throbber
Optical mapping of repolarization and refractoriness from intact hearts
`IR Efimov, DT Huang, JM Rendt and G Salama
` 1994;90;1469-1480
`Circulation
`Circulation is published by the American Heart Association. 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX
`72514
`Copyright © 1994 American Heart Association. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7322. Online
`ISSN: 1524-4539
`
`
`
`The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is
`located on the World Wide Web at:
`
`http://circ.ahajournals.org
`
`Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation is online at
`
` http://circ.ahajournals.org/subscriptions/

`Permissions: Permissions & Rights Desk, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, a division of Wolters
`Fax:
`Kluwer Health, 351 West Camden Street, Baltimore, MD 21202-2436. Phone: 410-528-4050.
`410-528-8550. E-mail:
` journalpermissions@lww.com

`Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at
`
`http://www.lww.com/reprints
`
`
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 1
`
`

`

`1469
`
`Optical Mapping of Repolarization and
`Refractoriness From Intact Hearts
`
`Igor R. Efimov, PhD; David T. Huang, MD; James M. Rendt, PhD;. Guy Salama, PhD
`
`Heterogeneities of repolarization (R) across
`Background
`the myocardium have been invoked to explain most reentrant
`arrhythmias. The measurement of refractory periods (RPs)
`has been widely used to assess R, but conventional electrode
`and extrastimulus mapping techniques have not provided
`reliable maps of RPs.
`Guinea pig hearts were stained with a
`Methods and Results
`voltage-sensitive dye to measure fluorescence (F) action po-
`tentials (APs) from 124 sites with a photodiode array. AP
`duration (APD) was defined as the time between depolariza-
`tion (dF/dt)max and R time points (ie, the time when AP returns
`to baseline or some percent thereof). However, R time points
`are difficult to determine because AP downstrokes are often
`encumbered by drifting baselines and motion artifacts, which
`make this definition ambiguous. In optical and microelectrode
`recordings, the second derivative of AP downstrokes is shown
`to contain an easily detected, unique local maximum. The
`
`S patial heterogeneities in repolarization have been
`proposed to explain the initiation of arrhythmias
`in cardiac tissue.' Theoretically, a unidirectional
`block can arise in regions containing abrupt variations
`of repolarization.2 Under certain conditions, these vari-
`ations can lead to wavefront fractionation and reentry.
`However, reliable experimental tests of this hypothesis
`have not been achieved.
`The major obstacle to testing this hypothesis is the
`lack of a practical technique to measure distributions of
`repolarization with sufficient spatial and temporal res-
`olution. The most common approach to map repolar-
`ization pathways is indirect, through measurements of
`refractory periods.3 Maps of refractoriness are conven-
`tionally measured by combining multiple extracellular
`electrode recordings with premature extrastimulus tech-
`niques.4 The heart is paced at a basic rate (Si), and a
`premature stimulus (S2) is applied with a variable
`coupling interval (S2-Sl). A disadvantage of this ap-
`proach is that the extrastimulus must be tested with
`variable delays, S2-S1, to determine the refractory pe-
`riod at each recording site and the process must be
`repeated at each electrode site to measure distributions
`of refractory periods. Maps of refractory periods de-
`rived by this approach are time-consuming and assume
`that the refractory period measured at one site did not
`vary while the measurements were repeated at other
`
`Received January 31, 1994; revision accepted May 23, 1994.
`From the Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Univer-
`sity of Pittsburgh (Pa) School of Medicine.
`Correspondence to Guy Salama, Department of Cell Biology
`and Physiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine,
`Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
`© 1994 American Heart Association, Inc.
`
`correlation between the position of this maximum (d'F/dt')m,
`and R has been tested during altered AP characteristics
`induced by changes in cycle length, ischemia, and hypoxia.
`Under these various modifications of the AP, the time points
`of (d F/dt )mM fell at 97.0±2.1% of recovery to baseline.
`Extrastimulus techniques applied to (1) isolated myocytes, (2)
`intact hearts, and (3) mathematical simulations indicated that
`(d2V/dt2)mua coincided with the effective RPs of APs. The
`coincidence of RPs and (d2V/dt )max was valid within 5 milli-
`seconds, for resting potentials of -75 to -90 mV and extra-
`stimuli three times threshold voltage.
`Thus, optical APs and (d2F/dt2)max can be used
`Conclusions
`to map activation, R, and RPs with AP recordings from a
`single heartbeat. (Circulation. 1994;90:1469-1480.)
`Key Words * mapping *
`electrophysiology
`potentials
`
`action
`
`*
`
`sites. As a result, such mapping measurements cannot
`be practically repeated under different physiological
`conditions without compromising both spatial and tem-
`poral resolution. Another difficulty is that the definition
`of refractory period depends on the amplitude, dura-
`tion, and polarity of the stimulating current. Michelson
`et al5 studied refractory periods in normal and ischemic
`myocardium and pointed out the difficulties inherent in
`choosing a standardized threshold current for the defi-
`nition of refractory periods.
`Intracellular microelectrodes provide accurate mea-
`surements of repolarization but are not practical for
`simultaneous measurements from multiple sites be-
`cause of technical difficulty of maintaining multiple
`stable recordings.
`Suction electrodes have been used to measure action
`potential (AP) durations (APDs) and refractory periods
`by monitoring conduction time delays between two
`sites.6 Premature stimuli delivered near the relative
`refractory period increased conduction time delays be-
`cause the extra AP propagated at slower conduction
`velocity. Refractory periods could thus be accurately
`determined and were shown to coincide with AP repo-
`larizations. However, suction electrodes are not practi-
`cal for simultaneous recordings of refractory periods at
`multiple sites and may produce unreliable recordings
`caused by tissue damage.6
`Signal processing techniques have been proposed to
`estimate repolarization by use of unipolar electrograms
`by correlating the most rapid increase in voltage (dV/
`dt)max near the peak of the T wave to the repolarization
`of the local AP.7 Millar et a18 defined an "activation-
`recovery interval" as the time difference between the
`most rapid decrease in voltage in the QRS complex
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 2
`
`

`

`1470
`
`Circulation
`
`Vol 90, No 3
`
`September 1994
`
`(dV/dt)min (activation time) and (dV/dt)ma near the peak
`of the T wave (repolarization time). Experimental8 and
`theoretical9 studies suggested that refractory periods
`were correlated with activation-recovery intervals.
`However, this correlation remained empirical, was
`strongly dependent on the shape, polarity, and kinetics
`of the T wave, and failed for multiphasic T waves.
`Ultimately, it proved to be of limited use because the
`amplitudes and kinetics of T waves were too variable to
`determine refractory periods.
`We have previously used voltage-sensitive dyes and
`imaging technique to simultaneously measure 124 APs
`from the epicardium of perfused hearts.10 In preliminary
`reports, we described signal processing techniques to
`uniquely identify the repolarization time points of fluo-
`rescence (F) APs through (d2F/dt2)max of their down-
`stroke."1 The algorithm was effective to measure repolar-
`ization time points even in optical AP recordings
`containing substantial distortions caused by movement
`artifacts. The method made it possible to measure het-
`erogeneities of repolarization and APDs in normal and
`hypoxic hearts during abrupt cycle length shortening.'2
`The present report investigates the physiological sig-
`nificance of this inflection point detected during AP
`downstrokes by theoretical and experimental ap-
`proaches. The data show that (d F/dtx)mx provides a
`reliable measurement of AP repolarization and is coin-
`cident with AP refractory period under physiological
`resting potentials. Preliminary reports of these findings
`have appeared in abstract form."1113
`Methods
`
`Preparations
`Guinea pigs of either sex weighing between 350 and 450 g
`were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of sodium
`pentobarbital (Nembutal, 30 mg/kg). The hearts were rapidly
`excised, rapidly cannulated at the aorta (within 60 seconds),
`and retrogradely perfused in a modified Langendorif appara-
`tus. The Krebs-Ringer's perfusate consisted of (in mmol/L)
`NaCI 130, KCl 4.75, CaCl2 1.0, MgSO4 1.2, NaHCO3 12.5, and
`glucose 5.0. The solution was continuously gassed with 95%
`02/5% C02, pH adjusted to 7.4+0.1 with NaHCO3. Temper-
`ature was maintained at 35 + PC with a thermistor probe and
`a heat-exchange coil. A perfusion pressure of 80 to 90 cm H20
`was maintained from the beginning of the experiment with
`variable flow rate (oo2 mL. min-1 g-1 heart wt). More de-
`tailed methods describing the perfusion setup, the staining
`procedure, the heart chamber, optics, and computer hardware
`and software were previously reported'10"24 and are briefly
`restated below.
`Hearts were paced at a fixed cycle length, typically 300 or
`350 milliseconds, with a bipolar Ag+ /AgCl electrode placed on
`the epicardium. The output of the pacer was adjusted to 1.5
`times the threshold voltage. A custom-designed perfusion
`chamber was used for studying intact guinea pig hearts. The
`preparation was held in place by a glass window at the front of
`the chamber and side and rear pads to minimize gross move-
`ment of the heart during contractions. Bipolar surface electro-
`gram recordings were measured by use of Teflon-coated silver
`wires (250-,um diameter), with Ag+/AgCl at the exposed tip of
`the wires and a 0.5-mm gap between the two wires. These
`sensing electrodes were sutured or glued to the epicardium to
`maintain stable recordings. The left epicardium was in contact
`with the glass of the front window to reduce the curvature of
`the ventricle and gross movement during contractions of the
`heart. The heart in the chamber was immersed in perfusate,
`which eliminated condensation on the glass window.
`
`Staining Procedures
`A styryl dye, RH-421 (S-1108, lot 2711-2, Molecular Probe),
`was used as the voltage-dependent fluorescent probe. When
`bound to the sarcolemma, RH-421 fluorescence was measured
`at wavelengths above the 645-nm cutoff filter when excited
`with a 520±20-nm interference filter. The dye exhibited a
`large fractional decrease in fluorescence of 6% to 9% per 100
`mV depolarization such that the voltage-dependent responses
`appeared as upside-down APs.14 The signals were automati-
`cally inverted under software to appear as rightside-up APs.
`This dye was chosen because it did not provoke detectable
`pharmacological effects, remained optically stable in solution,
`and exhibited optical APs with high signal-to-noise ratios (up
`to 250:1) for 2 to 4 hours.
`Hearts were stained by gradual injection of 50 to 100 IL
`from a 3 mmol/L stock solution of dye into a 5-mL bubble trap
`situated directly above the aortic cannula. The final dye
`concentration was approximately 2.5 ,mol/L, and 15 to 20
`minutes was allowed for the staining to be completed. The
`procedure resulted in homogeneous staining throughout the
`heart because the dye was efficiently delivered via coronary
`vessels. In experiments lasting more than 4 hours, photo-
`bleaching and/or dye washout reduced the signal amplitudes;
`in such cases, hearts were occasionally restained to restore the
`original signal-to-noise ratio.
`The experiments described in this study were based on a
`total of 20 guinea pig hearts. Six were used to map repolar-
`ization with voltage-sensitive dyes, 2 to prepare isolated myo-
`cytes for single-cell measurements of refractory periods, 6 for
`measurements during hypoxia, and 6 during ischemia. This
`investigation conformed with the Guide for the Care and Use
`of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Insti-
`tutes of Health (NIH publication No 85-23, revised in 1985).
`Instrument Setup
`Details of the optical and recording apparatus have been
`described elsewhere.10 The perfusion chamber containing the
`Langendorff-perfused heart was mounted on a micromanipu-
`lator and positioned along the optical axis of a photodiode
`array scanning apparatus. Light from two 45-W tungsten-
`halogen lamps was collimated, passed through a 520±20-nm
`interference filter, reflected off a 450 dichroic mirror, and
`focused on the left epicardium of the heart with a 35-mm
`camera lens (50 mm, f 1:1.4, Nikon). Epifluorescent light from
`the stained heart was collected, projected through a 645-nm
`cutoff filter, and focused to form an image of the heart on a
`12x 12-element photodiode array. The photodiode array con-
`sisted of 144 square diode elements, with each diode having
`dimensions of 1.4 x 1.4 mm separated by 0.1 mm of dead space.
`Of the 144 available diodes, 124 diodes were monitored; five
`elements from each corner were disregarded. The distances
`between the preparation, the lens, and the array could be
`varied and thus, the image of the heart falling on the array
`could be magnified by 1.5 to 6 times. In the present study, APs
`were recorded from a 12x 12-mm2 region of the epicardium.
`The depth of field of the optics restricted the detection of dye
`fluorescence to a depth of 144 ,um from the surface of the
`epicardium.14
`Signal Acquisition
`A scan of data acquisition consisted of 128 simultaneously
`recorded traces: 124 optical plus 4 instrumentation channels.
`The multiplexed instrumentation channels monitored the
`stimulus pulses, two surface electrogram signals located on the
`atrium and ventricle, and in some experiments, left ventricular
`pressure by use of a latex balloon inserted in the left ventric-
`ular cavity and a Statham pressure transducer (model P-10). A
`scan consisted of a continuous recording of these 128 channels
`for 1.2 to 34 seconds. The photocurrents from 124 diodes were
`fed to a current-to-voltage converter, amplified, digitized (1.3
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 3
`
`

`

`Efimov et al
`
`Optical Mapping
`
`1471
`
`A B C D E
`
`X, <~
`
`600 ms
`400
`200
`0
`Tracings showing signal processing of optical action
`FIG 1.
`potentials (APs) to resolve depolarization and repolarization time
`points. A, An optical AP was recorded (at 1.3 kHz) from a
`lx1-mm area of left epicardium from a perfused guinea pig
`heart. The voltage-dependent optical signal corresponded to a
`fractional decrease of fluorescence of 8%. B, The fluorescence
`(F) AP shown in (A) was filtered with a boxcar of 8 milliseconds'
`duration. C, Its first time derivative was obtained after filtration
`from trace B. D, Trace C was filtered with a 23-millisecond
`boxcar, and the time of depolarization was taken at the time point
`of (dF/dt)ma, of the AP upstroke (arrows on trace D). E, The time
`derivative of trace D is shown; note the unique peak that
`coincides with the end of the repolarization phase of the AP. The
`repolarization time point was taken at (d2F/dt2)ma
`(arrows on
`trace E).
`
`photodiode array (Fig 1A). The diode recorded the sum
`of voltage-dependent optical response of a group of
`cells (viewed by the diode) contained in a 1 x 1-mm2 area
`of left epicardium and a depth of 144 ,um. The recording
`contained high-frequency noise (Fig 1A), which was
`filtered with a boxcar of 8 milliseconds' duration to
`obtain Fig 1B. The depolarization time point of an AP
`recorded with an intracellular electrode is convention-
`ally defined at the maximum first derivative of the AP
`upstroke, (dV/dt)ma. For optical APs, the time point of
`depolarization was also defined as the maximum first
`derivative of the fluorescence AP upstroke (dF/dt)ma,
`because it corresponded to the time when most of the
`cells viewed by a diode were depolarizing. The depolar-
`ization time point was detected by taking the first
`derivative of Fig 1B to obtain Fig 1C (dF/dtma,X
`at
`arrows). The first derivative trace (Fig 1C) was filtered
`with a 23-millisecond boxcar to generate Fig 1D before
`taking the second derivative to generate Fig 1E. The
`repolarization time point is typically defined as the
`recovery of the AP back to baseline, which provides an
`accurate method to measure AP duration whenever the
`downstroke has a large negative slope and returns
`abruptly to its resting potential. When the downstroke
`returns gradually to baseline, repolarization is alterna-
`tively defined as a percentage of recovery to baseline.
`These definitions are often not suitable for optical
`recordings because movement artifacts distort the repo-
`larization phase (see Fig 2). Consequently, the repolar-
`ization time point was taken as the time of maximum
`
`kHz per channel, 8 bits per sample), and stored in a memory
`buffer of a Digital Equipment Corp PDP 11-73 computer.
`
`Experiments on Isolated Myocytes
`Guinea pig myocytes were isolated with collagenase and
`pronase as previously described."5 Current clamp measure-
`ments were performed with an Axoclamp 1D. Data were
`collected at a 5-kHz sampling rate. Patch pipettes were filled
`with a solution of the following composition (in mmol/L): KCl
`140, HEPES 10, MgATP 5, EGTA 10 at pH 7.25. Cells were
`superfused with an external solution containing (in mmol/L):
`NaCl 130, KCl 5, MgCl2 1, CaCl2 2, HEPES 10, glucose 5, pH
`7.35 at 37°C.
`Computer Simulation
`Computer simulations were performed with mathematical
`models of electrical activity in ventricular myocardial fiber.'6
`The Beeler-Reuter model is a system of first-order nonlinear
`differential equations of the Hodgkin-Huxley type. To solve
`the system, an implicit scheme with time step At=0.01 milli-
`second was used. Activation and inactivation parameters in a
`model of Hodgkin-Huxley type obey the usual first-order
`equation
`
`dy/dt=a,(1 -y)-,8y(y)
`where y is a parameter (m, h, etc), t is time (milliseconds), and
`a; and /ly are rate constants (milliseconds). If we call y the
`parameter value at the nth time step (At), the finite-difference
`equation for the time derivative yields
`(yn+l-yn)/,At =acy(l_yn+l) _ 8 (yn+l)
`
`which can be rewritten to
`y+ 1 = (yn + a,At)/ [1 + (a, +1y)At]
`The equation for membrane potential is
`dE/dt=Xi/C=Ig(E-Er)/C
`where E is the membrane potential (millivolts), i
`is ionic
`currents (I£A/cm2), and C is the membrane capacitance (,uF/
`cm2). The finite-difference equation for the time derivative in
`this case is
`
`(En+1-En)/,At=(l/Q1g(En+1 Er)
`which takes the form
`En+l=[En+ (At/C)z;gEr]/[1 +(lvt/C)g]1
`Stimulations of a model cell with normal Beeler-Reuter
`parameters were made by applying an external current pulse
`with amplitude ie,t==12 /LA/cm2 and duration At=5 millisec-
`onds. Computations were performed on IBM/PC-386 clone
`and the CRAY C90 of the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center.
`Programs were written with Borland C+ + compiler.
`Results
`Second Derivative of the Cardiac AP
`A signal-processing technique was used to detect the
`activation (depolarization) and recovery (repolariza-
`tion) time points of fluorescence (F) APs. The activa-
`tion time point was defined as the maximum first
`derivative (dF/dt)max of the AP upstroke. The recovery
`time point was defined as the maximum second deriva-
`tive of the AP downstroke, (d2F/dt')mx, because the
`second derivative of the cardiac AP was found to exhibit
`a local maximum between the most negative slope of the
`AP downstroke and the return to baseline."1-'3 Fig 1
`illustrates the method. Fluorescence APs are first re-
`corded from the epicardium by one of the diodes on the
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 4
`
`

`

`1472
`
`Circulation
`
`Vol 90, No 3
`
`September 1994
`
`56
`
`16
`
`16
`
`54
`
`54
`
`122
`
`122
`
`F
`
`F"
`
`:5: :
`
`| AF/F=%
`
`16
`
`.
`
`---j _:
`:.
`
`J
`
`-
`
`i
`
`.. v
`P.
`'I
`
`=
`
`2mg
`
`_
`
`100 ms
`
`Tracings show that (d2FIdt2),,
`of action potential
`FIG 2.
`(AP) downstrokes are not distorted by motion artifacts. Four
`of 124 simultaneously recorded APs are shown, and each is
`followed by its second derivative determined as described
`in Fig 1. The AP signal from diode 56 was chosen as an
`example of an optical AP with negligible motion artifact. APs
`from diodes 16, 54, and 122 were selected for their sub-
`stantial levels of motion artifacts. Their second derivatives,
`d2F/dt2, show prominent peaks at the repolarization time
`points of the APs. The computer algorithm automatically
`determined (d2F/dt2)ma and placed a "tick" mark at the
`calculated repolarization time point. The algorithm identi-
`fied unique repolarization time points for 95±2% of the APs
`recorded by the array. Developed force was measured with
`a balloon inserted into the left ventricular cavity. Peak
`developed force occurred during or just before the rapid
`phase of repolarization, and developed force was substan-
`tial during the repolarization phases, which accounted for
`the movement artifact. However, the second derivative of
`the force (and most likely movement artifacts) was relatively
`flat during repolarization.
`
`A
`
`150
`
`E Sf
`a 125
`
`B
`
`140
`
`120
`
`100l
`
`O 100
`
`0
`
`b
`
`95
`
`90
`
`1 00
`
`80
`,,_.____X___100
`
`~
`
`400
`300
`200
`Cycle Length (ms)
`
`290
`
`50D
`
`1O
`
`250
`200
`Cycle Length (ms)
`
`FIG 3.
`Graphs showing that (d2F/dt2),m, coincides with action
`potential (AP) repolarization under vanous physiological and
`pathological conditions. The correlation between (d2F/dt2),ms
`and repolarization was tested in simulations of the AP by use of
`the Beeler-Reuter model and with optical recordings under
`various conditions. AP durations (APD) were defined as the time
`difference dF/dt,,-(d2F/dt2)m,,
`of AP upstrokes and down-
`strokes. APs recorded by 12 of the 124 diodes were chosen for
`their negligible levels of movement artifact and were analyzed to
`correlate their percent repolarization (or recovery back to base-
`line) to the time point of (d2F/dt2),n,. Percent of repolarization
`was measured at the time point of (d2F/dt2),,,. For mathematical
`simulations, APDs were defined in the same way; that is, as the
`difference between (dV/dt)max and (d2V/dt2),,ax. A, APs were
`generated from Beeler-Reuter simulations and their APDs mea-
`sured as a function of cycle length (CL) (top trace). The percent
`repolarization at the time point of (d2V/dt2),,, was determined for
`APs at each CL and plotted in the lower graph. The data show
`that as APDs increased from 115.46 to 141.71 milliseconds with
`CLs increasing from 120 to 500 milliseconds, the time point of
`(d2V/Idt)max coincided with 99.46±0.23% (mean+SD) repolariza-
`tion back to baseline. B, The equivalent analysis was repeated
`with optical APs from the left epicardium of guinea pig hearts
`~paced at different cycle lengths. A bipolar stimulating electrode
`was placed on the right atrium to pace the heart at faster rates
`than the intrinsic pacemaker rate. APDs from 12 central diodes
`were analyzed to test the correlation between (d2F/dt2),,. and
`the percent repolarization. Top plot, Each data point represents
`jthe mean APD±SD for 12 APs recorded at a given cycle length.
`APDs increased from 94.09 to 130.39 milliseconds with increas-
`ing cycle lengths from 170 to 250 milliseconds. Bottom plot,
`Each data point represents the averaged percent repolar-
`ization+SD at the times that correspond to (d2FIdt2),
`of the 12
`APs; (d2F/dt2)max
`occurred at 96.14±0.82% repolarization
`(mean±SD). C and D, Same analysis as in B except that APDs and percent repolarization were plotted as a function of time of ischemia
`(C) and hypoxia (D). Preparations were paced at CL=350 milliseconds. lschemia experiments were carried out at 350C, APDs decreased
`from 156.52 to 81.42 milliseconds in 5 minutes of ischemia, and (d2F/dt2),
`fell at 96.96±1.44% of repolarization. Hypoxia experiments
`were carried out at 23°C, APDs decreased from 215 to 192 milliseconds in 30 minutes, and (d2F/dt^), fell at a similar percent
`repolarization of 95.67±0.43%. The higher percent repolarization in theoretical compared with the experimental results was attributed
`to the origins of optical signals, which represent the summed response of hundreds of cells in a patch of myocardium viewed by a diode.
`Experiments shown in B through D were reproduced in six hearts.
`
`C
`
`200
`
`\
`
`100' °°~
`
`D
`
`220-
`
`200
`
`\
`
`P.
`
`50
`100
`
`90
`
`1180 _
`I100
`
`95
`
`90
`
`5
`3
`4
`2
`0
`1
`Time of Ischemia (min)
`
`30
`10
`20
`0
`Time of Hypoxia (min)
`
`l
`
`X
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 5
`
`

`

`Efimov et al
`
`Optical Mapping
`
`1473
`
`Plots showing Beeler-Reuter simulation of ac-
`FIG 4.
`tion potential (AP) and (d2V/dt2)ma,. An AP was simu-
`lated for model guinea pig ventricular cells with a
`-83-mV resting potential, paced at 1 Hz. A, Superpo-
`sition of the AP and its second derivative. B, Time
`course of the inward currents carried by voltage-gated
`Na+ (INa+) and Ca2, (Is) channels. C, Time course of
`inward (IK1) and outward (l1,) rectifying K' channels. D,
`Activation (m) and inactivation (h) gates of voltage-
`gated Na+ channels.
`
`0.05
`mV/ms2
`
`0.00
`
`-0.05
`
`2
`
`0
`s A/cm
`-1
`
`-2
`
`-3
`
`-4
`
`1
`
`2cm2
`,/cm2
`
`0
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`0.0
`
`0
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`400
`
`500
`
`'Na13
`,|INa
`
`SSS@~~~~~~~--------------------------
`
`---
`
`:~
`
`.
`
`0
`
`1
`
`,
`
`2
`
`I
`
`.
`
`3
`
`0
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300 ms 400
`
`kL
`
`I
`.Xl
`
`500
`
`C
`
`mV
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`0
`g A/cm
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`5
`gA/cm4
`
`4 3 2
`
`0
`
`0
`
`100
`
`200
`
`300
`
`400
`
`500
`
`d2F/dt2 of the AP downstroke, a time point that fell
`between minimum dF/dt of the downstroke and the
`return to resting potential as in Fig 1E (arrows).
`The second derivative of the optical AP was a partic-
`ularly useful (although empirical) method to define
`repolarization because it identified a unique time point,
`even for AP downstrokes that are distorted by motion
`artifacts. Of 124 simultaneous AP recordings, approxi-
`mately one half of the signals had negligible movement
`artifact, and repolarization could be determined as a
`percentage of recovery to baseline. For the remaining
`half of the APs, the return to baseline was ambiguous to
`various degrees because of movement artifacts. Fig 2
`shows an example of an AP recording with negligible
`movement artifact (trace 1) followed by APs (traces 2
`through 4) selected for the different kinetics of their
`movement artifacts. Even though the time course and
`direction of movement artifacts was unpredictable, we
`found that the second derivatives (shown below each
`trace) detected unique maxima that seemed indepen-
`dent of the movement artifact and thus appeared to
`identify AP repolarization time points. A possible ex-
`planation for the stable (d2F/dt2)ma,, in the presence of
`movement artifacts may be the relatively slow rate of
`change of force (trace F) during the repolarization
`phase of the heart. For instance, the second derivative
`of the left ventricular pressure wave was constant during
`
`the repolarization phase (trace F") and was not likely to
`temporally displace the voltage-dependent inflection
`point.
`Correlation Between (d2F/dt2)max and
`Repolarization Time Points
`The second derivative of AP downstrokes served as a
`useful algorithm to identify repolarization even in the
`presence of movement artifacts. However, to generate
`maps describing propagation of repolarization across
`the epicardium, it is important to demonstrate that
`(d2F/dt2)max occurred reproducibly at the same percent
`recovery to baseline and that changes in AP character-
`istics (eg, shape and/or duration) did not shift (d2F/
`dt2)max relative to the percent recovery. The correlation
`between (d2F/dt2)m and percent recovery was therefore
`tested under various experimental conditions and pac-
`ing frequencies. APDs from Beeler-Reuter simulations
`of the AP were calculated from the depolarization time
`point defined at (dV/dt)m, of AP upstrokes minus the
`repolarization time point defined at (d2V/dt2)m,, of AP
`downstrokes. For optical APs, APDs were calculated by
`the same algorithm except that (dV/dt)ma, was substi-
`tuted by (dF/dt)ma, and (d2V/dt2)m by (d2F/dt2)max. Per-
`cent of AP recovery back to baseline was measured at
`the point of (d2V/dt2)ma, [or (d2F/dt2)ma.. and plotted
`along with changes in APDs.
`
`Downloaded from
`
`circ.ahajournals.org
`
` at Washington University on November 3, 2009
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2024 - Page 6
`
`

`

`1474
`
`Circulation
`
`Vol 90, No 3
`
`September 1994
`
`50
`
`mV
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`50
`
`mv
`
`0
`
`-50
`
`-100
`
`ms
`600
`
`400
`
`200
`
`0
`
`200
`
`400
`
`600
`
`1
`
`>1
`
`Plots showing refractory period predicted by the
`FIG 5.
`Beeler-Reuter model using premature stimuli. A, Second
`derivative of simulated action potential (AP) shows a
`prominent local maximum. B, Simulations of APs elicited
`by a pacing stimulus (S,) followed by premature stimuli
`(S2). Stimulations were modeled as square pulses with
`an amplitude of 12 pA/cm2 (ie, 2 times threshold voltage)
`and a duration of 5 milliseconds. The basic cycle length
`(S,) was 1000 milliseconds, and premature beats were
`applied once every 10 basic stimuli, at variable S2-S1
`intervals. C, Plot of additional depolarization time in-
`duced by a premature pulse S2 as a function of S2-S1
`interval. The increase in depolarization time is negligible
`when S2 fires during the absolute refractory period, and
`the total depolarization time begins to increase when
`S2-S1 is longer than 279 milliseconds (arrows), that is,
`when S2 fires past the time point of (d2V/dt)ma,x, ie, the
`end of the refractory period. Simulations were done on
`an IBM PC/386 clone computer. Integration of the equa-
`tions was performed with an implicit scheme with a time
`step At=0.01 milliseconds.
`
`0
`
`0
`
`200 m s 400
`
`600
`
`The consistent correlation of (d2F/dt2)ma,,, with repo-
`larization is illustrated in Fig 3. In Fig 3A, APDs were
`calculated with the Beeler-Reuter model based on
`(d2V/dt2)m,,a
`and plotted as a function of basic cycle
`length (CL, in milliseconds). The simulation predicted
`the expected increase of APDs at longer CL and showed
`that (d2V/dt2)m fell in the range of 99% to 100%
`recovery to baseline (A, bottom plot). The longer CLs
`(120 to 500 milliseconds) caused significant increases in
`APDs from 115.46 to 141.71 milliseconds; yet, the
`simulation experiment predicted that (d2V/dt2)m fell at
`99 ±0.52% of recovery for this range of APDs. Note that
`there was a slight decrease in percent repolarization at
`(d2V/dt2)max, which reflected changes in AP shape at
`longer CLs. Microelectrode recordings of APs from
`isolated myocytes indicated that (d2V/dt2)ma,
`fell at
`99.46±0.23% (mean±SD) of recovery (n=12 APs),
`which was in excellent agreement with findings from the
`Beeler-Reuter model. In Fig 3B, optical APs were
`measured from intact guinea pig hearts stained with a
`voltage-sensitive dye and imaged on a photodiode array.
`APDs increased from 94.09 to 130.39 milliseconds with
`increasing CL from 170 to 250 milliseconds (top), and
`(d2F/dt2)m.a fell at 96.14±0.82% of recovery to baseline.
`In Fig 3B, each data point represents the mean±SD of
`APD from a total of 12 optical APs from the center of
`the array. APDs were also modulated by metabolic
`perturbations. In Fig 3C and 3D, 24 APDs from central
`diodes were averaged and plotted as a function of time
`
`of ischemia and hypoxia, respectively. Ischemia in-
`duced by stopping coronary flow to the heart induced
`dramatic decreases in APD, from 156.52 to 81.42
`milliseconds. These changes in APDs did not alter the
`correlation between (d2F/dt2)m,,. and percent of recov-
`ery. That is, (d2F/dt2)ma fell at 96.95±1.44% during
`ischemia. Hypoxia (30 minutes) induced by switching
`from oxygen- to nitrogen-saturated Ringer's solution
`decreased APDs from 215 to 192 milliseconds. Again,
`(d2FIdt2)ma
`fell at 95.67±0.43% recovery to baseline.
`Note that this hypoxia experiment was carried out at
`room temperature (23°C), resulting in longer APDs
`(Fig 3D) compared with the other studies run at 35°C
`(Fig 3A through 3C). For Fig 3C and 3D, each point
`represented the mean APD±SEM of 124 optical APs
`as a function of time of ischemia or hypoxia. Fig 3B
`through 3D were generated from optical AP record-
`ings with excellent signal-to-noise ratio and negligible
`movement artifact such that the percent recovery to
`baseline could be readily determined. In Fig 4A, an
`AP was simulated for a guinea pig ventricular cell
`based on the Beeler-Reuter model and the ionic
`currents of voltage-gated Na+ (iNa+) and Ca21 (i,)
`channels (Fig 4B) and inward (iKl) and outward (i.1)
`K' rectifying channels (Fig 4C). The AP downstroke
`exhibits a maximum rate of voltage change, (d2V/
`dt2)ma, on its return to baseline (Fig 4A). The occur-
`rence of (d2V/dt2)max is a direct consequence of the
`kinetics of the AP do

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket