throbber
16.4L: Late-News
`
`Paper: A Novel Wide-Viewing-Angle
`Ultra-Trans
`ViewTM
`S. H. Lee, S. L. Lee, H. K Kim, Z Y Eom
`Hvundai Electronics
`Industries,
`Kvunaki-Do,
`..-
`
`Korea
`
`-.
`
`Technology:
`
`Abstract
`A novel nematic liquid crystal display of in-
`plane switching controlled by fringe-field has been
`developed. The device exhibits wide viewing angle
`over 160° and high transmittance
`comparable
`to
`the twisted nematic (TN) cell, a solution for long
`standing problem of previous wide viewing angle
`technologies with low transmittance.
`In this paper,
`the device with optimized design, i.e., less sensitive
`to process will be discussed.
`
`1. Introduction
`Recently,
`several new technologies minimizing
`viewing angle dependency of image quality have been
`introduced in nematic liquid crystal displays (LCDS).
`Among them are in-plane switching (IPS),’ multi-
`domain
`vertical
`alignment
`(MVA)~
`surrounding
`electrode (SE),3 optically compensated bend (OCB),4
`and four-domain VA (FDVA) controlled by in-plane
`field5. The IPS mode can realize wide viewing angle
`due to in-plane rotation of LC director without further
`optical
`compensation
`fUm. However,
`the
`using
`demerit
`in the IPS is low light eflkiency due to the
`low aperture ratio. The MVA, SE and FDVA modes
`also have
`low transmittance problem due to the
`existence of disclination lines in light-transmitted area.
`Fig.
`1
`shows
`the
`relationship
`between
`the
`transmittance
`and viewing angle of the LCDS for
`several display modes. As indicated, any previous
`modes do not satisfj both high transmittance and wide
`viewing
`angle
`characteristics
`at
`the
`same
`time.
`However, we have developed a novel TFT-LCD
`controlled by fringe-field switching (FFS)
`to meet
`both requirements.6 In this paper, we describe
`the
`optimized pixel design with less sensitive to process,
`and its electro-optic
`characteristics.
`2. Switching Principle of Fringe-Field Switching
`the
`Figure 2 shows the schematic features of
`the
`conventional
`IPS and FFS cells describing
`difference in light
`transmitted area (TA) and array
`structure.
`In the IPS cell,
`the distance (1) between
`electrodes is larger than the cell gap (d) and the width
`of electrode (w) such that
`the parallel
`field to the
`substrate (/lY) mainly exists between electrodes with
`bias voltage. Then homogeneously
`aligned liquid
`crystal molecules do mainly twist deformation in x-v
`plane by dielectric
`torque,
`giving rise
`to light
`
`Fig. 2 Features of the IPS and the FFS modes
`
`ISSN0099-0966X/99/3001-0180-$1.00 + .00 (c) 1999 SID
`
`n‘bMVA
`
`m
`
`m
`
`/
`
`&$
`
`Viewing Angle
`
`~
`
`Wide
`
`Fig, 1 Relationship between viewing angle and
`transmittance for several LCD modes.
`
`above
`the LC molecules
`transmittance. However,
`electrodes do not go through twist deformation. As a
`result, the area that light can be transmitted is reduced
`compared to the TN cell.
`In the FFS cell, the pixel and counter electrodes
`are transparent and 1 is zero or smaller than d and w
`so that the electric field parallel
`to the substrate can
`not be formed but
`instead the fringe field lines are
`formed in the whole area. In other words, such field
`lines having vertical
`components
`(EJ
`as well as
`horizontal ones (E”) exist. The interaction probability
`between E, and LC director for negative type of LC is
`about zero because the pretilt angle of LC director is
`
`FFS
`
`.x2- Y
`
`FFS
`<1 or (1
`<1 or ()
`Ey, E,
`ITO
`
`I
`I
`
`II
`
`I I
`
`IRS
`>1
`>1
`E,
`I Metals or ITO I
`
`E’s
`
`I
`I
`
`l/d
`l/w
`Field
`Electrode
`
`Page 1
`
`JDI/PLD - EX. 2009
`TIANMA MICROELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD. v. JDI/PLD
`IPR2021-01060
`
`

`

`the dielectric torque is applied
`very low. However,
`between Ey and the LC director such that
`the liquid
`crystal molecules do twist deformation in plane in the
`whole area,
`resulting in light
`transmission. Fig. 3
`shows a simulational
`result of dynamic
`response
`behavior with applied voltage for a negative LC. The
`light transmittance starts to occur
`near the edge of electrodes and extends to the whole
`area. This implies that the twisting of the LC director
`in the FFS mode does occur due to the dielectric
`torque initially and consecutively elastic force of the
`LC molecules to neighboring ones being at the center
`of electrodes. Another
`interesting characteristic
`in
`transmission
`unlike
`other
`displays
`is
`that
`the
`transmission is alternating along horizontal direction.
`This means that the degree of twist of LC director is
`different due to the alternating amplitude of Ey The
`efficiency of light transmittance also depends on the
`types of liquid crystal.
`
`I
`
`-------
`-------
`------
`.
`.
`-.
`. .
`-..
`#----
`-*.*-*.
`-*
`.*----
`
`------.
`.
`.
`.
`------
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`.
`--------
`.*-...
`*-..-*
`
`.
`
`.
`
`--
`
`..
`
`-------
`. -------
`.
`------
`.
`.
`.
`
`I
`
`.-
`
`.C
`
`1
`.- 1
`#-
`
`.
`
`-----
`.
`.
`.
`.
`-------
`.*---
`-------
`
`.
`
`--
`
`--,--a.
`
`--.--%,
`
`--
`
`.---,
`
`--
`
`x Counter electrode
`
`Pihl
`
`electrode
`
`Fig. 3 Simulational result of dynamic response
`behavior of LC director and corresponding
`transmittance
`
`3. Advantages of the FFS mode
`Fig. 4 shows one pixel design and equivalent
`circuit of the IPS and FFS cells. In the FFS cell, there
`are several advantages over the conventional IPS cells
`as following:
`-High transmittance
`-Crosstalkless
`-Less process dependence
`-No need of planarization for good alignment of LCS
`In the FFS cell, it does not need an additional space
`for storage capacitor (CJ because C, can be formed in
`
`the light-transmitted area, so that it has high aperture
`ratio. And also there is an additional fi-inge capacitor
`(CJ so the total capacitance is much higher than that
`of the IPS cell. This indicates that the fluctuation of
`the pixel electrode potential~ Vp disturbed by change
`of source-bus line potential
`V~ is less than the IPS
`cell and the feedthrough voltage d V is much lower
`than those of
`IPS and TN cells
`and is almost
`independent on applied voltage, owing to large total
`capacitor. This results in low crosstalk and less DC
`applied to cell. For a process view point,
`in the IPS
`mode, the threshold voltage is linearly proportional
`to
`the electrode distance,
`i.e., V,h=x I/d (K22f E .zf E )’12
`so that it is sensitive to the layer to layer misalignment
`and also the etch bias variation
`of
`the metals.
`However,
`in the FFS mode, two approaches to design
`a pixel, i.e., l/d< 1 or Oare possible. In the latter case,
`there is no electrode distance so that the relationship
`between V,h as well as transmittance
`and 1 are not
`linearly dependent. Instead they have a plateau range
`with best
`transmittance
`as varying the distance (Z’)
`between the pixel electrodes for given w, as shown in
`simulational
`results of Fig. 5. For simulation,
`the
`liquid crystal with negative dielectric anisotropy is
`used. The
`results
`show that
`for
`the
`l/d < 0,
`transmittance
`is linearly decreased as 1 and w is
`increasing. For l/d = O, the optimal range does exist
`for best transmission and the transmittance does not
`change
`linearly with increasing ~. This property
`improves uniformity in brightness. However,
`in this
`structure,
`the channel width of TFT and gate high
`voltage should be optimized for enough charging.
`Another issue is liquid crystal alignment. In the IPS
`cell, the pixel and counter electrodes are formed using
`gate and source-drain metals that have thickness at
`least above 1000 A,
`accordingly planarization
`for
`good alignment of LC is necessary. However,
`in the
`FFS cell, the pixel and counter electrodes are ITOS
`having a thickness about 400A,
`so good alignment of
`LC is obtained without extra process.
`
`4. Electro-optic characteristics of the FFS cell
`Fig.
`6
`shows
`again
`the
`voltage-dependent
`transmission curves for the TN, IPS, and FFS mode in
`12.1” SVGA.
`In transmittance
`efficiency,
`the TN
`mode is best and the FFS mode shows comparable
`light efficiency, about 90’% of the TN mode. Fig. 7
`curves
`transmittance
`voltage-dependent
`shows
`depending on the dielectric
`anisotropy of the LC.
`a positive LC is used,
`the maximum-
`When
`transmittance
`is decreased
`although
`the
`driving
`
`ISSN0099-0966X/99/3001-0180-$1.00 + .00 (c) 1999 SID
`
`Page 2
`
`JDI/PLD - EX. 2009
`TIANMA MICROELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD. v. JDI/PLD
`IPR2021-01060
`
`

`

`voltage is relatively lower than that of a negative one.
`For a positive LC, the LC molecules do tilt-up along
`the fringe field as well as twist deformation with bias
`voltage so that the degree of twist above electrodes is
`low,
`resulting in less transmittance
`than that of a
`negative one.
`
`Acknowledgements
`We deeply express our appreciation to Senior
`Vice President Soo Han Choi, Managers W. G. Lee,
`Y. J. Lim, J. Y. Lee, H. S. Park, our hardworking
`engineers, and the process teams for the full support
`of the project.
`
`H.
`
`References
`1, K. Kondo et al., SID ’98 Digest, 389 (1998).
`2. A. Takeda et al., SID ’98 Digest, 1077 (1998).
`3. N. Korea et al., SID ’96 Digest, 558 (1996); K.
`Kim et al., Asia Display ’98,383 (1998)
`4. P. L. Bos and J. A. Rahman, SID ’93 Digest, 273
`(1993); Y. Yamaguchi et al., SID ’93 Digest, 277
`(1993).
`5. S. H. Lee et al., KSID ’97 Digest, 23 (1997); Appl.
`Phys. Lett. 71 (19), 2851 (1997); SID ’98 Digest,
`1077 (1998); K. H. Kim et al., SID ’98 Digest, 175
`(1998).
`6. S. H. Lee et al., Asia Display ’98 Digest, 371
`(1998), Appl. Phys. Lett. 73 (20), 2881 (1998).
`
`180°
`
`270°
`
`90°
`
`0°
`
`Fig. 8 Iso-contrast curve of the FFS cell
`
`We have measured a viewing angle dependence of
`a contrast
`ratio (CR) as shown in Fig. 8. The CR
`greater than 10 with a polar angle of 80° in vertical
`and horizontal directions is obtained. This indirectly
`proves in-plane rotation of the LC director and also
`the CR greater than 250 at normal direction is easily
`obtained.
`
`TFT-LCD
`5. “Ultra-TransView”
`We
`have
`fabricated
`15.0” XGA TFT-LCD
`module utilizing the concept of FFS. It has a trade
`mark “Ultra-TransView” which has meaning of both
`ukra-transmittance
`and Ultra-viewing
`angle. The
`power
`consumption
`is only 19 W with surface
`luminance of 200nits. The crosstalk is less than 1.5%
`for both horizontal and vertical
`one as appeared in
`Table 1.
`
`6. Conclusion
`wide-viewing-angle
`We have developed a novel
`technology with concept of the FFS. This exhibits
`high transmittance
`and wide viewing angle at
`the
`same
`time with use of negative
`liquid crystal,
`the
`drawback
`of previous wide-
`overcoming
`viewing-angle
`technologies. We also optimized the
`device less sensitive to process. We believe that this is
`one of most promising candidates
`for high quality
`active matrix LCD,
`irrespective of panel size and
`uses.
`
`I
`I
`
`Table 1 Specflcations of “Ultra-TransView”
`15.0
`\Dia~onal Size (Inches)
`1024 (’X3)X 768
`lResolution
`99X 297
`lPixel Size (urn)
`6.5
`lSupplied Voltage (V)
`200
`Brightness (nit)
`4CCFL
`Backlight
`19
`Power Consunmtion (W)
`250:1
`Contrast Ratio
`160°
`Viewing Angle (CR>l O)
`<1.5’?/.
`Crosstalk
`
`I
`
`I
`I
`
`1
`
`I
`
`ISSN0099-0966X/99/3001-0180-$1.00 + .00 (c) 1999 SID
`
`Page 3
`
`JDI/PLD - EX. 2009
`TIANMA MICROELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD. v. JDI/PLD
`IPR2021-01060
`
`

`

`IRS
`
`~gd
`
`d Vgh
`
`FFS
`
`I
`
`Glass
`
`I
`
`w~
`
`,.
`
`Glass
`
`m
`
`Cs Bus Line
`
`Gate Bus
`M
`
`c, Cf
`TF
`
`Lc
`
`CP,-J
`Cgd
`
`kd
`Source Bus Line
`,,
`
`Av=
`
`1
`
`1
`
`8 7
`
`3
`
`o
`
`g4
`
`“g
`
`gz
`
`*1
`
`Cgd+ C, + Cf + CLC
`Fig. 4 Schematic drawing of a pixel layout and equivalent circuit of the IPS and FFS modes.
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`I
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`fi
`~
`H
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`/ (m)
`/ ‘(w;
`Fig. 5 Simulational results of a) 1and b) 1’- dependent transmission
`
`t
`
`6
`
`/iIll
`#nl
`
`+W=4
`+W=5
`
`I
`5
`
`8
`
`o
`
`0123456789
`
`Voltage(V)
`
`10
`
`Fig. 7 Voltage-dependent
`transmission curve
`depending on different types of liquid cgwtals.
`
`012345678910
`(V)
`Voltage
`Fig. 6 Voltage-dependent
`transmission
`curves for different display modes
`
`ISSN0099-0966X/99/3001-0180-$1.00 + .00 (c) 1999 SID
`
`Page 4
`
`JDI/PLD - EX. 2009
`TIANMA MICROELECTRONICS
`CO. LTD. v. JDI/PLD
`IPR2021-01060
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket