`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`
`Trials
`Jeremy Monaldo; Trials
`QE-Alivecor; Drew Holmes; Michael Kim; IPR50095-0033IP1; Quincy Lu; Jim Glass
`RE: IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, IPR2021-00972 – Reply to Preliminary Response
`Tuesday, October 12, 2021 5:15:35 PM
`
`Counsel: Petitioner is authorized to file a 5-page Reply to the discretionary denial arguments advanced in Patent Owner’s Preliminary Response in
`each of IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, and IPR2021-00972. Petitioner’s Reply shall be limited to addressing developments in the co-pending ITC
`case that occurred after the filing of the Petition and shall be filed no later than October 25, 2021.
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file a 5-page Sur-Reply responding to Petitioner’s Reply. Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply shall be limited to addressing
`issues raised in Petitioner’s Reply and shall be filed no later than November 8, 2021.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`
`
`From: Jeremy Monaldo <Monaldo@fr.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 1:13 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: QE-Alivecor <qe-alivecor@quinnemanuel.com>; Drew Holmes <drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com>; Michael Kim
`<michaelkim@quinnemanuel.com>; IPR50095-0033IP1 <IPR50095-0033IP1@fr.com>; Quincy Lu <quincylu@quinnemanuel.com>; Jim Glass
`<jimglass@quinnemanuel.com>
`Subject: IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, IPR2021-00972 – Reply to Preliminary Response
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments.
`
`
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner requests authorization to file a 5-page reply to the discretionary denial arguments advanced in the preliminary response in each of
`IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, and IPR2021-00972. Good cause exists for a reply because each preliminary response addresses developments in
`the co-pending ITC case that occurred after petition filing.
`
`Patent Owner opposes the request because the grounds identified do not constitute good cause for additional briefing. If Petitioner’s request is
`granted, Patent Owner requests a surreply of equal length and timing. Petitioner does not oppose a surreply of equal length and timing.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Jeremy
`
`
`Jeremy Monaldo :: Principal :: Fish & Richardson P.C.
`+1 (202) 626-7717 direct :: Monaldo@fr.com
`fr.com :: Bio :: LinkedIn :: Twitter
`
`
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
`information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
`sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
`****************************************************************************************************************************
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
