`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 157 Filed 01/05/22 Page i1of2 Page ID #:2404
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Case No.
`
`_CV 20-7872-GW-PVCx
`
`Date
`
`_January 5, 2022
`
`Title _Nantworks, LLC, et al. v. Bank of America Corporation,etal.
`
`Page
`
`1 of2
`
`Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`Javier Gonzalez
`Deputy Clerk
`
`None Present
`Court Reporter
`
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s)
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)
`
`None Present
`
`NonePresent
`
`Proceedings: INCHAMBERS —- SCHEDULING ORDER
`
`The Court has reviewed the parties’ joint scheduling report (Docket No. 155) in the Nantworks
`(20-7872) matter. There are two issues and the Court’s modification ofthe final dates:
`
`1. Whether the fact discovery cut-off should be June 30, 2022 or July 14, 2022.
`The Court selects July 14, 2022.
`
`2. Whether the parties should have final contentions deadlines and whether the amendments
`should be as a matter of right.
`Yes to deadlines; no to allowing amendments as a matter of right. As Defendant
`emphasizes, the parties disputed whether to use Judge Guilford’s local rules or the
`N.D.Cal. Local rules. Plaintiff wanted Judge Guilford’s and the Court agreed to
`use those rules. Thoserules do not do permit parties to amendtheir contentions as
`a matter of right but rather under a good cause standard, unlike the N.D. Cal.
`Rules. However, Judge Guilford’srulesstill have final contentions deadlines after
`the Markmanhearing, and the case law and logic dictate that the parties should be
`able to amend their contentions to do so under the good cause standard. Thus, the
`Court sets final contentions deadlines and orders that the good cause standard will
`apply to any amendments, as stated in Judge Guilford’s local rules. This includes
`Plaintiffs trade secret contentions, although not covered by Judge Guilford’s local
`tules, to keep consistency.
`
`3. The following dates are changed from the parties’ proposed dates:
`a) Hearing on summary judgement/Daubert motions from December 15, 2022 to
`December 19, 2022 at 8:30 a.m.
`b) Replies in support of motions in limine from April 4, 2023 to April 3.
`c) Pre-trial conference from April 11, 2023 to April 13, 2023 at 8:30 a.m.
`
`CV-90
`
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk JG
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1044, p. 1 of 2
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1044, p. 1 of 2
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 157 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:2405
`Case 2:20-cv-07872-GW-PVC Document 157 Filed 01/05/22 Page 2of2 Page ID #:2405
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Case No.
`
`CV 20-7872-GW-PVCx
`
`Date
`
`January 5, 2022
`
`Title _Nantworks, LLC,et al. v. Bank of America Corporation,etal.
`
`Page
`
`2o0f2
`
`d) Trial from May8, 2023 to April 25, 2023 at 9:00 a.m. It is unclear to the Court
`as to the parties’ estimation of the length ofthetrial.
`
`CV-90
`
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk JG
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1044, p. 2 of 2
`
`BANK OF AMERICA
`
`IPR2021-01080
`
`Ex. 1044, p. 2 of 2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
