throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`___________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`___________________
`
`
`APPLE, INC.,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ALIVECOR, INC.,
`Patent Owner
`
`___________________
`
`Case IPR2021-00970
`Patent No. 9,572,499
`___________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF SEAN PAK IN SUPPORT OF
`MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`I, Sean Pak, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
`
`LLP, counsel for Patent Owner AliveCor, Inc. (“AliveCor”). I submit this
`
`declaration in support of the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sean Pak. I
`
`have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon
`
`as a witness, I could and would testify to such facts under oath.
`
`2.
`
`I have been in private practice in the field of litigation since 2002. For
`
`the majority of that time, my practice has focused on the field of intellectual property
`
`litigation and, in particular, patent litigation.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of California. I am
`
`also admitted to practice before the following Courts:
`
`• United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
`
`• United States District Court for the Central District of California;
`
`• United States District Court for the Southern District of California;
`
`4.
`
`I have never been suspended, disbarred, sanctioned, or cited for
`
`contempt by any court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had a court or administrative body deny my application for
`
`admission to practice.
`
`6.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide
`
`and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`7.
`
`I agree to be subject to the United States Patent and Trademark Office
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct, as set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq., and
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`8.
`
`I have not previously sought pro hac vice appearance in any inter partes
`
`review action.
`
`9.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I have
`
`reviewed U.S. Patent No. 9,572,499 (“the ’499 patent”) and the prior art references
`
`that are asserted by Apple to invalidate that patent.
`
`10.
`
`I currently represent AliveCor in Case No. 6-20-cv-01112 in the United
`
`States District Court for the Western District of Texas, in which AliveCor alleges
`
`that Apple infringes the ’499 patent and Apple asserts in defense that the claims of
`
`the ’499 patent are invalid. I also represent AliveCor in investigation 337-TA-1266
`
`before the United State International Trade Commission.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`Executed in San Francisco, California on February 21, 2022.
`
`/s/ Sean S. Pak
`
`Sean S. Pak
`seanpak@quinnemanuel.com
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
`SULLIVAN, LLP
`50 California Street, 22nd Floor
`San Francisco, California 94111
`Tel: (415) 875-6600
`Fax: (415) 875-6700
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket