throbber
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277027133
`
`Human photoplethysmogram: New insight into chaotic characteristics
`
`Article  in  Chaos Solitons & Fractals · August 2015
`
`DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2015.05.005
`
`CITATIONS
`39
`
`2 authors:
`
`Nina Sviridova
`Tokyo University of Science
`
`19 PUBLICATIONS   83 CITATIONS   
`
`SEE PROFILE
`
`Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
`
`Soil Dynamics View project
`
`Development of driving simulator for agricultural tractor View project
`
`READS
`3,355
`
`Kenshi Sakai
`Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology
`
`192 PUBLICATIONS   1,156 CITATIONS   
`
`SEE PROFILE
`
`All content following this page was uploaded by Kenshi Sakai on 24 May 2015.
`
`The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 1
`
`

`

`Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
`
`Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
`Nonlinear Science, and Nonequilibrium and Complex Phenomena
`
`journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/chaos
`
`Human photoplethysmogram: new insight into chaotic
`characteristics
`Nina Sviridova a, Kenshi Sakai b,∗
`
`a United Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu-shi, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan
`b Environmental and Agricultural Engineering Department, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology 3-5-8 Saiwai-cho, Fuchu-shi,
`Tokyo 183-8509. Japan
`
`a r t i c l e
`
`i n f o
`
`a b s t r a c t
`
`Article history:
`Received 3 March 2015
`Accepted 3 May 2015
`Available online 19 May 2015
`
`The photoplethysmogram is widely used in medical settings and sports equipment to measure
`biological signals. The photoplethysmogram, which is measured noninvasively, can provide
`valuable information about cardiovascular system performance. The present study sought to
`investigate the underlying dynamics of photoplethysmographic signals from healthy young
`human subjects. In previous studies the photoplethysmogram was claimed to be driven by
`deterministic chaos [Tsuda 1992, Sumida 2000]; however, the methods applied for chaos de-
`tection were noise sensitive and inconclusive. Therefore, to reach a consistent conclusion it
`is important to employ additional nonlinear time series analysis tools that can test different
`features of the signal’s underlying dynamics. In this paper, methods of nonlinear time series
`analysis, including time delay embedding, largest Lyapunov exponent, deterministic nonlinear
`prediction, Poincaré section, the Wayland test and method of surrogate data were applied to
`photoplethysmogram time series to identify the unique characteristics of the photoplethys-
`mogram as a dynamical system. Results demonstrated that photoplethysmogram dynamics is
`consistent with the definition of chaotic movement, and its chaotic properties showed some
`similarity to Rossler’s single band chaos with induced dynamical noise. Additionally it was
`found that deterministic nonlinear prediction, Poincaré section and the Wayland test can re-
`veal important characteristics of photoplethysmographic signals that will be important tools
`for theoretical and applied studies on the photoplethysmogram.
`© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
`This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
`(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
`
`1. Introduction
`
`Physiological signals derived from the cardiovascular sys-
`tem show an extreme intricacy that arises from the interac-
`tion of many processes, structure units and feedback loops in
`humans. Attempts to improve our understanding of physio-
`logical complexity and develop new tools for promising ap-
`plications for human mental and physical health monitoring
`
`∗
`
`Corresponding author: Tel.: +81 423675755.
`E-mail addresses: nina_svr@mail.ru (N. Sviridova), ken@cc.tuat.ac.jp (K.
`Sakai).
`
`have made physiological signals such as electrocardiogram
`(ECG), electro-encephalogram (EEG), blood pressure, heart
`rate variability (HRV) and photoplethysmograph (PPG) the
`subject of recent studies [1–9]. Due to an increase in the suc-
`cessful use of nonlinear time series analysis (NTSA) methods
`in many scientific disciplines to quantify the complexity of
`signals [4,9], methods of nonlinear dynamics analysis have
`become a new and powerful tool for physiological signal in-
`vestigation. NTSA allows one not only to quantify, but to qual-
`ify data.
`Many studies have investigated ECG, EEG and HRV sig-
`nals obtained from healthy human subjects, as well as from
`
`http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.05.005
`0960-0779/© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
`(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 2
`
`

`

`54
`
`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`patients with mental or heart illnesses [1,3–9]. In early stud-
`ies PPG as well as ECG and HRV were claimed to be chaotic
`mostly based on results of time-delay reconstructed trajec-
`tory, correlation dimension and largest Lyapunov exponent.
`Later, with the development of methods of nonlinear time
`series analysis for real world data, evidence for the chaotic
`nature of many biological signals was questioned [8,9]. Many
`tools that were previously thought to provide explicit evi-
`dence of chaotic motion were discovered to be noise sen-
`sitive and could produce misleading results. Thus it is still
`quite controversial whether these signals’ dynamics involve
`chaotic motion or not [8,9]. Signals like HRV and ECG that
`were believed to be driven by deterministic chaos have been
`subjected to detailed reinvestigation [8,9]. Similarly PPG sig-
`nal was claimed to be chaotic in the early 90s, however
`nowadays past evidence of chaos was found to be neces-
`sary rather than sufficient, especially in biological studies
`[8,9]. Therefore it is also still not known whether the PPG
`signal, which is commonly measured by commercially avail-
`able medical and sport equipment devices to obtain HRV
`data, oxygen saturation and blood pressure, is chaotic or
`not. In addition, many of its characteristics are not yet well
`studied.
`The microcirculation of the skin is rather complex dy-
`namic system which is important for skin metabolism and
`temperature regulation and plays an important role in an
`organism’s defense system. As the skin surface is directly ac-
`cessible, it has become a valuable organ for many studies.
`Photoplethysmography (PPG) is one of the widely-used tech-
`niques that allows registration of pulsatile changes in the
`dermal vasculature [10,11].
`Photoplethysmography is a simple and low-cost optical
`technique that can be used to detect blood volume changes
`in the microvascular bed of tissue. The PPG wave form com-
`prises a pulsatile physiological waveform attributed to car-
`diac synchronous changes in the blood volume with each
`heart beat and is superimposed on a slowly varying base-
`line with various lower frequency components attributed to
`respiration, sympathetic nervous system activity and ther-
`moregulation [10–12]. Even though pulsation in a finger’s
`capillary vessels (i.e. PPG obtained from finger) in normal sub-
`jects was claimed to be chaotic [13,14], only classical methods
`such as time-delay reconstructed trajectory, power spectrum,
`correlation dimension (CD) and Lyapunov exponent (LE) and
`surrogation have been applied to characterize PPG time se-
`ries [5,13,14]. Positive Lyapunov exponent was believed to
`provide strong evidence of chaotic behavior. However, these
`tests (CD and LE) are inconclusive since as it was found in
`recent studies that they may indicate chaos even in systems
`that are not driven by chaos [9,15]. Therefore, a clear answer
`regarding the nature of the PPG signal dynamics cannot be
`obtained by only applying these types of classical measure-
`ments, although they may provide useful results for medical
`applications.
`In this study we applied the time delay embedding
`method, calculated the power spectrum, largest Lyapunov
`exponent (LLE), deterministic nonlinear prediction’s (DNP)
`correlation coefficient (CC) and relative route mean square er-
`ror (RRMSE), Poincaré section, Wayland test translation error
`and applied method of surrogate data to investigate whether
`the underlying dynamics of the PPG signal involve motion on
`
`a strange attractor and to study the chaotic motion charac-
`teristics of the PPG signal. This expanded toolkit is designed
`to cover most of the important characteristics of chaotic mo-
`tion and is expected to help us investigate a wider range of
`PPG signal characteristics, compared with previous studies,
`and thus to extract its underlying properties. Additionally,
`in an effort to analyze the PPG signal not only quantitatively,
`but qualitatively we conducted a comparative analysis of PPG
`signal and Rosser’s single band chaos.
`
`2. Methods and materials
`
`2.1. Photoplethysmography
`
`PPG can be defined as the continuous recording of the light
`intensity scattered from a given source by the tissues and col-
`lected by a suitable photodetector [10]. Modern PPG sensors
`usually utilize low cost semiconductor technology with LED
`and matched photodetector devices working at the near in-
`frared (NIR) wavelengths (NIR band 0.8–1 μm), which allows
`measurement of deep-tissue blood flow [11,12]. The light
`from the LED is absorbed by hemoglobin, and the backscat-
`tered radiation is then detected and recorded. The backscat-
`tered light depends on the amount of hemoglobin in the skin,
`and the obtained result therefore reflects the cutaneous blood
`flow [10,11].
`The microcirculation of the skin is rather complex and
`dynamic system which is important for skin metabolism and
`temperature regulation and is an important part of the organ-
`ism’s defense system against invaders. The cutaneous blood
`supply is carried out into microcirculatory bed composed of
`three segments—arterioles, arterial and venous capillaries,
`and venules; most of this microvasculature is contained in
`the papillary dermis 1–2 μm below the epidermal surface
`[10–12]. PPG waveform reflects heartbeat synchronized cu-
`taneous blood flow pulsatile changes in the dermal vascula-
`ture. The shape of the waveform is related to anacrotic and
`catacrotic phases. The anacrotic phase corresponds to the ris-
`ing edge of the pulse, and the catacrotic phase to the falling
`edge of the pulse curve. The first one is primarily connected
`with contraction of the heart and therefore with the systolic
`phase of cardiac cycle, while the second corresponds to dias-
`tolic phase (Fig. 1) and wave reflection from the periphery. A
`dicrotic notch, connected with wave reflected from the pe-
`riphery, usually can be seen in the catacrotic phase of subjects
`with healthy arteries [6,11].
`The pulsatile component of the PPG waveform that relates
`to cardiac pulsation is usually called the ‘AC’ (alternative cur-
`rent) component and its fundamental frequency depends on
`the heart rate and typically varies around 1–1.4 Hz. The AC
`component is superimposed onto a large ‘DC’ (direct current)
`component that depends on the structure of the tissue and
`the average blood volume of both arterial and venous blood.
`The DC component varies slowly due to respiration, vaso-
`motor activity, vasoconstrictor waves, thermoregulation and
`other slow circulatory changes [10–12].
`Although the origins of the components of the PPG signal
`are not fully understood, it is generally accepted that PPG can
`provide valuable clinical information about the cardiovascu-
`lar system [11].
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 3
`
`

`

`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`55
`
`Fig. 1. Components of PPG signal waveform for healthy young subjects.
`
`Fig. 2. Example of 30-second long portion of the healthy young subject PPG signal (9th subject’s 2nd measurement).
`
`2.2. Data collection
`
`The PPG signal was recorded using a finger PPG recorder
`by detecting the near infrared light reflected by vascular
`tissue following illumination with a LED. Data were collected
`from nine healthy 19–27-year old volunteers among Tokyo
`University of Agriculture and Technology (TUAT) students.
`Experimental data collection was approved by TUAT author-
`ities. Written informed consent was obtained from partici-
`pants prior to the experiment. At the time of the study all
`subjects were healthy non-smokers, physically active to sim-
`
`ilar levels, were not taking any medication, and none declared
`a history of heart disease.
`For each subject five measurement repeats were done. The
`measured period was 5 min with 5 ms sampling steps. For all
`data collection sessions, a BACS (Computer convenience, Inc.)
`transmission-mode PPG sensor was located on the right fore-
`finger. Every measurement was preceded by a blood pressure
`check. Since physical and mental activity, as well as exter-
`nal effects such as temperature, noise etc. can considerably
`affect cutaneous blood flow [10,11] all measurements were
`done with the subject in a relaxed sitting position in a room
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 4
`
`

`

`56
`
`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`Fig. 3. Example of typical spectra obtained by Fourier analysis, where LF is low frequency and PF is predominant frequency component.
`
`with temperature, noise and vibration control. Each test sub-
`ject was asked to rest for 5 min under quiet conditions in the
`laboratory room in a sitting position in which the record-
`ings were obtained, and with the test site uncovered. An
`example of a 30-second long portion of the obtained PPG
`signal is shown in Fig. 2.
`
`applied a complex of nonlinear time series analysis tools. Or-
`bital instability was tested with LLE, determinism with DNP,
`WTE, recurrence of motion with time-delay embedding and
`Poincaré section; additionally we applied phase randomized
`surrogation.
`
`3. Results
`
`Various definitions of chaos can be found in the literature;
`Thompson et al. [20] provide quite broad, so called “positive”
`definition of chaos as “recurrent motion in simple systems or
`low-dimensional behavior that has some random aspects as
`well as certain order”, which covers wide range of systems
`that produce chaos and yet have significantly different prop-
`erties, as for example chaotic Lorenz and Rossler systems.
`In this paper to analyze data sets obtained in the experi-
`ments described in Section 2.2 and to investigate whether the
`PPG signal is consistent with the above definition by Thomp-
`son et al. and study its chaotic characteristics in details, we
`
`3.1. Spectral analysis
`
`An example of typical plot of the Fourier spectrum in the
`studied time series is shown in Fig. 3. In Fig. 3, small fluc-
`tuations, which indicate environmental noise, can be distin-
`guished around the predominant component (PF) whose pe-
`riod is approximately equal to the heart cycle period. Lower
`frequency (LF) components correspond to respiration and
`other effects, such as thermoregulation and nervous system
`activity. Table 1 shows values of amplitude and frequency
`corresponding to the predominant component obtained by
`Fourier transform. As seen from Table 1, all predominant fre-
`quencies (PF) are in the range 1.02–1.52 Hz, which is the
`range of normal heart beat frequencies.
`
`Table 1
`Amplitude (|FT|) and frequency (PF) of PPG predominant component obtained by Fourier analysis.
`
`Subject
`
`Repeat
`
`1
`
`|FT|
`
`5339.0
`1877.5
`6198.9
`1057.7
`7843.4
`4382.0
`7085.3
`3028.2
`5324.7
`
`2
`
`|FT|
`
`5608.5
`2063.1
`6960.6
`3475.7
`6379.4
`5915.2
`6758.1
`2557.6
`7062.0
`
`PF
`
`1.12
`1.21
`1.15
`1.28
`1.09
`1.19
`1.12
`1.10
`1.47
`
`3
`
`|FT|
`
`5057.4
`2906.8
`5438.9
`2384.0
`7048.2
`7298.9
`5449.0
`2451.6
`8937.0
`
`PF
`
`1.09
`1.21
`1.11
`1.24
`1.05
`1.12
`1.15
`1.11
`1.43
`
`4
`
`|FT|
`
`4185.4
`2276.4
`5765.3
`4018.1
`4945.1
`5763.3
`4378.1
`3563.0
`5444.2
`
`PF
`
`1.04
`1.12
`1.03
`1.29
`1.03
`1.14
`1.07
`1.12
`1.41
`
`5
`
`|FT|
`
`1814.5
`1839.4
`2947.3
`3792.7
`2784.6
`4100.3
`4711.1
`3006.1
`3658.1
`
`PF
`
`1.02
`1.22
`1.19
`1.34
`1.05
`1.15
`1.13
`1.06
`1.39
`
`PF
`
`1.20
`1.24
`1.16
`1.40
`1.07
`1.17
`1.17
`1.09
`1.52
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 5
`
`

`

`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`57
`
`Fig. 4. Trajectory reconstructed in 4 dimensional phase space by time-delay embedding.
`
`3.2. Time delay embedding
`
`By using the time delay embedding technique the possi-
`ble dynamics of time series can be reconstructed in phase
`space. The structure of reconstructed trajectory is considered
`to be an important characteristic of time series; the obtained
`geometric pattern of the trajectory may provide valuable
`information about the PPG signal properties, for example,
`it can reflect the level of physical or mental activity or the
`level of maturity [13,14].
`For time delay reconstruction, the time delay lag τ needs
`to be sufficiently large to ensure that the resulting individual
`coordinates are relatively independent; however, it should
`not be too large to make it completely independent statis-
`tically [16]. In this study we have defined the time lag for
`further calculations as a quarter of the period of the predom-
`inant component [17] obtained by Fourier analysis (Table 1).
`Following previous studies [7,13,14] where it was shown
`that at least 4 dimensions need to be used for the PPG sig-
`nal, we performed a time-delay embedding technique with
`4 dimensions to obtain the reconstructed trajectory in phase
`space. An example (corresponding to the 1st subject’s 1st
`measurement) of our typical data for a time-delay recon-
`struction is shown in Fig. 4, where the fourth dimension is
`represented by color. As seen in Fig. 4, the reconstructed tra-
`jectory has clear, screwing structure similar to Möbius band.
`
`3.3. Largest Lyapunov exponent
`
`Sensitive dependence to initial conditions is one of the
`most important properties of the chaotic system. Any chaotic
`system should have at least one positive Lyapunov exponent,
`with the magnitude reflecting the time scale on which sys-
`tem dynamics become unpredictable [18,19]. Lyapunov ex-
`ponent, which provides a qualitative and quantitative char-
`acterization of dynamical behavior, is a useful dynamical di-
`
`Table 2
`Largest Lyapunov exponents for all collected PPG time series
`(calculated by Wolf’s method).
`
`Subject
`
`Repeat
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`1.041
`0.731
`1.143
`1.100
`1.279
`1.206
`1.250
`1.079
`1.014
`
`0.961
`0.810
`1.565
`0.968
`1.020
`1.692
`1.010
`1.150
`0.938
`
`1.145
`1.099
`1.398
`0.861
`1.209
`0.937
`1.121
`1.194
`1.182
`
`0.744
`0.902
`1.303
`1.019
`1.167
`1.621
`1.157
`1.040
`1.119
`
`0.787
`0.754
`0.968
`1.274
`0.766
`1.242
`0.929
`1.000
`1.008
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`agnostic for chaotic systems since it gives a measure of the
`rate of divergence of neighboring trajectories [18,19].
`In this study LLE was calculated with Wolf’s method [19],
`which allows the estimation of LLE from an experimental
`time series. As many studies have mentioned [8,9,15] most
`computational methods for estimating LLE have limitations
`and can produce positive LLE even for non-chaotic systems
`[9] or can overestimate its value [15].
`LLE was calculated for all measured PPG data, and in all
`cases resulted in a positive LLE as shown in Table 2.
`
`3.4. Deterministic nonlinear prediction
`
`As it is widely known, chaotic systems show predictability
`in the short term that should decay rapidly, however different
`systems demonstrate different predictabilities, like for exam-
`ple prediction performance for the Lorenz system in chaotic
`regime and Rossler’s single band chaos differs (as shown in
`Fig. 5).
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 6
`
`

`

`58
`
`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`Fig. 5. (a) Correlation coefficient (CC) and (b) relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) curves for nonlinear deterministic prediction of Rossler’s single band
`chaos, Rossler’s single band chaos data with 7% additive noise and PPG.
`
`Rossler’s system is described by the following equations
`[20]:
`
`⎧⎪⎨
`⎪⎩
`
`˙x = −y − z,
`˙y = x + ay,
`˙z = b + z (x − c);
`
`and Lorenz system by equations[20]:
`
`⎧⎪⎨
`⎪⎩
`
`˙x = −σ (x − y) ,
`˙y = ρx − y − xz,
`˙z = xy − βz.
`
`For calculation of Rossler’s data, the system coefficients
`chosen were a = 0.398, b = 2, c = 4 which corresponds to
`single-band chaos [20–22], and for the Lorenz system and
`σ = 10, ρ = 28, β = 8/3; numerical simulation was done
`by the 4th order Runge–Kutta method with time step 0.01.
`Information about predictability can be used to distinguish
`different behaviors. Additionally, the presence of short-term
`prediction indicates the determinism of the system under
`investigation [9].
`To examine whether PPG time series are predictable in the
`short-term and investigate how forecasting quality changes
`with increasing prediction time, we conducted direct deter-
`ministic nonlinear prediction (DNP) in this study. Fig. 5(a)
`shows an example of typical data of CC and Fig. 5(b) RRMSE
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 7
`
`

`

`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`59
`
`Fig. 6. Performance of deterministic nonlinear prediction. Original signal vs. 160 steps (0.8 s) forward prediction.
`
`between real and predicted signals with increasing prediction
`time.
`While short-time predictability can be easily identi-
`fied, conclusions regarding long-term prediction are not as
`straightforward, and in many cases are rather empirical and
`might be based on researcher experience. For example, pre-
`diction performance of well-known chaotic Lorenz data ex-
`hibits rapid and apparent decay of CC, which is not always
`observed for other well-known systems generating chaos.
`For example, in Fig. 5 Rossler’s single band chaos shows high
`CC (higher than 0.96) over more than 400 steps, while CC cor-
`responding to Lorenz reaches zero. It is important to notice
`in Fig. 5(a) and (b) that CC and RRMSE curves corresponding
`to chaotic Rossler band initially demonstrate decay, as would
`be expected, and later both curves stabilize at a high CC value
`(CC > 0.96) and a low RRMSE value (RRMSE < 0.28) over a
`long period, however, it is known that chaotic systems do not
`have long-term prediction and therefore despite the stable
`high CC value and low value of RRMSE these results should
`not be recognized as a sign of long-term prediction.
`As discussed later in Fig. 9, PPG trajectory have some topo-
`logical similarity to Rossler’s single band chaos; therefore, to
`illustrate changes in the PPG’s CC and RRMSE curves it was
`compared with the CC and RRMSE curves of the correspond-
`ing Rossler’s data. In addition, since the PPG data were ob-
`tained experimentally, it inevitably contains noise, so we also
`compared PPG prediction results with the same Rossler’s sys-
`tem with 7% additive (dynamical) noise; results are shown in
`Fig. 5(a) and (b).
`Fig. 6 shows example of actual vs. 0.8 s (160 time steps)
`predicted PPG, even after 160 steps forecast still resemble
`original time series with sufficiently high quality to reproduce
`not only the general trend of the PPG waveform, but also
`smaller details such as the dicrotic notch.
`As seen from Figs. 5 and 6, time series clearly demon-
`strated the presence of short-term prediction, which is in-
`dicative of underlying determinism. The chosen coefficients
`for the Rossler system correspond to a chaotic regime, and
`
`therefore the obtained Rossler’s data should not have long-
`term prediction. Thus comparison between CC and RRMSE
`curves corresponding to PPG, Rossler and noise induced
`Rossler data in Fig. 5 demonstrate the absence of long-term
`forecasting in the PPG signal, which is typical for chaotic mo-
`tion. Besides finding that PPG’s CC and RRMSE curves showed
`similar trends with CC and RRMSE corresponding to 7% noise
`induced Rossler’s data, these results have demonstrated that
`it might be misleading to compare results obtained from
`PPG with chaotic Lorenz data, which played a role of one
`of the classical examples of chaos over decades, but actu-
`ally demonstrates only one of many other possible chaotic
`behaviors.
`In this study DNP became an important method for testing
`the predictability properties of the PPG signal. In several stud-
`ies it was claimed that PPG time series of young healthy sub-
`jects are deterministic chaos, based mostly on results of the
`Lyapunov exponent, CD and attractor reconstruction, which
`as it is nowadays known, may produce misleading results
`for noise contaminated real-world signals. Results of DNP
`(Figs. 5 and 6) and its comparison with chaotic Rossler’s data
`provided not only substantial support for the claim of the
`chaotic nature of PPG, but more importantly, it provides us
`with quantitative (CC and RRMSE) as well as qualitative (sim-
`ilarity of prediction performance with noise induced chaotic
`Rossler’s data) characteristics of PPG dynamics.
`
`3.5. Poincaré section
`
`The Poincaré section is one of the most powerful tools for
`qualitative exploration of the dynamics of a system [9], as
`it enables a demonstration of the process generating chaos
`in the phase space. The Poincaré section was obtained from
`a three-dimensional time-delay reconstructed attractor by
`a clock-wise rotating slicing two-dimensional plane. Fig. 7
`demonstrates areas on trajectory sliced by the plane; in Fig. 8,
`an example of Poincaré sections for the 1st subject’s 1st mea-
`surement is shown.
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 8
`
`

`

`60
`
`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`Fig. 7. The areas sliced by the rotating plane on the reconstructed trajectory of PPG signal.
`
`Fig. 8. Poincaré sections for the PPG signal, where Y(t) =
`
`(cid:6)
`x(t)2 + x(t + τ )2.
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 9
`
`

`

`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`61
`
`As seen from Fig. 8 dense trajectories (α = 75°) tend to
`expand (α = 150°), bend (α = 225°) and stretch (α = 300°) and
`then fold back (α = 0° and α = 75°) along the attractor. This
`stretch-and-fold behavior generates sensitive dependence on
`the initial conditions, which is recognized as an important
`property of chaotic dynamics.
`
`3.6. Wayland test
`
`In order to explain the variability observed in complex
`time series and distinguish whether it is due to external
`stochastic noise, internal deterministic dynamics, or a combi-
`nation of both, we applied the Wayland test, which is a com-
`putationally simple variation of the Kaplan–Glass method
`and uses the phase space continuity observed in time series
`to measure determinism [23].
`We calculated Wayland test translation error (WTE),
`which can quantify smoothness of the flow reconstructed
`in the phase space. WTE performs well in high levels of un-
`correlated noise and provides a robust measure of the de-
`terminism in the trajectory reconstructed in the phase space
`[23]. WTE is insensitive to an overall scaling of the original
`time series. If the time series is deterministic, then the WTE
`will be small [23]. For instance, for chaotic Rossler time se-
`ries (dataset containing 60,000 points) with parameters as
`described in Section 3.4, the WTE is 0.0002, for Rossler with
`10% induced noise the WTE is 0.0045, and for white noise is
`1.08 (60,000 points). Table 3 shows the results of WTE calcu-
`lations for PPG (time series size is 60,000 points).
`According to Table 3, most of the WTE values are small,
`which is an indication of determinism in the PPG data.
`
`3.7. Surrogation
`
`The surrogation approach is to specify a defined null hy-
`pothesis and generate a set of surrogate signals that embody
`
`Table 3
`Results of Wayland test’s translation error (WTE) calculation
`for all collected PPG time series.
`
`Subject
`
`Repeat
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`0.007
`0.041
`0.023
`0.016
`0.092
`0.015
`0.012
`0.031
`0.018
`
`0.006
`0.041
`0.012
`0.024
`0.024
`0.010
`0.017
`0.030
`0.019
`
`0.005
`0.045
`0.013
`0.020
`0.059
`0.019
`0.016
`0.015
`0.027
`
`0.010
`0.023
`0.015
`0.034
`0.027
`0.019
`0.026
`0.039
`0.045
`
`0.024
`0.048
`0.050
`0.085
`0.017
`0.037
`0.035
`0.048
`0.024
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`
`a hypothesis about the time series. Then by determining the
`distribution of the index under investigation obtained from
`surrogates, empirical statistical boundaries can be found. By
`comparing the index of the original time series with the dis-
`tribution of the index from surrogates, the null hypothesis
`under which surrogates were generated can either be re-
`jected if the value from the original signal does not overlap
`with the distribution from surrogates, or fail to be rejected if
`the original index is within distribution with high significance
`[9,24].
`One of the typical applications of surrogate data is to check
`for determinism and whether data are a realization of a spe-
`cific random process. In this study the null hypothesis is that
`the signal is a realization of a linear Gaussian stochastic pro-
`cess. Surrogate time series were created by phase random-
`ization of Fourier transforms for the original PPG data and
`following inverse Fourier transform. As a result, the obtained
`surrogates are stochastic, but have the same power spectrum
`as the original data. Applying this type of surrogates allows
`one not only to place empirical boundaries, but also to test
`for nonlinearity of PPG.
`
`Fig. 9. Deterministic nonlinear prediction correlation coefficient for PPG (red line) and 30 surrogate datasets (blue lines). For interpretation of the references to
`colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2022 - Page 10
`
`

`

`62
`
`N. Sviridova, K. Sakai / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 77 (2015) 53–63
`
`DNP were applied to 30 surrogate datasets. Fig. 9 demon-
`strates the results of DNP for surrogate time series generated
`under the null hypothesis from the original data. As seen from
`the CC curve, the original signal is clearly distinct and does
`not overlap with curves corresponding to surrogates. Since
`the PPG data and surrogates are clearly distinguishable, the
`null hypothesis of a linear Gaussian stochastic process should
`be rejected. Additionally, we may suggest that there is no
`significant effect of Gaussian noise, which PPG may contain,
`based on results of DNP.
`
`4. Discussion
`
`The objective of this study was to provide evidence that
`the PPG signal, obtained from healthy human subjects, is con-
`sistent with the definition of chaotic motion given by Thomp-
`son et al. [20] and conduct a comprehensive study of the
`chaotic characteristics of PPG dynamics. Produced by sophis-
`ticated mechanisms of the cardiovascular system, the PPG
`signal is still not fully understood. In the in early 90s PPG was
`claimed to be chaotic based on time-delay reconstruction, LLE
`and CD results [13,14], which were previously believed to be
`sufficient to identify chaos. However, many studies subse-
`quently showed that these measures can be misleading and
`provide false evidence of chaos in the case of, for example,
`noise contaminated experimental data [8,9,15]. In addition, it
`is well known that physiological data are inevitably contam-
`inated by environmental noise and movement artifacts. And
`the same measures were used in application studies inves-
`tigating the dependence of PPG characteristics from human
`subject’s mental and physiological conditions [5,13,14].
`In an attempt to obtain reliable results, we have applied
`various methods of NTSA, including classical and widely used
`ones—power spectrum, time delay embedding, and largest
`Lyapunov exponent and have conducted deterministic non-
`linear prediction, Poincaré section, Wayland test and sur-
`rogation, results of which are not only considered to be
`
`more reliable in the case of noise-contaminated data, but can
`also provide new insights into the chaotic properties of PPG
`dynamics.
`Additionally, to study in more detail trajectories’ evolving
`process, we have directly investigated trajectories spreading
`in phase space. An arbitrary chosen fixed point on an attractor
`and its nearest neighbor were selected as the starting points
`of two trajectories. Fig. 10 shows the separation of these two
`trajectories based on the example of 140 and 300-step long
`segment for PPG time series (left side) and for Rossler’s single
`band chaos with 7% additive noise (right side), in both cases
`the trajectories evolve clock-wise. Star and circle markers are
`corresponding to trajectories originating from an arbitrarily
`chosen fixed point on an attractor and its neighboring tra-
`jectory, respectively, where red color indicates the starting
`and black color the ending points of the segment. The dis-
`tance between trajectories increases immediately with in-
`creasing evolution time step, however later trajectories are
`getting closer and remain in the bounded region. Obtained
`PPG trajectories are continuously bending due to that fold-
`ing is realized. In this sense PPG’s attractor seems to belong
`to the same folded band topological group as Rossler’s single
`band chaotic attractor, rather than the Lorenz group, in which
`folding is produced by splitting and layering [20].
`The investigated data primarily demonstrated

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket