throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 8
`
`
` Date: October 22, 2021
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CONFIGIT A/S,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`VERSATA DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`IPR2021-01055
`Patent 6,836,766 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, KEVIN F. TURNER, and
`DEBRA K. STEPHENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TURNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Dr. Jeffrey Schneidman
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01055
`Patent 6,836,766 B1
`
`
`Petitioner filed an Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`Dr. Jeffrey Schneidman. Paper 7 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). Petitioner also filed
`a Declaration of Dr. Schneidman in support of the Motion. Ex. 1052
`(“Declaration”). Petitioner represents that Patent Owner does not oppose the
`Motion. Mot. 1. For the reasons discussed below, Petitioner’s Motion is
`granted.
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause, subject to
`the condition that lead counsel be a registered practitioner. The
`representative Order authorizing motions for pro hac vice admission requires
`a statement of facts showing there is good cause for us to recognize counsel
`pro hac vice, and an affidavit or declaration of the individual seeking to
`appear. See Paper 3, 2 (citing Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC,
`Case IPR2013-00639 (PTAB Oct. 15, 2013) (Paper 7) (representative
`“Order – Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission”)).
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motion and the accompanying
`Declaration, we conclude that Dr. Schneidman has sufficient legal and
`technical qualifications to represent Petitioner in this proceeding, that Dr.
`Schneidman has demonstrated sufficient familiarity with the subject matter
`of this proceeding, and that Petitioner’s intent to be represented by counsel
`with litigation experience is warranted. Accordingly, Petitioner has
`established good cause for pro hac vice admission of Dr. Schneidman. Dr.
`Schneidman will be permitted to serve as back-up counsel only. See 37
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`We note that Petitioner submitted a Power of Attorney in accordance
`with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) for Dr. Schneidman. Paper 1. Petitioner’s
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01055
`Patent 6,836,766 B1
`
`Mandatory Notices also identify Dr. Schneidman. Paper 2, 75.
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Dr. Jeffrey Schneidman (Paper 7) is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Schneidman is authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Schneidman is to comply with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide1 (84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019)),
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title
`37, Code of Federal Regulations2; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Dr. Schneidman is to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et.
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`1 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`2 Dr. Schneidman indicates that he “will comply with the Office Patent Trial
`Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part
`42 of the Code of Federal Regulations 32.” Declaration ¶ 6. The Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules are set forth in part 42 of
`37 C.F.R. We deem this as harmless error.
`3
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2021-01055
`Patent 6,836,766 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`David Hoffman
`Kenneth Darby
`hoffman@fr.com
`kdarby@fr.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Robert G. Sterne
`James R. Hietala
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`rsterne-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`jhietala-PTAB@sternekessler.com
`
`Kent B. Chambers
`TERRILE, CANNATTI & CHAMBERS LLP
`Chamberskchambers@tcciplaw.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket