throbber
UNITED STATES
`INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
`
`--------------------------------x
`In the Matter of
` Investigation No.
`
`CERTAIN WEARABLE ELECTRONIC 337-TA-1266
`DEVICES WITH ECG FUNCTIONALITY AND
`COMPONENTS THEREOF
`--------------------------------x
`
`OPEN/CLOSED SESSIONS
`
`Pages:
`Place:
`Date:
`
`1102 through 1375
`Washington, D.C.
`April 1, 2022
`
`HERITAGE REPORTING CORPORATION
`Official Reporters
`1220 L Street, N.W., Suite 206
`Washington, D.C. 20005
`(202) 628-4888
`contracts@hrccourtreporters.com
`
`1
`
`APPLE 1073
`Apple v. AliveCor
`IPR2021-00972
`
`

`

`
`
` 1112
`
`
` 1 analysis this morning.
`
` 2 JUDGE ELLIOT: That's right. Thank you. Now I
`
` 3 remember. Very good. All right.
`
` 4 We're on the public record. And I'm waiting for
`
` 5 Dr. Stultz.
`
` 6 Good morning Dr. Stultz. Let me remind you
`
` 7 you're still under oath.
`
` 8 COLLIN STULTZ,
`
` 9 having been previously duly sworn and/or
`
` 10 affirmed on his oath, was thereafter examined and testified
`
` 11 further as follows:
`
` 12 DIRECT EXAMINATION (resumed)
`
` 13 BY MR. AMON:
`
` 14 Q. Good morning, Dr. Stultz. I'd like to now start
`
` 15 with your obviousness analysis.
`
` 16 If we could bring up RDX-3.39.
`
` 17 What framework did you use in analyzing your --
`
` 18 whether the Asserted Patents are invalid for obviousness?
`
` 19 A. So the framework I use is as illustrated on this
`
` 20 slide. There were four steps in the process.
`
` 21 First, to determine the scope and content of the
`
` 22 prior art, and to understand differences between that art
`
` 23 and the patent claim, and all of this is done within the
`
` 24 context of the person of ordinary skill in the art at the
`
` 25 time, and then, lastly, there were specific secondary
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
` 1113
`
`
` 1 considerations presented, is my understanding, by AliveCor,
`
` 2 and the question there is whether those considerations
`
` 3 affected my view.
`
` 4 Q. Dr. Stultz, what is Apple's burden in proving
`
` 5 that the Asserted Patents are invalid?
`
` 6 A. It is my understanding that it must be shown by
`
` 7 clear and convincing evidence.
`
` 8 Q. And just to backtrack for one second, is it your
`
` 9 understanding that Apple's burden is clear and convincing
`
` 10 for the patent-ineligible subject matter as well?
`
` 11 A. That is my understanding.
`
` 12 Q. If we go to RDX-3.40. What is this timeline,
`
` 13 Dr. Stultz?
`
` 14 A. So this timeline includes the relevant dates for
`
` 15 the patents in question, and it also outlines, briefly,
`
` 16 papers that represent the state of the art at the time.
`
` 17 So just -- I'm sorry to interrupt, but just to
`
` 18 expand upon that a little bit.
`
` 19 When I began this process, what I did was sit in
`
` 20 front of my computer and do a literature search setting the
`
` 21 time frame to 2013, which is the earliest date for the '499
`
` 22 and '731 patents, and then gathered the papers, and I think
`
` 23 there were maybe 50 to a hundred papers that were -- and
`
` 24 then reviewed those data.
`
` 25 And I think what was known at the time and the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
` 1114
`
`
` 1 work going on at the time is well encapsulated by these four
`
` 2 references in green.
`
` 3 MR. AMON: For the record, Your Honor, the
`
` 4 references that Dr. Stultz is referring to are RX-560,
`
` 5 RX-562, RX-554, and RX-563.
`
` 6 Q. Dr. Stultz, if we go to RDX-3.41, what is on this
`
` 7 slide here?
`
` 8 A. So this are the three primary references that I
`
` 9 rely on for my obviousness argument. There is AMON 2004 and
`
` 10 then there are two additional references, Kotzin, which was
`
` 11 published in 2004, and Almen published in 2008.
`
` 12 Q. Let me pause there for a second.
`
` 13 MR. AMON: Your Honor, I think there was a little
`
` 14 feedback. I don't know if you heard that.
`
` 15 (Clarification by reporter.)
`
` 16 JUDGE ELLIOT: I'm sorry. I was muted. I was
`
` 17 actually trying to say something and I was muted. I don't
`
` 18 know who that was, but, if you're not on video, please mute
`
` 19 yourself.
`
` 20 MR. AMON: For the record, Your Honor, the AMON
`
` 21 reference is RX-419, the Almen reference is RX-400, and the
`
` 22 Kotzin reference is 401.
`
` 23 What is the date of the AMON reference?
`
` 24 A. The AMON reference is December 2004.
`
` 25 Q. What is the date of the Almen reference?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
` 1115
`
`
` 1 A. That's also in December of 2008.
`
` 2 Q. And, finally, what is the date of the Kotzin
`
` 3 reference?
`
` 4 A. That was February 2004.
`
` 5 Q. If we go to RDX-3.42. What does the AMON
`
` 6 reference disclose?
`
` 7 A. So Amon describes a wearable medical monitoring
`
` 8 alert system, particularly targeting high-risk cardiac
`
` 9 respiratory patients.
`
` 10 The interesting thing here is that this is a
`
` 11 wrist-worn device that encompasses multiple sensors, sensors
`
` 12 including SpO2, blood pressure, and ECG.
`
` 13 Q. Just so that the record is clear, does an SpO2
`
` 14 sensor include a PPG?
`
` 15 A. That's right. So SpO2 technology is based on PPG
`
` 16 technology. Indeed, PPG gives you changes in the blood
`
` 17 volume in a particular vascular bed, so it sort of gives you
`
` 18 an estimate of the pulse rate. And the SpO2 builds on that
`
` 19 technology by incorporating different light sensors that
`
` 20 allow you to estimate the oxygenation in the corresponding
`
` 21 blood.
`
` 22 Q. If we go to RDX-3.43, was the AMON reference
`
` 23 cited by others in the field before May of 2015?
`
` 24 A. So in my literature search, I found one paper
`
` 25 that was listed on the left that specifically references
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`
` 1116
`
`
` 1 AMON. And in this paper they talk about a smartphone app
`
` 2 that combines information from multiple sensors to aid with
`
` 3 clinical restratisfication and decision-making.
`
` 4 And they say specifically their solution is
`
` 5 similar to AMON and analyses and -- and other things,
`
` 6 analysis of ECG on a local device.
`
` 7 The second reference is on the right, and in this
`
` 8 reference they referred to the AMON prototype as being
`
` 9 innovative. I think the only point here is to say that AMON
`
` 10 published in 2004 was noted by others in a way that it
`
` 11 suggests, at least from my read of these data, that it was
`
` 12 inspiring.
`
` 13 MR. AMON: And for the record, Your Honor, the
`
` 14 additional reference cited here is RX-420.
`
` 15 Q. If we go to RDX-3.44, what does the Almen
`
` 16 reference disclose?
`
` 17 A. So Almen, A-L-M-E-N, also refers to a wrist-worn
`
` 18 device. It can be an armband as well. And the particular
`
` 19 thing about Almen is that it focuses on optical sensing to
`
` 20 measure heart rate variability for a variety of different --
`
` 21 I think the term they use is cardiac maladies.
`
` 22 Q. And if we go to RDX-3.45, what does the Kotzin
`
` 23 reference disclose?
`
` 24 A. So Kotzin discloses a portable communication
`
` 25 device that can have one or more sensors. And the thing
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`
` 1117
`
`
` 1 here is it describes a system for communication between the
`
` 2 sensors and for relaying information from the sensors to the
`
` 3 user.
`
` 4 Q. So let's go to RDX-3.46. We're going to start
`
` 5 your obviousness analysis with the '941 patent.
`
` 6 Can you remind the Court the priority date for
`
` 7 the '941 patent, please?
`
` 8 A. That was in May 2015.
`
` 9 Q. Now looking at the limitations of claim 12 of the
`
` 10 '941, do you understand that there are certain limitations
`
` 11 that AliveCor does not dispute were disclosed by the AMON
`
` 12 reference?
`
` 13 A. That's my understanding.
`
` 14 Q. Which are those limitations?
`
` 15 A. Those are the limitations listed in A, B, C, and
`
` 16 D on this slide.
`
` 17 Q. In your opinion, Dr. Stultz, does the AMON
`
` 18 reference disclose limitations A, B, C, and D of claim 12 of
`
` 19 the '941?
`
` 20 A. Yes, it does.
`
` 21 Q. So what is the first limitation that AliveCor
`
` 22 contests from claim 12 of the '941 as we can see on this
`
` 23 slide?
`
` 24 A. It's the preamble, a smart watch comprising.
`
` 25 Q. If we go to RDX-3.47, does the AMON reference
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`
` 1118
`
`
` 1 disclose a smart watch?
`
` 2 A. So, it's interesting, because the reference
`
` 3 explicitly discloses a wrist-worn device that is able to
`
` 4 show time and compares it to other computerized watches, and
`
` 5 that includes these different sensors. At the very least
`
` 6 it's a prototype for a smart watch. And, in my view, in
`
` 7 2004 it certainly would be considered a smart watch.
`
` 8 Q. If we go to RDX-3.48, does AliveCor next contest
`
` 9 limitation (e) of claim 12 of the '941?
`
` 10 A. That is my understanding.
`
` 11 Q. And it's a lengthy limitation, so let's look at
`
` 12 it in your analysis, if we go to RDX-3.49.
`
` 13 In your opinion does the AMON reference disclose
`
` 14 a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium encoded
`
` 15 with a computer program including instructions executable by
`
` 16 the processor?
`
` 17 A. In my view it does. Non-transitory
`
` 18 computer-readable storage medium is essentially a mechanism
`
` 19 for short-term storage. And AMON specifically discloses, if
`
` 20 you look on the left-hand side of this slide, in this
`
` 21 diagram, flash memory, it says it has four megabytes of
`
` 22 flash memory, additional 136 of on-chip additional memory,
`
` 23 SRAM, for program and data storage.
`
` 24 Q. And does it include -- does the AMON reference
`
` 25 disclose instructions?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`
` 1119
`
`
` 1 A. Oh, yes, it does. And the SRAM chip is
`
` 2 specifically for programming data storage.
`
` 3 Q. If we go to RDX-3.50, does the AMON reference
`
` 4 disclose determining if a discordance is present between the
`
` 5 activity level value of the user and the heart rate
`
` 6 parameter of the user?
`
` 7 A. So this is quite interesting. So Amon tries to
`
` 8 identify high-risk zones given observations of patient data.
`
` 9 So the observations include the pulse rate, and
`
` 10 it tries to determine a high-risk zone based on settings.
`
` 11 And that is illustrated here in table 1.
`
` 12 The key point here is that the settings are
`
` 13 determined by the activity level, and that we see in the
`
` 14 text on the left-hand side; namely, AMON is capable of
`
` 15 detecting the level of user activity and correlating it with
`
` 16 vital signs. Moreover, it specifies pulse limits are set
`
` 17 according to the activity level, walking, running or
`
` 18 resting.
`
` 19 So the high-risk areas are -- signify when the
`
` 20 parameters are inconsistent with the activity level.
`
` 21 Q. In your opinion, does that disclose a
`
` 22 discordance?
`
` 23 A. Yes, it is, because the settings -- it's
`
` 24 particularly high risk because it's inconsistent with that
`
` 25 activity level.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`
` 1120
`
`
` 1 Q. If we go to RDX-3.51, does the AMON reference
`
` 2 disclose that based on the presence of a discordance it
`
` 3 indicates possible arrhythmia?
`
` 4 A. Right. So I think using the terminology that --
`
` 5 of arrhythmia given in the Court, the things that are --
`
` 6 that can -- faster or slower than normal can potentially be
`
` 7 arrhythmias.
`
` 8 In this high-risk zone, and if you look here in
`
` 9 table 1, and the normal values are at rest, so a pulse rate
`
` 10 of 121 to 180 would have been considered to be a high risk,
`
` 11 abnormal, and that fits within the Court's definition of
`
` 12 an -- at least a potential arrhythmia.
`
` 13 Q. To the extent that the AMON reference does not
`
` 14 expressly disclose indicating the arrhythmia, would it have
`
` 15 been obvious to a person of ordinary skill that they could
`
` 16 take -- use the information from the AMON reference, modify
`
` 17 it, and determine a discordance -- an arrhythmia based on a
`
` 18 discordance? Excuse me.
`
` 19 A. I think using the definition, that's right, of an
`
` 20 arrhythmia, certainly events when the heart rate is higher.
`
` 21 In 2013, I think individuals first in this space would have
`
` 22 been working closely or at least have interactions with
`
` 23 health care professionals, and I think these concepts would
`
` 24 not have been alien to such an individual.
`
` 25 Q. Would the same have been true by May of 2015?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
` 1121
`
`
` 1 A. That is my view.
`
` 2 Q. If we go to RDX-3.52, does the AMON reference
`
` 3 disclose receiving electric signals of the user from the ECG
`
` 4 sensor to confirm the presence of the arrhythmia?
`
` 5 A. Yes, it does. So if you look at the middle, the
`
` 6 verbiage in the middle portion of this slide, it says,
`
` 7 parameter out of range, remeasurement is performed, if the
`
` 8 outcome is the same as before, the user is informed
`
` 9 additional measurements are required, but one of the
`
` 10 measurements can be the ECG.
`
` 11 Q. If we go to RDX-3.53, in your opinion does the
`
` 12 Kotzin reference also disclose receiving electric signals of
`
` 13 the ECG to confirm the presence of the arrhythmia?
`
` 14 A. Yeah, I think that's the case. So Kotzin talks
`
` 15 about different sensors and characteristics. I think in the
`
` 16 actual reference they say sensors, they mean biosensors.
`
` 17 And communication between these sensors, if one of them is
`
` 18 determined to be unfavorable, meaning outside of the range
`
` 19 of some threshold, then an alert is sent to the user to
`
` 20 perform a specific action. That action can be measuring a
`
` 21 different characteristic, i.e., from a different -- from a
`
` 22 different sensor.
`
` 23 Q. Dr. Stultz, did you hear Dr. Picard's testimony
`
` 24 regarding how a person of ordinary skill would have
`
` 25 understood what it means to confirm the presence of the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`11
`
`

`

`
`
` 1122
`
`
` 1 arrhythmia?
`
` 2 A. Yes, I did.
`
` 3 Q. Did you also hear Dr. Jafari's testimony about
`
` 4 what it means to confirm the presence of the arrhythmia?
`
` 5 A. Yes, I did.
`
` 6 Q. Do you agree with how Dr. Picard understands that
`
` 7 confirming limitation of claim 12 of the '941?
`
` 8 A. I do.
`
` 9 Q. If the Court accepts Dr. Jafari's understanding
`
` 10 of the plain and ordinary meaning of confirming, does that
`
` 11 impact your invalidity analysis?
`
` 12 A. So I think two points are relevant here. One,
`
` 13 the AMON reference describes both intermittent ECG
`
` 14 measurements in addition to continuous ECG measurements. So
`
` 15 I think both are encapsulated in this reference.
`
` 16 The other point is the definition supplied by
`
` 17 Dr. Jafari, with all due respect, is a little unclear to me.
`
` 18 So that has to be -- that proviso has to be attached to my
`
` 19 response.
`
` 20 Q. Does the AMON reference disclose simultaneous
`
` 21 measurements between PPG and ECG, in your opinion?
`
` 22 A. I'm sorry. Can you repeat the question?
`
` 23 Q. Sure. In your opinion, does the AMON reference
`
` 24 disclose simultaneous measurements of PPG and ECG data?
`
` 25 A. Yes, it does. It specifically discloses two
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`12
`
`

`

`
`
` 1123
`
`
` 1 scenarios where PPG and ECG can be measured continuously and
`
` 2 simultaneously. It even says that this is done, at least I
`
` 3 think, three times throughout the day. It also states that
`
` 4 some of these measurements, including the ECG measurements,
`
` 5 can be done intermittently.
`
` 6 Q. RDX-3.54, in your opinion does the AMON reference
`
` 7 alone or in combination with Kotzin disclose all the
`
` 8 requirements of claim 12?
`
` 9 A. Yes, it does.
`
` 10 Q. So if we go to RDX-3.55, and start looking at the
`
` 11 dependent claims, what does claim 13 require in addition to
`
` 12 claim 12?
`
` 13 A. So claim 13 recites, the smart watch or wristlet
`
` 14 according to claim 12, wherein the heart rate parameter
`
` 15 comprises an indication of a heart rate variability and
`
` 16 wherein the arrhythmia is atrial fibrillation.
`
` 17 Q. And if we go to RDX-3.56, in your opinion does
`
` 18 the AMON reference render calculating HRV obvious?
`
` 19 A. Yes, it does. AMON specifically discloses the
`
` 20 measurement of R-R distances, which really is equivalent to
`
` 21 the instantaneous heart rate. And I think we've heard
`
` 22 before in this -- in the last few days the R-R distances and
`
` 23 how they are calculated from the ECG.
`
` 24 So it -- I mean, in 2013 and 2015 were relevant
`
` 25 for this particular patent. It would have been a knee-jerk
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`13
`
`

`

`
`
` 1124
`
`
` 1 reaction, I think, for persons skilled in the art to see R-R
`
` 2 distances and to think about heart rate variability
`
` 3 calculations.
`
` 4 Q. Dr. Stultz, do you understand that the '941 is
`
` 5 talking about calculating HRV from the PPG signal?
`
` 6 A. That is my understanding.
`
` 7 Q. And, in your opinion, would a person of ordinary
`
` 8 skill in May of 2015 have found it obvious to modify the
`
` 9 AMON reference to calculate R-R from the PPG data?
`
` 10 A. Yes, I think that's true. There's scholarship
`
` 11 that speaks to this. There was works known beforehand that
`
` 12 HRV could be calculated from the PPG. There have been works
`
` 13 comparing PPG or R-R distances versus ECG. So, yes, I think
`
` 14 it would have been obvious.
`
` 15 Q. And if we go to RDX-3.57, did we see this slide
`
` 16 during Dr. Jafari's presentation?
`
` 17 A. It's my recollection that this was -- Dr. Jafari
`
` 18 showed this slide during his presentation.
`
` 19 Q. And what did Dr. Jafari explain using this slide?
`
` 20 A. So here on this slide is, on the right-hand side,
`
` 21 this is a waveform arising from a PPG, PPG signal. And the
`
` 22 distance between the peaks are labeled as R-R intervals.
`
` 23 And I agree with Dr. Jafari in this sense that,
`
` 24 although R-R intervals, specifically the term refers to R
`
` 25 waves within the electrocardiogram, that individuals skilled
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`14
`
`

`

`
`
` 1125
`
`
` 1 in the art at the time and now thought about calculating or
`
` 2 would have considered calculating such interval lengths from
`
` 3 the PPG as representative of R-R intervals.
`
` 4 Q. Was this concept known in May of 2015?
`
` 5 A. Yes, it was.
`
` 6 Q. Was this concept known in December of 2013?
`
` 7 A. In my view it was, yes.
`
` 8 Q. And based on your training and education, was
`
` 9 this concept known in 2004 when the AMON reference
`
` 10 published?
`
` 11 A. I think that this work was around, that's
`
` 12 correct. Certainly most of the published work in this
`
` 13 happened a little after 2004, at least the papers that I can
`
` 14 recall, but certainly by 2013 and by 2015 this was
`
` 15 well-known.
`
` 16 Q. If we go to RDX-3.58, would the AMON reference
`
` 17 have rendered obvious the arrhythmia being atrial
`
` 18 fibrillation?
`
` 19 A. So I think, again, the key operative term here is
`
` 20 to a person skilled in the art. Again, someone who is
`
` 21 working in this area. And the concept of recognizing a
`
` 22 heart rate that is elevated, resting -- in the resting
`
` 23 state, as suggesting arrhythmia is, I think is -- would have
`
` 24 been known.
`
` 25 A case in point, in the '941 patent there is an
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`15
`
`

`

`
`
` 1126
`
`
` 1 example given, I think it's from a tracing, that's what that
`
` 2 0302 refers to, that's my recollection, where the heart rate
`
` 3 rapidly increases, and that also being consistent with
`
` 4 atrial fibrillation. That's really shown as an example to
`
` 5 illustrate the point.
`
` 6 Q. If we go to RDX-3.59, to the extent that the AMON
`
` 7 reference does not disclose HRV or atrial fibrillation, did
`
` 8 Almen disclose those additional requirements of claim 13?
`
` 9 A. Yes, it did. So Almen, again, specifically
`
` 10 recites a wrist-worn device with an optical sensor, and
`
` 11 central to this is the calculation of heart rate variability
`
` 12 from the optical sensor data, from the PPG data. And this
`
` 13 is, again, I think for lots of things that, if memory --
`
` 14 called cardiac maladies. Actually, the precise term here
`
` 15 that's used the heart maladies, and they list a few, of
`
` 16 which atrial fibrillation is one of them.
`
` 17 Q. If we go to RDX-3.60, what does claim 16 add to
`
` 18 claim 12?
`
` 19 A. So claim 16 adds a smart watch or wristlet
`
` 20 according to claim 12, wherein indicating to the user
`
` 21 further comprises instructing the user to record an ECG
`
` 22 using the ECG sensor.
`
` 23 Q. If we go to RDX-3.61, does AMON disclose this
`
` 24 additional limitation of claim 16?
`
` 25 A. Yes, in my view it does. It mentions
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`16
`
`

`

`
`
` 1127
`
`
` 1 specifically that when a parameter is out of range, the user
`
` 2 is informed to take additional measurements where one of
`
` 3 those measurements can be an ECG. And, moreover, the
`
` 4 patient is informed as to their own status and that of the
`
` 5 device.
`
` 6 Q. If we go to RDX-3.62, do you understand whether
`
` 7 AliveCor is disputing that AMON discloses the additional
`
` 8 limitation of claim 18?
`
` 9 A. It is my understanding that they are not.
`
` 10 Q. And in your opinion does AMON disclose the
`
` 11 additional limitation of claim 18?
`
` 12 A. Yes, it does.
`
` 13 Q. What does claim 19 add to claim 18?
`
` 14 A. So claim 19 adds, wherein the heart rate
`
` 15 parameter is a heart rate variability value wherein the
`
` 16 heart rate variability value is derived from the PPG signal.
`
` 17 Q. If we go to RDX-3.63, does AMON -- does the AMON
`
` 18 reference disclose the additional limitation of claim 19 in
`
` 19 your opinion?
`
` 20 A. Yes, it does. Again, it explicitly describes
`
` 21 calculating R-R distances, and heart rate variability being
`
` 22 calculated from R-R distances was well described at the
`
` 23 time. Workers and individuals in this area thought about
`
` 24 these things, not quite synonymously, but certainly one was
`
` 25 a knee-jerk reaction for the other concept.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Heritage Reporting Corporation
`(202) 628-4888
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
` 1128
`
`
` 1 Q. In May of 2013 would it have been obvious to
`
` 2 modify the AMON reference to use PPG data to derive HRV?
`
` 3 A. In my view, yes.
`
` 4 Q. If we go to RDX-3.64, to the extent AMON doesn't
`
` 5 disclose this, does Almen disclose calculating HRV from the
`
` 6 PPG signal?
`
` 7 A. So, as we've already discussed, a purpose of the
`
` 8 Almen, A-L-M-E-N reference, is to calculate HRV from optical
`
` 9 sensors, so yes.
`
` 10 Q. RDX-3.65, what does claim 20 require
`
` 11 additionally?
`
` 12 A. Claim 20 requires the smart watch according to
`
` 13 claim 18, wherein the heart rate parameter is a heart rate,
`
` 14 wherein the heart rate is derived from the PPG signal.
`
` 15 Q. If we go to RDX-3.66, does the AMON reference
`
` 16 disclose this additional limitation of claim 20?
`
` 17 A. In my view it does. It specifically mentions an
`
` 18 SpO2 sensor again, which is based or built off of PPG
`
` 19 sensors. Indeed, I have never seen an SpO2 sensor that did
`
` 20 not entail PPG technology. And in the middle figure it
`
` 21 specifically states that you can, from the SpO2, that there
`
` 22 are calculations of pulse.
`
` 23 Q. If we go to RDX-3.67, does AMON alone and/or in
`
` 24 combination disclose all the limitations of claims 13, 16,
`
` 25 18, 19, and 20?
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket