throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria1 Virginia 22313-1450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`
`
`wanna,
`FETK
`
`‘5
`
`
`
`APPLICAI'ION NO.
`ISSUE DATE
`PATENT NO.
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`16/019,937
`09/24/2019
`10423034
`HARU-0136
`7509
`
`38327
`
`7590
`
`09/04/2019
`
`Juan Carlos A. Marquez
`Marque7 Intellectual Property Law Office PI .J .C
`1629 K Street, NW
`Suite 300
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`ISSUE NOTIFICATION
`
`The projected patent number and issue date are specified above.
`
`Determination of Patent Term Adjustment under 35 U.S.C. 154 (b)
`
`(application filed on or after May 29, 2000)
`
`The Patent Term Adjustment is 0 day(s). Any patent to issue from the above-identified application will include
`an indication of the adjustment on the front page.
`
`If a Continued Prosecution Application (CPA) was filed in the above-identified application, the filing date that
`
`determines Patent Term Adjustment is the filing date of the most recent CPA.
`
`Applicant will be able to obtain more detailed information by accessing the Patent Application Information
`Retrieval (PAIR) WEB site (http://pair.uspto. gov).
`
`Any questions regarding the Patent Term Extension or Adjustment determination should be directed to the Office
`
`of Patent Legal Administration at (571)-272-7702. Questions relating to issue and publication fee payments
`
`should be directed to the Application Assistance Unit (AAU) of the Office of Data Management (ODM) at
`(571)-272-4200.
`
`APPLICANT(S) (Please see PAIR WEB site http://pair.uspto. gov for additional applicants):
`
`Takahiro OCHIAI, Chiba, JAPAN;
`Japan Display Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN;
`Panasonic Liquid Crystal Display Co., Ltd, Himeji-shi, JAPAN;
`Tohru SASAKI, Mobara, JAPAN;
`Tetsuya NAGATA, Mobara, JAPAN;
`
`The United States represents the largest, most dynamic marketplace in the world and is an unparalleled location
`
`for business investment, innovation, and commercialization of new technologies. The USA offers tremendous
`resources and advantages for those who invest and manufacture goods here. Through SelectUSA, our nation
`
`works to encourage and facilitate business investment. To learn more about why the USA is the best country in
`
`the world to develop technology, manufacture products, and grow your business, visit SelectUSA.gov.
`IR103 (Rev. 10/09)
`
`Page 1 of 114
`
`Tianma Exhibit 1004
`
`Page 1 of 114
`
`Tianma Exhibit 1004
`
`

