`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 36
`Filed: August 31, 2022
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_______________
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_______________
`
`
`TCL INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS CO., HISENSE CO., LTD.,
`and LG ELECTRONICS INC.
`
`Petitioners
`
`v.
`
`PARKERVISION, INC.
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_______________
`
`
`IPR2021-009851
`Patent No. 7,292,835 B2
`
`________________________________________________________
`
`PETITIONERS’ UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`
` 1
`
` LG Electronics Inc. who filed a petition in IPR2022-00246, is joined as petitioner
`in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Patent 7,292,835 B2
`
`PETITIONERS’ UPDATED EXHIBIT LIST
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`1001
`
`1002
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,292,835 (“‘835 patent”)
`
`Declaration of Dr. Matthew B. Shoemake Regarding U.S. Patent
`No. 7,292,835 (“Decl.”)
`
`1003
`
`Excerpts of ’835 patent File History
`
`1004
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,734,683 (“Hulkko”)
`
`1005
`
`U.S. Patent No. 4,672,117 (“Gibson”)
`
`1006
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,339,459 (“Schiltz”)
`
`1007
`
`L. Goldberg, “MCNS/DOCSIS MAC Clears a Path for the Cable-
`Modem Invasion,” Electronic Design; Dec. 1, 1997; 45, 27;
`Materials Science & Engineering Collection pg. 69 (“Goldberg”).
`
`1008
`
`USPN 6,011,548 (“Thacker”)
`
`1009
`
`ITU-T J.83b Recommendation (April 1997) (“ITU-T J.83b”)
`
`1010
`
`Declaration of Brenda Ray
`
`1011
`
`Claim Construction Order, ParkerVision v. Intel, 20:cv-00108-ADA
`(W.D. Tex. January 26, 2021)
`
`1012
`
`May 7, 2021 email from WDTX clerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Patent 7,292,835 B2
`
`Exhibit
`
`Description
`
`1013
`
`1014
`
`1015
`
`ParvkerVision’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions (TCL Case
`No. 6:20-cv-00945-ADA)
`
`ParvkerVision’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions (Hisense
`Case No. 6:20-cv-00870-ADA)
`
`ParvkerVision’s Preliminary Infringement Contentions (ZyXEL
`Case No. 6:20-cv-01010-ADA)
`
`1016
`
`April 27, 2022 Deposition Transcript of Dr. Steer
`
`1017
`
`Parkervision v. Qualcomm, Case no. 6:14-cv-687-PGB-LHP Order
`Granting Defendants’ Motion to Strike and Exclude Opinions
`Regarding Alleged Infringement and Validity Issues (Steer Dep. Ex.
`3)
`
`1018
`
`WDTX Discovery Order - TCL
`
`1019
`
`WDTX Discovery Order - Hisense
`
`1020
`
`ParkerVision Motion to Terminate - ITC No. 337-TA-982
`
`1021
`
`WDTX clerk’s email attaching Preliminary Claim Construction,
`ParkerVision v. LG Electronics, Case No. 6:21-cv-00520
`
`1022
`
`Petitioners’ Demonstrative Exhibits for Oral Argument
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Patent 7,292,835 B2
`
`Dated: August 31, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Kristopher L. Reed
`Kristopher L. Reed
`Reg. No. 58,694
`kreed@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Edward J. Mayle
`Reg. No. 65,444
`tmayle@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1400 Wewatta St. Suite 600
`Denver, CO 80202
`
`Matias Ferrario
`Reg. No. 51,082
`mferrario@kilpatricktownsend.com
`Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
`1001 West Fourth Street
`Winston-Salem, NC 27101-2400
`
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2021-00985
`Patent 7,292,835 B2
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that a copy of this paper was served on August 31,
`
`2022, via electronic mail to counsel for Patent Owner and by filing on the PTAB’s
`
`E2E system:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 31, 2022
`
`Ron Daignault
`rdaignault@daignaultiyer.com
`Jason Charkow
`jcharkow@daignaultiyer.com
`Chandran Iyer
`cbiyer@daignaultiyer.com
`Stephanie Mandir
`smandir@daignaultiyer.com
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Edward J. Mayle
`Edward J. Mayle
`Reg. No. 65,444
`
`Counsel for Petitioners
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
