`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________________________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD. and LG ELECTRONICS INC.,
`Petitioners
`v.
`PARKERVISION, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________
`Case No. IPR2021-009901
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444 B1
`____________________________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1 LG Electronics Inc., who filed a petition in IPR2022-00245, is joined as petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 141(c), 142, 319; and 37
`
`Case IPR2021-00990
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`
`
`C.F.R. §§ 90.2(a), 90.3(a), that ParkerVision, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) appeals from
`
`the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s Final Written Decision entered on November
`
`21, 2022 (Paper No. 39) in the above-captioned inter partes review of U.S. Patent
`
`No. 7,110,444 (the “’444 Patent”) to the United States Court of Appeals for the
`
`Federal Circuit. This notice is timely filed within 63 days of the Board’s Final
`
`Written Decision. 37 C.F.R. § 90.3(a)(l). Patent Owner’s appeal includes any
`
`underlying orders, decisions, rulings, and opinions as well as any issues raised
`
`during these proceedings. In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 90.2(a)(3)(ii), Patent
`
`Owner further indicates that the issues on appeal include, without limitation: (i) the
`
`Board’s determination that all challenged claims are unpatentable over the art of
`
`record in this proceeding; (ii) the Board’s claim constructions; (iii) the Board’s
`
`disposition and evidentiary rulings relating to Patent Owner’s objections to certain
`
`of Petitioner’s arguments and evidence; (iv) the Board’s disposition and
`
`evidentiary rulings relating to Petitioner’s objections to certain of Patent Owner’s
`
`arguments and evidence; (v) the Board’s obviousness analysis; (vi) the Board’s
`
`determination to institute this proceeding; (vii) the Board’s decision not to dismiss
`
`this proceeding; and (viii) any finding or determination supporting or related to the
`
`above-mentioned issues as well as all other issues decided adversely to Patent
`
`Owner including in any orders, decisions, dispositions, rulings, and/or opinions.
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00990
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`
`Simultaneously with this submission, Patent Owner is filing a true and correct copy
`
`of this Notice of Appeal with the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark
`
`Office.
`
`Patent Owner also provides notice that the ’444 Patent is presently involved
`
`in another proceeding before the Federal Circuit (Appeal No. 22-1548), which
`
`appeals the Board’s Final Written Decision in IPR2020-01265. That appeal (22-
`
`1548) is fully briefed and is in the process of being scheduled for oral argument.
`
`
`
`Dated: January 19, 2023
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`/s/ Ronald M. Daignault
`Ronald M. Daignault*
`Jason S. Charkow* (Reg. No. 46,418)
`Chandran B. Iyer (Reg. No. 48,434)
`Stephanie R. Mandir (Reg. No. 72,930)
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive - Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`*Not admitted to practice in Virginia
`
`Attorneys for ParkerVision, Inc.
`
`2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND FILING
`The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 19th day of January, 2023, in
`
`Case IPR2021-00990
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`
`
`addition to being electronically filed through the Patent Trial and Appeal Case
`
`Tracking System (P-TACTS), a true and correct copy of the above-captioned
`
`PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL is being filed by Express Mail on
`
`January 19, 2023, with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`
`Office, at the following address:
`
`Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`c/o Office of the General Counsel
`United States Patent and Trademark Office
`P.O. Box 1450
`Alexandria, VA 22313-1450
`
`The undersigned also herby certifies that a true and correct copy of the
`
`above-captioned PATENT OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL and the filing fee is
`
`being filed via CM/ECF with the Clerk’s Office of the United States Court of
`
`Appeals for the Federal Circuit on January 19, 2023.
`
`Dated: January 19, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Ronald M. Daignault
`Ronald M. Daignault
`
`3
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing PATENT
`
`Case IPR2021-00990
`U.S. Patent No. 7,110,444
`
`
`OWNER’S NOTICE OF APPEAL, was served by filing the document through the
`
`Patent Trial and Appeal Case Tracking System (P-TACTS), as well as by email on
`
`the following counsel of record for Petitioner:
`
`Counsel for TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd.
`Kristopher L. Reed
`Edward J. Mayle
`Matias Ferrario
`KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
`kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
`tmayle@kilpatricktownsend.com
`mferrario@kilpatricktownsend.com
`
`Counsel for LG Electronics Inc.
`Scott A. McKeown
`Steven Pepe
`Scott Taylor
`Matthew R. Shapiro
`ROPES & GRAY LLP
`scott.mckeown@ropesgray.com
`steven.pepe@ropesgray.com
`scott.taylor@ropesgray.com
`matthew.shapiro@ropesgray.com
`
`
`
`
`/Jason S. Charkow/
`Jason S. Charkow
`USPTO Reg. No. 46,418
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`Dated: January 19, 2023
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
