_ >\
`LL
`><
`O
`I
`X
`
`Q <
`
`(q
`O
`
`m
`O
`
`V:
`O
`
`noi’amssaid [glued uabkxo
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 7
`
`
`
`5,942,089
`
`
`
`
`1
`METHOD FOR SPUTTERING COMPOUNDS
`
`
`
`ON A SUBSTRATE
`
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Briefly,
`the present invention relates to a method and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`apparatus for sputtering of a thin film of a compound onto
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a substrate workpiece by means of cathodic, magnetron
`
`sputtering.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Application of metals and metallic compounds by use of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a reactive deposition process is known and is the subject, for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, of US. Pat. No. 4,428,811, “Rapid Rate Reactive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sputtering Of A Group IVB Metal” issued Jan. 31, 1984,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`incorporated herewith by reference. US. Pat. No. 4,428,811
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`discloses a method and apparatus for rapid rate deposition of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`metallic compounds such as titanium nitride onto a substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in a vacuum chamber. In the process, the chamber is filled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with inert gas that is ionized and bombards the metal target
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`within the chamber to initiate the sputtering process. A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate is positioned within the chamber for coating, and
`20
`a second reactive gas is fed into the chamber at a measured
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`rate to combine at the substrate with the atomized metal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from the target to form the coating. Control systems for such
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sputtering operations are also disclosed in the aforesaid
`patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Over the years, the technology associated with sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`processes has been improved so that additional compounds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and materials can be applied to a substrate by. A series of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`papers by the co-inventor reflect research in this area includ-
`
`
`
`ing the following:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1. “High Rate Reactive Sputtering Process Control,”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`published in Surface and Coatings Technology, 1987;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2. “The Effect of Target Power on the Nitrogen Partial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pressure Level and Hardness of Reactively Sputtered Tita-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nium Nitride Coatings,” published in Thin Solid Films,
`1989;
`
`3. “Advances in Partial-Pressure Control Applied to Reac-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tive Sputtering,” published in Surface and Coatings
`
`
`Technology, 1989;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4. “The Effect of N2 Partial Pressure, Deposition Rate and
`Substrate Bias Potential on the Hardness and Texture of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Reactively Sputtered TiN Coatings,” published in Surface
`
`
`
`
`and Coatings Technology, 1989;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5. “Deposition and Properties of Polycrystalline TiN/NbN
`45
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Superlattice Coatings,” published in J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A
`
`
`
`
`10/4, July/August 1992; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. “Control of a Reactive Sputtering Process for Large
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Systems,” a paper presented at
`the Society of Vacuum
`Coaters, 36th Annual Technical Conference, Dallas, Tex.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Apr. 30, 1993.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The text of these publications is incorporated herewith by
`reference.
`
`The energy source which effects the ionization of the inert
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gas in a sputtering system has evolved over time so that now
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pulsed, direct current electrical power is known to be a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`preferred energy source to the target material. Publications
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`relating to this technique and technology include the fol-
`
`lowing:
`7. “Mechanisms of Voltage Controlled, Reactive, Planar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Magnetron Sputtering of Al
`in Ar/N2 and Ar/O2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Atmospheres,” published in J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2(3),
`
`
`
`July—September 1984; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8. “Pulsed Magnetron Sputter Technology,” published in
`
`
`
`
`
`Surface and Coatings Technology, 1993.
`
`
`
`
`
`These publications are incorporated herewith by refer-
`ence.
`
`10
`
`15
`
`25
`
`30
`
`
`
`35
`
`
`
`
`40
`
`
`
`
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sputtering techniques for the application of pure metals
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are fairly well refined and effective. Additionally, sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`techniques for conductive or non-insulating compounds
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`have been somewhat successful utilizing the techniques
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described in the aforesaid publications. However, certain
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`materials, which provide an insulating, hard coating upon a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate are difficult
`to apply as a film or may not be
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`efficiently applied using such sputtering techniques. Alumi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`num oxide, for example, has heretofore been applied by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sputtering techniques to a substrate at only a small fraction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of the rate and efficiency of the application associated with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the pure aluminum metal. Thus, low deposition rates of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`insulating or non-conductive metal compounds have con-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tinued to pose a challenge. Publications that reflect research
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`regarding the sputtering of such compounds include the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`following, which are incorporated herewith by reference:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9. “Aspects and Results of Long-Term Stable Deposition
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of A1202 with High Rate Pulsed Reactive Magnetron
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sputtering,” published in Surface and Coatings Technology,
`1993;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10. “Reactive Direct Current Magnetron Sputtering of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Aluminum Oxide Coatings,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13(3),
`
`
`
`May/June 1995; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11. “Reactive DC Magnetron Sputtering of the Oxides of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ti, Zr, and Hf,” presented at the International Conference on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Metallurgical Coatings and Thin Films, Town and Country
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Hotel, San Diego, Calif., Apr. 24—28, 1995, and accepted for
`
`
`
`
`
`publication in Surface and Coatings Technology.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In sum, there has remained a need to provide an improved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method and apparatus for the deposition of metallic, insu-
`
`
`
`
`
`lating compounds such as aluminum oxide, on a substrate
`
`
`
`using sputtering techniques.
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In a principal aspect, the present invention comprises a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method for deposition of various compounds, especially
`
`
`
`
`
`
`insulating, metallic compounds such as aluminum oxide, on
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a substrate as a thin film by sputtering techniques utilizing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a pulsed, constant power, direct current electric power
`supply to cause ionization of an inert gas that bombards a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`target thereby releasing the atoms of the target into a vacuum
`chamber and further controlling the rate of admission and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thus the reaction of a second, reactive gas to the chamber
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with a combination of control signals. Specifically, the rate
`of admission is controlled by a first signal derived from the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`measured voltage of the target which is maintained at a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`constant power setting. The rate of admission is further
`controlled by a second signal derived from the measured
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partial pressure of the reactive gas. The partial pressure of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the reactive gas is sensed by means such as an optical gas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller or mass spectrometer, as well as the target voltage,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is sensed to provide control signals representative of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`desired composition and physical characteristics of the thin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`film. The desired composition and physical characteristics
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`are derived empirically for given target materials, reactive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gases and power settings. To further enhance the thin film
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`deposition process, the reactive gas at or near the substrate
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is subjected to local energy input, for example, by applying
`pulsed direct current to the substrate. By the method, it is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possible to carefully control the amount of reactive gas in the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system and thereby increase the rate of deposition of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compound multiple times the rate of deposition using prior
`
`
`sputtering techniques.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`it
`is an object of the invention to provide an
`Thus,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`improved method and apparatus for deposition of com-
`
`
`
`
`pounds on a substrate by sputtering techniques.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 8
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 8
`
`
`
`5,942,089
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`It
`is a further object of the invention to provide an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`improved method for deposition by sputtering of com-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pounds including oxides, nitrides,
`fluorides, sulfides,
`chlorides, borides and mixtures thereof.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Another object of the invention is to provide an improved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and highly efficient method and apparatus for deposition of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`insulating, metal compounds on a substrate utilizing
`
`
`
`improved control techniques.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Another object of the invention is to provide an improved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method for deposition of thin films of insulating, metal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compounds on a substrate at rates which are multiples of the
`
`
`
`
`
`rates of prior art sputtering techniques.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Another object of the invention is to provide an improved
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`method for deposition of metal and semi-conductor com-
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pounds as thin films using sputtering techniques.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Afurther object of the invention is to provide a method for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`effecting efficient deposition of compounds by sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`techniques utilizing a constant power, pulsed direct current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power supply for the target material and control signals for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controlling the admission of reactive gas wherein one signal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is reflective of the voltage of the target power source and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`another signal is reflective of the partial pressure of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reactive gas used in the practice of the process.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`These and other objects, advantages and features of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`invention will be set forth in the detailed description as
`follows.
`
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In the detailed description which follows, reference will
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`be made to the drawing comprised of the following figures:
`FIG. 1 is a schematic of a vacuum chamber and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`control circuitry associated therewith for the practice of the
`method of the invention;
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 2 is a graph depicting a symmetric, bipolar pulsed,
`
`
`
`
`
`direct current power supply wave;
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 3 is a graph depicting an asymmetric, bipolar pulsed
`
`
`
`
`
`direct current power supply wave;
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the target voltage/oxygen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partial pressure hysteresis curve for the reactive sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of aluminum in an argon/oxygen atmosphere; and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIG. 5 is a graph depicting the oxygen reactive gas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`flow/oxygen partial pressure hysteresis curve for the reactive
`
`
`
`
`
`sputtering of aluminum in an argon/oxygen atmosphere;
`DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED
`
`
`EMBODIMENT
`
`
`
`
`Overview And General Description
`The method of the invention as well as the associated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`apparatus are designed to optimize the conditions for reac-
`tion between atomized target material and reactive gas to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`form and deposit a thin film compound in a sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`system. Thus referring to FIG. 1 ,
`there is depicted the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`component parts of a sputtering system used to practice the
`invention.
`
`Avacuum chamber 10 is evacuated by a pump 12 after a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate material 14, e.g. quartz or a piece of steel
`is
`mounted on a holder 16 within the chamber 10. A target
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`material 18, e.g. Aluminum or some other metal or semi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conductor material, is also mounted within the chamber 10.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The target 18 serves as a cathode in the process and the
`inside walls 20 of chamber 10 serve as an anode. An inert
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gas, e.g. Argon (Ar),
`is admitted to chamber 10 from a
`source 22 via a meter 24 and valve 26 controlled by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller 28 responsive to a pressure sensor 30.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The target 18 is subject to a bipolar, pulsed, direct current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power source 32 of the type generally known in the art. The
`
`10
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`40
`
`45
`
`50
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`source 32 is preferably asymmetric as depicted in FIG. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with the cathode negatively biased, although a symmetric
`
`
`
`
`
`
`source 32, as depicted in FIG. 2, may be utilized.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A reactive gas, such as oxygen, is provided from a source
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`34 through a flow meter 36 and control valve 38 via a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`conduit 40 to the vicinity of the target 18 where its proximity
`to atoms from the target will enhance reaction therewith. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reactive gas control valve 38 is responsive to a plurality of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensing or feedback signals which are input to a controller
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`42 which, upon proper processing, provides a control signal
`via link 44 to valve 38.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The signals to the controller 42 are derived from two
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sources, first
`the voltage of the target 18 is constantly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`monitored. Second, the partial pressure of the reactive gas is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`monitored. Regarding the voltage target 18, this voltage may
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vary since the power to the target 18 is maintained at a
`constant value. For each set of conditions within the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`chamber, therefore, for a given target and reactive gas, it is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`possible to derive the relationship between such constant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`power voltage and the partial pressure of the reactive gas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`thereby identifying the optimal range of partial pressure and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`voltage for formation of the compound comprised of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`target material and reactive gas. An example of this empiri-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`cal derivation is depicted in FIG. 4 for a target material of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aluminum in an argon/oxygen atmosphere for increasing and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`decreasing oxygen partial pressure wherein the target power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`was 2 kilowatts from a 20 kHz3 pulsed direct current source
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and the total chamber pressure was 4 mTorr. Note that partial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure of about 0.03 mTorr at a target voltage of 270 to 380
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`volts is indicative of highly efficient film formation. This
`information or information of this type is derived from an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`experimental or test run, and the results are programmed into
`
`
`
`
`
`
`controller 42 thus enabling the controller 42 the capability to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`provide almost
`instantaneous feedback control
`input
`
`
`
`
`
`
`because voltage measurements provided to the controller 42
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from target 18 are inherently rapid. Thus, the voltage feed-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`back signal provides a highly sensitive, rapid response,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`control function, when empirical or full range test run,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hystersis information derived from an experiment or full
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`range test run of the type reflected by FIG. 4 is programmed
`into the controller 42.
`
`
`
`
`Simultaneous with the rapid control signal derived from
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the voltage of target 18, a second less rapid signal is derived
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by directly measuring the partial pressure of the reactive gas,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e.g. oxygen. Thus, as depicted in FIG. 1, a mass spectrom-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`eter 46, for example, or a partial pressure controller, e.g. an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`analyzer (OGC made by Leybold Infilon of East Syracuse,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NY.) is provided to determine the partial pressure of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`specific reactive gas. Note the signal derived from sensor 46
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is species specific, e.g. oxygen; whereas the target voltage
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signal is not. Thus,
`the target voltage signal, previously
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`described, may result, at least in part, due to phenomena
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`other than the partial, pressure of the reactive gas. For
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`example, out gassing from the substrate or chamber walls
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`may have an impact on the signal. Thus, the reactive gas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor 46 provides a signal 48 to the controller which is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reflective of the true partial pressure of the reactive gas
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(oxygen) albeit a slowly developed or slowly derived signal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`relative to the target voltage signal because of the instru-
`mentation involved.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In any event,
`the meaning of the signal 48 is also
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dependent upon the empirical relationship between reactive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gas partial pressure and flow rate. This relationship is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`derived simultaneously with the empirical power voltage/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partial pressure relationship discussed with regard to FIG. 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for each specific set of conditions. FIG. 5 is a graph
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`depicting the relationship for the same conditions (in fact,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`derived during the same empirical experimental run) as FIG.
`4.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 9
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 9
`
`
`
`5,942,089
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Referring to FIG. 5, for the reported conditions and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`materials, which is the same as specified for the data of FIG.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4, the optimal partial pressure is in the range of about 0.02
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mTorr, at which point the oxygen flow is in the range of 15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`to 20 Sccm. Thus,
`the signal 48 from sensor 46 can be
`utilized to “zero” or set the controller 42 so that the target
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`voltage signal to controller 42 is working from an appro-
`
`
`
`priate base line.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`One further input to the system is provided to enhance the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`film deposition process. An energy source 50 provides a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`means for activating the reactive gas, e.g. Oxygen, at or near
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the substrate 14. For example, a pulsed direct current power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supply may be applied to the substrate 14. Other energy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sources include a radio frequency voltage source, lasers,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`electron beams, a microwave source, or an inductively
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`coupled plasma source. A radio frequency source of 13.56
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MHZ or a harmonic multiple thereof may be used. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`energy input at the substrate 14 has the effect of enhancing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the process efficiency as reflected by the data derived in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`FIGS. 4 and 5, by way of example, so as to increase flow rate
`
`
`
`
`and voltage at optimal conditions.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Also by correlating the data of the type derived in FIGS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4 and 5 with various physical parameters of the film
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compound, it becomes possible to apply films having cus-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`tomized characteristics. For example, each of the data points
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of FIGS. 4 and 5 are representative of compounds having
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`associated therewith a variety of measurable physical char-
`
`
`
`
`
`acteristics including conductivity, modulus, hardness,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extinction coefficient, index of refraction, reflectivity, trans-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mission and constituent composition. By controlling the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sputtering process to such data points, as it is possible to do
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`with this process, the desired custom film may be sputter
`
`
`
`applied to a substrate 14.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the deposition of
`The process is especially useful
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`insulating, metal compounds such as aluminum oxide.
`
`
`
`
`
`Experimental results demonstrate application rates 15 to 20
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`times better than prior techniques. For example, with the
`
`
`
`
`
`reactive sputtering of stoichiometric A1203, the deposition
`rate had been increased from about 5% of the metal depo-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sition rate to 70% or more of the metal deposition rate. Also,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the process is useful with many compounds including
`oxides, nitrides, carbides, sulfides,
`fluorides, chlorides,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`borides and mixtures thereof. Numerous metals, including
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aluminum, titanium, hafnium, zirconium, tantalum, silicon,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and chromium have been successfully used as the target
`material.
`
`
`
`Specific Example:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Following is a specific example of the practice of the
`invention:
`
`
`
`
`
`Deposition of Aluminum Oxide by Means of
`
`
`Reactive DC Sputtering
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Aluminum oxide (stoichiometric composition but non-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`crystalline) may be deposited using the following deposition
`
`
`system hardware:
`The substrate to be coated is placed in a stainless steel
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vacuum chamber, approximately 29" 0d. and about 30"
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`high, which is electrically grounded to earth potential and is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pumped with a 6" diffusion pump and a 1500 Us turbo-
`60
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`molecular pump, which are both backed up with appropri-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ately sized mechanical pumps (in this case, Edwards EM2-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`80’s) capable of achieving a base pressure of 1><10'6 Torr.
`The substrate may be a flat glass slide or other material of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`choice, which is mounted on the 5 "-diameter, rotatable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`substrate table. The closest approach of the substrate to the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`target is about 3" and it may be rotated or held stationary
`
`
`during coating.
`
`
`
`50
`
`55
`
`65
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Two nominally 5 "x15 " rectangular MRC Inset targets are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mounted vertically, opposing one another about 11" apart
`with the substrate table in between. The cathodes are an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`unbalanced magnetron design, which enhances the plasma
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`density in the vicinity of the substrate, and at least one target
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is aluminum with a metallic purity of at least 99.99%.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The cathodes (targets) are each connected to Advanced
`
`
`
`
`
`Energy MDX 10 kW dc power supplies through 20 kHz
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Sparc-Le (or higher frequency) units which together provide
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a pulsed dc power and suppression of arcing on the target
`
`
`
`surface during sputtering.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The substrate table is connected to a 3 kW rf power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`supply, and the induced dc voltage is read out through a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`meter which is shielded from rf power by means of an
`
`
`appropriate filter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The total gas pressure in the chamber is monitored by a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Baratron (capacitance manometer) for sputtering pressures
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(1—10 mTorr), and lower pressures are monitored with a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Bayard-Alpert type ionization gauge. The ionization gauge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`is also used as a reference in checking the calibration of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partial pressure sensors (OGC or mass spec.), or a more
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`stable instrument such as a spinning rotor gauge can be used
`
`
`
`and is preferred if available.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The partial pressures of all gases in the system are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`monitored with an Inficon Quadrex 100, quadrupole mass
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`spectrometer, and two of the gases (oxygen and argon) are
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`monitored with an Inficon OGC (Optical Gas Controller).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The mass spectrometer is attached to a sampling system
`
`
`
`
`
`
`which is differentially pumped, since it requires an operating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pressure that is typically in the 10'6 Torr range, and is
`mounted to the top of the chamber. The OGC is attached
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`directly to the back of the chamber through a standard KF
`
`
`
`
`
`flange, since it operates at sputtering pressures.
`The gas flow controllers are MKS model 260 with modi-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`fications that allow them to respond to pressure signals
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`instead of flow signals. In this case, the total pressure is
`maintained constant by a feedback control involving the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Baratron and the MKS controller. The target voltage on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`aluminum target is used as the primary indicator of oxygen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`partial pressure during sputtering and is used as a feedback
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signal to the MKS controller which operates the inlet valve
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`for a quick response to any deviations in partial pressure
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(voltage). Since the voltage is not a unique signal with
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respect to the partial pressure of oxygen, the OGC or the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mass spectrometer is used to provide a feedback signal for
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the voltage set point, which is thus tied to the actual desired
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`level of oxygen partial pressure. This OGC or mass spec-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trometer value is updated more slowly than the voltage. This
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dual feedback loop provides a fast response that optimizes
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the process control and maintains a unique relationship
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`between the control set points and the selected partial
`
`
`pressure of oxygen.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In order for the process to function in the preferred
`manner, one desires to also establish an anode surface in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`close proximity to the plasma but shielded from deposition,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`since the insulating film produced in the process will cause
`the anode to become non-functional if not protected and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`would cause the process to stop.
`
`
`Deposition protocol:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The appropriate partial pressure of oxygen has been
`previously selected from an initial determination of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`hysteresis curve, which relates the gas flow (see FIG. 5) and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the target voltage (see FIG. 4) to the set partial pressure of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oxygen in a fixed and determinable way for a given system
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and given operating conditions. The partial pressure that is
`selected will be that which uses the least amount of reactive
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 10
`
`Ex. 1011, Page 10
`
`
`
`
`
`5,942,089
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`gas and still makes a coating with the desired properties.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Once the partial pressure of O2 has been determined that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`corresponds to the desired properties of the oxide coating
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(e.g., optically clear), and the target