`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`ALIVECOR, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2021-00972
`Patent 10,638,941
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF NOAH C. GRAUBART IN SUPPORT OF
`PETITIONER’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
`ADMISSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE 1059
`Apple. v. Alivecor
`IPR2021-00972
`
`1
`
`
`
`I, Noah C. Graubart, hereby declare to the following:
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2021-00972
`Attorney Docket: 50095-0034IP1
`
`
`1.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Georgia, the
`
`Supreme Court of Georgia, Court of Appeals of Georgia, the Supreme Court of the
`
`United States, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Fifth, Ninth, Eleventh,
`
`and Federal Circuits, the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, the U.S.
`
`District Court for the Middle and Northern Districts of Georgia, and the U.S.
`
`District Court for the Eastern and Western Districts of Texas.
`
`2.
`
`I have not been suspended or disbarred from practice before any court
`
`or administrative body.
`
`3.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied, subject to two exceptions. Specifically, in two
`
`instances, my application to appear pro hac vice in the Northern District of
`
`California was denied initially based on inadvertent omission of required
`
`information (i.e., a specific identification of “the highest court of another State” to
`
`which I am admitted). Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Avaya Inc., No. 3:14-
`
`cv04309-WHA, Dkt. No. 16 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2014); Straight Path IP Group,
`
`Inc. v. Avaya Inc., No. 3:16-cv-03459-WHA, Dkt. No. 19 (N.D. Cal. July 19,
`
`2016). In both instances, my application to appear pro hac vice was subsequently
`
`granted after re-submission with the required information. Straight Path IP Group,
`
`Inc. v. Avaya Inc., No. 3:14-cv-04309-WHA, Dkt. No. 20 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 31,
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`2014); Straight Path IP Group, Inc. v. Avaya Inc., No. 3:16-cv-03459-WHA, Dkt.
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2021-00972
`Attorney Docket: 50095-0034IP1
`
`
`No. 23 (N.D. Cal. July 26, 2016).
`
`4.
`
`No sanction or contempt citation has been imposed against me by any
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials set forth in part 42 of the Code
`
`of Federal Regulations.
`
`6.
`
`I will be subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set
`
`forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. §
`
`11.19(a).
`
`7.
`
`In the past three years, I have applied for and received admission pro
`
`hac vice in IPR2018-01250, IPR2018-01251, IPR2018-01280 and IPR2018-01281.
`
`8.
`
`I am an experienced patent litigation attorney with over sixteen years
`
`of experience representing clients in cases involving smartphone software, audio
`
`and video processing, telecommunications solutions, wireless networking, optical
`
`networking, computer hardware interfaces, and semiconductor fabrication
`
`methods. I regularly litigate patent cases before the U.S. District Courts across the
`
`country, at the U.S. International Trade Commission, as well as arguing or briefing
`
`cases in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, including at the Federal Circuit.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`I am intimately familiar with the issues and subject matter presented
`
`Proceeding No.: IPR2021-00972
`Attorney Docket: 50095-0034IP1
`
`
`9.
`
`in this above-captioned inter partes review proceeding. For example, I have
`
`extensively reviewed the above identified patent, its prosecution history, the
`
`Petition for IPR (including the invalidity grounds therein, and the cited references),
`
`and all exhibits filed in this case.
`
`10. My biography is attached hereto as Appendix A.
`
`11.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein of my own
`
`knowledge are true and that all statements made on information and belief are
`
`believed to be true; and further that these statements were made with the
`
`knowledge that willful false statements and the like so made are punishable by fine
`
`or imprisonment, or both, under Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code
`
`and that such willful false statements may jeopardize the validity of the application
`
`or any patents issued thereon.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date: March 9, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/Noah C. Graubart/
`NOAH C. GRAUBART
`Fish & Richardson P.C.
`Email: Graubart@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIX A
`
`5
`
`
`
`Noah C. Graubart
`Principal
`
`Atlanta, GA
`
`404-724-2820
`
`“He just gets it, he knows exactly what | need. He’s responsive, pragmatic and he really breaksit
`downin an easily digestible manner.”
`
`— Client testimonials, 2019 Chambers and Partners
`
`Overview
`
`
` ÿÿ
`
`
ÿ
`graubart@fr.com
`
`
`
` ÿ! " ÿ "ÿ ÿ ÿ# $"ÿ % &ÿ$ ÿ'ÿ (ÿ )"ÿ " " * ÿ ÿ(ÿ ÿ &ÿ
` #"ÿ
`
`( $ÿ ÿÿ " &ÿ( "
` ÿ +
`B* * $
`,ÿ./0123ÿ3143056207/48ÿ9:;<ÿ.=75>1?4ÿ72@ÿA7?321?4
`CDEFGÿIEJK
` ÿÿ
` ÿ "ÿÿ ( ÿ ÿL " )"ÿ ÿ ÿ$ ÿ ("ÿ %ÿ ÿ ÿ(
` ÿ ÿ &ÿ" "ÿ ÿ" ÿ ÿ ÿ$ ()"ÿ " ÿ ÿ &ÿ "ÿ
` ÿ &ÿ " "ÿ "ÿ ÿMNÿO " ÿ "ÿ ""ÿ ÿ &ÿ ÿ ÿMNÿ'
`P( ÿ "" ÿ ÿ ÿMNÿ "ÿ ÿ "ÿ ( ÿ ÿ ÿL ( ÿ
` )"ÿ ÿ ( "ÿ % ÿ$ ÿÿ( * " ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ &ÿ ÿ ( ÿ" "
` * * ÿ" ÿ" $ ÿ ( ÿ(ÿ* ( ÿ "" ÿ "ÿ" "ÿ$ ""
` $ # ÿ ÿ $ # ÿ ÿ ($ ÿ "ÿ(ÿ" ( ÿ
`
`
` ("
` ÿ" * "ÿ"ÿ ÿ ÿ )"ÿA?6ÿQ626ÿ ( ÿ(ÿ "ÿ * &ÿ * * (ÿ ÿ "ÿR?6ÿ
`>626ÿ " "ÿÿ )"ÿR?6ÿ>626ÿ ÿ "ÿ ( (ÿ "ÿ " * ÿ ( "ÿ ÿ"
`(ÿ ( ÿ ÿ ( ÿ" * ÿ( ÿ &ÿ" "ÿÿ ÿ"" " (ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`N ÿ ÿ ÿS ÿÿ * "ÿ(ÿ $ÿ" ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ( ÿ"
`ÿ ÿ" * "ÿ ÿ ÿT (ÿ ÿO "ÿ ÿ ÿP %"ÿO ( ÿN * ÿ(ÿ"ÿÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`(* " &ÿ ÿ ÿU ("ÿ ÿ (ÿ ÿO " ÿVU' OW
`
`graubart@fr.com
`
`
`
` ÿ! " ÿ "ÿ ÿ ÿ# $"ÿ % &ÿ$ ÿ'ÿ (ÿ )"ÿ " " * ÿ ÿ(ÿ ÿ &ÿ
` #"ÿ
`
`( $ÿ ÿÿ " &ÿ( "
` ÿ +
`B* * $
`,ÿ./0123ÿ3143056207/48ÿ9:;<ÿ.=75>1?4ÿ72@ÿA7?321?4
`CDEFGÿIEJK
` ÿÿ
` ÿ "ÿÿ ( ÿ ÿL " )"ÿ ÿ ÿ$ ÿ ("ÿ %ÿ ÿ ÿ(
` ÿ ÿ &ÿ" "ÿ ÿ" ÿ ÿ ÿ$ ()"ÿ " ÿ ÿ &ÿ "ÿ
` ÿ &ÿ " "ÿ "ÿ ÿMNÿO " ÿ "ÿ ""ÿ ÿ &ÿ ÿ ÿMNÿ'
`P( ÿ "" ÿ ÿ ÿMNÿ "ÿ ÿ "ÿ ( ÿ ÿ ÿL ( ÿ
` )"ÿ ÿ ( "ÿ % ÿ$ ÿÿ( * " ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ &ÿ ÿ ( ÿ" "
` * * ÿ" ÿ" $ ÿ ( ÿ(ÿ* ( ÿ "" ÿ "ÿ" "ÿ$ ""
` $ # ÿ ÿ $ # ÿ ÿ ($ ÿ "ÿ(ÿ" ( ÿ
`
`
` ("
` ÿ" * "ÿ"ÿ ÿ ÿ )"ÿA?6ÿQ626ÿ ( ÿ(ÿ "ÿ * &ÿ * * (ÿ ÿ "ÿR?6ÿ
`>626ÿ " "ÿÿ )"ÿR?6ÿ>626ÿ ÿ "ÿ ( (ÿ "ÿ " * ÿ ( "ÿ ÿ"
`(ÿ ( ÿ ÿ ( ÿ" * ÿ( ÿ &ÿ" "ÿÿ ÿ"" " (ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`N ÿ ÿ ÿS ÿÿ * "ÿ(ÿ $ÿ" ÿ ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿÿ( ÿ"
`ÿ ÿ" * "ÿ ÿ ÿT (ÿ ÿO "ÿ ÿ ÿP %"ÿO ( ÿN * ÿ(ÿ"ÿÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`(* " &ÿ ÿ ÿU ("ÿ ÿ (ÿ ÿO " ÿVU' OW
`
ÿ ÿ!
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ" * (ÿ"ÿÿ$ÿ #ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿX &ÿYÿN ÿ ÿ ÿM (
`
`Noahservesasthe Atlanta office’s Pro Bono Coordinatorandis actively involved in numerous pro
`bono causes. Noah'spro bonopractice has included numerouspost-conviction proceedingsin state
`and federal court, including several death penalty cases. Noahassisted in obtaining from the
`Supreme Court of Virginia a reversal and new sentencing hearing for a client facing a death sentence.
`He serves on the Board of Directors for the Texas Defender Service and as a member ofthe Atlanta
`Advisory Committee of Kids in Need of Defense (KIND).
`
`About Noah
`
`Noah C. Graubart is a co-founderof Fish’s Atlanta office, who leads complex patentlitigation and
`otherintellectual property cases for some of the world’s most prominent technology companies.
`Noah regularly represents clients in U.S. District Courts across the country, at the U.S. International
`Trade Commission, in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, including at the Federal Circuit.
`
`Noah’s practice includes experience with a diverse range of high technologylitigation, including cases
`involving smartphonesoftware, audio and video processing, telecommunications solutions, wireless
`networking, optical networking, computer hardware interfaces, and semiconductorfabrication
`methods.
`
`Prior to joining the firm, Noah served asa law clerk for the Honorable Jerry E. Smith of the United
`
`6
`
`
` ÿX &ÿYÿN ÿ ÿ ÿM (
`
`Noahservesasthe Atlanta office’s Pro Bono Coordinatorandis actively involved in numerous pro
`bono causes. Noah'spro bonopractice has included numerouspost-conviction proceedingsin state
`and federal court, including several death penalty cases. Noahassisted in obtaining from the
`Supreme Court of Virginia a reversal and new sentencing hearing for a client facing a death sentence.
`He serves on the Board of Directors for the Texas Defender Service and as a member ofthe Atlanta
`Advisory Committee of Kids in Need of Defense (KIND).
`
`About Noah
`
`Noah C. Graubart is a co-founderof Fish’s Atlanta office, who leads complex patentlitigation and
`otherintellectual property cases for some of the world’s most prominent technology companies.
`Noah regularly represents clients in U.S. District Courts across the country, at the U.S. International
`Trade Commission, in the U.S. Courts of Appeals, including at the Federal Circuit.
`
`Noah’s practice includes experience with a diverse range of high technologylitigation, including cases
`involving smartphonesoftware, audio and video processing, telecommunications solutions, wireless
`networking, optical networking, computer hardware interfaces, and semiconductorfabrication
`methods.
`
`Prior to joining the firm, Noah served asa law clerk for the Honorable Jerry E. Smith of the United
`
`6
`
`
`
`States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
`
`Noahlives in Atlanta, Georgia, with his wife of sixteen years, Emily, and their three children.
`
`Focus Areas
`
`Services
`
`e Litigation
`
`e ITC Litigation
`
`e Patent Litigation
`
`Industries
`
`e ConsumerProducts
`
`¢ Digital Media and E-Commerce
`
`e Electrical and Computer Technology
`
`e Internet
`
`e Manufacturing
`
`e Telecommunications
`
`Education
`
`B.A., Political Science, Northwestern University (2001)
`
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`
` !"#$ %&
`'(ÿ&
`*+,-%.!# %
`) ÿ&
` ÿ)
`/ ÿ0 ÿ ÿ 1
`
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
`
` !"#$ %&
`'(ÿ&
`*+,-%.!# %
`) ÿ&
` ÿ)
`/ ÿ0 ÿ ÿ 1
`
` ÿ ÿ
ÿ(
`'
`0
`
`(
`
`2/ÿ3456ÿ6898:;<ÿ=:>?:ÿ8@ÿ56?ÿA84@ÿÿB ÿ
`ÿÿ&ÿ ÿCDEEFGÿ0 H ÿI94J?:;45Kÿ8@ÿ
`A64LMN8ÿOM3ÿP?J4?3
`
`'
`0
`
`(
`
`2/ÿ3456ÿ6898:;<ÿ=:>?:ÿ8@ÿ56?ÿA84@ÿÿB ÿ
`ÿÿ&ÿ ÿCDEEFGÿ0 H ÿI94J?:;45Kÿ8@ÿ
`A64LMN8ÿOM3ÿP?J4?3
`
`Q ÿ) ÿ ÿ ÿB ÿCDEERG
`ST. +.ÿ*+V!#+W X +.ÿYT% %
`Z4:?[?;;ÿ\4;L8J?:KÿOOAÿJ]ÿ^_`a[?ÿb:M>49NÿOOA<ÿ?5ÿM[]ÿCc/ÿ( ÿDEDEGÿC H ÿ2Gdÿÿ ÿ
`
`Q H ÿÿ
ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
1H ÿ
`
`J.D. with honors, Orderof the Coif , University of Chicago Law School (2004) Member,University of
`Chicago Law Review
`
`Experience
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Cases
`
`Wireless Discovery LLC v. Bumble Trading LLC,et al. (W.D. Tex. 2020) (Albright, J.): Counsel for
`Bumble in patent infringement caserelated to online dating applications and location-based social
`
`7
`
`
`
`J.D. with honors, Orderof the Coif , University of Chicago Law School (2004) Member,University of
`Chicago Law Review
`
`Experience
`
`
`
`Patent Infringement Cases
`
`Wireless Discovery LLC v. Bumble Trading LLC,et al. (W.D. Tex. 2020) (Albright, J.): Counsel for
`Bumble in patent infringement caserelated to online dating applications and location-based social
`
`7
`
`
`
`networking technology.
`
`Ikorongo Texas LLC,et al. v. Bumble Trading LLC (W.D. Tex. 2020)(Albright, J.): Counsel for
`Bumble in patent infringement case concerning online dating application and location-sharing
`technology.
`
`Clear Imaging Research, LLC v. SamsungElectronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2019) (Gilstrap, J.):
`Counsel for Samsungin patent infringement case concerning digital photography software.
`
`adv. SEVEN Networks LLC (E.D. Tex. 2019) (Gilstrap, J.): Counsel for large electronics supplier in a
`patent dispute involving mobile device and cloud services technologies.
`
`Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. AVAYA, Inc. (D. Colo. 2018) (Brimmer, J.): Counsel for AVAYA
`in patent infringementlitigation related to AV compression standards.
`
` ÿ
`
`ÿÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ! ÿ"#$% ÿ&'ÿ ÿ()*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.-./ÿ(0
1 2ÿ3/4ÿÿ56 7
ÿ8
`96:1
`96:1
ÿ ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
`<7 ÿ
`
` ÿ
`<7 ÿ
`
` ÿ
ÿ=< ÿ<;;
`< ÿ< =ÿ
`< >7 <
`
`
`
` ÿ$'ÿ?@A ÿ ÿ! ÿB$#ÿC @ '@ÿ ÿ & ÿ ÿ<
ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.EF/ÿ(G
7<;2ÿ3/4ÿ
`56 7
`56 7
ÿ8ÿH<:76 ÿ ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
`<7 ÿ
`
` ÿ=<
`<7 ÿ
`
` ÿ=<
ÿ; <;
ÿ78 <
`&! ÿBCICJÿJ Kÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.EF/ÿ(G
`&! ÿBCICJÿJ Kÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.EF/ÿ(G
7<;2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ
< ÿ
`
`7ÿ76;;
ÿ ÿ<
`;< ÿ=7;6 ÿ L
`;< ÿ=7;6 ÿ L
L ÿ:1
ÿ= L
` ÿ< =ÿ
`
` ÿ< =ÿ
`
6=ÿ7 L
` 7ÿ
`
` 7ÿ
`
7
`? '$ÿM&N '!ÿB $'ÿ ÿ! ÿMIMOM ÿ@ ÿ(*ÿ5
`? '$ÿM&N '!ÿB $'ÿ ÿ! ÿMIMOM ÿ@ ÿ(*ÿ5
ÿ-.EP/ÿ(9:: 2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ0Q0R0
` ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
` ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
< ÿ
< =ÿÿ0Qÿ
`:; 77 ÿ7< =<=7
`&! ÿS# @$$ÿ@ ÿ(H*ÿ5<
`:; 77 ÿ7< =<=7
`&! ÿS# @$$ÿ@ ÿ(H*ÿ5<
ÿ-.ET/ÿ(9
`L 2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
`L 2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ
< ÿ
`
`7ÿ76;;
ÿ ÿ<
`;< ÿ=7;6 ÿ L
`;< ÿ=7;6 ÿ L
L ÿ:1
ÿ= L
` 7
`U' '$ÿ! ÿVWXÿY % ÿ@ ÿ ÿ ÿ(*ÿZ< ÿ-.ETÿ[ÿH*ÿ5<
` 7
`U' '$ÿ! ÿVWXÿY % ÿ@ ÿ ÿ ÿ(*ÿZ< ÿ-.ETÿ[ÿH*ÿ5<
ÿ-.EP/ÿ()<==6;72ÿ3ÿ[ÿ\<
72ÿ3/4
`56 7
`56 7
ÿ8ÿ*3]ÿ ÿ= 7 ÿ;< ÿ
`<7 ÿ L
`<7 ÿ L
L ÿ ; =
`ÿ1<
` 7
`? '$ÿM&N '!ÿB $'ÿ ÿ! ÿB 'ÿI ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ(*ÿ5
`ÿ1<
` 7
`? '$ÿM&N '!ÿB $'ÿ ÿ! ÿB 'ÿI ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ(*ÿ5
ÿ-.ET/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ0^^_Hÿ
`;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
`;< ÿ 8 : ÿ
< ÿ
< =ÿÿ0Qÿ
`:; 77 ÿ7< =<=7
`BCICJÿJ Kÿ ÿ! ÿB$#ÿC @ '@ÿ ÿ & ÿ ÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.ET/ÿ(G
`:; 77 ÿ7< =<=7
`BCICJÿJ Kÿ ÿ! ÿB$#ÿC @ '@ÿ ÿ & ÿ ÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.ET/ÿ(G
7<;2ÿ3/4ÿ
`56 7
`56 7
ÿ8ÿH<:76 ÿ ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ=7;6 ÿ
`
` ÿ0 ==>
`
` ÿ0 ==>
< =ÿ; >7<L
`8 <6 7
` 'ÿ #$ÿC @ '@ÿV!'@ ÿ@ #&'ÿ !'' ÿY$'ÿ ÿ`%' ÿaAÿ&ÿ
`% ÿ&ÿJ KbC% &ÿVIVÿ&ÿ" #b?cÿa cÿ(_+5ÿ-.ET/ÿ(d=2ÿ0d3/4ÿ56 7
`8 <6 7
` 'ÿ #$ÿC @ '@ÿV!'@ ÿ@ #&'ÿ !'' ÿY$'ÿ ÿ`%' ÿaAÿ&ÿ
`% ÿ&ÿJ KbC% &ÿVIVÿ&ÿ" #b?cÿa cÿ(_+5ÿ-.ET/ÿ(d=2ÿ0d3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8
`5:;
`5:;
< < ÿ0^^_Hÿ ÿ_+5ÿ L 7< ÿ8ÿL<67ÿH
ÿ L
L ÿL<67ÿ
` 76: ÿ
` 76: ÿ
`
`7
`
`
7
` 'ÿV'' ÿ % ÿ&ÿB ' ÿa&#@ ÿB bNÿ" ÿY Kc ÿ&ÿ $N ÿAe
`(_+5ÿ-.ET/ÿ(f
`g<:<<2ÿ0d3/4ÿ56 7
` 'ÿV'' ÿ % ÿ&ÿB ' ÿa&#@ ÿB bNÿ" ÿY Kc ÿ&ÿ $N ÿAe
`(_+5ÿ-.ET/ÿ(f
`g<:<<2ÿ0d3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ^ 7; = 2ÿ0^^_H2ÿ ÿ_+5ÿ L 7< ÿ L
L ÿ7 >;
`1,ÿ< =ÿ ÿ< < ÿ= L
` 7
`'Iÿ@ ÿ! ÿB$#ÿC @ '@ÿ ÿ & 2ÿ ÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(G
`1,ÿ< =ÿ ÿ< < ÿ= L
` 7
`'Iÿ@ ÿ! ÿB$#ÿC @ '@ÿ ÿ & 2ÿ ÿ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(G
7<;2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿH<:76
` ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ=7;6 ÿ
`
` ÿL= ÿ;
` 77 ÿ ÿ:1
` ÿ;< ÿ 8 : ÿ=7;6 ÿ
`
` ÿL= ÿ;
` 77 ÿ ÿ:1
ÿ= L
` 7ÿ< =ÿ*Q^ÿ7 >;ÿ1, 7
`&! ÿC'@ÿ@ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(G
` 7ÿ< =ÿ*Q^ÿ7 >;ÿ1, 7
`&! ÿC'@ÿ@ ÿ(D*ÿ+ ,ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(G
7<;2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ
< ÿ
`
`7ÿ76;;
ÿ ÿ<ÿ;<
`=7;6 ÿ L
`=7;6 ÿ L
L ÿ:1
ÿ= L
` ÿ78 <
`a@ '!ÿ ÿ! ÿi'A &ÿa@'ÿB # ' ÿ@ ÿ(g*ÿG<ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(5 2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
` ÿ78 <
`a@ '!ÿ ÿ! ÿi'A &ÿa@'ÿB # ' ÿ@ ÿ(g*ÿG<ÿ-.Eh/ÿ(5 2ÿ3/4ÿ56 7
ÿ8ÿ\
< =
`
`Certain ConsumerElectronic Devices, Including Televisions, Gaming Consoles, Mobile Phones and
`Tablets, and Network-Enabled DVD and Blu-Ray Players (ITC 2017) (Lord, ALJ): Counselfor
`Complainant ARRIS in ITC investigation of various Sonyinvolving various consumerelectronics
`technologies.
`
`adv. QualcommInc. (S.D. Cal. 2017) (Bencivengo,J.): Counsel for large electronics supplier in a
`patent dispute involving mobile devices.
`
`Williams v. DJO Global, Inc., et al. (D. Utah 2017 / S.D. Cal. 2018) (Waddoups,J. / Hayes,J.):
`Counsel for DJO in design patent case involving orthopedic braces.
`
`Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, LLC, et al. (D. Colo. 2017): Counsel for ARRIS in
`patentinfringementlitigation related to AV compression standards.
`
`SEVEN Networks LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2017) (Gilstrap, J.):
`Counsel for Samsungin patent infringement dispute concerning Android-related power-saving
`features.
`
`Certain Digital Cable and Satellite Products, Set-Top Boxes, Gateways, and Components Thereof
`(ITC 2017) (McNamara, ALJ): Counsel for Respondent, ARRIS, in ITC investigation involving set-top
`box and network gateway devices.
`
`TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2015) (Gilstrap, J.): Counsel for Samsung
`in patent infringement dispute concerning video processing in mobile devices and DVRset-top boxes.
`
`adv. Ericsson Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2015) (Gilstrap, J.): Counsel for large electronics supplier in a patent
`dispute involving mobile device software.
`
`Pactiv LLC v. Highland Packaging Solutions, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2015) (Cohen, J.): Counsel for Highland
`
`8
`
`
`
`Certain ConsumerElectronic Devices, Including Televisions, Gaming Consoles, Mobile Phones and
`Tablets, and Network-Enabled DVD and Blu-Ray Players (ITC 2017) (Lord, ALJ): Counselfor
`Complainant ARRIS in ITC investigation of various Sonyinvolving various consumerelectronics
`technologies.
`
`adv. QualcommInc. (S.D. Cal. 2017) (Bencivengo,J.): Counsel for large electronics supplier in a
`patent dispute involving mobile devices.
`
`Williams v. DJO Global, Inc., et al. (D. Utah 2017 / S.D. Cal. 2018) (Waddoups,J. / Hayes,J.):
`Counsel for DJO in design patent case involving orthopedic braces.
`
`Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV, LLC, et al. (D. Colo. 2017): Counsel for ARRIS in
`patentinfringementlitigation related to AV compression standards.
`
`SEVEN Networks LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2017) (Gilstrap, J.):
`Counsel for Samsungin patent infringement dispute concerning Android-related power-saving
`features.
`
`Certain Digital Cable and Satellite Products, Set-Top Boxes, Gateways, and Components Thereof
`(ITC 2017) (McNamara, ALJ): Counsel for Respondent, ARRIS, in ITC investigation involving set-top
`box and network gateway devices.
`
`TiVo Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2015) (Gilstrap, J.): Counsel for Samsung
`in patent infringement dispute concerning video processing in mobile devices and DVRset-top boxes.
`
`adv. Ericsson Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2015) (Gilstrap, J.): Counsel for large electronics supplier in a patent
`dispute involving mobile device software.
`
`Pactiv LLC v. Highland Packaging Solutions, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2015) (Cohen, J.): Counsel for Highland
`
`8
`
`
`
` ÿ
`
ÿÿ
`
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
` ÿ !ÿ"#$ÿ%%&ÿ'(ÿ)* + ÿ,- ../ ÿ012$ÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ345ÿ67ÿÿ89:;<ÿ3=
`
>ÿ?<@ÿA
`
` ÿB Cÿÿ
`
` ÿB Cÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
C ÿ
D
`
`2E . -ÿF GH-ÿ&HE -I$ÿ"-(ÿ'(ÿ# J .Gÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ3K5ÿL
` ÿ89:;<ÿ35
`
`
`2E . -ÿF GH-ÿ&HE -I$ÿ"-(ÿ'(ÿ# J .Gÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ3K5ÿL
` ÿ89:;<ÿ35
`
>ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ
`M ÿN ÿÿ
`ÿ
`M ÿN ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ
`BOMAÿ
`
`BOMAÿ
`
`1. P!ÿ# !ÿ"#ÿQ.H*ÿ"-(ÿ'(ÿ2R2S2ÿ"-(ÿ3T5ÿA
`ÿ89:;<ÿ3M
` >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿMOMUMÿÿ
`
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿO V ÿ
`ÿO V ÿ
`D
`W EH-G#ÿ%%&ÿ'(ÿQ* .G -ÿ"-G*/. /ÿ&H.(ÿ345ÿ67ÿ89:;<ÿ3=
`
>ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ=
`V
`ÿ ÿ=
`V
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ X
` ÿ Y ÿ
`ÿ X
` ÿ Y ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿY
`
`
ÿ
DZ
`& . -ÿ&H-/*E .ÿ, .H-/ÿ"- *G-Pÿ[H\ ÿ#!H- /ÿ -Gÿ \ /ÿ""ÿ3V6Aÿ89:;<ÿ3 >ÿM]?<@
`A
`ÿ ÿ ÿÿV6Aÿ
`& . -ÿ&H-/*E .ÿ, .H-/ÿ"- *G-Pÿ[H\ ÿ#!H- /ÿ -Gÿ \ /ÿ""ÿ3V6Aÿ89:;<ÿ3 >ÿM]?<@
`A
`ÿ ÿ ÿÿV6Aÿ
ÿY D
ÿYÿA
`
`
ÿ
ÿK Y
`ÿ
`
`C
` ÿ
`ÿ
`
`C
` ÿ
ÿ
`"- . ' ÿ"- P - $ÿ"-(ÿ'(ÿ#. / - ÿ !-H HPI$ÿ%%&ÿ3T5ÿ= ÿ89:^<ÿ36
`"- . ' ÿ"- P - $ÿ"-(ÿ'(ÿ#. / - ÿ !-H HPI$ÿ%%&ÿ3T5ÿ= ÿ89:^<ÿ36
Y>ÿ?<@ÿA
`
` ÿ
`
` ÿ
ÿ
ÿ6D
` ÿÿ
` ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
C
`_`#ÿa(R(ÿ'(ÿF / .!ÿ"-ÿ[HH-ÿ%G($ÿ ÿ (ÿ3K5ÿL
`ÿ89:8<ÿ3A C >ÿA?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ
`_`#ÿa(R(ÿ'(ÿF / .!ÿ"-ÿ[HH-ÿ%G($ÿ ÿ (ÿ3K5ÿL
`ÿ89:8<ÿ3A C >ÿA?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ
`b
` bÿ3c c ÿN DÿVÿK
<ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿC
` ÿ
`ÿC
` ÿ
`
` >ÿY ÿ
>ÿ= ÿ Cÿ
>ÿ ÿ
ÿ Y
ÿ
DZ
`& . -ÿ&H-/*E .ÿ, .H-/ÿ"- *G-Pÿ[H\ ÿ#!H- /ÿ -Gÿ \ /ÿ3V6Aÿ89:8<ÿ3=
` >ÿM]?<@
`A
`ÿ ÿ ÿÿV6Aÿ
`& . -ÿ&H-/*E .ÿ, .H-/ÿ"- *G-Pÿ[H\ ÿ#!H- /ÿ -Gÿ \ /ÿ3V6Aÿ89:8<ÿ3=
` >ÿM]?<@
`A
`ÿ ÿ ÿÿV6Aÿ
ÿY D
ÿYÿA
`
`
ÿ
ÿMOÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ
D
`
`d */- .ÿ !-H HP /e"#R`ÿ345ÿ67<ÿ35 >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
`d */- .ÿ !-H HP /e"#R`ÿ345ÿ67<ÿ35 >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ ÿ
>ÿ
` ÿA
`
` ÿA
`
>ÿM >ÿD 6
`>ÿKfÿT
`>ÿKfÿT
C
>ÿ ÿg ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
`
`
D
`
`aH/ ÿ&H.(ÿ'(ÿ1W"ÿ !-H HP /$ÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ35ÿK ÿ899h>ÿ89:^<ÿ3U >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ
`
`
`aH/ ÿ&H.(ÿ'(ÿ1W"ÿ !-H HP /$ÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ35ÿK ÿ899h>ÿ89:^<ÿ3U >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ ÿ
`
`b ÿA ÿÿ
`
`ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
X
`
`ÿ ÿ
`&! !ÿE-ÿ%%&ÿ'(ÿ2 i%* -ÿ012$ÿ"-($ÿ ÿ (ÿ345ÿ67ÿ89::<ÿ35 >ÿ?<@ÿA
`ÿ
`
ÿL
Cÿ6D
` >ÿVÿÿ
` >ÿVÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
`ÿ
C
`
`# j -Jÿ'(ÿ1!H-HPÿ#! .E/(>ÿ ÿ (ÿ35ÿT?ÿ89:9<ÿ3 >ÿ?<@ÿkY
`
`# j -Jÿ'(ÿ1!H-HPÿ#! .E/(>ÿ ÿ (ÿ35ÿT?ÿ89:9<ÿ3 >ÿ?<@ÿkY
ÿ
`ÿC
`ÿC
Dÿl ÿ
`
`9
`
`
`
`9
`
`
`
` ÿ
`
` ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
`
` ÿ ÿ !ÿ"#$%"&'ÿ"%(! ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+,-ÿ. /ÿ012134-ÿ5ÿ01216ÿ+- 7ÿ839 7ÿ986:
`9
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿ
ÿ;
7ÿ; ÿ ÿ- ÿ;
` ÿ; ÿ ÿ
` ÿ; ÿ ÿ
<
` ÿ
`
` ÿ
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ= ÿ
ÿ
`
`ÿ ÿ
`
`
`ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿ
` ÿ ÿ !ÿ>"?#@"#ÿ"#$%"&@ ÿ#A! ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+,-ÿ. /ÿ011B6ÿ+- 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ
`8
`
` ÿ9
`
`7ÿ; ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ= ÿ =
`C ÿ
`
`
`D#A?%"E)ÿF)A?#"&"GDÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ*E@H#GÿI&)A$%"#JA@ÿKE)%JA* ÿ#A! ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011B6ÿ+9 7
`986:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ= ÿ =
`C ÿ
`
`
`D#A?%"E)ÿF)A?#"&"GDÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ*E@H#GÿI&)A$%"#JA@ÿKE)%JA* ÿ#A! ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011B6ÿ+9 7
`986:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ Cÿ ÿ ÿ
` LÿI&)A@! ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ)$$)%@ÿL%"H(ÿM"%&NOJN)7ÿ ÿ)$ÿ*&ÿ+,-ÿ. /ÿ011P6ÿ+Q
`
`
` ÿ
` ÿ Cÿ ÿ ÿ
` LÿI&)A@! ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ)$$)%@ÿL%"H(ÿM"%&NOJN)7ÿ ÿ)$ÿ*&ÿ+,-ÿ. /ÿ011P6ÿ+Q
`
`
7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿR5
`,
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿR5
`,
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`
`KE)%JA*#ÿS*& ) ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿT#J$)NÿH%A?*@J#GÿK@@U#7ÿ 7ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+-ÿV ÿ011P6ÿ+Q C7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`
`W
` ÿ ÿ
`
`KE)%JA*#ÿS*& ) ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿT#J$)NÿH%A?*@J#GÿK@@U#7ÿ 7ÿ)$ÿ*&!ÿ+-ÿV ÿ011P6ÿ+Q C7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`
`W
ÿX ÿ ÿ ÿ
7ÿ
Cÿ
7ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ
7
`
`
`
`
`
` ÿ
`ÿ ÿ 7ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿÿ
` ÿÿ
`YIÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿMJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#Aÿ+-ÿ- ÿ011Z6ÿ+Q 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿ
`= ÿ
`
\ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ< ÿ ÿ011P7ÿ= ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ< ÿ ÿ011P7ÿ= ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ"! ÿ ÿ !ÿ)&&#)$ÿF)A?#"&"GD ÿ#A!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011Z6ÿ+9 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ9 ÿ.
`
`
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
7ÿ ÿ
`= 7ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
`
`= 7ÿ ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`
`
ÿ =
`C ÿ
`
`
`MJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿYIÿD@$)E@ ÿ#Aÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011Z6ÿ+] 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
`C ÿ
`
`
`MJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿYIÿD@$)E@ ÿ#Aÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011Z6ÿ+] 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`= ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ
`= ÿ ÿ
\ÿ
` ÿ<
` ÿ
`ÿ
` ÿ<
` ÿ
`ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿÿ
`?*Oÿ#NH@$%J)@ÿL%"H( ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ#$)%^*A) ÿ#A!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011_6ÿ+V 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ=
`; ÿ ÿ ÿ
`?*Oÿ#NH@$%J)@ÿL%"H( ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿ#$)%^*A) ÿ#A!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011_6ÿ+V 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ=
`; ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
`MJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿYIÿD@$)E@ ÿ#Aÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011`6ÿ+a 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
` ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
`MJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ !ÿYIÿD@$)E@ ÿ#Aÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011`6ÿ+a 7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿ ÿ
` b ÿ ÿ
`=
` ÿ
`Fÿ"^$O*%)ÿD@$)E@ÿ $N!ÿ !ÿMJ$#)@@ÿD@$)E@ ÿ#A!ÿ+4-ÿ5ÿ011`6ÿ+
`7ÿ86:ÿ9
` ÿ
`ÿ[
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ
` ÿX
`;aÿ
` ÿ \ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ011P7ÿ ÿ
`<
` ÿX
`;aÿ
` ÿ \ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ011P7ÿ ÿ
`<
ÿ
`ÿ
`
`ÿ
`
`
`10
`
`
`
`Appellate Cases
`
`Johnsonv. White, et al. (11th Cir. 2021): Counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant Andy Johnson in FTCA case
`concerning alleged sexual assault at U.S. Penitentiary — Atlanta.
`
`Ahmedv. Kifle, et al. (11th Cir. 2015, 2016, 2017): Counsel for Defendant Elias Kifle in various
`appeals regarding alleged defamation claim filed by Ethiopian businessmanagainstexiled Ethiopian
`dissident journalist.
`
`ShawIndustries Group, Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2015): Counsel for Appellant
`and Cross-Appellee Shaw Industries in connection with Inter Partes Review of patentrelated to textile
`manufacturing creels.
`
` ÿ
`
`
`
`
ÿÿ ÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ!"!#$ÿÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,*- ' ++./00)**-'ÿ/'12ÿ3% '(%'ÿ 'ÿ45 /ÿ6-()
`6%'6) ' '7ÿ-**)7)1ÿ()8&-*ÿ-((-&*ÿ-ÿ9 : ÿ,)' )' - 2ÿ;ÿ/*-'-
`< =>ÿÿ?@Aÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ!"Bÿ!"Cÿ!"D#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿE)+)'1-'ÿF* -(ÿG +*)ÿ 'ÿH- %&(
`-00)-*(ÿ )7- 1 '7ÿ-**)7)1ÿ1)+-I- %'ÿ6*- Iÿ+ *)1ÿJ2ÿF %0 -'ÿJ&( ')((I-'ÿ-7- '(ÿ)8 *)1ÿF %0 -'
`1 (( 1)'ÿK%& '-* (
`L MÿN
`6%'6) ' '7ÿ-**)7)1ÿ()8&-*ÿ-((-&*ÿ-ÿ9 : ÿ,)' )' - 2ÿ;ÿ/*-'-
`< =>ÿÿ?@Aÿÿÿ ÿ ÿ!"Bÿ!"Cÿ!"D#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿE)+)'1-'ÿF* -(ÿG +*)ÿ 'ÿH- %&(
`-00)-*(ÿ )7- 1 '7ÿ-**)7)1ÿ1)+-I- %'ÿ6*- Iÿ+ *)1ÿJ2ÿF %0 -'ÿJ&( ')((I-'ÿ-7- '(ÿ)8 *)1ÿF %0 -'
`1 (( 1)'ÿK%& '-* (
`L MÿN
>O
P
ÿQP
`ORAÿN
`ORAÿN
Sÿÿ<O
`=>ÿTPÿLU = AÿN
`=>ÿTPÿLU = AÿN
Sÿ4)1 ÿ ÿ!"B#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ/00)**-'
`-'1ÿ %((./00)**))ÿ: -VÿW'1&( )(ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿN
`-'1ÿ %((./00)**))ÿ: -VÿW'1&( )(ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿN
PÿXP
ÿY)H )Vÿ%+ÿ0-)'ÿ )*-)1ÿ%ÿ)8 *)
`I-'&+-6& '7ÿ6 ))*(
`ZPP ÿÿT>Mÿ9:ÿ!"[#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,) %') ÿ/*H 'ÿ\- (ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿ6) % - ÿ0) %'
`6 -**)'7 '7ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`]P
`M
`I-'&+-6& '7ÿ6 ))*(
`ZPP ÿÿT>Mÿ9:ÿ!"[#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,) %') ÿ/*H 'ÿ\- (ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿ6) % - ÿ0) %'
`6 -**)'7 '7ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`]P
`M
ÿÿLR
ÿ9:ÿ!"[#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ1)- .()')'6)1ÿ,) %') ÿ/ & ÿ^ %V'ÿ3 ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'
`V ÿ6) % - ÿ0) %'ÿ6%'6) ' '7ÿ1)' -*ÿ%+ÿ() H 6)(ÿ 'ÿ(&00% ÿ%+ÿ_ ÿ^ %V'`(ÿ6*)I)'62ÿ0 %6))1 '7(
`T
`ÿÿP>
`V ÿ6) % - ÿ0) %'ÿ6%'6) ' '7ÿ1)' -*ÿ%+ÿ() H 6)(ÿ 'ÿ(&00% ÿ%+ÿ_ ÿ^ %V'`(ÿ6*)I)'62ÿ0 %6))1 '7(
`T
`ÿÿP>
AÿQ
`PaÿLÿXP
`
`PaÿLÿXP
`
ÿ ÿ ÿ!"b#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,) %') ./00)**-'ÿ^%Jÿ3-2ÿ %*)
` 'ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`]
` ÿT
`PRÿÿLcNÿdS
` 'ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`]
` ÿT
`PRÿÿLcNÿdS
`
`a AÿN
SAÿÿÿ4)1 ÿ ÿ!"b#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,*- ' ++./00)**-'ÿ^%()
` % 0 ÿ 'ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ(&II- 2ÿK&17I)'ÿ% 1) ÿ 'ÿ0-)'ÿ '+ '7)I)'ÿ6-()ÿ 'H%*H '7ÿ )I%).6%' %**)1
`(0)-e) ÿ(2()I(
`fPÿg>AÿÿÿÿTRÿg>Aÿÿÿ4)1 ÿ ÿ!"#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿE)+)'1-'./00)**-'ÿ 0*-ÿh1 ÿ '
`-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ6%')I0ÿ% 1) ÿ 'ÿ0-)'ÿ '+ '7)I)'ÿ1 (0&)ÿ 'H%*H '7ÿH)) '- 2ÿ0)( 6 1)(
`XP
`ÿÿT
`==
`
` % 0 ÿ 'ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ(&II- 2ÿK&17I)'ÿ% 1) ÿ 'ÿ0-)'ÿ '+ '7)I)'ÿ6-()ÿ 'H%*H '7ÿ )I%).6%' %**)1
`(0)-e) ÿ(2()I(
`fPÿg>AÿÿÿÿTRÿg>Aÿÿÿ4)1 ÿ ÿ!"#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿE)+)'1-'./00)**-'ÿ 0*-ÿh1 ÿ '
`-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ6%')I0ÿ% 1) ÿ 'ÿ0-)'ÿ '+ '7)I)'ÿ1 (0&)ÿ 'H%*H '7ÿH)) '- 2ÿ0)( 6 1)(
`XP
`ÿÿT
`==
`
M ÿ
`@ÿiPa
`@ÿiPa
ÿj- ÿ!""k#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ1)- .()')'6)1ÿE)+)'1-'./00)**-'
`/*+ )1%ÿ, )%ÿ 'ÿ1 )6ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ1)- ÿ()')'6)
`T
`/*+ )1%ÿ, )%ÿ 'ÿ1 )6ÿ-00)-*ÿ%+ÿ1)- ÿ()')'6)
`T
ÿÿlOP=
ÿB ÿ ÿ!""D#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,) %') ÿ3-H ) ÿm6 %-ÿ -'-*)(ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'
`V ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`nopqrsÿtuvwÿnroxyvsz
`>ÿlOS
`==ÿN
`V ÿ1 (I ((-*ÿ%+ÿ -J)-(ÿ6% 0&(ÿ0) %'
`nopqrsÿtuvwÿnroxyvsz
`>ÿlOS
`==ÿN
Sÿ,5/^ÿ!"k#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ*- 7)ÿ)*)6 %' 6(ÿ(&00* ) ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿ()H) -*ÿ
`N
`N
PÿXP
ÿY)H )Vÿ0 %6))1 '7(ÿ6%'6) ' '7ÿI-6 ')ÿ*)- ' '7ÿ I-7)ÿ0 %6)(( '7ÿ-'1ÿJ-) 2
`6 - 7 '7ÿ)6 '%*%7 )(
`XP
`6 - 7 '7ÿ)6 '%*%7 )(
`XP
SÿdS
`
`aUAÿggTÿÿN
PSÿN
a
SAÿN
Sÿ,5/^ÿ!"[#$ÿ %&'()*ÿ+% ÿ,) %')
`, )()'6)ÿ5)6 '%*%72ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿN
`, )()'6)ÿ5)6 '%*%72ÿ 'ÿ6%'')6 %'ÿV ÿN
PÿXP
ÿ{Mÿ0) %'ÿ )*- '7ÿ6%'-6ÿ6)') ÿ(%+V- )
`
`Harris v. Caldwell (US 2014): Counsel for Petitioner Alvin Harris in connection with certiorari petition
`challenging dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Brown v. Stephens (US 2014): Counsel for death-sentenced Petitioner Arthur Brown Jr. in connection
`with certiorari petition concerning denial of services in support of Mr. Brown’s clemency proceedings.
`
`Cole v. Warden, Georgia State Prison (11th Cir. 2013): Counsel for Petitioner-Appellant Bob Jay Cole
`in appeal of dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Bose Corp. v. SDI Technologies, Inc., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2013): Counselfor Plaintiff-Appellant Bose
`Corp. in appeal of summary judgmentorderin patent infringement case involving remote-controlled
`speaker systems.
`
`Merial Lid., et al. v. Cipla Ltd., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2011): Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Cipla Ltd. in
`appeal of contemptorderin patent infringement dispute involving veterinary pesticides.
`
`Prieto v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. 2008): Counsel for death-sentenced Defendant-Appellant
`Alfredo Prieto in direct appeal of death sentence.
`
`Canales v. Quaterman(5th Cir. 2007): Counsel for Petitioner Javier Ochoa Canales in connection
`with dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Post-Grant Review Proceedings
`
`adv. Qualcomm Inc. (PTAB 2018): Counselfor large electronics supplier in connection with several
`Inter Partes Review proceedings concerning machine learning, image processing, and battery
`charging technologies.
`
`Presence Technology, LLC v. Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (PTAB 2014): Counsel for Petitioner
`Presence Technologyin connection with Inter Partes Review petition relating contact center software
`
`11
`
`11
`
`
`
`Harris v. Caldwell (US 2014): Counsel for Petitioner Alvin Harris in connection with certiorari petition
`challenging dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Brown v. Stephens (US 2014): Counsel for death-sentenced Petitioner Arthur Brown Jr. in connection
`with certiorari petition concerning denial of services in support of Mr. Brown’s clemency proceedings.
`
`Cole v. Warden, Georgia State Prison (11th Cir. 2013): Counsel for Petitioner-Appellant Bob Jay Cole
`in appeal of dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Bose Corp. v. SDI Technologies, Inc., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2013): Counselfor Plaintiff-Appellant Bose
`Corp. in appeal of summary judgmentorderin patent infringement case involving remote-controlled
`speaker systems.
`
`Merial Lid., et al. v. Cipla Ltd., et al. (Fed. Cir. 2011): Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Cipla Ltd. in
`appeal of contemptorderin patent infringement dispute involving veterinary pesticides.
`
`Prieto v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. 2008): Counsel for death-sentenced Defendant-Appellant
`Alfredo Prieto in direct appeal of death sentence.
`
`Canales v. Quaterman(5th Cir. 2007): Counsel for Petitioner Javier Ochoa Canales in connection
`with dismissal of habeas corpuspetition.
`
`Post-Grant Review Proceedings
`
`adv. Qualcomm Inc. (PTAB 2018): Counselfor large electronics supplier in connection with several
`Inter Partes Review proceedings concerning machine learning, image processing, and battery
`charging technologies.
`
`Presence Technology, LLC v. Interactive Intelligence, Inc. (PTAB 2014): Counsel for Petitioner
`Presence Technologyin connection with Inter Partes Review petition relating contact center software
`
`11
`
`11
`
`
`
` ÿ
`
ÿ
ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ!"#$%ÿ!"#&'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿ ÿ01 /ÿ *, ÿ)*/ ÿ2
`3* 32*ÿ124ÿ5 ÿ675 ÿ8 92 1,ÿ/ - :ÿ*ÿ/ ;* <3*/*-- :ÿ, = /ÿ,>, ;ÿ
`?@ABCDA@EÿGÿHIJK@LMNOÿPQR@LQMCDCQOÿHASCS
`6757TÿÿU 75ÿÿ 5ÿ7ÿ )Vÿ) -ÿ!"#&'ÿ 0W)* --%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿ) : ÿ *,ÿ)*/ ÿ2
`: . , ÿ*.ÿ3- 2;,ÿ.*/ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ :ÿ3*9 /,2*
`Z
`3* 32*ÿ124ÿ5 ÿ675 ÿ8 92 1,ÿ/ - :ÿ*ÿ/ ;* <3*/*-- :ÿ, = /ÿ,>, ;ÿ
`?@ABCDA@EÿGÿHIJK@LMNOÿPQR@LQMCDCQOÿHASCS
`6757TÿÿU 75ÿÿ 5ÿ7ÿ )Vÿ) -ÿ!"#&'ÿ 0W)* --%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿ) : ÿ *,ÿ)*/ ÿ2
`: . , ÿ*.ÿ3- 2;,ÿ.*/ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ :ÿ3*9 /,2*
`Z
[5ÿÿÿ\]^ÿ
ÿ _Vÿ` ÿ!"#$'ÿ --%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿa23/*,*.ÿ2ÿ3* >/2Y4
`2./2Y ; ÿ :ÿb/ 34ÿ*.ÿ-23 ,2Yÿ Y/ ; ÿ3 ,
`cdÿZ 5
`2./2Y ; ÿ :ÿb/ 34ÿ*.ÿ-23 ,2Yÿ Y/ ; ÿ3 ,
`cdÿZ 5
ÿe5fÿÿg ÿ57ÿghi75ÿ
ÿ _Vÿ) -ÿ!"#"'ÿ j ;2-*%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->
`*b 2 :ÿ ; */ />ÿ/ ,/ 22Yÿ*/: /%ÿ / -2;2 />ÿ2l+32*%ÿ :ÿ /; ÿ2l+32*ÿ.*/ÿ - 22..ÿ 2*<
`m*/ÿa 23,ÿ2ÿ/ : ; /=%ÿ/ : ÿ:/ ,,%ÿ :ÿ3*+ /. 22Yÿ:2, + ÿ29*-92Yÿ)j8nk n_ oÿ-2 ÿ*.
`3*,; 23,ÿ :ÿ/ ; ,
`ep
`*b 2 :ÿ ; */ />ÿ/ ,/ 22Yÿ*/: /%ÿ / -2;2 />ÿ2l+32*%ÿ :ÿ /; ÿ2l+32*ÿ.*/ÿ - 22..ÿ 2*<
`m*/ÿa 23,ÿ2ÿ/ : ; /=%ÿ/ : ÿ:/ ,,%ÿ :ÿ3*+ /. 22Yÿ:2, + ÿ29*-92Yÿ)j8nk n_ oÿ-2 ÿ*.
`3*,; 23,ÿ :ÿ/ ; ,
`ep
ÿ
`7f5ÿeeÿÿqfÿg7hiÿ5ÿ
`7f5ÿeeÿÿqfÿg7hiÿ5ÿ
ÿ 5ÿ7ÿ aVÿ` ÿ!""r'ÿ s 1,*%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/
`t*/-:ÿu ;*+,ÿk */,ÿ2ÿ/ : ; /=ÿ :ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ3 , ÿ/ Y /:2Yÿ3 ;*+.- Y ÿ / -
`
`ÿvÿwipÿxyz{ÿe5fÿ 5ÿ7ÿÿ|75i ÿe7]ÿeeÿ _Vÿ }ÿ!""~'ÿ u2,4%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿ - 22..,ÿ2
`/ : ; /=%ÿ/ : ÿ:/ ,,%ÿ :ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ3 2 ÿ,4 ; **ÿ /*:+3,
`zh
`t*/-:ÿu ;*+,ÿk */,ÿ2ÿ/ : ; /=ÿ :ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ3 , ÿ/ Y /:2Yÿ3 ;*+.- Y ÿ / -
`
`ÿvÿwipÿxyz{ÿe5fÿ 5ÿ7ÿÿ|75i ÿe7]ÿeeÿ _Vÿ }ÿ!""~'ÿ u2,4%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/ÿ - 22..,ÿ2
`/ : ; /=%ÿ/ : ÿ:/ ,,%ÿ :ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ3 2 ÿ,4 ; **ÿ /*:+3,
`zh
7ÿ7 ÿ
ÿÿy5 fÿ6i
7ÿz%ÿee%ÿ 5ÿ7ÿ Vÿa2ÿ!""~'ÿ u/ =%ÿX'(ÿ)*+, -ÿ.*/
` ; /23 ÿ -9 ÿ2ÿ ÿ2./2Y ; %ÿ/ : ; /=ÿ2./2Y ; %ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; %
`;2, /* /2 2*ÿ*.ÿ/ : ÿ, 3/ ,%ÿ :ÿb/ 34ÿ*.ÿ3*/ 3ÿ:2, + ÿ/ - 2Yÿ*ÿ3 ,ÿ2/*ÿb --ÿ9 -9 ,
`ASCÿAOCQOÿ A@ELQMÿHASCS
` ÿi5 7
` ; /23 ÿ -9 ÿ2ÿ ÿ2./2Y ; %ÿ/ : ; /=ÿ2./2Y ; %ÿ3* >/2Y4ÿ2./2Y ; %
`;2, /* /2 2*ÿ*.ÿ/ : ÿ, 3/ ,%ÿ :ÿb/ 34ÿ*.ÿ3*/ 3ÿ:2, + ÿ/ - 2Yÿ*ÿ3 ,ÿ2/*ÿb --ÿ9 -9 ,
`ASCÿAOCQOÿ A@ELQMÿHASCS
` ÿi5 7
ÿvÿe 7ÿ 5 ÿeeÿÿ7hiÿ
`
`
hhi
75ÿzh
7ÿeeÿ tVÿa*
`!"##'ÿ m >,%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->ÿ*b 2 :ÿ / <:2,3*9 />ÿ:2,;2,, -ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿk ;,+Yÿ2ÿ3 ,
`29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ3*,+; /ÿ - 3/*23,
`ih ÿ65
`!"##'ÿ m >,%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->ÿ*b 2 :ÿ / <:2,3*9 />ÿ:2,;2,, -ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿk ;,+Yÿ2ÿ3 ,
`29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ3*,+; /ÿ - 3/*23,
`ih ÿ65
5ÿih ÿeeÿÿ7hiÿ\
5
ÿÿe5fÿ 5ÿ7ÿ Vÿ ÿ!"##'
` +3= /%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->ÿ*b 2 :ÿ / <:2,3*9 />ÿ:2,;2,, -ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿk ;,+Yÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Y
` -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ3*,+; /ÿ - 3/*23,
`Zi ÿÿ
` +3= /%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->ÿ*b 2 :ÿ / <:2,3*9 />ÿ:2,;2,, -ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿk ;,+Yÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Y
` -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ3*,+; /ÿ - 3/*23,
`Zi ÿÿ
75ÿÿ kVÿ) -ÿ!"##'ÿ +/,%ÿX'(ÿk+33 ,,.+-->ÿ*b 2 :ÿ / <:2,3*9 />ÿ:2,;2,, -
`.*/ÿ: . : ÿk3 /*ÿ)*/ ÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ ,
`.*/;,675 5ÿ
`i5 ÿeeÿÿ7Tÿ[ÿzh
`.*/ÿ: . : ÿk3 /*ÿ)*/ ÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Yÿ3*3 /2Yÿ ,
`.*/;,675 5ÿ
`i5 ÿeeÿÿ7Tÿ[ÿzh
7ÿÿ Vÿ ÿ!"#"'ÿ 0W_ 2--%ÿX'(ÿ0b 2 :ÿ:2,;2,, -ÿ124
` / l+:23 ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿ =ÿ*.ÿ ; /23 ÿ)*/ ÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Y
`
`12
`
`
` / l+:23 ÿ.*/ÿ: . : ÿ =ÿ*.ÿ ; /23 ÿ)*/ ÿ2ÿ3 , ÿ29*-92Yÿ -- Y 2*,ÿ*.ÿ. -, ÿ ÿ; /=2Y
`
`12
`
`
`
`concerning credit cards.
`
`Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Interface, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2007) (Murphy, J.): Counsel for Shaw
`Industries in false patent marking case regarding carpettiles.
`
`Trade Secret Misappropriation & Commercial Disputes
`
`Solaborate Inc. v. Avaya Inc. (Cal. Super. Ct. 2020) (San Bernardino County; Alvarez, J): Counsel
`for Avayain litigation concerning alleged misappropriation of trade secrets and contractual breaches.
`
`T&S Property Management, LLC v. CINC Systems, LLC (N.D. Ga. 2016) (Totenberg, J.): Counselfor
`CINC Systemsin breachof contract declaratory judgment case regarding alleged unlawful copying of
`software.
`
`Southwire Co. v. Novakovic (Super. Ct. Douglas County, Ga. 2011): Counsel for employeein alleged
`trade secret misappropriation case.
`
`Ragsdale v. Twin City Insurance Co. (N.D. Ga. 2005) (Batten, J.): Obtained summary judgmentfor
`insureds in coverage dispute stemming from defense againstallegations of misappropriation of
`softwaretrade secrets.
`
` ÿ ÿ
`
` ÿÿ ÿ ÿ! ÿ" ÿ ÿ#$
%
ÿ&
`
`
ÿ'(()*ÿ#+,-./0ÿ1
*2ÿ3 , 4ÿ5 ÿ6.
`7
`8, ÿÿ5
`4 ÿ-
` ÿ9
`:ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`- ÿ 4
`7
`8, ÿÿ5
`4 ÿ-
` ÿ9
`:ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`- ÿ 4
`;<=>?ÿA?B<?CÿDEF=GG<HG<E=CEHIÿJÿKHLL?<BE=MÿNEFGOC?F
`
` PQ ÿ ÿ! ÿÿR!Sÿ ÿ#3
`4
ÿ6,-
ÿ3
ÿ'('(*ÿ#6
`ÿT
` ÿ3 , /UÿV4W
` X0ÿ1*2ÿÿ3 , 4
`5 ÿVW
`/
`ÿÿ4
` ÿ ÿ
`44 ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ 5ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ,
`4ÿY
` .
`ÿT
` ÿ3 , /UÿV4W
` X0ÿ1*2ÿÿ3 , 4
`5 ÿVW
`/
`ÿÿ4
` ÿ ÿ
`44 ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ 5ÿ
` ÿ ÿ
`ÿ
` ,
`4ÿY
` .
`Z[ ÿ\ Sÿ]^_ ÿ``aÿ! ÿabaÿ S_ ÿ``aÿ#$
%
ÿ&
`
`
ÿ'(cd*ÿ#e Y 0ÿ1
*2ÿ3 , 4ÿ5
`38$3ÿ6/ 9 ÿÿY
` .ÿ 5ÿ
` ÿ 4
`
` /ÿf,9 ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`44 ÿ,4
`75,4ÿ -/ÿ 5
` 5 7
`
`38$3ÿ6/ 9 ÿÿY
` .ÿ 5ÿ
` ÿ 4
`
` /ÿf,9 ÿ
` ÿ
`ÿ
`44 ÿ,4
`75,4ÿ -/ÿ 5
` 5 7
`
` ÿa ÿ! ÿb !g ! ÿ#6,-
ÿ3
ÿ% ,4
` ÿ3 , /0ÿ&
`
` ÿ3 , /0ÿ&
`
ÿ'(cc*2ÿ3 , 4ÿ5 ÿ 9-4 / ÿÿ
`44
`
` ÿ ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ
`
`44
`
` ÿ ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ
`
`h^Pÿ! ÿZÿaSÿ ÿa ÿ#$
%
ÿ&
`
`
ÿ'((i*ÿ#T
` 0ÿ1
` 0ÿ1
*2ÿjY
` ÿ ,99
`/ÿf,9 ÿ5
` , ÿÿ W
` ÿ -, ÿ 99ÿ5 9ÿ 5 ÿ
`
` ÿ
`44
` ÿ 5ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ 5
`8 .
` 5 7
` ÿ
` ÿ
` ÿ ,99
`/ÿf,9 ÿ5
` , ÿÿ W
` ÿ -, ÿ 99ÿ5 9ÿ 5 ÿ
`
` ÿ
`44
` ÿ 5ÿ9
`-- -
` ÿ 5
`8 .
` 5 7
` ÿ
` ÿ
`kOlMEB=CEHIFmn
`4ÿ3 , ÿn ÿ%
`4ÿ3
`9
`ÿ
`ÿVY
` ÿ8
`0oÿpÿ`^ ÿqP ^ÿ#1,4/ÿd0ÿ'('c*
`mr s6, ÿT ÿr
` ÿ5 ÿ8 44 ,
`4ÿr - /ÿt
` 0oÿR ÿ "ÿa ÿa P ÿ
` ^ÿa ÿ#j Y ÿ'(cu*
`mr
` ÿ85 9 ÿt
` 0oÿp PSÿ" ÿ\ÿh ÿ ÿvwSÿR! ÿa ÿ
`\ ^_ÿ#V-4ÿ'(cu*
`m8rÿt
` ÿ
` ÿ . ÿ8
`
`4ÿe
` ÿ3 99 0oÿR ÿ "ÿa ÿa P ÿ
` ^ÿa ÿ#1,4/ÿ'(c)*
`m$
` 0ÿr Wÿxÿ+
`
`ÿy ,ÿ8rÿz. ÿÿy ,ÿ{ ÿxÿr
` ÿV 9 0oÿ
`R ÿ "ÿa ÿa P ÿ ^ÿa ÿ#6 - 9Y ÿ'(cd*
`m|Qÿ
`ÿr
` ÿ%
`9
` 0oÿ]ÿPP Pÿ\ Sÿ S_ _ÿ#$ W 9Y ÿ'(ci*
`m$
%
ÿ&
`
`
ÿz 5, ÿ ÿt5 ÿ6
`/ÿr ÿ8rz0ÿ% - ÿ3 4, ÿ 5ÿz , ÿ
`ÿz }
`9
`
`0oÿpÿ`^ ÿqP ^ÿ#n Y,
`/ÿ'(ci*
`m$
`/ÿr ÿ8rz0ÿ% - ÿ3 4, ÿ 5ÿz , ÿ
`ÿz }
`9
`
`0oÿpÿ`^ ÿqP ^ÿ#n Y,
`/ÿ'(ci*
`m$
%
ÿ&
`
`
ÿz f ÿ8 5 ÿV,9 ÿ, ÿbPÿ! ÿq ^ oÿpÿ`^ ÿqP ^
`#V,, ÿ'(c~*
`
`“Federal Circuit Finds Digital Camera an Abstract Idea,” Fish Litigation Blog (July 6, 2021)
`“Pre-Suit Best Practices for Intellectual Property Litigation,” Association of Corporate Counsel,
`Georgia Chapter (October 2019)
`“Patent InfringementLitigation,” Faculty for Patent Resources Group 3-day Advanced Courses
`Program (April 2019)
`“IP Litigation at the International Trade Commission,” Association of Corporate Counsel,
`Georgia Chapter (July 2017)
`“Negotiating, Preserving & Managing Your IP Rights in Your Vendor & Partner Agreements,”
`Association of Corporate Counsel, Georgia Chapter (September 2016)
`“Daubert and Patent Damages,” MidwestIntellectual Property Symposium (November 2015)
`“N.D. Ga. Refusesto Lift Stay Pending IPR, Despite Conclusion of Reissue and Reexamination
`, Fish Litigation Blog (February 2015)
`“N.D. Ga. Rejects Indefiniteness Argument under Nautilus v. Biosig,” Fish Litigation Blog
`(August 2014)
`
`Insights
`
`
`
`Publications
`
`13
`
`13
`
`
`#V,, ÿ'(c~*
`
`“Federal Circuit Finds Digital Camera an Abstract Idea,” Fish Litigation Blog (July 6, 2021)
`“Pre-Suit Best Practices for Intellectual Property Litigation,” Association of Corporate Counsel,
`Georgia Chapter (October 2019)
`“Patent InfringementLitigation,” Faculty for Patent Resources Group 3-day Advanced Courses
`Program (April 2019)
`“IP Litigation at the International Trade Commission,” Association of Corporate Counsel,
`Georgia Chapter (July 2017)
`“Negotiating, Preserving & Managing Your IP Rights in Your Vendor & Partner Agreements,”
`Association of Corporate Counsel, Georgia Chapter (September 2016)
`“Daubert and Patent Damages,” MidwestIntellectual Property Symposium (November 2015)
`“N.D. Ga. Refusesto Lift Stay Pending IPR, Despite Conclusion of Reissue and Reexamination
`, Fish Litigation Blog (February 2015)
`“N.D. Ga. Rejects Indefiniteness Argument under Nautilus v. Biosig,” Fish Litigation Blog
`(August 2014)
`
`Insights
`
`
`
`Publications
`
`13
`
`13
`
`
`
`Speaking Engagements
`
`e “Patent Litigation: What Non-IP In-House Counsel Need to Know,” ACC Georgia “Deep Dive”
`Luncheon (October 27, 2021)
`
`Recognition
`
`
`
`e Nameda “Leading Patent Professional” by JAM Patent 1000 (2021)
`e Georgia IP Alliance, IP Community Service Award, tri-annual award to individuals who have
`roles in the field of intellectual property and who have madesignificant contributions to
`community service (2020)
`e Super Lawyers, Rising Star (2013 — 2015)
`e Daily Report, On the Rise Award, annual honorfor 40 attorneys under age 40 predicted to make
`lasting contributions to Georgia’s legal community (2014)
`
`“Recent decision underscores claim construction uncertainty at Federal Circuit,” Fish Litigation
`Blog (July 2014).
`“Hot Topics in Intellectual Property,” Daily Report’s In-House Counsel CLE Seminar (July 2013)
`“A Review of Recent Patent Damages Developments,” PLI’s Patent Litigation (November 2009)
`“Developments in Federal Circuit Claim Construction Jurisprudence: from Markman to Texas
`Digital to Phillips and Back Again?,” Patent Claim Construction Workshop, Law Seminars
`International (April 2007)
`“The Importance of Determining Alito’s Brand of Conservatism,” OnlineJournal.com (2005)
`
` ÿ
`ÿ
`
ÿ
ÿ
`
`
`ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ ÿ
` ! ÿ"# ÿ$%&'()
` *
`ÿ+
`, ÿÿ- ÿ.
` ! ÿ"# ÿ$%&'()
` *
`ÿ+
`, ÿÿ- ÿ.
`,
ÿ/ !0ÿ123 45ÿ6 78 92ÿ: 9 2!ÿ:;ÿ<2= 4ÿ"#
ÿ$%&>(
` ?ÿ @Aÿ
`Bÿ ÿ.ÿCD ÿC@
`, ÿE65ÿE 2 ÿ ÿ"F
`@G
` ?ÿ @Aÿ
`Bÿ ÿ.ÿCD ÿC@
`, ÿE65ÿE 2 ÿ ÿ"F
`@G
ÿ$%%H(
` C@
`, ÿÿ
` C@
`, ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
`
`
`ÿ#
,
IÿB
`ÿJ 4K= ÿ
`ÿL2M ÿ
`/ !ÿ
`ÿE!!3ÿÿN Oÿ?DPÿE 2 ÿ:! =ÿ: 49Q ÿR 4K 3Sÿ Tÿ<2= 4ÿ
`6 24 !ÿ"?,
ÿ$%%U(
` +Vÿ-,
`
` +Vÿ-,
`
ÿ
`BÿC
`BÿC
Dÿ?
`W ÿN
`W ÿN
ÿ
`Bÿ
`
`Bÿ
`
@ ÿX ! 2Y 94 !ZQ =ÿ"$%%[(
`\]^_`abcÿebc_c^f^bgh
` .ÿiD
`IÿjVÿF
`k-.ÿ-k*
` ÿ
` ÿFÿ
`ÿl
`Aÿm::ÿn2 4 ÿo/223ÿ/p2qÿ
`
`D
`
`9 Q2 ÿ"r
`G
`\]^_`abcÿebc_c^f^bgh
` .ÿiD
`IÿjVÿF
`k-.ÿ-k*
` ÿ
` ÿFÿ
`ÿl
`Aÿm::ÿn2 4 ÿo/223ÿ/p2qÿ
`
`D
`
`9 Q2 ÿ"r
`G
ÿ$Uÿ$%$&(
`Fÿÿ iDÿ.ÿ.
`Fÿÿ iDÿ.ÿ.
`B
` ÿGÿ6mJÿE 2 ÿstttÿ"$%$&(
`u
`
Dÿ-.ÿ?
ÿ-.ÿ
` ÿv
` ÿv
@ ÿ?A
ÿ
k
ÿA
ÿ
`ÿ@ ÿAV
`ÿV@
`
`
`ÿ@ ÿAV
`ÿV@
`
`
` ÿÿVÿB ÿ
`Bÿ ÿ,
`,
ÿÿAV
`ÿV@ÿÿ DB ÿ
`
`ÿV@ÿÿ DB ÿ
`
G
` ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
` ÿ
`
`
` ÿ
@ ÿ"$%$%(
`<9324ÿ T024ÿ Dÿv
`<9324ÿ T024ÿ Dÿv
ÿ"$%&>ÿwÿ$%&[(
`/ !0ÿ123 4ÿrÿVÿ ÿ?A
`/ !0ÿ123 4ÿrÿVÿ ÿ?A
ÿ
ÿV
`
`
`
`
ÿB
`
`
ÿ'%ÿ
`
`
ÿ
ÿDÿ'%ÿ,
ÿ
`ÿO
` Dÿ
`
`ÿO
` Dÿ
`
G
` ÿ
`ÿu
`
` ÿ
`ÿu
`
DW ÿ
D
ÿ
` ÿ"$%&'(
`
` ÿ"$%&'(
`
O V,
`x)v)ÿ
`
`x)v)ÿ
`
ÿ
`Bÿ?,, ÿB
`
`Bÿ?,, ÿB
`
ÿVÿ
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
