`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`WACO DIVISION
`
`PARKERVISION,INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`HISENSECO., LTD., and HISENSE
`VISUAL TECHNOLOGYCO., LTD. (F/K/A
`QINGDAO HISENSE ELECTRONICS CO.),
`LTD. and HISENSE ELECTRIC Co., LTD.
`
`Defendants.
`
`Case No. 6:20-cv-870-ADA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`AMENDED DISCOVERY ORDER
`
`Before the Court is the parties’ dispute jointly submitted via email. The Court held a
`
`hearing in front of Magistrate Judge Derek T. Gilliland on May 17, 2022, on this issue. The Court
`
`heard this dispute in conjunction with a related case, ParkerVision v. TCL Industries Holdings Co.,
`
`et al., Case No. 6:20-CV-00945.
`
`Plaintiff ParkerVision, Inc. (“ParkerVision”) complains that Defendants violated the
`
`Protective Orderin this case by using Plaintiff's infringement contentions (which were designated
`
`as Confidential) in an inter partes review proceedings (the “IPRs’’) in front of the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board (the “PTAB”). The PTAB ordered ParkerVision to produce the contentions in the
`
`IPRs. ParkerVision notes, however,
`
`that the PTAB did not require Defendants to use the
`
`contentionsin anyfilings.
`
`The Court finds that Defendants did not violate the Protective Order in this case.
`
`Defendants, however, should not be allowed to use the contentions in the IPRs because they were
`
`TCL & Hisense
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Page 1
`
`TCL & Hisense
`Ex. 1019
`Page 1
`
`
`
`Case 6:20-cv-00870-ADA Document 67 Filed 05/24/22 Page 2 of 2
`
`designated as Confidential in this case. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendants are prohibited
`
`from using the infringement contentionsin this case in any filings in any related IPR proceedings
`
`(including IPR2021-00990 and IPR2021-00985).
`
`SIGNEDthis 24th day of May, 2022.
`
`DEREK T. GILLILAND
`UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
`
`TCL & Hisense
`
`Ex. 1019
`
`Page 2
`
`TCL & Hisense
`Ex. 1019
`Page 2
`
`