throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________
`
`
`Playtika Ltd. and Playtika Holding Corp.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NexRF Corp.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`__________________
`
`Case IPR2021-00951
`Patent 8,747,229
`__________________
`
`
`DECLARATION OF CHRISTOPHER GOSSELIN IN SUPPORT OF
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Patent Owner NexRF Exhibit 2007, Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`I, Christopher Gosselin, declare as follows:
`
`IPR2021-00951
`U.S. Patent 8,747,229
`
`
`
`1.
`
`I am an associate with the law firm of Haug Partners LLP, 745 Fifth
`
`Avenue, New York, New York 10151. I have practiced law for more than
`
`ten years as a litigation attorney specializing in patent litigation and representing
`
`clients in patent litigation matters in various United States District Courts, the
`
`Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the United States International Trade
`
`Commission. My experience includes many matters involving technology in the
`
`software, electrical, mechanical, and electro-mechanical arts.
`
`2.
`
`I am familiar with the subject matter at issue in this proceeding. I
`
`very familiar with U.S. Patent No. 8,747,229, as well as the legal subject matter,
`
`technical subject matter, and prior art discussed in the Petition. I have personally
`
`reviewed the ’229 patent, its prosecution history, the prior art discussed in the
`
`petition, and the declaration and exhibits accompanying the Petition. I have been
`
`and continue to be, actively involved with preparing submissions in this matter,
`
`with the strategic, factual, and technical aspects of this matter, and in counseling,
`
`and coordinating with Patent Owner.
`
`3.
`
`I am a member in good standing of the New York State Bar and the
`
`District of Columbia Bar Association and am admitted to practice before the
`
`United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`
`
`
`Patent Owner NexRF Exhibit 2007, Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`I have never been suspended or disbarred from practice before any
`
`IPR2021-00951
`U.S. Patent 8,747,229
`
`
`
`4.
`
`court or administrative body.
`
`5.
`
`I have never had an application for admission to practice before any
`
`court or administrative body denied.
`
`6.
`
`I have never had sanctions or a contempt citation imposed against me
`
`by any court or administrative body.
`
`7.
`
`I have read and will comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice
`
`Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in part 42 of title 37
`
`of the Code of Federal Regulations.
`
`8.
`
`I have read, agree to abide by, and be subject to the U.S. Patent and
`
`Trademark Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101
`
`et. seq. and disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`
`9.
`
`In the past three years, I have not applied for or appeared pro hac vice
`
`in any proceeding before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`10.
`
`I hereby declare that all statements made herein are true; and further
`
`that these statements are made with the knowledge that willful false statements and
`
`the like are punishable by fine, imprisonment, or both, under 18 U.S.C § 1001.
`
`
`Dated: September 9, 2021
`
`
`By: /s/ Christopher Gosselin
`Christopher Gosselin
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patent Owner NexRF Exhibit 2007, Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket