throbber
EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 2040
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 1 of 7
`
`

`

`Exhibit A-1
`
`reference to the ‘218 Patent.
`1 As the ‘218, ‘855, and ‘787 Patent share a common specification, Plaintiff cites to the shared specification of all three patents by
`
`22:57-23:32.
`15:39-17:11, 20:59-21:47,
`9:30-10:40, 10:41-14:31,
`2A-F, 3A-C, 6:33-7:12,
`'009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`22:57-23:32.
`15:39-17:11, 20:59-21:47,
`9:30-10:40, 10:41-14:31,
`2A-F, 3A-C, 6:33-7:12,
`'009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`'009: All
`claims
`'787: All
`claims
`218: All
`
`security channel
`
`2
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`Construction
`
`claims
`'009: All
`claims
`2181: All
`Claim Nos.
`
`secured channel
`
`1
`
`Claim term
`
`DISPUTED TERMS
`
`I.
`
`PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2041
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 2 of 7
`
`

`

`Exhibit A-2
`
`not agree that such reservation is proper under the rules, and reserves all rights to contest any such arguments.
`2 Google has indicated that it “reserves the right” to purse indefiniteness arguments regarding this term at a later stage. RFCyber does
`
`
`
`40.
`14:32-59, 15:18-33, 16:18-
`6A-B, 7, 7:2-12, 12:58-13:6,
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`'009 Patent at FIGS. 1A, 1E,
`
`41, 4:57-66, 5:60-6:10.
`218 Patent at FIG. 2, 2:25-
`
`
`
`7, 12:47-14:68, 17:23-48.
`3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C, 6A-B,
`'046 Patent at 1A-B, 2A-F,
`
`
`
`4A-C, 4:35-5:29, 5:50-7:44.
`218 Patent at FIGS. 2, 3A-C,
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`
`
`constructions.
`Defendant's proposed
`to rebut and respond to
`claim constructions, or
`support of its proposed
`Mark T. Jones in
`or testimony of Dr.
`the expert declaration
`Plaintiff may rely on
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`
`
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`All claims
`claims
`'787: All
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`218: All
`
`wired network2
`payment server over a
`smart card and the
`the e-purse applet in the
`communication between
`facilitates
`contactless interface that
`
`5
`
`4 Applet
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`17
`'787: 6-7, 16-
`'855: 1, 9
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`218: 1, 11
`Construction
`Claim Nos.
`
`initial security channel”
`channel on top of the
`[creating] “a security
`
`Claim term
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 2042
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 3 of 7
`
`

`

`5:4, 5:60-6:54, 8:13-25.
`3A-C, 4A-C, 2:9-41, 4:47-
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`16:29, 20:13-21:15.
`7, 2:22-3:33, 8:25-53, 13:41-
`3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C, 6A-B,
`'046 Patent at 1A-B, 2A-F,
`
`18:23-62.
`11:41-13:6, 15:50-17:2,
`3:32-4:18, 10:41-1:26,
`6A-B, 7, 1:45-67, 2:41-52,
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`'009 Patent at FIGS.1A-B,
`
`
`
`
`
`20:6, 21:48-22:18, 23:33-59.
`10:3-40, 14:37-18:6, 19:29-
`C, 4A-C, 2:41-63, 6:40-54,
`Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2, 3A-
`'009 Patent at FIGS. '218
`
`6:10, 7:10-8:12.
`3:46-4:46, 4:57-5:4, 5:30-
`3A-C, 4A-C, 1:50-2:46,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`
`
`Action.
`21 Response to Office
`'218 File History, 2010-12-
`
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A-3
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`'009: All
`12, 16
`'787: 2, 6-7,
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`218: All
`
`install / installed
`
`7
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`Construction
`
`e-purse / electronic purse 218: All
`
`Claim Nos.
`
`Claim term
`
`6
`
`
`
`
`claims
`'046: All
`'009: 3-5
`claims
`'787: All
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 2043
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 4 of 7
`
`

`

`Exhibit A-4
`
`not agree that such reservation is proper under the rules, and reserves all rights to contest any such arguments.
`3 Google has indicated that it “reserves the right” to purse indefiniteness arguments regarding this term at a later stage. RFCyber does
`
`
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`41, 4:8-5:29, 6:26-54.
`3A-C, 4A-C, 1:13-22, 2:10-
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`5:4, 5:60-7:9.
`3A-C, 4A-C, 2:9-41, 4:47-
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`22:57-23:32.
`15:39-17:11, 20:59-21:47,
`9:30-10:40, 10:41-14:31,
`2A-F, 3A-C, 6:33-7:12,
`'009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`7:45-55.
`4:22, 4:35-56, 5:50-7:9,
`3A-C, 4A-C, 1:60-2:9, 3:46-
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`218: 3, 14
`
`meaning
`plain and ordinary
`
`meaning
`plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`218: All
`11
`'855: 2, 5, 6,
`claims
`218: All
`
`meaning
`plain and ordinary
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`meaning
`plain and ordinary
`Construction
`
`'009: 6-12, 17
`claims
`'787: All
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`218: All
`claims
`'787: All
`'855: 7-8
`claims
`218: All
`Claim Nos.
`
`issue the e-purse3
`(SAM) originally used to
`authentication module
`/ existing security
`used to issue the e-purse
`12 e-purse SAM originally
`
`11 smart card
`
`10 pre-loaded with [an/the]
`
`emulator
`
`personalization
`personalizing /
`personalized /
`personalize /
`
`payment server
`
`Claim term
`
`9
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 2044
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 5 of 7
`
`

`

`6A-B, 7, 6:6-57, 7:19-8:2
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`046 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B,
`Action at p. 8-9.
`3, 2015 Response to Office
`'009 File History, September
`
`61, 11:50-12:12, 14:37-17:2.
`6A-B, 7, 6:26-7:25, 10:41-
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`17:2, 19:29-20:6.
`11:15, 12:22-13:21, 15:39-
`7:31, 8:27-10:17, 10:62-
`6A-B, 7, 2:53-4:17, 6:55-
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`9:16, 12:22-49, 13:10-21.
`6A-B, 7, 2:64-4:17, 8:27-
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`009 Patent at FIGS. 1A-E,
`
`
`
`4:35-56, 5:50-7:9.
`3A-C, 1:60-2:41, 3:46-4:22,
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`41, 4:8-5:29, 6:26-54.
`3A-C, 4A-C, 1:13-22, 2:10-
`218 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B, 2,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Exhibit A-5
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`046: All
`
`mobile device
`receiving an entry by the
`
`18
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`009: All
`
`17 secure element
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`009: All
`
`16 key set installed on the
`
`secure element
`
`meaning,
`Plain and ordinary
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`Construction
`
`claims
`009: All
`17
`'787: 6-7, 16-
`claims
`'855: All
`claims
`218: All
`
`claims
`787: All
`Claim Nos.
`
`15 device information of [a /
`
`the] secure element
`
`14 security authentication
`
`(SAM)
`authentication module
`module / security
`
`13 smart card module
`Claim term
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 2045
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 6 of 7
`
`

`

`6A-B, 7, 8:3-30, 21:15-22:2.
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`046 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B,
`7:46-8:54, 19:23-21:15.
`6A-B, 7, 1:54-67, 6:6-14,
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`046 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B,
`7:54-8:24, 15:32-16:23.
`6A-B, 7, 3:8-35, 5:46-6:5,
`2A-F, 3A-B, 4A-C, 5A-5C,
`046 Patent at FIGS. 1A-B,
`
`RFCyber Intrinsic
`
`Evidence
`
`Exhibit A-6
`
`Extrinsic Evidence
`RFCyber Add’l.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ordinary meaning
`otherwise Plain and
`satisfy a request,"
`construed as "refusal to
`"denial" should be
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`
`claims
`046: All
`
`claims
`046: All
`
`RFCyber Proposed
`
`meaning
`Plain and ordinary
`Construction
`
`claims
`046: All
`Claim Nos.
`
`
`
`21 displaying a denial of the
`
`the total amount
`the balance is less than
`payment request when
`
`gateway
`device to the payment
`request from the mobile
`
`20 settlement information
`
`19 sending the payment
`Claim term
`
`
`
`
`Case 2:20-cv-00274-JRG Document 101-1 Filed 08/19/21 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 2046
`
`GOOG-1041 / IPR2021-00956
`GOOGLE LLC v. RFCYBER CORP. / Page 7 of 7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket