throbber
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`James R. Asperger (Bar No. 83188)
`jimasperger@quinnemanuel.com
`865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543
`Telephone: (213) 443-3000
`Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
`kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
`Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282)
`toddbriggs@quinnemanuel.com
`Brice C. Lynch (Bar No. 288567)
`bricelynch@quinnemanuel.com
`555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
`Redwood Shores, California 94065
`Telephone: (650) 801-5000
`Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
` & SULLIVAN, LLP
`Eric Huang (pro hac vice)
`erichuang@quinnemanuel.com
`51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
`New York, New York 10010
`Telephone: (212) 849-7000
`Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`NANTWORKS, LLC and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CASE NO. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`
`PLAINTIFFS NANTWORKS, LLC,
`AND NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC,
`PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF
`ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`NANTWORKS, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company, and NANT
`HOLDINGS IP, LLC, a Delaware
`limited liability company,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`CORPORATION, a Delaware
`corporation, and BANK OF
`AMERICA, N.A., a national banking
`association,
`
`Defendants.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1017, p. 1 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order in this action (Dkt. No. 91), Plaintiffs
`
`NantWorks LLC, and Nant Holdings IP, LLC, (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or
`
`“NantWorks”), hereby submit its Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims.
`
`On March 4, 2021, NantWorks served its Preliminary Infringement
`
`Contentions, setting forth its theories of infringement for an initial set of asserted
`
`claims. Because of the early stage of this case and because Defendants have not
`
`provided sufficient discovery regarding the design and operation of the Accused
`
`Products and the full bases for their defenses for each of the Initial Asserted Claims,
`
`NantWorks reserves the right to amend its Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims.
`
`Defendants, for example, have not provided any source code regarding the
`
`design and operation of the Accused Products, nor have they produced documents
`
`sufficient to show the design and operation of the Accused Products. Defendants
`
`Invalidity Contentions also disclose millions of potential prior art reference
`
`combinations with no known way to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of all the
`
`potential prior art combinations. Nor have Defendants responded to NantWorks’
`
`interrogatories seeking damages related information regarding the number of uses of
`
`the Accused Products to perform a mobile check deposit. Furthermore, the parties
`
`have just begun the claim construction process, no briefing has been exchanged, and
`
`the Court is months away from holding the claim construction hearing. There are
`
`many open issues that remain to be decided that will be highly relevant to choosing
`
`asserted claims for trial.
`
`Because of the uncertainties and variables remaining in this case, it would be
`
`highly prejudicial to require NantWorks to narrow its asserted claims at this time
`
`without allowing NantWorks the opportunity to amend its Preliminary Election Of
`
`Asserted Claims based on new defenses and theories set forth by Defendants and other
`
`open issues as the case moves forward and circumstances change. This is particularly
`
`true where an unselected claim presents unique issues as to liability or damages. In
`
`re Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litig., 639 F.3d 1303, 1312-13 (Fed. Cir.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1017, p. 2 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`2011) (finding that if a patentee demonstrates “that some of its unselected claims
`
`presented unique issues as to liability or damages,” a refusal to permit the patentee to
`
`add those specified claims “would be subject to review and reversal”). Thus,
`
`NantWorks provides this Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims without prejudice
`
`to amend the election to include initially asserted claims that have not been included
`
`in the present Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims.
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Scheduling Order, NantWorks identifies below its
`
`Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims, totaling 48 claims and no more than 15
`
`claims per Asserted Patent:
` U.S. Patent No. 9,031,278: Claims 1 and 4-5
` U.S. Patent No. 7,881,529: Claims 2, 4, 7, 9, 18, and 20
` U.S. Patent No. 7,899,252: Claims 18, 26-27, 29, and 31
` U.S. Patent No. 8,326,038: Claims 1, 3, 9-10, 16, and 19-20
` U.S. Patent No. 8,463,030: Claims 1, 3-4, 6-7, 19, 21, 25-26, 30, 32, and 37
` U.S. Patent No. 8,520,897: Claims 25, 30, 33-34, 39, and 42
` U.S. Patent No. 9,324,004: Claims 1, 3, 6, and 18
` U.S. Patent No. 8,478,036: Claims 1, 10, 12-13, and 15
`This Preliminary Election Of Asserted Claims is not intended to alter or amend
`
`NantWorks’ infringement theories, which are disclosed as in NantWorks’ Preliminary
`
`Infringement Contentions, which are incorporated completely herein by reference.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1017, p. 3 of 5
`
`

`

`Respectfully submitted,
`
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`
`By
`/s/ Todd M. Briggs
`James R. Asperger
`Kevin P.B. Johnson
`Todd M. Briggs
`Eric Huang
`Brice C. Lynch
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff, NANTWORKS,
`LLC and NANT HOLDINGS IP, LLC
`
`
`
`4
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`
`
`DATED: May 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1017, p. 4 of 5
`
`

`

`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 11, 2021, I caused a true and correct copy of the
`
`foregoing document to be served via e-mail to all counsel of record who have
`
`appeared in this matter.
`
`
`
`DATED: May 11, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By /s/ Brice C. Lynch
`Brice C. Lynch
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7872-GW-PVC
`PLAINTIFFS’ PRELIMINARY ELECTION OF ASSERTED CLAIMS
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1017, p. 5 of 5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket