`
`GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`
`IPR2021-01041
`
`DEPOSITION SOLUTIONS
`
`Page 2062-Page 1
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`DR. JACOB O. WOBBROCK
`
`September 08, 2022
`
`Page 2062-Page 1
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`·2· · · · · · ·BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`·3
`
`·4· GOOGLE LLC,· · · · · · · · · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·5· · · · · · · · · Petitioner,· · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·6· · · · · · ·vs.· · · · · · · · · · · ) Case No. IPR2021-01041
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·7· NEONODE SMARTPHONE LLC,· · · · · · ·)
`· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · )
`·8· · · · · · · · · Patent Owner.· · · ·)
`· · ____________________________________)
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · · DEPOSITION TAKEN VIA ZOOM OF DR. JACOB O.
`
`15· · · · · · · WOBBROCK, the witness appearing remotely at
`
`16· · · · · · · 9:02 a.m. on Thursday, September 8, 2022,
`
`17· · · · · · · before Jimmy Rodriguez, CSR 13464.
`
`18
`
`19· · · · · · · Job No. J8537920
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 2062-Page 2
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL:
`
`·2· ·FOR PETITIONER:
`
`·3· · · · · · FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER
`· · · · · · · BY:· KEVIN D. RODKEY, Esq.
`·4· · · · · · · · ·(Appearance Via Zoom)
`· · · · · · · · · ·- And -
`·5· · · · · · · · ·YI YU, Ph.D.
`· · · · · · · · · ·(Appearance Via Zoom)
`·6· · · · · · 271 17th Street, NW
`· · · · · · · Suite 1400
`·7· · · · · · Atlanta, GA 30363
`· · · · · · · TEL:· (404) 653-6484
`·8· · · · · · Kevin.rodkey@finnegan.com
`
`·9
`· · ·FOR PATENT OWNER:
`10
`· · · · · · · LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX, LLP
`11· · · · · · BY:· PARHAM HENDIFAR, Esq.
`· · · · · · · · · ·(Appearance Via Zoom)
`12· · · · · · 1880 Century Park East
`· · · · · · · Suite 815
`13· · · · · · Los Angeles, CA 90067
`· · · · · · · TEL:· (310) 307-4510
`14· · · · · · Hendifar@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 2062-Page 3
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · ·I N D E X
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·EXAMINATIONS· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · PAGE
`
`·4· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·4
`
`·5
`
`·6
`
`·7· · · · · · · · · · · · E X H I B I T S
`
`·8· · · · · · · · · · · · (None offered.)
`
`·9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · · · WITNESS INSTRUCTED NOT TO ANSWER
`
`15· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·(None)
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18· · · · · · · · · · ·INFORMATION REQUESTED
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·(None)
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 2062-Page 4
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · Thursday, September 8, 2022
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · ·9:02 a.m. - 9:34 a.m.
`
`·3
`
`·4· · · · · · · · · · ·DR. JACOB O. WOBBROCK,
`
`·5· ·produced as a witness and having been first duly sworn
`
`·6· ·by the Certified Shorthand Reporter, was examined and
`
`·7· ·testified as follows:
`
`·8
`
`·9· · · · · · · · · · · · · EXAMINATION
`
`10· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`11· · · ·Q· · ·Good morning, Dr. Wobbrock.· Thank you very
`
`12· ·much for your time this morning.· What did you do to
`
`13· ·prepare for your deposition today?
`
`14· · · ·A· · ·Well, I reviewed my second declaration,
`
`15· ·which I know you have as an exhibit.· And I also met
`
`16· ·with counsel for petitioner just to talk to --
`
`17· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· And --
`
`18· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· -- some of the issues.
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· -- I want to caution the
`
`20· ·witness not to disclose the topics or any information
`
`21· ·related to discussions held with counsel.
`
`22· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Understood.
`
`23· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`24· · · ·Q· · ·May I please refer you to Paragraph 6 of
`
`25· ·your second declaration.
`
`Page 2062-Page 5
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· So we're on the same page, can
`
`·2· ·you just put the exhibit number in the record so it's
`
`·3· ·on the transcript?
`
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. HENDIFAR:· Sure.
`
`·5· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`·6· · · ·Q· · ·When I refer to your second declaration,
`
`·7· ·Dr. Wobbrock, I'll be referring to Petitioner
`
`·8· ·Exhibit 1032.· May I please refer you to Paragraph 6
`
`·9· ·of that exhibit.
`
`10· · · ·A· · ·Okay.
`
`11· · · ·Q· · ·There you explain that you disagree with
`
`12· ·many positions expressed by Dr. Rosenberg; do you see
`
`13· ·that?
`
`14· · · ·A· · ·Yes, I do.
`
`15· · · ·Q· · ·Okay.· Did you determine which portions of
`
`16· ·your disagreements with Dr. Rosenberg to include in
`
`17· ·your second declaration and which portions not to
`
`18· ·include?
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, form.
`
`20· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I'm not sure I caught every
`
`21· ·word of the question, if you could repeat it, I'd
`
`22· ·appreciate that, thank you.
`
`23· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`24· · · ·Q· · ·Of course.
`
`25· · · · · · ·Did you determine which portions of your
`
`Page 2062-Page 6
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·disagreements with Dr. Rosenberg to include in your
`
`·2· ·second declaration and which portions not to include?
`
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, to form.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I was asked to provide my
`
`·5· ·opinion in a second declaration, specifically related
`
`·6· ·to Dr. Rosenberg's use of the term "desktop" with
`
`·7· ·respect to the Robertson reference; and the related
`
`·8· ·issue of Dr. Rosenberg's referring to the X Windows
`
`·9· ·platform and its use on various computing platforms,
`
`10· ·particularly what I thought was his erroneous
`
`11· ·assertion that it was an operating system confined to
`
`12· ·use on desktop hardware computer workstations; which
`
`13· ·it's not, and it's been used on mobile computing
`
`14· ·platforms since before the priority date.· So I wanted
`
`15· ·to clarify those two issues.
`
`16· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`17· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you for that explanation.
`
`18· · · · · · ·What is a light pen?
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`20· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Could you give me a pointer to
`
`21· ·a specific instance of where you're seeing that used
`
`22· ·in my declaration or elsewhere so I have some context?
`
`23· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`24· · · ·Q· · ·I don't believe it's used in your
`
`25· ·declaration.· So maybe I'll start with some
`
`Page 2062-Page 7
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·foundational questions.
`
`·2· · · · · · ·Are you familiar with an input device for
`
`·3· ·computers known as a light pen?
`
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Light pens are a computer
`
`·6· ·input device that I have certainly encountered in my
`
`·7· ·research work and in my work as an expert in human
`
`·8· ·computer interaction and user interfaces.· But I have
`
`·9· ·not recently encountered light pens or worked with
`
`10· ·them in this matter to my knowledge thus far.
`
`11· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`12· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you.
`
`13· · · · · · ·And what is a light pen?
`
`14· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`15· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, just speaking very
`
`16· ·broadly here about input devices in general, a light
`
`17· ·pen would be considered in a similar category of input
`
`18· ·device as a mouse or a touchscreen or even eye
`
`19· ·tracking, all of these are methods for providing input
`
`20· ·to a computer system.
`
`21· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`22· · · ·Q· · ·And how does a light pen provide input to
`
`23· ·the system?
`
`24· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`25· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, a light pen as the name
`
`Page 2062-Page 8
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·suggests is a type of pen input.· There are many other
`
`·2· ·kinds of pen input devices as well.· A light pen uses
`
`·3· ·light that is emitted from the pen and tracked by a
`
`·4· ·receiver; for example, but not always, the receiver
`
`·5· ·might be behind a screen and the location of the light
`
`·6· ·spot is tracked, which tells the system where the pen
`
`·7· ·is on the screen.
`
`·8· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`·9· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you for that explanation.
`
`10· · · · · · ·Now, I don't recall ever having seen a light
`
`11· ·pen and I wonder if that's because they're no longer
`
`12· ·in use, or I was just having bad luck, so my question
`
`13· ·is, are light pens still in common use in the
`
`14· ·industry?
`
`15· · · ·A· · ·I've certainly seen light pens in computing
`
`16· ·systems both historically and in current systems. I
`
`17· ·believe they still are in use, although I could not
`
`18· ·point you to a make and model of a system off the top
`
`19· ·of my head.· They are in the class of pen computing
`
`20· ·input devices and have had a long history in the input
`
`21· ·device space of human computer interaction
`
`22· ·technologies.
`
`23· · · ·Q· · ·Are light pens used generally with desktop
`
`24· ·or laptop computers now or when they were commonly
`
`25· ·being used, whenever that was?
`
`Page 2062-Page 9
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope and form.
`
`·2· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I really haven't considered
`
`·3· ·that question.· I'm not sure I could say.· The use of
`
`·4· ·light pens like with all computer input devices such
`
`·5· ·as mice, these are generic input devices that can be
`
`·6· ·used across many different kinds of platforms.· It
`
`·7· ·really just depends on how the platforms are
`
`·8· ·implemented.
`
`·9· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`10· · · ·Q· · ·Is it true that light pens have a wire that
`
`11· ·connects into the computer so that the detection of
`
`12· ·the light could be transmitted back to the computer?
`
`13· · · ·A· · ·I have seen light pens that had a wire
`
`14· ·connected to the computer.· I have no doubt there are
`
`15· ·light pens that operate without a wire; for example,
`
`16· ·on a wireless connection, over Bluetooth for example
`
`17· ·would be one option.· Again, just like mice, which
`
`18· ·might have a cable to the computer or might operate
`
`19· ·over Bluetooth, we're talking here with light pens
`
`20· ·about a generic input device that could be used on any
`
`21· ·number of computing systems, platforms, any particular
`
`22· ·kinds of hardware designs, including the way that they
`
`23· ·connect to the computer.
`
`24· · · ·Q· · ·May I please refer you to Paragraph 21 of
`
`25· ·your second declaration, Exhibit 1032.
`
`Page 2062-Page 10
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·A· · ·Paragraph 21?
`
`·2· · · ·Q· · ·Yes, please.
`
`·3· · · ·A· · ·Okay, I'm there.
`
`·4· · · ·Q· · ·Did you select the Newton's Telecom
`
`·5· ·Dictionary as your source for evidence?
`
`·6· · · ·A· · ·I am familiar with Newton's Telecom
`
`·7· ·Dictionary, I've seen this dictionary cited
`
`·8· ·previously.· In this particular instance this -- this
`
`·9· ·definition of "desktop" and the use of Newton's
`
`10· ·dictionary was pointed out to me by counsel.· But I'm
`
`11· ·familiar with Newton's Telecom Dictionary as a popular
`
`12· ·reference.
`
`13· · · ·Q· · ·Same question with Barron's dictionary, did
`
`14· ·you select the Barron's dictionary to cite in your
`
`15· ·declaration?
`
`16· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· And I wanted to just caution
`
`17· ·the witness not to disclose the substance of any
`
`18· ·conversations with counsel.
`
`19· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Understood.
`
`20· · · · · · ·My answer is the same as before.
`
`21· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`22· · · ·Q· · ·Okay.· Did you personally search for any
`
`23· ·dictionary definitions of the word "desktop"?
`
`24· · · ·A· · ·I did my searching for the use of "desktop"
`
`25· ·in the other references that we see in my second
`
`Page 2062-Page 11
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·declaration, finding its use in, for example, manuals
`
`·2· ·describing handheld computer platforms, referring to
`
`·3· ·desktop as the virtual onscreen user interface desktop
`
`·4· ·metaphor of files and folders and trash bins and icons
`
`·5· ·and so on, menus; so those are the references that I
`
`·6· ·searched for.· I did not myself search for dictionary
`
`·7· ·definitions in this particular case.
`
`·8· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you.· Are you familiar with a
`
`·9· ·processor named Pentium II?
`
`10· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`11· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I'm vaguely familiar with the
`
`12· ·Pentium line of processors that I believe Intel
`
`13· ·Computer Corporation created, but only vaguely.
`
`14· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`15· · · ·Q· · ·I'm sorry, did I interrupt you?
`
`16· · · ·A· · ·I just said only vaguely familiar.
`
`17· · · ·Q· · ·And why is it that your familiarity with
`
`18· ·Pentium processors is only vague?
`
`19· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, mischaracterizes,
`
`20· ·scope.
`
`21· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You asked me if I'm familiar
`
`22· ·with the Pentium II processor; that's a very specific
`
`23· ·processor in the Pentium line.· My expertise is in
`
`24· ·human computer interaction, user interface, and so on.
`
`25· ·Processor architecture is a different area of
`
`Page 2062-Page 12
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·specialization in computer engineering, and so while
`
`·2· ·I've encountered the Pentium line of processors in
`
`·3· ·passing, it's not something I've spent my time and
`
`·4· ·education studying.
`
`·5· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`·6· · · ·Q· · ·Do you have any knowledge about what was the
`
`·7· ·typical weight of a laptop computer with a Pentium II
`
`·8· ·processor around the year 2001?
`
`·9· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope, relevance.
`
`10· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I couldn't say.
`
`11· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`12· · · ·Q· · ·Do you have any knowledge about the typical
`
`13· ·dimensions of a laptop with a Pentium II processor
`
`14· ·around 2001?
`
`15· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope and relevance.
`
`16· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· I couldn't say.
`
`17· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`18· · · ·Q· · ·Do you have any knowledge about the typical
`
`19· ·battery life of laptops with Pentium II processors
`
`20· ·around 2001?
`
`21· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope and relevance.
`
`22· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Again, I couldn't say.
`
`23· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`24· · · ·Q· · ·Can you please explain in your view what
`
`25· ·distinguishes a laptop from a desktop computer?
`
`Page 2062-Page 13
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·A· · ·That's not an analysis I spent any time
`
`·2· ·performing as part of this case.· I can speak just in
`
`·3· ·very general terms that I think probably most people
`
`·4· ·could appreciate.
`
`·5· · · · · · ·A laptop is a generally smaller form factor
`
`·6· ·than a desktop hardware machine, and is more portable,
`
`·7· ·can be handheld, taken from one person's work surface
`
`·8· ·to another more easily, that kind of thing.
`
`·9· · · ·Q· · ·So is it essentially a relative comparison?
`
`10· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, form.
`
`11· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· You asked me to compare a
`
`12· ·desktop and a laptop, so I'm not sure what you mean by
`
`13· ·a relative comparison.
`
`14· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`15· · · ·Q· · ·Okay.· So let me rephrase my question.
`
`16· · · · · · ·Looking at the device, how would you know if
`
`17· ·it's a desktop or a laptop?
`
`18· · · ·A· · ·I'm not sure how to answer that in such
`
`19· ·broad and unqualified terms.· It would depend on the
`
`20· ·specific device, how it's situated in space, whether
`
`21· ·it's visible or obscured, how it's positioned perhaps
`
`22· ·on a desk or under a desk, I mean, there's just many
`
`23· ·different things that might lead one to conclude a
`
`24· ·particular machine is one or the other.
`
`25· · · ·Q· · ·Of the many different things, can you name
`
`Page 2062-Page 14
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·three characteristics as to what would lead you to
`
`·2· ·conclude that a device is a laptop or a desktop?
`
`·3· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, relevance, scope.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, as I said in an earlier
`
`·5· ·answer, generally speaking, a laptop is going to have
`
`·6· ·probably a lighter weight than a desktop machine, and
`
`·7· ·probably a smaller form factor.· Often, but not
`
`·8· ·always, laptop-type devices have a screen that folds
`
`·9· ·over their keyboard.· Those would generally be things
`
`10· ·one might expect.
`
`11· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`12· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you.
`
`13· · · · · · ·Now you mentioned that a laptop is a lighter
`
`14· ·weight than a desktop.
`
`15· · · · · · ·Is there a weight at which the device
`
`16· ·transforms from being a laptop to a desktop?
`
`17· · · ·A· · ·Again, that's a very broad and general
`
`18· ·observation that laptops generally are going to be
`
`19· ·lighter than desktop machines and generally smaller.
`
`20· ·But I have not conducted an analysis where we could,
`
`21· ·for example, plot out the weights of typical desktop
`
`22· ·machines and laptops and find that there's a
`
`23· ·distribution there where there's a separation.· That's
`
`24· ·just not something I've considered or an analysis I
`
`25· ·performed, so I couldn't tell you a weight.
`
`Page 2062-Page 15
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q· · ·Would your answer be the same about the form
`
`·2· ·factor and what size of the form factor would
`
`·3· ·transform a device from being a laptop to a desktop?
`
`·4· · · ·A· · ·My answer would be that it's not an analysis
`
`·5· ·I performed.· I couldn't say.
`
`·6· · · ·Q· · ·Is it your view that all laptops are
`
`·7· ·portable handheld devices?
`
`·8· · · ·A· · ·That's not an opinion that I've offered in
`
`·9· ·this case.· What I have indicated is that the '879
`
`10· ·patent refers to laptops as a type of handheld
`
`11· ·computing system; if memory serves, that's in Column 1
`
`12· ·of the specification.
`
`13· · · · · · ·And since my job in this case was to look at
`
`14· ·the '879 patent and what it describes and what it
`
`15· ·considers, for the purposes of my analysis, and in
`
`16· ·keeping with the intentions of the '879 patent, I've
`
`17· ·considered laptops as a form of a handheld portable
`
`18· ·computer device.
`
`19· · · ·Q· · ·So my question is, have you considered any
`
`20· ·and all laptops regardless of size and weight to be a
`
`21· ·type of mobile handheld computer unit as that term is
`
`22· ·used in Column 1 of the '879 patent?
`
`23· · · ·A· · ·Well, the patent itself in Column 1 as it
`
`24· ·describes laptop computers as a handheld computer
`
`25· ·device does not make any distinctions about weight or
`
`Page 2062-Page 16
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·size, so neither have I.
`
`·2· · · ·Q· · ·Okay.· May I please refer you to
`
`·3· ·Exhibit 1040.
`
`·4· · · · · · ·And for the court reporter, all these are
`
`·5· ·exhibits are already marked, nothing has to be marked.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·So if I may please refer you to
`
`·7· ·Exhibit 1040, Dr. Wobbrock.
`
`·8· · · ·A· · ·Can you tell me which that is?· I just have
`
`·9· ·my second declaration here and --
`
`10· · · ·Q· · ·That's fine, I'll put it in the chat box,
`
`11· ·that's not a problem.
`
`12· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Yeah, Counsel, please just put
`
`13· ·it in the chat so we're all sure we're looking at the
`
`14· ·same one.
`
`15· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· It's the Hamburgen reference
`
`16· ·if I'm not mistaken.
`
`17· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`18· · · ·Q· · ·May I refer you to PDF Page 3, native page
`
`19· ·No. 28.
`
`20· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Sorry, what page?
`
`21· · · · · · ·MR. HENDIFAR:· PDF Page 3, native page
`
`22· ·No. 28.
`
`23· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Thank you.
`
`24· · · · · · ·MR. HENDIFAR:· Of course.
`
`25· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· One moment.· Yes, okay.
`
`Page 2062-Page 17
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`·2· · · ·Q· · ·In the first column, the second paragraph
`
`·3· ·starts with, "Our primary hardware goals"; do you see
`
`·4· ·that?
`
`·5· · · ·A· · ·Yes.
`
`·6· · · ·Q· · ·Okay.· Towards the second half of that
`
`·7· ·paragraph, there is a sentence that starts with,
`
`·8· ·"Developers can use the Linux operating system with
`
`·9· ·extensions for a flash file system, resource sharing,
`
`10· ·and power management"; do you see that?
`
`11· · · ·A· · ·Yes.
`
`12· · · ·Q· · ·What does "resource sharing" mean in this
`
`13· ·context?
`
`14· · · ·A· · ·I don't know.· That's not a point of focus
`
`15· ·that I applied and I haven't given that any time for
`
`16· ·my analysis.· So I would have to consider that
`
`17· ·question in depth to really have an answer for you
`
`18· ·there.
`
`19· · · ·Q· · ·May I please refer you to PDF Page 7,
`
`20· ·Page 32 of Exhibit 1040.
`
`21· · · ·A· · ·Okay.
`
`22· · · ·Q· · ·And specifically on top of the page there is
`
`23· ·a figure named Figure 3; do you see that?
`
`24· · · ·A· · ·Yes.
`
`25· · · ·Q· · ·And in this figure, there are three oval
`
`Page 2062-Page 18
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·windows in green, the top one says MPEG Player, middle
`
`·2· ·one says X Windows, and the bottom one says
`
`·3· ·Qt Palmtop.
`
`·4· · · ·A· · ·Right.
`
`·5· · · ·Q· · ·What do these green ovals represent in this
`
`·6· ·figure?· Are they three different devices or what are
`
`·7· ·they?
`
`·8· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, form.
`
`·9· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· So, the reference in general
`
`10· ·here refers to a small credit card-sized mobile
`
`11· ·touchscreen device, and that device they call Itsy,
`
`12· ·I-t-s-y.
`
`13· · · · · · ·Figure 3 is, as it says, an example of
`
`14· ·sessions.· The green ovals you asked about are three
`
`15· ·different sessions that are running on the device and
`
`16· ·interacting with various components of the device.
`
`17· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`18· · · ·Q· · ·So what does Qt Palmtop denote?
`
`19· · · ·A· · ·That's not something I recall having focused
`
`20· ·on in my analysis of this piece.· My focus was on the
`
`21· ·X Windows aspect of Itsy, which is an example of a
`
`22· ·small credit card-sized touchscreen device running
`
`23· ·X Windows as its operating system.
`
`24· · · · · · ·And so I'm not specifically sure what the
`
`25· ·Qt Palmtop component is -- is about there.
`
`Page 2062-Page 19
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · ·Q· · ·Thank you.
`
`·2· · · · · · ·Do you know why light pens are no longer in
`
`·3· ·common use?
`
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope, assumes facts
`
`·5· ·not in evidence, mischaracterizes.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· When you asked me earlier
`
`·7· ·about common use, I did not agree that they're not in
`
`·8· ·common use.· They are a longstanding input device to
`
`·9· ·computers and human computer interaction.· And so I'm
`
`10· ·not sure I would agree that they're not in common use.
`
`11· ·BY MR. HENDIFAR:
`
`12· · · ·Q· · ·Do you believe that light pens today are in
`
`13· ·common use?
`
`14· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Objection, scope.
`
`15· · · · · · ·THE WITNESS:· Well, I'm not -- I haven't
`
`16· ·performed an analysis of what common use might or
`
`17· ·might not entail.· I'm uncertain as to the number of
`
`18· ·systems, whether in research or commercial use, that
`
`19· ·might use light pens.· There may well be many systems
`
`20· ·in industrial settings, for example, where light pens
`
`21· ·are applicable.· That's just not a topic I've
`
`22· ·investigated and it appears nowhere in my second
`
`23· ·declaration.
`
`24· · · · · · ·MR. HENDIFAR:· Okay.· No further questions.
`
`25· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· Okay.· Why don't you give us
`
`Page 2062-Page 20
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·five minutes.
`
`·2· · · · · · ·MR. HENDIFAR:· Okay.
`
`·3· · · · · · ·(Break taken.)
`
`·4· · · · · · ·MR. RODKEY:· We have no questions.· Thank
`
`·5· ·you for your time, Dr. Wobbrock.
`
`·6· · · · · · ·(Whereupon the deposition was concluded at
`
`·7· ·9:34 a.m.)
`
`·8
`
`·9· · · · · · ·(DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY ON THE
`
`10· ·FOLLOWING PAGE HEREOF.)
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 2062-Page 21
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ***
`
`·2
`
`·3
`
`·4· · · · · · I, DR. JACOB O. WOBBROCK, do solemnly declare
`
`·5· ·under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is my
`
`·6· ·deposition under oath; that these are the questions
`
`·7· ·asked of me and my answers thereto; that I have read
`
`·8· ·same and have made the necessary corrections,
`
`·9· ·additions, or changes to my answers that I deem
`
`10· ·necessary.
`
`11· · · · · · It witness thereof, I hereby subscribe my
`
`12· ·name this day of ___________________________, 2022.
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19· · · · · · · · · · · · _________________________________
`
`20· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·WITNESS SIGNATURE
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`Page 2062-Page 22
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· · · · · · · · · · · · ·CERTIFICATION
`
`·2· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·OF
`
`·3· · · · · · · · · CERTIFIED SHORTHAND REPORTER
`
`·4
`
`·5
`
`·6· · · · · · I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
`
`·7· ·Reporter of the State of California do hereby certify:
`
`·8· · · · · · That the foregoing proceedings were taken
`
`·9· ·before me at the time and place herein set forth; that
`
`10· ·any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to
`
`11· ·testifying, were placed under oath; that a verbatim
`
`12· ·record of the proceedings was made by me using machine
`
`13· ·shorthand which was thereafter transcribed under my
`
`14· ·direction; further, that the foregoing is an accurate
`
`15· ·transcription thereof.
`
`16· · · · · · I further certify that I am neither
`
`17· ·financially interested in the action nor a relative or
`
`18· ·employee of any attorney of any of the parties.
`
`19· · · · · · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date
`
`20· ·subscribed my name.
`
`21· ·Dated:· September 8, 2022
`
`22
`
`24
`· · · · · · · · · · · · Jimmy Rodriguez, RPR
`25· · · · · · · · · · · Certificate Number 13464
`
`Page 2062-Page 23
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·Reference No.: 8537920
`
`·2
`
`·3· ·Case:· GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`
`·4
`· · · · ·DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY
`·5
`· · · · · I declare under penalty of perjury that
`·6· ·I have read the entire transcript of my Depo-
`· · ·sition taken in the captioned matter or the
`·7· ·same has been read to me, and the same is
`· · ·true and accurate, save and except for
`·8· ·changes and/or corrections, if any, as indi-
`· · ·cated by me on the DEPOSITION ERRATA SHEET
`·9· ·hereof, with the understanding that I offer
`· · ·these changes as if still under oath.
`10
`
`11· · · · · ·___________________________
`
`12· · · · · ·Dr. Jacob O. Wobbrock
`
`13
`
`14· · · · · · ·NOTARIZATION OF CHANGES
`
`15· · · · · · · · · (If Required)
`
`16
`
`17· ·Subscribed and sworn to on the ______ day of
`
`18
`
`19· ·__________________________, 20____ before me,
`
`20
`
`21· ·(Notary Sign)________________________________
`
`22
`
`23· ·(Print Name)· · · · · · · · · · Notary Public,
`
`24
`
`25· ·in and for the State of _____________________
`
`Page 2062-Page 24
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·Reference No.: 8537920
`· · ·Case:· GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`·2
`
`·3· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`·4· ·__________________________________________________
`
`·5· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`·6· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`·7· ·__________________________________________________
`
`·8· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`·9· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`10· ·__________________________________________________
`
`11· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`12· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`13· ·__________________________________________________
`
`14· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`15· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`16· ·__________________________________________________
`
`17· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`18· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`19· ·__________________________________________________
`
`20· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`21· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`22· ·__________________________________________________
`
`23· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`24
`· · ·SIGNATURE:_______________________DATE:___________
`25· ·Dr. Jacob O. Wobbrock
`
`Page 2062-Page 25
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`·1· ·Reference No.: 8537920
`· · ·Case:· GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`·2
`
`·3· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`·4· ·__________________________________________________
`
`·5· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`·6· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`·7· ·__________________________________________________
`
`·8· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`·9· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`10· ·__________________________________________________
`
`11· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`12· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`13· ·__________________________________________________
`
`14· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`15· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`16· ·__________________________________________________
`
`17· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`18· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`19· ·__________________________________________________
`
`20· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`21· ·Page No._____Line No._____Change to:______________
`
`22· ·__________________________________________________
`
`23· ·Reason for change:________________________________
`
`24
`· · ·SIGNATURE:_______________________DATE:___________
`25· ·Dr. Jacob O. Wobbrock
`
`Page 2062-Page 26
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`DR. JACOB O. WOBBROCK
`GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`
`
`
`
`15:11,22,
`23
`
`1032
`
`5:8 9:25
`
`1040
`
`16:3,7
`17:20
`
`2001
`
`12:8,14,
`20
`
`21
`
`9:24 10:1
`
`agree
`19:7,10
`
`analysis
`13:1
`
`14:20,24
`15:4,15
`17:16
`
`18:20
`
`19:16
`
`appears
`19:22
`
`September 08, 2022
`Index: 1..Corporation
`
`bad
`
`8:12
`
`Barron's
`
`10:13,14
`
`battery
`12:19
`
`bins
`
`11:4
`
`10:16
`
`characteris
`
`tics
`
`14;
`
`chat
`
`16:10,13
`
`cite
`
`10:14
`
`Bluetooth
`
`cited
`
`9:16,19
`
`10:7
`
`12:1,7,25
`15:18,21,
`24 19:9
`
`computers
`7:3 8:24
`
`15:24
`
`19:9
`
`computing
`6:9,13
`8:15,19
`9:21
`15:11
`
`conclude
`
`13:23
`
`14:2
`
`conducted
`
`14:20
`
`confined
`
`6:11
`
`bottom
`
`18:2
`
`box
`
`16:10
`
`break
`
`20:3
`
`broad
`
`13:19
`14:17
`
`clarify
`6:15
`
`class
`
`8:19
`
`column
`
`15:11,22,
`23 17:2
`
`commercial
`
`19:18
`
`connect
`
`Neonode Exhibit 2062 Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`computer
`6:12 7:5,
`8,20 8:21
`9:4,11,
`12,14,18,
`23 11:2,
`13,24
`
`6:11
`
`assumes
`
`11:7 13:2
`
`15:9,13
`
`components
`18:16
`
`19:4
`
`
`
`
`category
`7:17
`
`caught
`5:20
`
`caution
`
`4:19
`
`Z ESQUIRE
`
`800.211.DEPO (3376)
`EsquireSolutions.com
`
`9:23
`
`connected
`
`9:14
`
`connection
`
`9:16
`
`connects
`
`9:11
`
`considered
`
`7:17 9:2
`
`14:24
`
`15:17,19
`
`considers
`
`15:15
`
`context
`
`6:22
`
`17:13
`
`conversatio
`ns
`
`10:18
`
`Corporation
`Page 2062-Page 27
`
`28
`
`3
`
`32
`
`16:19, 22
`
`applicable
`19:21
`
`broadly
`7:16
`
`common
`
`8:13
`
`applied
`17:15
`
`architectur
`
`16:18,21
`17:23
`
`18:13
`
`17:20
`
`e
`
`11:25
`
`area
`
`11:25
`
`aspect
`18:21
`
`cable
`
`9:18
`
`call
`
`18:11
`
`card-sized
`
`18:10,22
`
`assertion
`
`case
`
`19:3,7,8,
`10,13,16
`
`commonly
`8:24
`
`compare
`13:11
`
`comparison
`13:9,13
`
`component
`18:25
`
`Page 2062-Page 27
`Neonode Exhibit 2062
`Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`
`
`September 08, 2022
`Index: counsel..foundational
`
`10,11,13,
`14,23
`11:6
`
`engineering
`12:1
`
`facts
`
`19:4
`
`entail
`
`familiar
`
`dimensions
`
`19:17
`
`DR. JACOB O. WOBBROCK
`GOOGLE V. NEONODE
`
`11:13
`
`17:17
`
`counsel
`
`describes
`
`4:16,21
`10:10,18
`16:12
`
`15:14,24
`
`describing
`11:2
`
`court
`
`16:4
`
`created
`
`11:13
`
`credit
`
`18:10,22
`
`current
`
`8:16
`
`date
`
`6:14
`
`declaration
`
`designs
`9:22
`
`desk
`
`13:22
`
`desktop
`6:6,12
`8:23
`
`10:9,23,
`24 11:3
`
`12:25
`
`13:6,12,
`17 14:2,
`6,14,16,
`19,21
`15:3
`
`detection
`
`12:13
`
`disagree
`5:11
`
`disagreemen
`ts
`
`5:16 6:1
`
`disclose
`
`4:20
`
`10:17
`
`discussions
`
`4:21
`
`distinction
`s
`
`15:25
`
`distinguish
`es
`
`12:25
`
`erroneous
`
`6:10
`
`essentially
`13:9
`
`evidence
`
`10:5 19:5
`
`exhibit
`
`4:15 5:2,
`8,9 9:25
`16:3,7
`17:20
`
`7:2 10:6,
`11 11:8,
`11,16,21
`
`familiarity
`11:17
`
`figure
`17:23,25
`18:6,13
`
`file
`
`17:9
`
`files
`
`11:4
`
`exhibits
`
`find
`
`16:5
`
`14:22
`
`expect
`14:10
`
`expert
`7:7
`
`finding
`11:1
`
`fine
`
`16:10
`
`Neonode Exhibit 2062 Google v. Neonode, IPR2021-01041
`
`13:16,20
`14:2,15
`15:3,18,
`25 18:11,
`15,16,22
`19:8
`
`4:14,25
`5:6,17
`6:2,5,22,
`25 9:25
`
`10:15
`
`11:1 16:9
`
`19:23
`
`9:11
`
`determine
`
`5:15,25
`
`Developers
`17:8
`
`definition
`
`device
`
`10:9
`
`definitions
`
`7:2,6,18
`8:21 9:20
`
`distributio
`n
`
`14:23
`
`doubt
`
`9:14
`
`expertise
`11:23
`
`explain
`5:11
`
`12:24
`
`E
`
`explanation
`6:17 8:9
`
`earlier
`
`14:4 19:6
`
`expressed
`5:12
`
`flash
`
`17:9
`
`focus
`
`17:14
`
`18:20
`
`focused
`
`18:19
`
`folders
`
`11:4
`
`10:23
`
`11:7
`
`denote
`
`18:18
`
`depend
`13:19
`
`depends
`9:7
`
`deposition
`4:13
`
`depth
`
`easily
`13:8
`
`education
`
`12:4
`
`emitted
`
`8:3
`
`encountered
`
`7:6,9
`12:2
`
`devices
`
`7:16 8:2,