`

`Complete and send this form, together with applicable fee(s), by mail or fax, or Via EFS—Web.
`
`PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL
`
`By mail, send to:
`
`By fax, send to:
`
`(571)-273-2885
`
`Mail Stop ISSUE FEE
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`INSTRUCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the IS SUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). Blocks 1 through 5 should be completed where appropriate. All
`further correspondence including the Patent, advance orders and notification of maintenance fees will be mailed to the current correspondence address as indicated unless corrected
`below or directed otherwise in Block 1. by (a) specifying a new correspondence address; and/or (b) indicating a separate ”FEE ADDRESS” for maintenance fee notifications.
`Note: A certificate of mailing can only be used for domestic mailings of the
`Fee(s) Transmittal. This certificate cannot be used for any other accompanying
`papers. Each additional paper, such as an assignment or formal drawing, must
`have ils own cerlificale (if mailing or lransmission.
`Certificate of Mailing or Transmission
`
`CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS (Note: Use Block 1 for any change ofaddress)
`
`38327
`
`7590
`
`05/20/2019
`
`Juan Carkm A. Marquez
`_
`Marquez Intellectual Property Law Office PLLC
`1629 K Street, NW
`Suite f{00
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`I hereby certify that this Fee(s) Transmittal is being deposited with the United
`States Postal Service With sufficient postage for first class mail in an envelope
`addressed to the Mail Stop ISSUE FEE address above, or being transmitted to
`the USPTO Via EFS-Web or by facsimile to (571) 273-2885, on the date below.
`(Typed or piiutedname)
`
`(Date)
`
`(Signature)
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`16/019,937
`
`06/27/2018
`
`Takahiro OCHIAI
`
`HARU-0136
`
`7509
`
`TITLE OF INVENTION: LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
`
`APPLN. TYPE
`
`ENTITY STATUS
`
`ISSUE FEE DUE
`
`PUBLICATION FEE DUE
`
`PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE
`
`TOTAL FEE(S) DUE
`
`DATE DUE
`
`nonprovisional
`
`UNDISCOUNTED
`
`$1000
`
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`
`$1000
`
`08/20/2019
`
`EXAMINER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`CLAS S-SUBCLASS
`
`LAU, EDMOND C
`
`2871
`
`349-155000
`
`1. Change of correspondence address or indication of "Fee Address" (37
`CFR 1363).
`
`3 Change of correspondence address (or Change of Correspondence
`Address form PTO/SB/122) attached.
`
` 3 "Fee Address" indication (or ”Fee Address” Indication form PTO/
`
`2. For printing on the patent front page, list
`( l) The names of up to 3 registered patent attorneys
`or agents OR, allernalively,
`(2) The name of a single firm (having as a member a
`registered attorney or agent) and the names of up to
`2 registered patent attorneys or agents. If no name is
`listed, no name will be printed.
`
`
`
`SB/47; Rev 03-09 or more recenl) allached. Use of a Customer
`Number is required.
`3. ASSIGNEE NAME AND RESIDENCE DATA TO BE PRlNTED ON THE PATENT (print or type)
`PLEASE NOTE: Unless an assignee is identified below, no assignee data will appear on the patent. If an assignee is identified below, the document must have been previously
`recorded, or filed for recordatiori, as set forth in 37 CFR 311 and 37 CFR 3.81(a). Completion of this form is NOT a substitute for filing an assignment.
`(A) NAME OF ASSIGNEE
`(B) RESIDENCE: (CITY and STATE OR COUNTRY)
`
`1 Juan carlos A. Marquez
`
`2 Marguez IP Law Office, PLLC
`
`Tokyo, Japan
`(1) Japan Dlsplay Inc.
`Hyogo-ken, Japan
`(2) Panasonic Liquid Crystal Display Co., Ltd.
`Please check the appropriate assignee category or categories (will not be printed on the patent) : D Individual KI Corporation or other private group entity D Government
`4a. Fees submitted:
`Mlssue Fee
`qublication Fee (if required)
`DAdvance Order - # of Copies
`4h. Method of Payment: (Pleua‘eflru reapply (my [)revitmsly pair/fee xhnwn a/mve)
`
`KI Electronic Payment Via EFS-Web
`
`[I Enclosed check
`
`[I Non-electronic payment by credit card (Attach form PTO-2038,)
`
`XI The Director is hereby authorized to charge the required feets), any deficiency, or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account No. 60-01 55
`
`5. Change in Entity Status (from status indicated above)
`.
`.
`. 7.
`.
`.
`3 Applicant certifying micro entity status. See 37 CFR 1‘29
`J Applicant asserting small entity status. See 37 CFR 1.27
`
` 3 Applicant changing to regular undiscounted fee status.
`
`NOTE: Absent a valid certification of Micro Entity Status (see forms PTO/SB/ 15A and 15B), issue
`fee payment in the micro entity amount will not be accepted at the risk of application abandonment.
`NOTE: If the application was previously under micro entity status, checking this box will be taken
`to be a notification of loss of entitlement to micro entity status.
`NOTE: Checking this box will be taken to be a notification of loss of entitlement to small or micro
`entity status, as applicable.
`NOTE: This form must be signed in accordance with 37 CFR 131 and 1.33. See 37 CFR 1.4 for signature requirements and certifications.
`
`/juan.carlos.a.marquez/
`Date
`August 12, 2019
`
`Juan Carlos A. Marquez
`Registration No_
`34,072
`
`Authorized Signature
`
`Typed or printed name
`
`PTOL—85 Part B (08-18) Approved for use through 01/31/2020
`
`Page 2 of 3
`OMB 0651-0033
`
`US. Patent and Trademark Office; US. DEPARTMENT OF COMlVIERCE
`
`Page 2 of 114
`
`Page 2 of 114
`
`

`

`Electronic Patent Application Fee Transmittal
`
`Application Number:
`
`16019937
`
`Filing Date:
`
`27—Jun—2018
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
`
`
`
`First Named Inventor/Applicant Name:
`
`Takahiro OCHIAI
`
`_ Juan carlos A MarqueZ/Llly Nlu
`
`Attorney Docket Number:
`
`HARU—O136
`
`Filed as Large Entity
`
`Filing Fees for Utility under 35 USC111(a)
`
`
`
`.
`
`_
`
`.
`
`Sub-Total in
`
`Basic Filing:
`
`Claims:
`
`
`Miscellaneous-Filing:
`
`Patent-Appeals-and-lnterference:
`
`Post-AlIowance-and-Post-lssuance:
`
`UTILITY APPL ISSUE FEE
`
`
`Page 3 of114
`
`Page 3 of 114
`
`

`

`Extension-of—Time:
`
`Total in USD (5)
`
`Miscellaneous:
`
`Page 4 of 114
`
`Page 4 of 114
`
`

`

`Electronic Acknowledgement Receipt
`
`36849481
`EFS ID:
`
`
`Application Number:
`
`16019937
`
`Title of Invention:
`
`LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
`
`
`
`——
`
`
`
`Attorney Docket Number: HARU70136
`
`Receipt Date:
`
`12—AUG—201 9
`
`Application Type:
`
`Utility under 35 USC 111(a)
`
`Payment information:
`
`The Director ofthe USPTO is hereby authorized to charge indicated fees and credit any overpayment as follows:
`
`——
`
`Page 5 of114
`
`Page 5 of 114
`
`

`

`
`
`File Listing:
`
`Document
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`FileSizelBytes)/
`MessageDigest
`610716
`
`Pages
`Multi
`Part/zip ("av“)
`
`Information:
`
`Issue Fee Payment (PTO—85 B)
`
`HARU—136—Issue_fee_form.pdf 6D456fc14l98b15bf170d3378ld939130l5cl
`
`Warnings:
`Information:
`
`Fee Worksheet ($806)
`
`fee—info.pdf
`
`82df1913e/I9d437647fb3085ef1fcISBf/Igd '
`01f
`
`Warnings:
`
`
`
`Total Files Size (in bytes) 641059
`
`This Acknowledgement Receipt evidences receipt on the noted date by the USPTO of the indicated documents,
`characterized by the applicant, and including page counts, where applicable. It serves as evidence of receipt similar to a
`Post Card, as described in MPEP 503.
`
`New Applications Under 35 U.S.C. 111
`lfa new application is being filed and the application includes the necessary components for a filing date (see 37 CFR
`1.53(b)—(d) and MPEP 506), a Filing Receipt (37 CFR 1.54) will be issued in due course and the date shown on this
`Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the filing date of the application.
`National Stage of an International Application under 35 U.S.C. 371
`lfa timely submission to enter the national stage of an international application is compliant with the conditions of 35
`U.S.C. 371 and other applicable requirements a Form PCT/DO/EOI903 indicating acceptance of the application as a
`national stage submission under 35 U.S.C. 371 will be issued in addition to the Filing Receipt, in due course.
`New International Application Filed with the USPTO as a Receiving Office
`If a new international application is being filed and the international application includes the necessary components for
`an international filing date (see PCT Article 11 and MPEP 1810), a Notification of the International Application Number
`and of the International Filing Date (Form PCT/RO/105) will be issued in due course, subject to prescriptions concerning
`national security, and the date shown on this Acknowledgement Receipt will establish the international filing date of
`the application.
`
`
`
`Page 6 of 114
`
`Page 6 of 114
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTVIENT OF COMMERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Addiess: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandiia, Virginia 2231371450
`www.uspto.gov
`
`16/019,937
`
`06/27/2018
`
`Takahiro OCHIAI
`
`HARU-0136
`
`7509
`
`Juan Carlos A. Marquez
`Marquez Intellectual Property Law Office PLLC
`1629 K Street, NW
`Suite 300
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`LAU'EDMOND C
`
`PAPER NUMBER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`2871
`
`NOTIFICATION DATE
`
`DELIVERY MODE
`
`08/05/2019
`
`ELECTRONIC
`
`Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
`
`The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication.
`
`Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above—indicated "Notification Date” to the
`following e-mail address(es):
`US PTO @ dockettrakcom
`
`lniu @ InanueziplaW.com
`mail @ marqueziplaw.com
`
`PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07)
`
`Page 7 of 114
`
`Page 7 of 114
`
`

`

`Applicant-InitiatedInterview Summary
`
`Application No.
`16/019,937
`
`Examiner
`EDMOND C LAU
`
`Applicant(s)
`OCHIAI et al.
`
`Art Unit
`2871
`
`AIA (FITF) Status
`No
`
`All participants (applicant, applicants representative, PTO personnel):
`
`(1) EDMOND C. LAU.
`
`(2) Juan Carlos Marguez.
`
`Date of Interview: 31 July 2019.
`
`Type:
`
`[:1 Video Conference
`Telephonic
`D Personal [copy given to:
`[:1 applicant
`
`[:1 applicant's representative]
`
`Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted:
`If Yes, brief description:
`
`Cl Yes
`
`
`
`:I No.
`
`
`
`LYJOthers
`U112 U102 U103
`IssuesDiscussed U101
`(For each of the checked box(es) above, please describe below the issue and detailed description of the discussion)
`
`Claim(s) discussed: 1.
`
`Identification of prior art discussed: US 20040084673 A1 to Hirakata et al..
`
`Substance of Interview
`(For each issue discussed, provide a detailed description and indicate if agreement was reached. Some topics may include: identification or clarification of a
`reference or a portion thereof, claim interpretation, proposed amendments, arguments of any applied references etc...)
`
`Discussed entering proposed amendments under §1.312 and was determined that the proposed amendments would
`substantially change the scope of the claims therefore will not be entered if submitted. Applicant is advised that a
`continuation may be filed with the proposed claims.
`
`
`
`Applicant recordation instructions: The formal written reply to the last Office action must include the substance of the interview. (See MPEP
`section 713.04). It a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, applicant is given a non-extendable period of the longer of one month or
`thirty days from this interview date, or the mailing date of this interview summary form, whichever is later, to file a statement of the substance of the
`interview.
`
`Examiner recordation instructions: Examiners must summarize the substance of any interview of record. A complete and proper recordation of
`the substance of an interview should include the items listed in MPEP 713.04 for complete and proper recordation including the identification of the
`general thrust of each argument or issue discussed, a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed regarding patentability and the
`general results or outcome of the interview, to include an indication as to whether or not agreement was reached on the issues raised.
`
`Attachment
`
`/EDMOND C LAU/
`
`Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2871
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`
`PTOL-413 (Rev. 8/11/2010)
`
`Page 8 of114
`
`Interview Summary
`
`Paper No. 20190731
`
`Page 8 of 114
`
`

`

`Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), Section 713.04, Substance of Interview Must be Made of Record
`A complete written statement as to the substance of any faceetoeface, video conference, or telephone interview with regard to an application must be made of record in the
`application whether or not an agreement with the examiner was reached at the interview.
`
`Summary of Record of Interview Requirements
`
`Title 37 Code of Federal Regulations (CFFI) 1.133 Interviews
`Paragraph (b)
`
`In every instance where reconsideration is requested in view of an interview with an examiner, a complete written statement of the reasons presented at the interview as
`warranting favorable action must be filed by the applicant. An interview does not remove the necessity for reply to Office action as specified in §§ 1.111, 1.135. (35 U.S.C.
`132)
`
`37 CFR §1.2 Business to be transacted in writing.
`All busmess with the Patent or Trademark Office should be transacted in writing. The personal attendance of applicants or their attorneys or agents at the Patent and
`Trademark Office is unnecessary. The action of the Patent and Trademark Office will be based exclusively on the written record in the Office. No attention will be paid to any
`alleged oral promise, stipulation, or understanding in relation to which there is disagreement or doubt.
`
`The action of the Patent and Trademark Office cannot be based exclusively on the written record in the Office if that record is itself
`incomplete through the failure to record the substance of interviews.
`It is the responsibility of the applicant or the attorney or agent to make the substance of an interview of record in the application file, unless
`the examiner indicates he or she will do so. It is the examiners responsibility to see that such a record is made and to correct material inaccuracies
`which bear directly on the question of patentability.
`
`Examiners must complete an Interview Summary Form for each interview held where a matter of substance has been discussed during the
`interview by checking the appropriate boxes and filling in the blanks. Discussions regarding only procedural matters, directed solely to restriction
`requirements for which interview recordation is otherwise provided for in Section 812.01 of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, or pointing out
`typographical errors or unreadable script in Office actions or the like, are excluded from the interview recordation procedures below. Where the
`substance of an interview is completely recorded in an Examiners Amendment, no separate Interview Summary Record is required.
`
`The Interview Summary Form shall be given an appropriate Paper No., placed in the right hand portion of the file, and listed on the
`"Contents" section of the file wrapper. In a personal interview, a duplicate of the Form is given to the applicant (or attorney or agent) at the conclusion of
`the interview. In the case of a telephone or videoeconference interview, the copy is mailed to the applicants correspondence address either with or prior
`to the next official communication. If additional correspondence from the examiner is not likely before an allowance or if other circumstances dictate, the
`Form should be mailed promptly after the interview rather than with the next official communication.
`
`The Form provides for recordation ofthe following information:
`. Application Number (Series Code and Serial Number)
`- Name of applicant
`- Name of examiner
`- Date of interview
`- Type of interview (telephonic, video-conference, or personal)
`, Name of participant(s) (applicant, attorney or agent, examiner, other PTO personnel, etc.)
`- An indication whether or not an exhibit was shown or a demonstration conducted
`- An identification of the specific prior art discussed
`-
`An indication whether an agreement was reached and if so, a description of the general nature of the agreement (may be by
`attachment of a copy of amendments or claims agreed as being allowable). Note: Agreement as to allowability is tentative and does
`not restrict further action by the examiner to the contrary.
`- The signature of the examiner who conducted the interview (if Form is not an attachment to a signed Office action)
`
`It is desirable that the examiner orally remind the applicant of his or her obligation to record the substance of the interview of each case. It
`should be noted, however, that the Interview Summary Form will not normally be considered a complete and proper recordation of the interview unless
`it includes, or is supplemented by the applicant or the examiner to include, all of the applicable items required below concerning the substance of the
`interview.
`
`A complete and proper recordation of the substance of any interview should include at least the following applicable items:
`1) A brief description of the nature of any exhibit shown or any demonstration conducted,-
`2) an identification of the claims discussed,
`3) an identification of the specific prior art discussed,
`4)
`an identification of the principal proposed amendments of a substantive nature discussed, unless these are already described on
`the Interview Summary Form completed by the Examiner,
`5) a brief identification of the general thrust of the principal arguments presented to the examiner,
`(The identification of arguments need not be lengthy or elaborate. A verbatim or highly detailed description of the arguments is not
`required. The identification of the arguments is sufficient if the general nature or thrust of the principal arguments made to the
`examiner can be understood in the context of the application file. Of course, the applicant may desire to emphasize and fully
`describe those arguments which he or she feels were or might be persuasive to the examiner.)
`6) a general indication of any other pertinent matters discussed, and
`7)
`if appropriate, the general results or outcome of the interview unless already described in the Interview Summary Form completed
`by the examiner.
`Examiners are expected to carefully review the applicants record of the substance of an interview. If the record is not complete and accurate,
`the examiner will give the applicant an extendable one month time period to correct the record.
`
`Examiner to Check for Accuracy
`
`If the claims are allowable for other reasons of record, the examiner should send a letter setting forth the examiners version of the statement
`attributed to him or her. If the record is complete and accurate, the examiner should place the indication, Interview Record OK on the paper recording
`the substance of the interview along with the date and the examiners initials.
`
`Page 9 of 114
`
`Page 9 of 114
`
`

`

`PROPOSED CLAIM AMENDMENTS FOR CONSIDERATION UNDER §1.312
`
`FOR U.S. APPLICATION NO. 16/019,937
`
`Proposed Amendment A2
`
`1.
`
`A liquid crystal display device comprising;
`a first substrate;
`a second substrate;
`
`liquid crystal enclosed between the first substrate and the second substrate;
`a scanning line formed between the first substrate and the liquid crystal;
`a drain line crossing the scanning line;
`a thin film transistor having a semiconductor layer and a source electrode, a first insulation
`film above the semiconductor layer and having a first contact hole and a second contact hole; the
`semiconductor layer being connected to the drain line via the first contact hole and connected to the
`source electrode via the second contact hole;
`
`an organic film above the source electrode;
`a second insulation film;
`
`a common electrode between the organic film and the second insulation film;
`a first pixel electrode above the second insulation film and connected to the source electrode
`via a third contact hole formed in the second insulation film;
`
`a second pixel electrode adjacent to the first pixel electrode; and
`a spacer disposed between the first substrate and the second substrate,
`
`wherein the scanning line gs
`has-a first side and a second side opposite—te—tl-ie—fi-rst
`side—in the plan View, the first pixel electrode is located on the first side and the second pixel electrode
`is located on the second side,
`wherein the semiconductor layer overlapped with the scanning line at a first channel region
`and a second channel region, and a part of the semiconductor layer between the first channel region
`and the second channel region is located on the second side-eiLthe—sea-nn-i-ng—hne,
`wherein the spacer is overlapped with the semiconductor layer, the drain line, the organic film,
`and the common electrode,
`wherein the first contact hole, the second contact hole, and the third contact hole are located
`on the first side—ef—the—seanning—l—ine, and
`wherein the part of the semiconductor layer between the first channel region and the second
`channel region is overlapped with the second pixel electrode.
`
`(supplemental drawincr)
`
`
`
`Page 10 of114
`
`Page 10 of 114
`
`

`

`Proposed Amendment B:
`
`1.
`
`A liquid crystal display device comprising;
`a first substrate;
`a second substrate;
`
`liquid crystal enclosed between the first substrate and the second substrate;
`a scanning line formed between the first substrate and the liquid crystal;
`a drain line crossing the scanning line;
`a thin film transistor having a semiconductor layer and a source electrode, a first insulation
`film above the semiconductor layer and having a first contact hole and a second contact hole, the
`semiconductor layer being connected to the drain line via the first contact hole and connected to the
`source electrode via the second contact hole;
`
`an organic film above the source electrode;
`a second insulation film;
`
`a common electrode between the organic film and the second insulation film;
`a first pixel electrode above the second insulation film and connected to the source electrode
`via a third contact hole formed in the second insulation film;
`
`a second pixel electrode adjacent to the first pixel electrode; and
`a spacer disposed between the first substrate and the second substrate
`wherein the scanning line has a first side and a second side opposite to the first side1n the
`plan view the first pixel electrode1s located
`_en—the—fir—st—side—and the second pixel
`
`electrode is located ‘
`'
`
`
`where1n the sen11conductor layer overlapped with the scanning line at a first channel region
`and a second channel region and a part of the semiconductor layer between the fir st channel region
`
`and the second channel region is located on the second
`y‘gg‘meoflthe—sea-nmng—hne,
`wherein the spacer is overlapped with the semiconductor layer, the drain line the organic film,
`and the common electrode
`
`wherein the first contact hole the second contact hole and the third contact hole are located
`
`011 the first
`fidQ—QLEhB—fibd—Hflifig—l—H—Ie and
`wherem the part of the semiconductor layer between the first channel region and the second
`channel region is overlapped with the second pixel electrode.
`
`(supplemental drawing)
`
`
`f»: wage“....,‘.A..e...«.«..4.......4...,,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3”“,(mflf5fl
`»IVaufluaun.,,
`
`
`
`
`Page 11 of114
`
`Page 11 of 114
`
`

`

`Page 12 of114
`
`Page 12 of 114
`
`

`

`
`
`UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMJVIERCE
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
`PO Box I450
`Alexandria. Virginia 2231371450
`www usptugov
`
`NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE AND FEE(S) DUE
`
`38327
`
`7590
`
`4
`03/20/2019
`
`Juan Carlos A. Marquez
`Marquez Intellectual Property Law Office PLLC
`1629 Ks... Nw
`Suite 300
`
`Washlngton, DC 20006
`
`EXAMINER
`
`LAU.EDMONDC
`
`2871
`
`DATE MAILED: 05/20/2019
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`FILING DATE
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`16/019,937
`06/27/2018
`Takahiro OCHIAI
`HARU-0136
`
`TITLE OF INVENTION: LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
`
`APPLN. TYPE
`
`ENTITY STATUS
`
`ISSUE FEE DUE
`
`PUBLICATION FEE DUE
`
`PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE
`
`TOTAL FEE(S) DUE
`
`DATE DUE
`
`nonprovi sional
`
`UNIDISCOI INTED
`
`519 l 000
`
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`
`$ l 000
`
`08/20/20l 9
`
`THE APPLICATION IDENTIFIED ABOVE HAS BEEN EXAMINED AND IS ALLOWED FOR ISSUANCE AS A PATENT.
`
`PROSECUTION ON THE MERITS IS CLOSED. THIS NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE IS NOT A GRANT OF PATENT RIGHTS.
`TIIIS APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO WITIIDRAWAL FROM ISSUE AT TIIE INITIATIVE OF TIIE OFFICE OR UPON
`PETITION BY THE APPLICANT. SEE 37 CFR 1.313 AND MPEP 1308.
`
`THE ISSUE FEE AND PUBLICATION FEE (IF REQUIRED) MUST BE PAID WITHIN THREE MONTHS FROM THE MAILING
`
`DATE OF THIS NOTICE OR THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE REGARDED AS ABANDONED. THIS STATUTORY PERIOD
`CANNOT BE EXTENDED. SEE 35 U.S.C. 151. THE ISSUE FEE DUE INDICATED ABOVE DOES NOT REFLECT A CREDIT
`FOR ANY PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE IN THIS APPLICATION.
`IF AN ISSUE FEE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN PAID IN
`THIS APPLICATION (AS SHOWN ABOVE), THE RETURN OF PART B OF THIS FORM WILL BE CONSIDERED A REQUEST
`TO REAPPLY THE PREVIOUSLY PAID ISSUE FEE TOWARD THE ISSUE FEE NOW DUE.
`
`HOW TO REPLY TO THIS NOTICE:
`
`1. Review the ENTITY STATUS shown above. If the ENTITY STATUS is shown as SMALL or MICRO, verify whether entitlement to that
`entity status still applies.
`
`If the ENTITY STATUS is the same as shown above, pay the TOTAL FEE(S) DUE shown above.
`
`If the ENTITY STATUS is changed from that shown above, on PART B — FEE( S) TRANSMITTAL, complete section number 5 titled
`"Change in Entity Status (from status indicated above)".
`
`For purposes of this notice, small entity fees are 1/2 the amount of undiscounted fees, and micro entity fees are 1/2 the amount of small entity
`fees.
`
`II. PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL, or its equivalent, must be completed and returned to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`(USPTO) with your ISSUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). If you are charging the fee(s) to your deposit account, section "4b"
`of Part B — Fee(s) Transmittal should be completed and an extra copy of the form should be submitted. If an equivalent of Part B is filed, a
`request to reapply a previously paid issue fee must be clearly made, and delays in processing may occur due to the difficulty in recognizing
`the paper as an equivalent of Part B.
`
`III. All communications regarding this application must give the application number. Please direct all communications prior to issuance to Mail
`Stop ISSUE FEE unless advised to the contrary.
`
`IMPORTANT REMINDER: Maintenance fees are due in utility patents issuing on applications filed on or after Dec. 12, 1980.
`It is patentee's responsibility to ensure timely payment of maintenance fees when due. More information is available at
`WWW.uspto.gov/PatentMaintenanceFees.
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`PTOL—SS (Rev. 02/11)
`
`Page 13 of114
`
`Page 13 of 114
`
`

`

`Complete and send this form, together with applicable fee(s), by mail or fax, or Via EFS—Web.
`
`PART B - FEE(S) TRANSMITTAL
`
`By mail, send to:
`
`By fax, send to:
`
`(571)-273-2885
`
`Mail Stop ISSUE FEE
`Commissioner for Patents
`PO. Box 1450
`Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
`INSTRUCTIONS: This form should be used for transmitting the IS SUE FEE and PUBLICATION FEE (if required). Blocks 1 through 5 should be completed where appropriate. All
`further correspondence including the Patent, advance orders and notification of maintenance fees will be mailed to the current correspondence address as indicated unless corrected
`below or directed otherwise in Block 1. by (a) specifying a new correspondence address; and/or (b) indicating a separate ”FEE ADDRESS” for maintenance fee notifications.
`Note: A certificate of mailing can only be used for domestic mailings of the
`Fee(s) Transmittal. This certificate cannot be used for any other accompanying
`papers. Each additional paper, such as an assignment or formal drawing, must
`have ils own cerlificale (if mailing or lransmission.
`Certificate of Mailing or Transmission
`
`CURRENT CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS (Note: Use Block 1 for any change ofaddress)
`
`38327
`
`7590
`
`05/20/2019
`
`Juan Carkm A. Marquez
`_
`Marquez Intellectual Property Law Office PLLC
`1629 K Street, NW
`Suite f{00
`
`Washington, DC 20006
`
`I hereby certify that this Fee(s) Transmittal is being deposited with the United
`States Postal Service With sufficient postage for first class mail in an envelope
`addressed to the Mail Stop ISSUE FEE address above, or being transmitted to
`the USPTO Via EFS-Web or by facsimile to (571) 273-2885, on the date below.
`(Typed or piiutedname)
`
`(Date)
`
`(Signature)
`
`APPLICATION NO.
`
`FILING DATE
`
`FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
`
`ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
`
`CONFIRMATION NO.
`
`16/019,937
`
`06/27/2018
`
`Takahiro OCHIAI
`
`HARU-0136
`
`7509
`
`TITLE OF INVENTION: LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY DEVICE
`
`APPLN. TYPE
`
`ENTITY STATUS
`
`ISSUE FEE DUE
`
`PUBLICATION FEE DUE
`
`PREV. PAID ISSUE FEE
`
`TOTAL FEE(S) DUE
`
`DATE DUE
`
`nonprovisional
`
`UNDISCOUNTED
`
`$1000
`
`$0.00
`
`$0.00
`
`$1000
`
`08/20/2019
`
`EXAMINER
`
`ART UNIT
`
`CLAS S-SUBCLASS
`
`LAU, EDMOND C
`
`2871
`
`349-155000
`
`1. Change of correspondence address or indication of "Fee Address" (37
`CFR 1363).
`
`3 Change of correspondence address (or Change of Correspondence
`Address form PTO/SB/122) attached.
`
` 3 "Fee Address" indication (or ”Fee Address” Indication form PTO/
`
`2. For printing on the patent front page, list
`( l) The names of up to 3 registered patent attorneys
`or a enls OR, allernalivelv,
`g
`'
`(2) The name of a single firm (having as a member a
`registered attorney or agent) and the names of up to
`2 registered patent attorneys or agents. If no name is
`listed, no name will be printed.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`
`
`SB/47; Rev 03-09 or more recenl) allached. Use of a Cusmmer
`Number is required.
`3. ASSIGNEE NAME AND RESIDENCE DATA TO BE PRlNTED ON THE PATENT (print or type)
`PLEASE NOTE: Unless an assignee is identified below, no assignee data will appear on the patent. If an assignee is identified below, the document must have been previously
`recorded, or filed for recordatiori, as set forth in 37 CFR 311 and 37 CFR 3.81(a). Completion of this form is NOT a substitute for filing an assignment.
`(A) NAME OF ASSIGNEE
`(B) RESIDENCE: (CITY and STATE OR COUNTRY)
`
`Please check the appropriate assignee category or categories (will not be printed on the patent) : D Individual D Corporation or other private group entity D Government
`4a. Fees submitted:
`Ellssue Fee
`qublication Fee (if required)
`DAdvance Order - # of Copies
`4h. Method of Payment: (Pleua‘eflru reapply (my [)revitmsly pair/fee xhnwn a/mve)
`
`3 Electronic Payment Via EFS-Web
`
`[I Enclosed check
`
`[I Non-electronic payment by credit card (Attach form PTO-2038)
`
` :I The Director is hereby authorized to charge the required fee(s), any deficiency, or credit any overpayment to Deposit Account No.
`
`NOTE: Absent a valid certification of Micro Entity Status (see forms PTO/SB/ 15A and 15B), i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket