`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`
`Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Tuesday, October 12, 2021 2:16 PM
`Jeremy Monaldo; Trials
`QE-Alivecor; Drew Holmes; Michael Kim; IPR50095-0033IP1; Quincy Lu; Jim Glass
`RE: IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, IPR2021-00972 – Reply to Preliminary Response
`
`[EXTERNAL EMAIL from trials@uspto.gov]
`
`Counsel: Petitioner is authorized to file a 5-page Reply to the discretionary denial arguments advanced in Patent
`Owner’s Preliminary Response in each of IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, and IPR2021-00972. Petitioner’s Reply shall
`be limited to addressing developments in the co-pending ITC case that occurred after the filing of the Petition and shall
`be filed no later than October 25, 2021.
`
`Patent Owner is authorized to file a 5-page Sur-Reply responding to Petitioner’s Reply. Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply shall
`be limited to addressing issues raised in Petitioner’s Reply and shall be filed no later than November 8, 2021.
`
`Thank you,
`
`Maria King
`Deputy Chief Clerk for Trials
`Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
`703-756-1288
`
`From: Jeremy Monaldo <Monaldo@fr.com>
`Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 1:13 PM
`To: Trials <Trials@USPTO.GOV>
`Cc: QE-Alivecor <qe-alivecor@quinnemanuel.com>; Drew Holmes <drewholmes@quinnemanuel.com>; Michael Kim
`<michaelkim@quinnemanuel.com>; IPR50095-0033IP1 <IPR50095-0033IP1@fr.com>; Quincy Lu
`<quincylu@quinnemanuel.com>; Jim Glass <jimglass@quinnemanuel.com>
`Subject: IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, IPR2021-00972 – Reply to Preliminary Response
`
`CAUTION: This email has originated from a source outside of USPTO. PLEASE CONSIDER THE SOURCE before responding, clicking on
`links, or opening attachments.
`
`Your Honors,
`
`Petitioner requests authorization to file a 5-page reply to the discretionary denial arguments advanced in the
`preliminary response in each of IPR2021-00970, IPR2021-00971, and IPR2021-00972. Good cause exists for a reply
`because each preliminary response addresses developments in the co-pending ITC case that occurred after petition
`filing.
`
`1
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2014 - Page 1
`
`
`
`Patent Owner opposes the request because the grounds identified do not constitute good cause for additional
`briefing. If Petitioner’s request is granted, Patent Owner requests a surreply of equal length and timing. Petitioner does
`not oppose a surreply of equal length and timing.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`Jeremy
`
`
`
`Jeremy Monaldo :: Principal :: Fish & Richardson P.C.
`+1 (202) 626-7717 direct :: Monaldo@fr.com
`fr.com :: Bio :: LinkedIn :: Twitter
`
`
`
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential
`and privileged information. Any unauthorized use or disclosure is prohibited. If you are not the
`intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original
`message.
`***************************************************************************************************
`*************************
`
`2
`
`AliveCor Ex. 2014 - Page 2
`
`