`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., LTD., HISENSE CO., LTD., AND ZYXEL
`COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`
`Case No. IPR2021-00985
`Patent No. 7,292,835
`
`________________________________________________________
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING AS TO
`PETITIONER ZYXEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioner ZyXEL Communications Corp. (“ZyXEL Corp.” or “Petitioner”)
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`and Patent Owner ParkerVision, Inc. (“ParkerVision”) have reached a settlement.
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74, Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. and
`
`Patent Owner ParkerVision jointly move to terminate the present inter partes
`
`review proceeding with respect to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.
`
`I. Statement of Facts
`
`ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have reached an agreement to resolve the
`
`Parties’ disputes. The settlement agreement settles (i) this proceeding and (ii) the
`
`related district court litigation styled ParkerVision, Inc. v. ZyXEL Communications
`
`Corporation, No. 6:20-cv-01010 (W.D. Tex.). Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(b),
`
`the Parties’ settlement agreement is in writing, and a true and correct copy is being
`
`filed as Exhibit 2010. The settlement agreement is being filed electronically with
`
`access to “Board Only.” A “Joint Request to File Settlement Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Information Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. §
`
`42.74” is being filed concurrently with this Joint Motion to Terminate to treat the
`
`settlement agreement as business confidential information and to keep it separate
`
`from the files of the involved patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`
`
`II. Relief Requested
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`Termination of this inter partes review as to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. is
`
`respectfully requested, and the Parties submit that such termination is justified.
`
`“There are strong public policy reasons to favor settlement between the parties to a
`
`proceeding.” Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 86 (Nov. 2019). “The Board
`
`expects that a proceeding will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement,
`
`unless the Board has already decided the merits of the proceeding.” Id. (citing 35
`
`U.S.C. §§317(a)).
`
`The Board should terminate this proceeding as to Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.,
`
`as the Parties jointly request, for the following reasons:
`
`First, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have met the statutory requirement
`
`that they file a “joint request” to terminate before the Office “has decided the
`
`merits of the proceeding.” 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). Under section 317(a), an inter
`
`partes review shall be terminated upon such joint request “unless the Office has
`
`decided the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`
`There are no other preconditions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(a). At the time of this paper,
`
`the Board has not issued its decision on whether to institute trial.
`
`Second, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision have reached a settlement as to all
`
`the disputes in this proceeding and as to U.S. Patent No. 7,292,835. A true copy of
`
`the settlement agreement is filed concurrently herewith. See Confidential Exhibit
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`
`
`2010. ZyXEL Corp. and Patent Owner request that the settlement agreement be
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the files of
`
`this proceeding in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). No other such
`
`agreements, written or oral, exist between or among the Parties.
`
`Third, termination would save significant further expenditure of resources
`
`by the Parties. Termination upon settlement as requested would also further the
`
`purpose of inter partes review proceedings to provide an efficient and less costly
`
`alternative forum for patent disputes. Further, maintaining the proceeding as to
`
`Petitioner ZyXEL Corp. would discourage further settlements, as patent owners in
`
`similar situations would have a strong disincentive to settle if they perceived that
`
`an inter partes review would continue regardless of a settlement.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`For the foregoing reasons, ZyXEL Corp. and ParkerVision respectfully
`
`request termination of this inter partes review with respect to Petitioner ZyXEL
`
`Corp. only. The IPR petition will remain in force with respect to the non-ZyXel
`
`Corp. petitioners, who continue to be represented by currently designated counsel.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 27, 2021
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By: /Chandran B. Iyer/
`Jason S. Charkow
`(USPTO Reg. No. 46,418)
`Chandran B. Iyer
`(USPTO Reg. No. 48,434)
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`(USPTO Reg. No. 72,930)
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`
`
`Attorneys for ParkerVision, Inc.
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`By:
`/Victoria Hao/
`Victoria Hao
`Reg. No. 47,630
`vhao@sjclawpc.com
`Martha Hopkins
`Reg. No. 46,277
`mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
`
`USPTO Customer No. 98,920
`Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang
`17220 Newhope Street, Suites 101-
`102
`Fountain Valley, CA 92708
`
`
`Counsel for Petitioner ZyXEL Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing JOINT MOTION
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Paper No. 10
`
`
`
`
`
`TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING AS TO PETITIONER ZYXEL
`
`COMMUNICATIONS CORP. was provided on September 27, 2021, to the
`
`following counsel of record for the Patent Owner via electronic mail:
`
`Jason S. Charkow
`Chandran B. Iyer
`Stephanie R. Mandir
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`DAIGNAULT IYER LLP
`8618 Westwood Center Drive
`Suite 150
`Vienna, VA 22182
`
`
`By: /Victoria Hao/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`