throbber
Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., HISENSE CO., LTD., AND ZYXEL
`COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00985
`Patent No. 7,292,835
`
`________________________________________________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING AS TO
`PETITIONER ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
`
`
`
`

`

`Petitioner ZyXEL Communications Corp. (“ZyXEL Corp.” or “Petitioner”)
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`and Patent Owner ParkerVision, Inc. (“ParkerVision”) have reached a settlement.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. and
`
`Patent Owner ParkerVision jointly move to terminate the present inter partes
`
`review proceeding with respect to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.
`
`I. Statement of Facts
`
`ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have reached an agreement to resolve the
`
`Parties’ disputes. The settlement agreement settles (i) this proceeding and (ii) the
`
`related district court litigation styled ParkerVision, Inc. v. ZyXEL Communications
`
`Corporation, No. 6:20-cv-01010 (W.D. Tex.). Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b),
`
`the Parties’ settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being
`
`filed as Exhibit 2010. The settlement agreement is being filed electronically with
`
`access to “Board Only.” A “Joint Request to File Settlement Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74” is being filed concurrently with this Joint Motion to Terminate to treat the
`
`settlement agreement as business confidential information and to keep it separate
`
`from the files of the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`
`II. Relief Requested
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`Termination of this inter partes review as to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. is
`
`respectfully requested, and the Parties submit that such termination is justified.
`
`“There are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a
`
`proceeding.” Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 86 (Nov. 2019). “The Board
`
`expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement,
`
`unless the Board has already decided the merits of the proceeding.” Id. (citing 35
`
`U.S.C. §§317(a)).
`
`The Board should terminate this proceeding as to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.,
`
`as the Parties jointly request, for the following reasons:
`
`First, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have met the statutory requirement
`
`that they file a “joint request” to terminate before the Office “has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). Under section 317(a), an inter
`
`partes review shall be terminated upon such joint request “unless the Office has
`
`decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`
`There are no other preconditions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). At the time of this paper,
`
`the Board has not issued its decision on whether to institute trial.
`
`Second, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have reached a settlement as to all
`
`the disputes in this proceeding and as to U.S. Patent No. 7,292,835. A true copy of
`
`the settlement agreement is filed concurrently herewith. See Confidential Exhibit
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`
`2010. ZyXEL Corp. and Patent Owner request that the settlement agreement be
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the files of
`
`this proceeding in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). No other such
`
`agreements, written or oral, exist between or among the Parties.
`
`Third, termination would save significant further expenditure of resources
`
`by the Parties. Termination upon settlement as requested would also further the
`
`purpose of inter partes review proceedings to provide an efficient and less costly
`
`alternative forum for patent disputes. Further, maintaining the proceeding as to
`
`Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. would discourage further settlements, as patent owners in
`
`similar situations would have a strong disincentive to settle if they perceived that
`
`an inter partes review would continue regardless of a settlement.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision respectfully
`
`request termination of this inter partes review with respect to Petitioner ZyXEL
`
`Corp. only. The IPR petition will remain in force with respect to the non-ZyXel
`
`Corp. petitioners, who continue to be represented by currently designated counsel.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`
`Dated: September 27, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /Chandran B. Iyer/
`Jason S. Charkow
`(USPTO Reg. No. 46,418)
`Chandran B. Iyer
`(USPTO Reg. No. 48,434)
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`(USPTO Reg. No. 72,930)
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`
`
`Attorneys for ParkerVision, Inc.
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By:
`/Victoria Hao/
`Victoria Hao
`Reg. No. 47,630
`vhao@sjclawpc.com
`Martha Hopkins
`Reg. No. 46,277
`mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
`
`USPTO Customer No. 98,920
`Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang
`17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101-
`102
`Fountain Valley, CA 92708
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING AS TO PETITIONER ZYXEL
`
`COMMUNICATIONS CORP. was provided on September 27, 2021, to the
`
`following counsel of record for the Patent Owner via electronic mail:
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`Chandran B. Iyer
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`
`
`By: /Victoria Hao/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket